Pages

▼

Thursday, September 5, 2013

Red Lines In The White House, or WAR For Peace - Part 1


The Nobel Peace Prize recipient occupying the White House, at least when he is not playing golf or God or raising campaign funds, has once again shown his stripe and color which is not red, white and blue, is writing executive orders and about to commit US military assets to begin yet another costly war and attack Syria. A nation which has not aggressed the United Sates. 



Alleged American military troops who are against breaking their oath to defend the United States and fight a unilateral offensive action or war in Syria have posted across the Internet. The reason for the posts, that they would be fighting with and for the same extremist terrorists who are busy killing fellow soldiers throughout the Middle East, is well grounded in fact. They would be fighting for and with Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood, the same groups of terrorists who were involved in the Benghazi debacle. It should be correct and is right that all Americans must oppose an attack on a nation that is embroiled in a religious civil war.

"On the other side, Russia very much prefers the Assad regime for a whole bunch of reasons. One of those reasons is that Assad is helping to block the flow of natural gas out of the Persian Gulf into Europe, thus ensuring higher profits for Gazprom. Now the United States is getting directly involved in the conflict. If the U.S. is successful in getting rid of the Assad regime, it will be good for either the Saudis or Qatar (and possibly for both), and it will be really bad for Russia. This is a strategic geopolitical conflict about natural resources, religion and money, and it really has nothing to do with chemical weapons at all."
"Former US congressman Ron Paul has said that a reported chemical weapons attack in Syria was a “false flag” likely carried out by the US-backed militant groups.

 Washington has accused the government of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad of launching a chemical attack against militant strongholds on August 21, and is preparing for what it calls a retaliatory military response. 

 “We are not really positive who set off the gas,” Paul, a long-time Republican representative from Texas, said during a Fox News interview filmed Wednesday. 
“The group that is most likely to benefit from that is al-Qaeda. They ignite some gas, some people die and blame it on Assad,” he noted. 

 Paul said that the case for a military intervention in Syria resembles the scenario used prior to the 2003 invasion of Iraq when the US accused the Saddam Hussein regime of having an active “weapons of mass destruction” (WMD) program. The intelligence was later discredited. 

 “Just look at how many lies were told us about Saddam Hussein prior to that buildup. More propaganda. It happens all the time,” he stated. “I think it’s a false flag. I think really, indeed,” Paul said, referring to the reported use of chemical weapons in Syria.

 The US released an intelligence report on Friday claiming the Syrian government was responsible for the chemical attack. The Syrian government has strongly rejected the allegation. 

 On Saturday, President Barack Obama, who had previously described the use of chemical weapons as a “red line”, announced that he had decided Washington should attack Syria. The president, however, said he would seek congressional approval for an attack." by HJ/HJ 

The Chemical weapon attack, the Obama administration has used against Bashar Al-Assad’s forces to justify a new war in Syria, is just another lie coming from the administration. One of an uncountable number of prevarications of the truth used by this criminal administration in order to carry out the destabilization of the Middle East in order to carve out an area for an Al Qaeda Nation. The number of deaths are not important to Obama and his minions:  he has already caused the deaths of hundreds of thousands all over the world. The illegal administration will have its way at any price. Syrian Jabhat al-Nusra rebels, an Al-Qaeda offshoot, in the Damascus suburb of Ghouta are responsible for the Chemical weapon attack. This new information (linked below) is now an unquestionable fact. 

 False Flag Operations and Operations of Misdirection are being used against multiple targets "Senator Lindsay Graham has warned South Carolinians about the threat of a ‘terrorist nuclear attack’ on the same day that our exclusive high level military Intel revealed to us that nuclear warheads were being shipped to South Carolina from a major Texas air force base under an ‘off the record’ black ops transfer." as reported by Anthony Gucciardi and Alex Jones (linked below)
John Kerry wants a House resolution of war worded in such a way which allows for ground troops in an attack on Syrian soil. Mr. Kerry, after attending extensive meetings given by expert people who were on the ground in Syria, refuses to believe the rebels are the same groups of terrorists who were involved in the Benghazi debacle. It is not clearly understood just who make up the factions, except that they are religious fanatics committed to killing anyone having different beliefs. The Head of the U.S. State Department is displaying unsound judgement based in faulty logic which relies on a refusal to understand basic facts and truths and is completely detached from reality. 

 The American people, according to various polls, who approve of this costly open ended military action is hovering poorly around eleven percent (11%), which of course means, of those polled, eighty nine percent (89%) disapprove of any involvement in Syria. The person occupying the White House where red lines abound is unwilling to take any responsibility for his instigation and blames inaction on anyone he can call on the telephone.

 Anyone in Congress who supports such an action displays their weakness of moral fortitude and mental ineptitude to reason, especially when Democratic loyalties are given as the foundation for support which are blatantly political in nature, instead of the principles and concepts held within the Unanimous Declaration and the Constitution. If Congress or the person occupying the White House commits troops to battle when there are no apparent attacks or threats of any kind directed against America or American interests, their action is not sane. Any action taken, simply because of atrocities committed in the Middle East, is not a valid constitutional reason to declare war and send American troops into harms way. 

The price of this proposed action will be more lives in ruin and heaps of dead people and a further destabilization of the Middle East region. The cost of this action's opening shot has been estimated at two billion dollars;  however, if the action lasts more than a week or two no one is sure of the figure. The esteemed Fix America readers may recall the 900 billion dollar figure for the ACA which was covered in the previous article 'The Pain of Health Care at Any Cost: The Remedy is Nullification and Then Repeal' and how the implementation estimates have grown to 2.6 trillion dollars and increasing, which does not cover any unfunded liabilities.

 It has now been revealed, General Jack Keane former vice chief of staff of the US Army, that Obama plans for a much larger engagement in Syria, see link below. The American people have been told by the Obama administration that the planned intervention will be from a week to two weeks;  however, various sources within the Department of Defense are indicating months to years and that it is an open-ended plan for the instigation of full scale warfare. 
-- End of part 1.

 Reference links:



at

No comments:

Post a Comment