My Response to Senator Merkley's Campaign Manager

I certainly must admit that these people have unmitigated gall! After removing my letter from his Facebook page and then removing my comment regarding the same, I published both Senator Merkley's email and my reply for the Esteemed Readers of the Fix America blog to peruse. But instead of addressing me, the non-representing Senator and his staff not only ignored me, but had the audacity to send me a solicitation for campaign contributions for his re-election!

Following is that solicitation email and my response. I am sure you agree with my position and encourage you to share these posts and write to your own elected representatives and see where they stand on issues of rights and constitutional legislation.

"Fred, 

As Jeff Merkley's Campaign Manager, it’s my job to help re-elect one of the strongest progressive champions in the U.S. Senate. 

How will I do that?  By building an impressive grassroots campaign that takes Senator Merkley’s progressive message to every community, every neighborhood, and every doorstep in Oregon.  To do that we need you, and supporters just like you, to join our campaign.

Grassroots support matters, and it’s a way to help the causes you care about. We aren’t just working to win an election.  We’re working to raise the minimum wage, stop corporate polluters, hold Wall Street accountable, take on the giant biochemical industry, fight for marriage equality, and restore the American Dream for middle-class families.

So join us.  We’ve set our biggest monthly goal so far – an aggressive $48,000 target.  There are just seven full days left in February, so chip in $7 right now and let’s make it happen!

When we all stand up, everyone from the Koch Brothers to the Tea Party Republicans take notice.  And make no mistake: they’re coming.  They’re making a list and Jeff Merkley’s on it.  As Karl Rove has said, “Oregon might be next.” 

When the attacks come I want to make sure we’re ready.  $7 today makes you a part of this fight. 

Join us!

Alex Youn
Campaign Manager
Merkley for Senate"



My reply:

Alex,

The first line says it all! "...one of the strongest progressive champions.." and that is the problem! We the People do not want strong progressives, we want strong statesman who will stand up to those who dare oppose the rights of the People and try to justify passing legislation that erode our rights.

As I posted on the Senator's Facebook page (which was removed along with my comments about that removal) and on my blog, I feel that all gun laws are unconstitutional, therefore we want our representatives to stand with us in fighting these blatant attempts to disarm the People, and not stand with those who want to take our arms and rights away.

I want you also to understand that I am not a member of a political party nor do I support them. As far as I am concerned, party candidates represent the party agenda and not the will of the People. Senator Merkley has on numerous occasions demonstrated his loyalty to his party and not his constituents by his voting record.

If you think the 'Tea Party' is coming to Oregon, I have a revelation for you:   We are already here! 

I wish you good luck in convincing other Oregonians to back more socialist/progressive party politicians. I certainly will not be in your corner.


In liberty,

Fred Marsico
Patriot and Sovereign

My Reply to Senator Merkley

I received this letter as a reply to my concern that Senator Merkley was in favor of restrictions on arms/magazine capacities, and demanding that he vote against any such unconstitutional infringements now and in the future. Apparently the Senator does not represent We the People of Oregon, but an ideology that he feels is more justified than the will of those he was elected to represent.

"Dear Fred,

Thank you for contacting me to express your views on legislation to reduce gun violence. As Oregonians, we have experienced more than enough gun violence and this issue hits close to home for many of us. And yet many Oregonians cherish their guns and want to ensure that they continue to have the right to use them safely. I appreciate knowing the thoughts of Oregonians on all sides of this complex issue. 

As you probably know, the Senate recently debated the Safe Communities, Safe Schools Act (S.649), a bill that I have supported as a strong effort to keep guns out of the hands of criminals and reduce gun violence without impinging on the Second Amendment. The bill's main thrust is to close loopholes in the background check system, including the gun-show loophole. Oregon closed the gun-show loophole years ago, so this is consistent with choices we have made. I believe strongly that the most basic protection we can provide is to do a better job keeping guns out of the hands of criminals and people with serious mental illnesses who may pose a threat to themselves and others. The bill also includes provisions strengthening criminal penalties for people who conduct "straw purchases" on behalf of others in order to evade background checks.

During the debate of the bill, the Senate also considered amendments on a number of other provisions. I supported restrictions on large ammunition magazines, which are not needed for hunting or target shooting, but have been used in many mass shootings, and on military-style assault weapons. I also voted in favor of a bipartisan amendment to improve the mental health system and an amendment by Senator Barrasso (R-WY) to stop states from publicly disclosing personal information about people with gun permits.

I recognize that Oregonians come down in very different places on some of these policy choices. I come from rural Oregon and recognize the importance of hunting, target shooting, and gun collecting in many communities. I am committed to protecting the constitutional right of law-abiding citizens to own guns. As a parent and a policymaker, I also feel a strong responsibility to take meaningful action to reduce the gun deaths and injuries that plague our country and to keep kids safe.   We need to do what we can to prevent the horror of Newtown and Clackamas Town Center and so many other tragedies from happening again. I believe S. 649 meets both of those priorities.

Work on the bill was suspended after it became clear that it lacked the supermajority of 60 votes to overcome a filibuster. If the Senate returns to this topic, I will certainly keep your views in mind. Thank you for sharing your thoughts with me.

All my best,

Jeffrey A. Merkley
United States Senator"

And this is my reply to Senator Merkley:

Dear Jeffrey,

It is interesting how you view the Second Amendment, with hunting, target shooting, and gun collecting as your basis for endorsing legislation that does absolutely nothing to keep weapons out of the hands of criminals, but does much to infringe upon the rights of the People.

Perhaps you need to read the Constitution Jeff. Does this look familiar? "The right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." It says nothing about 'law-abiding citizens'  nor mentions hunting, target shooting, or gun collecting. In fact, it does not make exceptions for 'assault weapons' or 'high capacity' magazines. So where do you get the idea that laws for registration or capacity limits protect the 'constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens'? Is that to the exclusion of constitutional rights for everyone else? In fact what it does say is that you Mr. Senator, have no damn authority to pass ANY laws that prohibit or restrict arms of any type for any reason whatsoever.

Personally, if I could afford to own and maintain heavy artillery, I would do so, and it is NOT the province of government to tell me what I can and cannot own. Do you recall a fracas back in 1776 regarding government getting a bit too intrusive in the lives of the People?

Justify your unconstitutional and treasonous position with somebody who sympathizes with that rhetoric, because liberty loving patriotic Americans certainly don't!

In liberty,

Fred Marsico
American Patriot

Hook, Line, and Sinker - Part 1

As an afterthought to False Flag Operations being carried out by the Federal Government, it is on-going and shows no signs of stopping or letting up. Following the staged;  Waco Event on February 28, 1993, Oklahoma City Bombing Event on April 19, 1995, and the World Trade Center Event on September 11, 2001, and the Sandy Hook School Massacre Event On December 14, 2012, and the Boston Marathon Bombing Event on April 15, 2013, we can only expect more of the same in order to instill fear, instability, and insecurity in the minds of the people of this country.

Like other False Flag Operations, the Sandy Hook School Massacre Event has yet to be resolved to any degree of certainty regarding exactly what happened. All the available information indicates some type of State and Federal Active Shooter Training Exercise. Hundreds of unanswered important questions have been followed by denied FOIA requests which all point to another False Flag Operation carried out by Federal and State Authorities. This FFO was used as an example of why guns should be made illegal and confiscated. 

What can be stated as fact is straight forward.

A Federal 'Active Shooter Training Event' occurred on the same day at the same time in the local area.

Over 1,200 Law Enforcement Officers responded to the Sandy Hook School Massacre event.

First Responders and Police officers violated State regulations, crime scene protocols and procedures, and dozens of state laws. 

It was reported that an Assault Rifle was the only weapon responsible for the deaths. Then two hand guns were supposedly retrieved from the crime scene, then it was reported that there were four hand guns.

No assault rife was found in the trunk of Mrs. Lanza's vehicle. What was found was an un-fired shotgun.

No blood was seen by anyone, anywhere.

No children were processed through any triage area.

No bodies or body bags were transported anywhere at any time. No bodies were seen.

Miss Emily Parker (one of the supposedly deceased Sandy Hook School students) does not appear in any Sandy Hook School class photograph.

Parents of the supposed victims of gun violence were denied positive identification of alleged dead children.

All burials were closed casket to all persons.

The day after the alleged killing of his daughter, Emily Parker, Mr. Robbie Parker gave a press interview which reveals very bad acting at best.

All Information regarding autopsies, death certificates is not available to anyone because it has been sealed under court order by state law.

Name changes and relocation of families were provided by federal funds (your tax dollars at work). They were also provided with shares of $17 million raised through internet donation sites.

Mr. Robbie Parker was setting up an internet donation site before and during the time of his daughter's alleged murder. He opened the account on the day before the Sandy Hook School Massacre Event.

Miss Emily Parker was photographed sitting on the lap of the person occupying the White House, after her supposed death and closed casket burial.

The Sandy Hook School has been razed and the rubble removed by an unnamed company to an unknown location.

Thousands of unanswered questions are all that remain.

Video Links:

http://www.federaljack.com/school-safety-expert-threatened-for-questioning-sandy-hook/

http://www.federaljack.com/ct-cop-on-sandy-hook-inconsistencies-things-dont-add-up/

http://www.federaljack.com/the-sandy-hook-shooting-fully-exposed/

Two Americas Tied in a Bow

"In early January 2014, Bob Lonsberry, a Rochester talk radio personality on WHAM 1180 AM, read his 'Two Americas' response to Barry Soetoro's/Obama speech on 'Income inequality'":

Two Americas

by Bob Lonsberry,

December 9th, 2013

The Democrats are right, there are two Americas.

The America that works, and the America that doesn’t. The America that contributes, and the America that doesn’t. It’s not the haves and the have nots, it’s the dos and the don’ts. Some people do their duty as Americans, obey the law, support themselves, contribute to society, and others don’t. That’s the divide in America.

It’s not about income inequality, it’s about civic irresponsibility. It’s about a political party that preaches hatred, greed and victimization in order to win elective office. It’s about a political party that loves power more than it loves its country. That’s not invective, that’s truth, and it’s about time someone said it.

The politics of envy was on proud display a couple weeks ago when President Obama pledged the rest of his term to fighting “income inequality.” He noted that some people make more than other people, that some people have higher incomes than others, and he says that’s not just.

That is the rationale of thievery. The other guy has it, you want it, Obama will take it for you. Vote Democrat. That is the philosophy that produced Detroit. It is the electoral philosophy that is destroying America.

It conceals a fundamental deviation from American values and common sense because it ends up not benefiting the people who support it, but a betrayal. The Democrats have not empowered their followers, they have enslaved them in a culture of dependence and entitlement, of victimhood and anger instead of ability and hope.

The president’s premise – that you reduce income inequality by debasing the successful – seeks to deny the successful the consequences of their choices and spare the unsuccessful the consequences of their choices.

Because, by and large, income variations in society is a result of different choices leading to different consequences. Those who choose wisely and responsibility have a far greater likelihood of success, while those who choose foolishly and irresponsibly have a far greater likelihood of failure. Success and failure usually manifest themselves in personal and family income.

You choose to drop out of high school or to skip college - and you are apt to have a different outcome than someone who gets a diploma and pushes on with purposeful education. You have your children out of wedlock and life is apt to take one course; you have them within a marriage and life is apt to take another course. Most often in life our destination is determined by the course we take.

My doctor, for example, makes far more than I do. There is significant income inequality between us. Our lives have had an inequality of outcome, but, our lives also have had an inequality of effort. While my doctor went to college and then devoted his young adulthood to medical school and residency, I got a job in a restaurant.

He made a choice, I made a choice, and our choices led us to different outcomes. His outcome pays a lot better than mine.

Does that mean he cheated and Barack Obama needs to take away his wealth? No, it means we are both free men in a free society where free choices lead to different outcomes.

It is not inequality Barack Obama intends to take away, it is freedom. The freedom to succeed, and the freedom to fail. There is no true option for success if there is no true option for failure.

The pursuit of happiness means a whole lot less when you face the punitive hand of government if your pursuit brings you more happiness than the other guy. Even if the other guy sat on his arse and did nothing. Even if the other guy made a lifetime’s worth of asinine and shortsighted decisions.

Barack Obama and the Democrats preach equality of outcome as a right, while completely ignoring inequality of effort.

The simple Law of the Harvest – as ye sow, so shall ye reap – is sometimes applied as, “The harder you work, the more you get." Obama would turn that upside down. Those who achieve are to be punished as enemies of society and those who fail are to be rewarded as wards of society.

Entitlement will replace effort as the key to upward mobility in American society if Barack Obama gets his way. He seeks a lowest common denominator society in which the government besieges the successful and productive to foster equality through mediocrity.

He and his party speak of two Americas, and their grip on power is based on using the votes of one to sap the productivity of the other. America is not divided by the differences in our outcomes, it is divided by the differences in our efforts. It is a false philosophy to say one man’s success comes about unavoidably as the result of another man’s victimization.

What Obama offered was not a solution, but a separatism. He fomented division and strife, pitted one set of Americans against another for his own political benefit. That’s what socialists offer. Marxist class warfare wrapped up with a bow."

Two Americas post from:  http://www.lonsberry.com/writings.cfm?story=3651&go=4

Income Inequality speech text from:  http://www.politico.com/story/2013/12/obama-income-inequality-100662.html#ixzz2too6EJSA  as provided by The White House

UPDATE! IRS HEARINGS: ‘THIS SCANDAL IS NOT OVER. THE LYING HAS NOT STOPPED.’

Ms. Cleta Mitchell

NEW EMAILS Could Send Democrat Elijah Cummings to Prison for Targeting Voter Rights Group

"Democrat Leader Elijah Cummings Could Face Up to Five Years in Prison for Illegal Attacks on True the Vote–

Last April House Oversight Chairman Darrell Issa (R-CA) released a report implicating Democrat Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD) in colluding with the IRS and Lois Lerner against the nonpartisan voters rights group “True the Vote.”

Catherine Engelbrecht, the founder of “True the Vote,” testified before Congress in February.
She was targeted by FBI, IRS, ATF, and OSHA after she filed for tax exempt status for her voters rights group.

Engelbrecht said this during her testimony before Congress and Cummings,
“Frankly, to sit before my accuser and be silent in the face of what he did was unconscionable.”"

Update! June 7, 2016
See:  http://allenwestrepublic.com/2016/06/07/allen-west-what-the-irs-just-revealed-should-start-a-wave-of-outrage/#

"Cleta Mitchell, attorney for an assortment of Tea Party groups that received very special attention from Barack Obama’s politicized Internal Revenue Service, lowered the boom on what she described as a “sham, non-existent” Justice Department investigation of the scandal during House Ways and Means Committee hearings on Thursday:

“I want to make three primary points here today,” said Mitchell.  ”First, the IRS scandal is real. It’s not pretend, it’s real.  Number two, the IRS scandal is not just a bone-headed bunch of bureaucrats in some remote office contrary to what the President of the United States told the American People on Sunday.  And, number 3, the IRS scandal is not over.  It is continuing to this day.  And the Department of Justice Investigation is a sham.  It is a nonexistent investigation.”

Her one-sentence summary of the scandal was powerful stuff: “The IRS, at the direction of some political elites in Washington - not in Cincinnati, but Washington – took what had been, for decades, a process of reviewing applications for exempt status that, for 501(c)(4) organizations, could be expected to take three to four weeks, and they converted that process into one that took three to four years, and in some cases is still not over.”

Okay, it was a long sentence, but she got the whole thing in there with a few pauses for comma insertion.  This scandal is not complicated.  There’s no reason responsible reporters should throw up their hands and declare the whole thing an inscrutable mess nobody can ever figure out.  There’s no doubt the conservative groups targeted by the IRS received wildly disproportionate treatment, of a nature displayed to very, very few non-conservative applicants.  The media has been helping Obama drag the scandal out until the public loses interest, so perhaps some people have forgotten this whole thing began with the IRS admitting it acted improperly.  Remember that?  Long before Lois Lerner was taking the Fifth to avoid testimony over a situation Barack Obama claims is utterly devoid of corruption, she rose to fame by staging a press conference in which a planted question allowed her to get out in front of a devastating internal agency report.

As Mitchell noted in her testimony, there have been documented instances of an IRS official lying to Congress during the investigation, which is a crime.  Among those lies was a false assertion by the IRS commissioner that no targeting of conservative groups was occurring… the very same scandalous process Lerner would later admit to.  Confidential information from various groups – the Texas Public Policy Foundation, Governor Rick Perry’s Public Policy Council, the National Organization for Marriage, Koch Industries – has been leaked, which is a crime."  From: Human Events - Powerful Conservative Voices.

Link:  http://www.humanevents.com/2014/02/07/irs-hearings-this-scandal-is-not-over-the-lying-has-not-stopped/

The Truth Will Set You Free

I have endeavored to impart the truth in many articles of fact and opinion to the Esteemed Readers of Fix America. In the articles Red Lines in The White House, Or Stirring A Pot of Lies - Part 3 and Red lines In The White House, or Criminals, Corruption, and god - Part 4,  a lecture by Dr. John Coleman has been added (to part 3) and videos (to part 4)  should interest all Americans. They explain in some detail the reasons for the World Trade Center attack and facts surrounding the sequence of events involved in the false flag operation. 

The war for the very survival of the People of the United States, and the United States of America has been ongoing since the formation of the Incorporated United States of America in Washington D.C. by Act during 1871. The debt renewal and its provisions for the cost of the Civil War between the States was the signing over of public lands by the person occupying the White House on March 27, 1851, Abraham Lincoln. Every person occupying that position has not been the President of the United States up to the current fraud, an Indonesian Citizen, who started life as a British Subject born in Kenya, not a U.S. Citizen of any kind or type.




Each successive office holder has in one action after another, step-by-step, moved this nation closer to a socialistic structure (Marxism) with the intent of the total destruction of the American middle class and the U.S. Constitution, while simultaneously destroying the various industrial and manufacturing capabilities. This plan of attack has ruined millions of American lives and families and forced the majority of the population into involuntary servitude by way of never ending and increasing slavery to indebtedness.

Our Congressional Representatives and Senators have failed to uphold the U.S. Constitution and have been treasonous in their actions toward the Country and Public in the face of the Enemy, the One World Government and the New World Order. It is a time, long past due, for America to awaken to the grave peril the nation faces and educate themselves regarding the dangers of One World Government and the New World Order. If they do not, "The Truth Will Set You Free" has no meaning and perpetual enslavement will be the only heritage we leave for our posterity.

Hillary Gate Part II - From Watergate to Benghazi

Updated:  June 12, 20016

It turns out that Rand Paul was correct when he accused the Obama Administration of aiding the 'enemy' by sending guns to rebels (terrorists) in Syria from Benghazi. And of course former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton lied!



http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015/05/breaking-rand-paul-was-right-obama-admin-was-running-guns-to-syria-hillary-lied-under-oath/



Updated:  December 25, 2015

In light of the seemingly imminent nomination of Hillary Rodham Clinton by the Democratic Party for President of the United States of America in 2016, I am compelled to list a number of facts about Mrs. Clinton that the privately-owned major media seems to ignore.

Starting with the attack on Americans in Benghazi, we have a woman who death seems to be the consequence in her wake. Four Americans were killed by terrorists in what some experts described as a well-planned, military-type strike, where the enemy knew of all of the strengths and weaknesses of the compound. It also is now well known that requests for additional security was denied by Mrs. Clinton's State Department several times and yet she testified before Congress that she had no knowledge of such requests or denials by her department. The head of the department has no knowledge of such requests made by the Ambassador? Is it not her State Department's duty to secure Americans around the world? 

When Hillary Clinton was campaigning against Barack Obama in 2008, both attended a 'secret' meeting of the 'Bilderberg Group' and after being the front-runner, she quickly faded and Obama won the nomination. At the time the secret meeting, the press were misled and not told beforehand but were instead held on the aircraft with Robert Gibbs. (See:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfgfH1ro6vs) 

And then Hillary accepts the post of Secretary of State from the man who defeated her for the presidency. But who is Hillary Rodham Clinton?

http://joeforamerica.com/2014/01/clinton-insider-truth-needs-told-hillary/ 

Whitewater and Vince Foster's death.

“Foster's death, occurring just six months into the new administration, is thought by some to have ended the optimism and remaining innocence of the White House staff.  White House chief-of-staff and childhood friend Mack McLarty said that "It was a deep cut. It clearly had a tremendous impact." Fellow White House Counsel Bernard Nussbaum felt that if Foster had lived, he would have helped resist the calls to appoint Independent Counsels, and the many investigations lumped under the Whitewater umbrella that occupied the administration and Clinton for the rest of his presidency, might not have happened. As it happened, how Hillary Clinton's chief of staff, Margaret Williams in particular handled Foster's files and documents immediately after his death became an issue of much investigation itself.“

Hit man for Hillary!
I wrote about Larry Nichols claims in a post on January 22. Please see: Former Hillary Associate Claims to Have Been Her Personal Hit Man   

Hillary and Watergate

Oh yes! Hillary was on the team after Nixon back then.
Her involvement with the Watergate investigation in which she withheld information to maintain a position which would have been proven unfounded by the data she hid.

Hillary and Watergate
FLASHBACK: HILLARY CLINTON FIRED FROM WATERGATE INVESTIGATION FOR ‘LYING, UNETHICAL BEHAVIOR’

In the link above it is clear that Hillary Rodham was from the start an unethical and immoral person.

From that post:

“Excerpted from EO-History:  The now-retired general counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee, who supervised Hillary when she worked on the Watergate investigation, says Hillary’s history of lies and unethical behavior goes back farther – and goes much deeper – than anyone realizes.

Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat, supervised the work of 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on the committee. Hillary got a job working on the investigation at the behest of her former law professor, Burke Marshall, who was also Sen. Ted Kennedy’s chief counsel in the Chappaquiddick affair. When the investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation – one of only three people who earned that dubious distinction in Zeifman’s 17-year career.

Why?
“Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said in an interview last week. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.”

How could a 27-year-old House staff member do all that? She couldn't do it by herself, but Zeifman said she was one of several individuals – including Marshall, special counsel John Doar and senior associate special counsel (and future Clinton White House Counsel) Bernard Nussbaum – who engaged in a seemingly implausible scheme to deny Richard Nixon the right to counsel during the investigation.

Why would they want to do that? Because, according to Zeifman, they feared putting Watergate break-in mastermind E. Howard Hunt on the stand to be cross-examined by counsel to the president. Hunt, Zeifman said, had the goods on nefarious activities in the Kennedy Administration that would have made Watergate look like a day at the beach – including Kennedy’s purported complicity in the attempted assassination of Fidel Castro.”

She is NOT who most people think she is. She is not a person who respects the rule of law, in fact her actions have been contrary to the rule of law in every position and office she has held.

Reference links:

http://www.globalresearch.ca/barack-o-bilderberg-picking-the-president/9270