Beliefs and Actions

So... Palin says, "they are getting more grounded in their beliefs and are articulating them better."

Palin thinks Romney, Gingrich, and Santorum are becoming more grounded in their beliefs. These politicians and businessman are fully grown men with past actions and public statements which should have cemented their convictions and character development by the age of 21.

By the time U.S. males turn 30, patterns of belief and behavior are developed and become set and the actions and words derived from them define and reinforce those convictions. These male characteristics remain in and with their holders until overtaken by death.

The prime ability and skill politicians must posses is to speak well and convey their ideas to listeners convincingly, nothing else is more important. Even if mistakes are made in their actions or words the skill to talk around, under, over or through opposition, disaster or debacle is paramount:   nothing is more important to a successful career politician. If nothing else, Romney, Gingrich, and Santorum should have developed the skill to speak well and convincingly, by now.

You might think Romney, Gingrich, and Santorum truly would have made up their minds ten years later by their 40th year of thought over what they believe in and their actions should have revealed exactly what they believed, or 20 years later by their 50th year of thinking over the same things they believe in and whatever they have done.

Most, if not the majority, of the male population of the U.S. Are considered old codgers that are completely set in their ways by the time they reach their 55th year. Romney, Gingrich, and Santorum have the experience of their actions and the publics' reaction and response to whatever they have done or said in the past with which to work. Regardless of reaction and response, when considering the true worth and measure of any man, his record of actions can be the only quality of merit or accomplishment.

Romney, a corporate raider with a record of business cannibalism and destruction, believes money and the power to get more is the most important thing in his life, since he has spent his entire professional life doing just that. Great hair, pretty teeth and a real live shark.

Gingrich, a politician with a long ugly record of ethics violations and more, continues to do and say whatever he thinks people will believe. His personal life, a failure at any point except to take advantage of self-made disasters, and use them for financial or political gain reflects his professional life and vise-versa. Great hair, rotund presence and words that are only backed by current listeners.

Santorum, another career politician with severe blemishes, pandering to lobbyists, developing rapidly into a sleazy politician (no moral or ethical compass of any bearing) and representing foreign institutions by adding an amendment which drove the suicide rate at one home for Veterans from 59 in 2000 to 131 in 2003. Earmarking, big government spending, and bringing religious matters and concerns to whip-up the voting public. It should be remembered that the U.S. Constitution prohibits laws regarding religion. Santorum does not think it important and does what he can to circumvent the letter and spirit of the U.S. Constitution, even at the high price of U.S. Veterans lives. Suave, self righteousness at any price oozing from every pore.

However, there is a completely unexplainable exception to this cavalcade of professional Politicians and wanna-bes.

An apparent statesman, who relies on and applies judiciously and unerringly what was written and trusted more than two centuries ago. His entire carrier has in purpose and action been applied to the benefit and well being of his countrymen. These actions of record were gained by a thorough understanding of what was written and what it represented. Few politicians and even fewer citizens take the time to truly become familiar with the document that defines our nation and by extension its people. While others argue, accuse and insult one another, this statesman explains truthfully and simply what has gone wrong and what must be done to correct these problems. His beliefs are secondary when compared to his record. He lives an ordinary life with his family in Texas with one huge glaring difference:  he well knows his beliefs and convictions and has had the character and courage to stand alone in upholding the U.S. Constitution against all enemies.

Is America a Land of Cowards and Slaves?

There are no brave Americans. Americans are cowards. In the near future right around the corner from today, the real Americans are going to be wondering "just what the hell happened?" The Great Experiment is almost over. Not because the idea was ill formed or the concept flawed, but because the inheritors were asleep or worse yet, because the American People have been lulled into a state of passivity, due to little adjustments constantly being made in various ways over generations of families.

U.S. Citizens are out of work and hungry, if you ever believed, or cared, or not, the middle class is extinct. What were they? People that owned (no mortgage) their own house and the land upon which it was built and had the ability and skill to produce goods to support a family of four or more. They earned 4 to 5 times the minimum wage. As sub classes, Yuppies and Dinks were looked on unfavorably.

The rich greedy ego-maniacal ne'er-do-wells running for president, not to mention the fraud in office, have demonstrated in thoughts, words and actions their negligent, incompetent, and treasonous acts and are a disgrace against all statesmen. These pretenders to concern for the welfare of our Nation and its' Citizens have no regard for honor or integrity for statecraft of any stripe-and-color unless it is yellow-and-green and serves their own purposes. Romney, Gingrich and Santorum are liars, cowards, and traitors.

A true and real nightmare has been brought to life and is unfolding right in front of our eyes, and most Americans are blind to what is happening. When the average citizen has been asked directly what he thinks or how he feels, the most common response is he does not understand the question. This ignorance can be understood considering the scope and magnitude of the methods being employed by the enemy, but it can not continue or the result will be death. Some of the responses to questions about the war have been the responses of gibbering idiots.

War is being waged and engagements with America's Enemy are sporadic but in progress and America is failing. America has been fighting the war haphazardly because it only dimly recognizes engagements and does not well understand the war fronts at all. The war is raging on multiple fronts and America is loosing badly in various engagements.

This war is being waged for the total and complete annihilation of the very heart and soul of our Nation. The majority of American soldiers engaged on the ground can not recognize the enemy or identify its Leadership. The Soldiers that have been placed in harms way are not trained and poorly equipped for this war. The casualties are severe, and what little of the Army at the various fronts that have managed to survive, have been signaling desperately, by every method imaginable, across an expanse of time, for relief and supplies and those have been misinterpreted, and the requests have been ignored.

Make No Mistake! Your Way of Life and The Very Survival Of Your Families Is The Price That Will Be Paid In Full.

The known recent engagement cost has been calculated to be $27,000,000,000,000.00 dollars (27 Trillion) and is about to be increased by an additional war funding of $1,300,000,000,000.00 dollars (1.3 Trillion). The money that is being spent by our government is real and represents the entire current earnings (wages, salaries, investment earnings, and dividends) and the savings of American generations past, present, and generations to come. The country is in debt to the tune of "your Great Grandchildren" and it is almost to "your Great Great Grandchildren," which is just 80 years.

The cost of the war in current dollars has been roughly estimated in the Quintillions of dollars (example, $123,456,789,101,234,567,891.01) the actual cost will never be known.

The War consists of a multi-dimensional battle field that is global in nature. In addition to the normal fully integrated symmetrical and asymmetrical methods, newer Temporal Methods have been deployed for some time and the effects have been devastating because they were unrecognized by active American strategists and completely ignored by American Military strategists. The Military has been and is trained to engage combatants that look and act like themselves, not words, ideas and concepts from the past, present and future. The actual Geo-temporal war plans of the Enemy are not known, only the results are recognized and then not completely or clearly. 

Some of The Known War Fronts:

Education:

The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America-Iserbyte

The Underground History of American Education-Gatto
Change Agents


Economic Stability

The Federal Reserve System-
       The Creature from Jekyll Island-Griffin
       The Great Debasement-smith

International Monetary Fund


Governmental Integrity and Security

Fascism-Socialism-Marxism-Communism
Patriot Act-NDA Act-NDRP-Department of Homeland Security-U.S. Policy (CRF)
Incorporation of the United States 1871
Removal of the legitimate Ratified original 13th Amendment to The Constitution
United Nations-Club of Rome-Round Table Group, Committee of 300, Agenda 21, etc.


National Physical Security

The Report from Iron Mountain-Lewin
The Evolution of Civilizations: An Introduction to Historical Analysis-Quigley
Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time-Quigley
Illegal Immigration-Open Boarders


Agronomic


Geo engineering-Weather Modification-Colony Collapse Disease-White Nose Syndrome
Chemical Fertilizers-Herbicides-Pesticides-Fungicides,
Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) Terminator Seeds
        Contamination of non-GMO Crops by GMO Pollination


Medical and Health 

Codex Alimentarius-World Heath Organization-United Nation
Chem trails-Geo engineering-Weather Modification--Metal Rosining-Deforestation
AIDS-Lyme Disease-Morgellons Disease
Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) Foods-
        Reduced U.S. Birth Rate-Chemical Sterilization
Fluoridation of Water


National Psychological Modification

The Report from Iron Mountain-Lewin
Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars TW-SW7905.1

False Flag Operations
             Ruby Ridge
             Kansas City Bombing
             World Trade Center Bombing
             Sandy Hook School Shooting
             Boston Marathon Bombing
             etc.
The Round Table Groups


Social Philosophical Modification
Literary introduction
            1984
            Animal Farm

            Brave New World
Neo Republican Party-Fascism-Nazism-Police State
Neo Democratic Party-Socialism-Marxism-Communism-
        Police State
  Gun Control, etc.


Political Ideology

None Dare Call It Conspiracy-Allen
Our Enemy, The State-Nock
TAVISTOCK -- The Best Kept Secret In America-Coleman
Conspirators' Hierarchy:  THE STORY OF THE COMMITTEE OF 300-Coleman


Religious Philosophical Modification
America: a Muslim foundation?
False Flag Operations-Waco



Definitions:


Geo Temporal Warfare-Fully Integrated Battle Field-Symmetrical and Asymmetrical Warfare-Unconventional Warfare, etc.  Planned in detail to unfold over five or more generations (gen = twenty-five years)

See also: Fear Rules America or A Land of Cowards and Slaves

Another One Bites The Dust

Strange how things are turning out. John Huntsman drops out and endorses Mitt Romney, and now Rick Perry hangs up his spurs and offers his reins to Newt Gingrich! All that campaign rhetoric about "Washington Insiders" and Perry endorses the one with the most questionable honesty and integrity? I can almost hear the music starting and stopping and starting and stopping. It almost seems as if the Party favorites are all acting out in a never ending play of musical chairs designed to distract the American Citizen from choosing the only real candidate who actually believes in America.

Wake Up America! Your Rights are disappearing!

Now, verified official reports revised vote totals Thursday that give party favorite, Santorum a 34-vote edge over party favorite, Romney, which reverses the eight-vote advantage held before the state completed certifying the results of the Jan. 3 caucuses with missing truckloads of votes in addition to known misreporting of precinct counts, affidavits of election fraud added to not knowing what the true count is and no way of ever determining anything:  the Republican Party in Iowa has declared party favorite, Santorum, the winner and another favorite, Romney, with another party favorite, Perry, gaining or losing votes.

Wake Up America!  Your Constitution is Almost Gone!

A truely stupid display of who they think is important considering it is based on and tallied from missing truckloads of uncounted votes. The Elementary School children of Iowa could have been more professional, but they don't have a hidden agenda to ignore and make sure the only candidate U.S. Solders and Americans at home respect isn't acknowledged, is too radical and can't win...because the Republican Party rigged the election rules at the last minute before voting, because for the first time in Iowa they decide to move the ballots around in a giant shell game, because the Republican Party and their multimillionaire lying dishonest party favorites can hardly wait to get into office and change nothing.

Wake Up America! Smell the Coffee, While You are Still Able!

The same old bailouts for friends and Corporations, the same old policies that will begin a new war, the same old practices that force more U.S. Businesses to bankrupt then close and be liquidated. More Citizens out of work, more inflation due to the ever failing economy and monetary system, more dishonest sleazy politicians making millions while in office. Wavy dark hair and perfect teeth in smiles as practiced as the sunset: they remind me of a small school of large sharks circling each other...just waiting to take the first bite!

Wake Up America!   Before You have No Choice!

I personally do not think that Romney can beat (Obama?) heads up in a fair contest. Gingrich might have a better chance but then when I think about what America would be like with another lying cheating multimillionaire in the White House, it makes me shudder and start looking for another choice that is not a party favorite. I turned to who the military is supporting.

Wake Up America!  Before the Land of the Free and Home of the Brave Is a Fading Memory!

Almost three quarters of the active duty military, those that have to do the fighting, more than all other candidates and (Obama?) combined together, support Dr. Ron Paul. And yet, we here at home hear the never ending beat of the war drums, and that Ron Paul would be detrimental to the military and our national defense. When I heard the people's booing Romney or Gingrich echoing in the past when they spoke about the military and the "Iran Threat" or they were "Bad Americans," I realized why Ron Paul wasn't among the GOP favorites. Those that are against Dr. Paul are the ones that sent our young people into harms way and really want to start yet another war. These Warmongers are the ones that ridicule and ostracize Ron Paul.

Wake Up America!  Before Your Freedom is Gone!

It makes me sad to admit, I do not have all that much confidence in voters that are so easily swayed by one party or another into voting for any candidate that supports undeclared preemptive unilateral war. With more and more of our freedoms being usurped in the name of national security, I see America rapidly declining into a fascist nation run completely by corporations wielding the most powerful weapons on the planet and that it frightening.

Wake Up America!  Before It Is Too Late!

Please...Help Little Barry! Or, Who will Shoot this Indonesian Snake? by a concerned reader - Part 1

Please...Help Little Barry! Or, Who will Shoot this Indonesian Snake

by a concerned reader - Part 1

What has happened? The story and details are torturous and convoluted; however, with patience the story will unfold and make some sort of sense.

Little Barry has issues and problems. Plagued by an identity issue,problems with Social Security Numbers, problems with U.S. Citizenship, problems with Lawsuits from Local Courts to Superior Courts, problems with his job, little Barry's problems are ever multiplying along with the costs engendered by his issues & problems.

The Name Game:  Barry, Barry, Bo arry Bonana fanna fo farry

                          Fee fy mo marry, Barry!

Exactly WHEN did Little Barry legally change his name from Barry Soetoro to Barack Hussein Obama II, or is it Jr.? He did not, according to Stephen Pidgeon, Barak Mounir Ubayd changed his name to Barack Hussein Obama on 14th of October 1982 as evidenced by a change of name form (registration No.1973200415889) issued by the Ministry of Health Planning British Columbia, Canada.

In a passport amendment submitted Aug. 13, 1968, the child's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, identified her son with an Indonesian surname and asked the State Department to drop him from her U.S. passport.

The fact that the child was adopted by Indonesian Lolo Soetoro Mangunharjo in the 1970s, and his name was legally changed to Barry Soetoro at that time, is most likely the reason he is spending millions of dollars to hide his real birth certificate. He never filed the papers to change his name back to “Barack Hussein Obama, Jr.”, so any birth certificate produced by the state of Hawaii would list him as “Barry Soetoro”. Especially since the certificate of live birth was generated after the fact. It should have reflected his new name, which indicates it was never changed back.

That’s not the only problem with his birth record or citizenship either. When Barry's mother took him to Indonesia she created another little problem for little Barry. Little Barry's bigger problem is larger than any birth record. His adopted mother dropped his American citizenship because she wanted him to go to school in Indonesia. Well, in order to go to school in Indonesia, unlike here in the USA, you have to be a citizen of Indonesia. Indonesia does not have dual citizenship as an option, you become Indonesian or attend school elsewhere. Little Barry's mother went all in, (see westernjournalism.com) if he ever did change his name, as of this writing, there is no record anywhere of it.

The Social Security System: running numbers

A list of some 100 addresses under the name of Barack Obama (and similar spellings was obtained by Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ.) The list in itself is not a problem; however, these addresses are attached to different social security numbers. As is known the first three digits in a social security number signify the state. These attached numbers were issued all over the country. One of which was used, by Little Barry a law student, while attending Harvard. He used this number which was attached to his address in Sommervile, Massachusetts, but was issued in the State of Connecticut. Records of the Social Security Administration clearly state that the holder of this number was 118 years old.

No U.S. Citizen can legally have dozens of different social security numbers and ?/Soetoro/Ubayd/Obama? (Little Barry) is not a 118 years old. .

A very interesting article written by an ex-IRS investigator was forwarded to me.

It Follows:

"Trump is probably correct, Barry Soetoro, AKA Obama must be hiding something in his past that is very bad... and it may not be his citizenship. (Trump would have no reason to dream this up, if he had not uncovered something. Fortunately, he has the financial strength to sift the dirt...)

As an IRS tax examiner, one of many former federal jobs, I have seen what it appears Barry Soetoro has done, mostly by illegal aliens attempting to acquire a new identity in the U.S and/or criminals looking to acquire a new ID.

Barry, AKA Obama, was lawfully adopted by a foreign national, Lolo Soetoro, and Barry's name was legally changed to "Barry Soetoro". (Barry’s own admission) Barry Soetoro was also made an official legal Indonesian citizen. (again Barry’s own admission) The adoption would be noted in Barry's vital statistics record in Hawaii on his original birth certificate...

OR Lolo Soetoro may have always been Barry's legal birth farther. The public does not know for sure at this point who Barry's father really was and Barry himself may not know.

Barry was raised as a Muslim in Indonesia and attended a Catholic funded school that permitted all faiths to attend.

Barry's mother dropped him as a dependent for some reason, maybe even when Barry was adopted by Lolo Soetoro. His mother's passport records dropped Barry as a dependent indicating Barry was no longer a legal dependent of his mothers. (The passport records of his mother have been produced showing Barry was no longer a dependent when Barry was permanently residing in Indonesia.) Barry went to Hawaii to live with his alleged grand parents after Lolo Soetoro and Barry's mother divorced.

A "certificate of live birth" can have names changed on it including a child's birth name, and birth parent’s names. Even a modified date of birth can be on a "certificate of live birth". This occurs frequently for adopted children where the birth parent does not want the child to know who they are. The public has no idea who Barry’s real birth father is or who Barry’s real birth mother is. (Barry could have been adopted by his mother) The original birth certificate is the only legal vital statistics record of a person’s birth parents, birth location, birth date, etc… I can get a “certificate of live birth” for a dead person; I cannot get a birth certificate of a dead person without “Deceased” on it. (I’ve tried)

There is no evidence Barry Soetoro ever lawfully changed his name to “Barrack Hussein Obama”. There is no proof Barry Soetoro was born with the name "Barrack Hussein Obama". I’m willing to bet the name “Barrack Hussein Obama” is not present on the real birth certificate as Barry’s birth name or as Barry’s birth father. I have pictures of me with my mother and Jimmy Buffet… that doesn’t make him my father even if I start using the name Jimmy Buffet.

The public knows Barry Soetoro finished high school in Hawaii as Barry Soetoro and attended Occidental as Barry Soetoro where he did drugs and flunked out of school. After dropping out of Occidental, Barry showed up in New York, homeless and on drugs. (Barry’s own admission) Barry then hooked up with a Pakistani to live with and traveled back to Indonesia on his new boyfriend’s dime to renew his Indonesian passport and traveled to Pakistan with him.

Ask any law enforcement officer in a large city or detective and they will tell you homeless young men on drugs in large cities usually end up as male prostitutes. Barry ended up as a world traveler with a degree...(Not likely) Barry Soetoro returned to New York from Pakistan and began using the fictitious name “Obama” for some reason. (again Barry Soetoro’s own admission) One could only suspect that a person addicted to drugs returning from Pakistan to New York, the main route for Afghan heroin into the U.S., maybe Barry had a reason to start using a new name. There are literally over 1 million open warrants on file in New York...maybe Barry is one of them?....

After spending some time in New York allegedly working under the name “Obama”, It appears Barry used the fictitious name "Barrack Hussein Obama" for the first time to file his federal taxes in Connecticut at a Post Office Box for the purpose of evading paying taxes in New York and /or to establish a new identity. (This is a felony with no statute of limitation.) When the IRS received Barry Soetoro’s federal tax filing, the IRS could not attach the name Barrack Hussein Obama to the SSI number provided or the address provided. So the IRS assigned the fictitious name "Barrack Hussein Obama" a tax ID number for a person from Connecticut (Where Barry unlawfully filed a federal tax form using a false name). Barry Soetoro began using the tax ID number as his SSI number when using the fictitious name Barrack Obama. This is why Barry Soetoro has a Connecticut SSI number. When I worked for the IRS, I saw this occur more than once and yes, it is a felony to knowingly file a fraudulent federal tax forms. Most of the politicians that cheat on their taxes claim it was an accident. That is how they get away with their tax cheat crimes. Using a fake name is no accident.

It appears Barry fled New York to Chicago using his new identity to get a job . He likely ordered a fake diploma to bolster his new identity as "Obama". Fake Diploma's were very big in the 80's and diploma mills were even being used by federal workers to get promotions. There is evidence his alleged attendance at Columbia was faked (Barry never attended Columbia) and Barry lied his way into Harvard (he had no transcripts to get in)... Including telling the Saudi royal family he was fighting in Afghanistan with the Muslim Jihad against the Russians, so they would help him get into a law school.

The Saudi's apparently loved Barry's story of Jihad in Pakistan/Afghanistan and paid for Barry to attend Harvard under the name "Obama". The Saudi family has admitted to paying for Obama to attend Harvard and gave Harvard a gift of $20 million dollars. Harvard in turn made their special attendy President of the law review a person that never wrote a single law review.... I guess that is what $20 million buys at Harvard.

It is unlikely Barry was a Jihadist and was most likely a drug mule if anything, maybe even a CIA street hire to haul Afghan heroin back to New York, so the Afghans could buy U.S. Made stinger missiles with U.S. dollars to shoot down Russian helicopters?... I hired people over seas to do work below my pay grade all the time, even foreign nationals... I think this is the story Barry told the Saudi's, but he was most likely really just a drug mule/dealer and probably still wanted on an outstanding warrant in New York.

Barry’s selective service registration is not normal either...
http://www.debbieschlussel.com/4428/...t-commander-in...
After I looked at Barry’s selective service filing I noticed it was most likely fraudulent too based on the name he used. Barry did not start using the name "Obama" until he returned from Pakistan (long after he flunked out of school in California) His selective service record (maintained in Chicago coincidentally) shows he registered at a Hawaiian post office as “Obama” in Sept 1980... Problem, Barry was getting high in California at Occidental in Sept 1980 (Barry's own admission) and was not using the fictitious name "Obama" at that time. Barry began using the fictitious name "Obama" only after he returned from Pakistan. The selective service filing is fraudulent.

NEW NOTE - On the the Selective Service Registration, Barry did not have the Connecticut Tax ID number he used on the Registration until after he began using the name "Obama" in New York. More evidence his Selective Service filing is fraudulent.

Barry returned to Chicago and attend a semi-Christian radical black church with his first female love Michelle. Barry admits keeping in touch with Phil Boener, who traveled to New York from Occidental to be with Barry and was most likely Barry's first love.

Barry still could not get a real job, because he was still a fraud, even with his Harvard degree in hand he could lie and take the Bar exam, but he could not work as a lawyer for a major law firm without a back ground investigation and he would never pass one. So, Michelle got Barry a job at her law firm. Barry never filed a case alone and never filed a motion. He wrote lots of memos according to the law firm where Barry worked. (I think they know Barry is a fraud and don't want to be sued by previous clients) Barry rescinded his law licenses, so as not to be disbarred for fraud. The Bar knows Barry lied on his application. Michelle also had to turn over her law license for her involvement in corruption with the Chicago mayor's office.

With time on his hands Barry, a well spoken black man, was able to get elected to a state office, oddly because he looked for fraud in his opponents voter registrations and got his opponent disqualified from running. Barry a well versed liar was a natural in state politics. He used his political influence to get himself a position as a lecturer at Chicago's law school. Barry embellished this position as a "professor of law" which everyone knows is completely false. Barry was not a professor or even a specialist at anything but lying.

On a whim Barry ran for United States Senate for the State of Illinois.  Politicians do this all the time to make a name for themselves even if they can't win. At the time the Republican Ryan was a shoe in for the Senate seat, so no real Democrat contenders entered the race, but Barry did. On a fluke after the primary Ryan's wife Jeri Ryan (Seven of nine from Star Trek) went public that her husband was making her have sex with other people while he watched. Ryan dropped out and Alan Keyes moved from Maryland to run against Barry Soetoro.

The election got all kinds of press because there were no blacks in the U.S. Senate and one of these black men was going to be a Senator. Alan Keys did his best to warn everyone Barry was not who he claimed to be, but the public saw him as a carpet bagger. Barry kept the lie going and presented himself as a clean black man that talked like a white man... Illinois elected Barry to U.S. Senate. The Democrats had already began scrubbing Barry's back ground when Ryan dropped out.

Phil, Barry's boy friend from Occidental, was found working in California as a communications specialist (receptionist) for a dental hygienist school and given a diploma from Columbia and cover story. The rest of Barry's drug friends were all given jobs or money by the Democrat machine to keep quiet.

Because Barry was such a news maker as the only Black in the Senate, and he could speak like a white man he was made key speaker for the Democrat convention. Barry then decided to run for President to keep the lie going. No one thought to question Barry's back ground in the Democrat party... They helped cover up the ugly back ground. The only person jumping up and down warning Barry was not who he claimed to be was Alan Keyes and he was discarded as just an angry loser.

Now we have a complete fraud sitting in the Office of the President. Clearly the most corrupt, inexperienced, and ignorant President in the history of the United States whose only quality is that he can lie with a straight face. Barry Soetoro is as much of a fraud as Bernie Madoff and his house of cards will soon fall down."

In the campaign ramp up for election massive financial fraud could have been perpetrated to fill Little Barry's War chest. The large number of accounts of Name/SS number/ addresses might have been used to split up large campaign contributions and other transactions into smaller amounts. There is evidence of campaign contributions coming from countries like Libya, Uganda, Palestinian authority and Saudi Arabia.

Little Barry's grandmother, Ms. Madelyn Dunham worked as a volunteer in probate department of the Oahu Circuit court and had access to the Social security numbers of deceased individuals, which might explain some of the findings. Little Barry's mother Ann Dunham, according to databases had numerous aliases and at least two social security numbers.

The ongoing adventures and antics of Little Barry will be continued for the readers in all 57 states in an exciting series of Parts to be presented at later dates...

Stay Tuned!

So... You Want Which Fox to Guard the Hen House?

Let's examine some facts which makes up the totality of Mitt Romney's business experience.

Bain & Company was established in 1973 by a group of seven former partners from the Boston Consulting Group headed by Bill Bain. The company was headquartered in Lexington, MA on Militia Drive. Under Bain’s direction, the firm implemented a number of unconventional practices in its early years. Notably, Bain & Co. would only work with one client per industry to avoid potential conflicts of interest. Partners did not carry business cards and clients were referred to by code names, further demonstrating its reputation for enforcing client confidentiality. The company preferred to work behind closed boardroom doors rather than marketing itself.

The firm’s founding was followed by a period of growth in the late 1970s and early 1980s as the firm opened offices in London, Munich, San Francisco, and Tokyo.

An innovative consulting approach that Bain & Co. pioneered was aligning its incentives with its clients’ performance by accepting equity in lieu of fixed fees. It sometimes landed clients by offering several weeks of work at no cost until the clients stock market value demonstrated an increase in stock price relative to the Dow Jones Industrial Average. An estimated 10% of Bain's revenue is derived from this equity participation or "success fees." As an example, Bain took an ownership stake in fruit processor Del Monte Foods while working to revamp the company’s strategy.

"Coming into a leveraged buyout situation is never easy," says Del Monte CEO Richard Wolford." Bain's desire to obtain equity in the client's business was the engine behind Bain's interest in the business.

Bain &  Co. found itself facing a growing list of challenges in the 1980s. In the midst of sluggish business conditions and over staffing, Bain also faced the dilemma of having to turn away business due to its one-client-per-industry restriction. Competition increased as other firms copied Bain’s implementation-focused strategy. Daunting though these external challenges were, it was internal infighting among the senior partnership that threatened to destroy the business. In response, Bain & Company, Inc. was formally incorporated in 1985 as Bain Capital Inc. and, over the course of two years, the Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) was established. Bain's senior partners began borrowing against the ESOP equity for cash, leaving the firm with a heavy debt load and employees with a stock plan that might have been nothing more than a fable. As business slowed, this debt load began to have a real effect on the firm. Bain ultimately found itself in non-compliance with the Bank of New England's loan covenants. The resulting debt write-off at the Bank of New England eventually resulted in that bank's failure in 1991.

Facing financial duress, Bain & Company, Inc. partner Mitt Romney was asked to rejoin Bain Capital, Inc. as interim CEO. Bringing along two lieutenants from Bain & Co.,  Romney began a traveling campaign to rally employees at all Bain offices globally. Romney led a cadre of attorneys that eventually negotiated a complex settlement between the Bain partnership and the firm's lenders, including a $10 million reduction in the $38 million Bain owed the Bank of New England, which by that time had been seized by the FDIC and placed in Chapter 7 liquidation. The Boston Globe pointed out that: “Over several weeks, Romney's team managed negotiations with the banks and among the partners. The moment came when negotiations produced a package in which Bill Bain and the founding partners would give up control of the firm, turning back $30 million they had taken from the ESOP and $100 million in notes they held against the firm.”

The Romney Team plan involved "a complicated restructuring of the firm’s stock-ownership plan, real-estate holdings, bank loans, and money still owed to partners". To avoid the financial crisis that a buyout would have triggered, the group of founding partners agreed to return about $100M cash and forgive outstanding debt. Bain Capital has come a long way since the hostile takeovers it was known for when Mitt Romney was CEO.

Today it reports about $655 billion in assets, including such industry giants as Toys R US, Clear Channel Communications, (parent company of Rush Limbaugh's EIB network, and the radio shows of Glenn Beck and Sean Hannity, Dunkin Brands (Dunkin Donuts), Burlington, Warner Music Group, and the Weather Channel. Bain Capital also owns another company that for some reason is not listed on the Bain Capital website: EDGAR Online.

From an article forwarded to me:

"Bain Capital said that it had purchased Edgar Online for $12 million with the stipulation of the right to name two of the Board Members of Edgar Online, a publicly traded data services company that helps businesses prepare regulatory filings in a new format that will be mandatory by 2012... Edgar Online's main offering is helping companies to prepare filings for the Securities and Exchange Commission in a computer format known as XBRL, which is used for the S.E.C.'s Edgar tool. It also offers data analysis products for regulatory filings."

The question is why did Bain buy Edgar Online? Does the phrase "prepare filings" catch in the throat?

"EDGAR, the Electronic Data-Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval system, performs automated collection, validation, indexing, acceptance, and forwarding of submissions by companies and others who are required by law to file forms with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). The database is freely available to the public via the Internet (Web or FTP)." Approximately 3,000 company filings are made with EDGAR each and every day. In fact, if you wish to search for company filings on the Securities and Exchange Commission's website, you will be redirected to the EDGAR database.

So, Mitt Romney's Bain Capital has the ability see and then monitor every company's SEC Filing information even before the SEC sees it. Before anyone else can see them, Bain sees the filings. That is what is known as a competitive advantage. It is also known as Trading on Insider Information if Bain Capital is perusing these financial filings and using them to decide what to buy and sell within its portfolio.

According to SEC Guidelines:

"The SEC adopted new Rules 10b5-1 and 10b5-2 to resolve two insider trading issues where the courts have disagreed. Rule 10b5-1 provides that a person trades on the basis of material nonpublic information if a trader is "aware" of the material nonpublic information when making the purchase or sale. The rule also sets forth several affirmative defenses or exceptions to liability. The rule permits persons to trade in certain specified circumstances where it is clear that the information they are aware of is not a factor in the decision to trade, such as pursuant to a pre-existing plan, contract, or instruction that was made in good faith.

Rule 10b5-2 clarifies how the misappropriation theory applies to certain non-business relationships. This rule provides that a person receiving confidential information under circumstances specified in the rule would owe a duty of trust or confidence and thus could be liable under the misappropriation theory." (SEC.gov)

In what could be viewed as a huge advantage over the average investor, this scandal would make the movie "Wall Street" look like "Sesame Street". An investigation of Bain Capital's internal documents by any enforcement agency, including the SEC or Congress, could make Michael Milken look like a boy scout.

"Milken was indicted on 98 counts of racketeering and securities fraud in 1989 as the result of an insider trading investigation. After a plea bargain, he plead guilty to six securities and reporting violations but was never convicted of racketeering or insider trading. Milken was sentenced to ten years in prison and permanently barred from the securities industry by the Securities and Exchange Commission. After the presiding judge reduced his sentence for cooperating with testimony against his former colleagues and good behavior, he was released after less than two years. Milken could only wish that he had access to every company's financial reports and SEC filings before anyone else knew about them.

An investigative report by ABC revealed that Republican Presidential Primary candidate Mitt Romney, has avoided paying his fair share of taxes by keeping his money in off-shore accounts in the Cayman Islands and elsewhere. Is it any wonder that he continues to refuse to release his income tax records as is the tradition of those running for the Executive Office of this nation?

Evoking FOIA exemption 7(a), the FBI denied access regarding Bain Capital records held by the F.B.I. on the grounds that such information was currently part of an ongoing criminal investigation: The letter, viewable on Scribd.com, has had the name of the person requesting information redacted, as well as the date it was written. The top of the letter reads “Subject: Bain Capital” The relevant paragraph in the letter, signed by the FBI’s David Hardy, Records/Information Dissemination Section Chief, reads in part, “I have determined that the records responsive to your request are law enforcement records; that there is a pending or prospective law enforcement proceeding relevant to these responsive records; and that the release of the information contained in these responsive records could reasonably be expected to interfere with the enforcement proceedings.” In fact, the only time the Bureau is allowed to deny such a request is during an active investigation in which acknowledgment of responsive records would compromise it.

This should be front-page news but the privately owned major media seems to have missed the importance of this issue. With Wall Street and Congress so corrupt that the average stock investor doesn't have a chance of making anything on their investments, this is an ethical and moral outrage. Is it any wonder why Mitt Romney's company, Bain Capital, from which he continues to receive significant compensation from, reports the New York Times, is under the scrutiny of the FBI?

So...Let me see if I understand this correctly, New Hampshire and Iowa want Romney to control the purse strings of this nation? You might as well have the Fox guarding the Hen House! Or maybe..., a Wolf to guard the Sheep!



For a short romping story of "Romneycare" see:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massachusetts_health_care_reform

The Great New Hampshire Debate-For Educational Purposes Only

by a concerned reader

The New Hampshire Debate has accomplished little to define either the candidates intentions, ideas, or beliefs or a coherent account of their records. This was due to the moderators questions which steered around all the major problems facing this country focusing on issues not pertinent to the governance of this nation and the moderators inability to curtail frivolous issues which ended with pastime pursuits!

I would have cared to listen to the candidates response to questions like:

As president, how would you:

1. Restore and protect citizens' rights as enumerated in the U.S. Constitution?

Signing the National Defense Authorization Act on New Year’s Eve, President Barry (Barack Hussein Obama?) Soetoro said that he had his reservations over the controversial legislation that will allow for the indefinite detention of Americans; but, signed it anyway.

Now, some of the president’s advisers are expressing their concern with Obama’s action and say that the commander-in-chief should have thought harder before signing away the civil liberties of Americans. Under the bill, which approves all defense spending for the 2012 fiscal year, certain provisions allow for the military detainment and torture of US citizens, indefinitely, essentially allowing for Guantanamo Bay-style prisons to be a real possibility for every American.  As the act floated around Congress, an underground outrage erupted and activists attempted to keep the bill from leaving the House and the Senate, although a lack of media coverage largely left the matter hidden from the public. Despite this campaign, the legislation made it out of the Capitol Building and into the Oval Office last month, prompting advocates against the act to petition for the president to veto it. But, Barry (Barack Hussein Obama?) Soetoro signed it anyway.

2. Repair the damage that has been done to several of the amendments to the U.S. Constitution?

Violation of the U.S. Constitution by deliberate omission of the original 13th Amendment:

"If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honour, or shall without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office, or emolument of any kind whatever, from any Emperor, King, Prince, or foreign Power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them."

The Real Thirteenth Amendment, shown above, was ratified March 12, 1819 with the vote of the Virginia General Assembly to publish the Revised Code of the Laws of Virginia with this article of amendment included in the Constitution of the United States, and thus it became an integral part of the Constitution for the United States of America. This amendment added a heavy penalty, not included in the original exclusion of Titles of Nobility provided in Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution, upon any person holding or accepting a Title of Nobility or Honour, or receiving any emolument, other than their legitimate earnings, under any guise from external sources, by making that person "cease to be a citizen of the United States" and "incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under the them, or either of them." This amendment was proposed, properly ratified, and was a matter of record in the several States archives until 1876, by which time it was quietly, and fraudulently "disappeared", never repealed, during the period of Reconstruction after the Civil War and the presently acknowledged Thirteenth Amendment was substituted.

Article 1, Section 8: perversion of the monetary system; ... To coin money, (responsibly?) regulate the value thereof, and of foreign coin, and fix the standard of weights and measures; the federal Congress has unconstitutionally turned over the coining of Money, the regulation of the value thereof, and of foreign coin to the Treasury, in contradiction to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 5 and Article 1, Section 10, Clause 1; the federal Congress has failed to provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current coin of the United States in contradiction to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 6, by implementing the Federal Reserve Bank in 1913; HJR 192 – Federal Reserve Notes are NOT lawful money – “payment is declared to be against public policy” (Act of 28 October 1977, Pub. L. 95-147, § 4(c), 91 Stat. 1227, 1229, now codified in 31 U.S.C. § 5118(d)(2)).

Violation of Article 1, Section 9:

The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it. ; ... the Department Of Justice, in contradiction to Article 1, Section 9, Clause 3, has allowed ex post facto laws to be passed (i.e., retroactive taxation), and, in contradiction to Posse Commitatus, has allowed the military to be used against citizens in the united States of America, resulting in the deaths of minor children and adults;

Violation of Article 3, Section 1:

The federal Judiciary, in contradiction to Article 3, Section 1, has held Office during bad behavior by not complying with the following: The supreme Court has the power of “judicial review,”  (i.e., the power to declare laws passed by the U.S. Congress to be null and void if such a law or laws was/is in violation of the Constitution for the united States of America.)  They have failed by omission to declare as unconstitutional both the public and secret edicts of President(s) (i.e. Executive Orders.)

(To protect states against invasion); borders are wide open; the federal President has become a “domestic enemy” by implementing Bankruptcy (1930-32) and “War and Emergency Powers” (March 9, 1933 and subsequently) and “International Emergency and War Powers” (1977) in contradiction to Article 4, Section 4; “The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion (from all enemies foreign and domestic); and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic violence.”

Also, under Title 8, Section 1325 of the U.S. Code, “Improper Entry by Alien,” any citizen of any country other than the United States who:

Enters or attempts to enter the United States at any time or place other than as designated by immigration officers; or Eludes examination or inspection by immigration officers; or Attempts to enter or obtains entry to the United States by a willfully false or misleading representation or the willful concealment of a material fact;... has committed a federal crime. Violations are punishable by criminal fines and imprisonment for up to six months. Repeat offenses can bring up to two years in prison. Additional civil fines may be imposed at the discretion of immigration judges, but civil fines do not negate the criminal sanctions or nature of the offense.

Violation of Article 5 of the U.S. Constitution:

By all 535 members of Congress (see FOAVC.ORG and Walker vs. Members of Congress);

Violation of Article 6 of the U.S. Constitution:

Flagrant violations of oath of office;  the federal President has failed to live up to his oath of office in contradiction to Article 2, Section 1, Clause 8, to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution for the united States of America (original intent); NOT: “of the United States” – limited jurisdiction (legal entity).

The Congress has flagrantly violated their oath of office to uphold the U.S. Constitution (i.e., Article 5 is one obvious example)

The violation of the 1st Amendment:  Passage of laws providing federal tax revenues to be provided to faith based organizations; Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances; also, by violating Article 5, the Congress has violated the 1st Amendment (and vice-versa)clause: “and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.”

Violation of the 2nd Amendment:

The right to bear arms;  only recently did the Supreme Court finally uphold the 2nd Amendment by rejecting Washington D.C.’s ban on hand gun ownership for the past 32 years.

Violation of the 4th Amendment:

(search and seizure without a warrant); Too many examples to justify use of space.

Violation of the 5th Amendment:

Flagrant legal plunder via eminent domain abuses (Supreme Court upholds abuse of eminent domain abuse); 6.8 new cases per day;

For the violation of the following: the 5th Amendment: right not to be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury (Statutory Jurisdiction notwithstanding the 6th Amendment: right in all criminal prosecutions to enjoy a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of Counsel for his defense. the 7th Amendment: right to trial by jury; as opposed to trial WITH jury; the 9th Amendment: the enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people; the 10th Amendment: the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people; 16th Amendment: Also, many people are claiming that the 16th Amendment was never ratified by three-fourths of the states? 17th Amendment: Was the 17th Amendment really ratified by three-fourths of the states?  The violation of U.S. law and international treaty (Geneva Convention): torture at Guantanamo Bay, water-boarding (which is stated in clear legal language that it is illegal in the Army Field Manual);

3. Correct the American economy and monetary system?

4. Restore the Posse Comitatus Act, and would you redefine military service branches, (i.e., Departments), to insure military force not be used against U.S. Citizens on U.S. soil?

5. Dissolve unconstitutional departments and agencies, or re-mandate and re-task them?

Federal agencies that are not constitutional, specifically the Department of Education, the Department of Energy and National Labor Relations Board (NLRB).

The Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution states that the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

Those who claim the Department of Education is Constitutional say that it promotes the general welfare of the United States, however, this phrase, appearing in the preamble of the Constitution does not grant or prohibit power to Congress, is not its purpose. The preamble simply describes the Constitution and what the document itself was designed to do, and is not actually a binding decree of the Constitution.

The Department of Education was founded using the preamble as the basis for its Constitutionality, but due to what’s stated above, it is clear that it is not. Thomas Jefferson considered the federal government’s involvement in education to be unconstitutional. In 1862, James Buchanan warned that giving education to Congress would create a vast and irresponsible authority. Both he and Jefferson were right.

President Obama requested a $48.8 billion budget for the Department of Education, and an additional $28.6 billion for Pell Grants (both increases from previous years) in his first 2012 budget. Despite all the spending for education, test scores do not improve. Because of this failure of the department, and its inherent unconstitutionality, it should be devolved back to the states.

The Department of Energy should suffer the same fate. Nowhere in the Constitution does the federal government have the right to control a specific industry. The elimination of this department was something Ronald Reagan greatly desired, but was unable to do with Democrats controlling Congress. The department was created from components of existing agencies in 1977. By 1982, the agency’s budget had doubled. President Obama’s 2011 budget request for the department was $28.4 billion, a 6.8% increase from 2010. Please remember, the Department of Energy is responsible for the crony loan program which gave taxpayer dollars to companies like Solyndra, Beacon, Evergreen Solar and many more which have all bankrupted after loans were granted or received. This department, which has been using taxpayer funds to invest in highly risky companies (I thought risky investments were the reason the Occupiers hate Wall Street?) based solely on political reasons is clear grounds for elimination.

The NLRB… where to begin. This agency has been trying to bolster union support since its inception. Union membership actually only totals about 9% of the national workforce, yet this agency would prefer that to be 100%. We’ve seen that with their lawsuit against Boeing. They want Boeing to shut down a plant that employs over 1000 people just because it’s not unionized. House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) even agreed that the government force the plant to shut down, but she would prefer it simply become union.

Is this kind of government overreach Constitutional? Remember, these are only some of the agencies that are not authorized by the Constitution, and are just a small example of departments in our federal government that should not exist.

6. Prevent world-wide preemptive U.S. Military action and stop unrequested and invasive military action (i.e., unilateral warfare)?

The long war provoked by the treasonous acts of Sept. 11 is over. The congressional resolutions authorizing combat in Afghanistan and Iraq no longer justify military operations in either country -- or anywhere else. U.S. President Barack Obama gained office by denouncing his predecessor’s assertion of unilateral power to commit the nation to an endless war against terror (the cause of which is now plain to see for anyone willing to look at the real evidence). Yet, despite the absence of legislative authorization, Obama is moving down George W. Bush’s path to unilateral warfare. This is the real existential threat to American democracy.

7. Guarantee the right to privacy for U.S. Citizens from all Departments, Agencies, and Bureaus?

From The Washington Post, Posted at 2:35 PM ET, 01/31/2011

FBI in hundreds of privacy violations, report finds By Jeff Stein

The Federal Bureau of Investigation reported nearly 800 violations of privacy laws and regulations to the President’s Intelligence Oversight Board from 2001 to 2008, according to records obtained by a watchdog group.

The San Francisco-based Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) said it had also uncovered “indications that the FBI may have committed upwards of 40,000 possible intelligence violations in the 9 years since 9/11.” It said it could find no records of whether anyone was disciplined for the infractions.

The group drew its findings from about 2,500 documents it obtained under the Freedom of Information Act.

The reports of serious misconduct by FBI agents included "lying in declarations to courts, using improper evidence to obtain grand jury subpoenas, and accessing password-protected files without a warrant," the EFF said.

Valerie Caproni, the FBI's general counsel, said that the violations were mostly technical or procedural.

The number of substantive violations of someone's rights is very small and we take them very seriously," she told the Los Angeles Times, which first reported the findings on Sunday.

These guidelines were put in place to prevent civil rights abuses," responded Mark Rumold, the EFF lawyer who obtained the documents. "And when the FBI is glibly treating violations as technical mistakes, it's indicative of a broader problem — the FBI's attitude toward dedicated, effective oversight.”

Caproni told the Times that she was “confident that, by and large, 99.9 percent of the time our agents are acting in compliance with the Constitution, the statutes, executive orders (which now have effectively negated all civil liberties and the Constitution itself, a concerned reader states) and FBI and DOJ policies on civil liberties.

The disclosure comes as Congress grapples with renewing the USA Patriot Act, passed in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, which loosened restrictions on U.S. intelligence agencies to obtain personal information on American citizens. It expires in February.

Sen. Patrick Leahy, (D-Vt.), the chairman of the Judiciary Committee, has proposed putting restrictions on domestic intelligence-gathering (now negated by practices of Fusion Centers all over the country, a concerned reader states). His office said he would have no comment on the EFF report until he had had a chance to read it.

But on Jan. 26, when he introduced his USA PATRIOT Act Sunset Extension Act, Leahy said the legislation would "increase judicial oversight of government surveillance powers that capture information on Americans."
By Jeff Stein | January 31, 2011; 2:35 PM ET

These are just seven of the more than thirty critically important questions I was hoping to hear answers to from each candidate.

Instead of these, the moderators allowed and encouraged responses regarding personal religious beliefs or customs (the constitution prohibits any law regarding religion),  arguments involving the truth of numbers of jobs generated (figures no one has actually counted, calculated or confirmed), issues voted on (a matter of record not open to debate), mud slinging, and the penultimate question of the evening "if you weren't doing this what would you be doing?" Only one candidate had any response I thought was reasonable considering just one of the problems facing the state of our nation. It wasn't regarding football or basketball!

If I were in charge of the network who staged this circus, I would tell Stephanopoulos and the dizzy blond to pack their bags and look for work elsewhere!

They Are All The Same!

UPDATE: Ron Paul ad says what I have said about these candidates. Maybe the rest of America will see the truth before they vote.

At some point in time it seems that Americans will begin to realize that the GOP candidates and Obama are all really the same. The only differences are minor ones that serve their own special interests.

Mitt Romney has changed his positions with each bid to get elected. His former 

Hedge Fund running company is now under investigation by the FBI, he has refused to release his tax records, he passed a health care bill in his State that is as detrimental as ObamaCare. His silly call to "punish" China for the "manipulation of their own currency" is blatantly absurd. That is what the private banking cartel's Federal Reserve System (whose only purpose is foreign profit) has always done, which has made our dollar so unsound the U.S. lost its most favored credit rating which is due to be down graded again. His policies on Iran will force the U.S. into another foreign war where borrowed money and American lives will be the cost, with an outcome of further destabilization of the Middle East more innocent lives lost or ruined and increased resentment toward the U.S.

 

Rick Santorum is also a war-monger as well as being anti-gay. He would have the U.S. military carry out a preemptive strike against Iran to prevent them from becoming a nuclear power and possibly developing nuclear weapons. His continuing insistence on a constitutional amendment to define marriage as being between a man and a woman inhibits freedom of religion and expression and is on its face unconstitutional. His term in the Senate among other questionable habits displays his penchant for earmarks and pork-barrel projects; so, I fail to see where his present policies or politics are any different from the present actions of a failing congress.

Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich speaks well but his actions betray his words. His past is littered with illegal actions while in office, and marred by continuing infidelity in marriage. His stance for military aggression against "Islamic extremists" is well known. His more dangerous position against the judicial branch of government is also known. Newt, as a leader, will bully the legislature to impeach and remove judges or justices that do not comply with his agenda.

 

Governor Rick Perry of Texas claims that he created more jobs in Texas than Obama did in the rest of the U.S. While that might be true (I still question the numbers of part time government summer jobs) he also authorized free education to illegal residents in Texas, and then he raised taxes significantly to pay for those entitlements. He tried, by Executive Order, to force young girls to take the Gardasil vaccine (the Texas legislature voted against it). He has stated that he feels the Bilderberg Group are "good guys" and they want to help us out of our economic mess. This same group, Bilderberg Group, gave us Obama and it supports the banking cartel behind the Federal Reserve System and is directly tied to the other central banks of the world that are bankrupting nations in Europe and all around the world.

 

All of the favored GOP candidates, like Obama, want the government to be everything to everyone, deciding and then telling you what you can eat, what you can drink, what health choices are right for you, and how much of your wages or savings you can keep: doesn't this sound just a bit socialistic or communistic, systems that historically fail without rigid police state enforcement? Not one of these favored candidates or Obama have even mentioned correcting or repairing the damage that has been done to the U.S. Constitution, they are, in fact, the ones responsible for recent and ongoing damage. None of them have come up with any plan to make America productive and competitive in global markets. They all want the government to manipulate "fix" everything so the problems will vanish, like some magic trick with a rabbit. It was the government that created the problems by passing unconstitutional measures, incorrectly regulating and taxing businesses into closing or relocating off-shore and by allowing Executive Orders to stand.  Even Mitt Romney has a good portion of his undeclared holdings outside the U.S. in foreign banks.

As I listen and watch the candidates speaking in debates and town hall meetings, and as I then listen to the analysis from the so-called political experts, it is clear that the agenda is not to fix anything, but merely give the illusion that GOP party favorites are the best thing we have other than another term of Obama.  Let's face it, if I ran against Obama with his record, I could beat him soundly.  So could any of these candidates, but the real question we all must ask ourselves is:  who truly has the only track record of voting, based on the U.S. Constitution, that reflects sound reasoned judgment and has real plans for the repair and restoration of our country.  "Can the favorites restore America or someone else?"

Is Breakfast Ready?

When are Americans going to realize both the Republican Party and Democratic Party are owned and controlled by the same group of criminals that have raped our country and are about to take complete control of our nation? They have stripped us of our constitutional rights and are about to get rid of the U. S. Constitution altogether. Is the average citizen so dumbed down and poorly educated that he/she doesn't recognize his freedom to choose has all but vanished and their liberty is disappearing quickly. It maybe the average citizen has completely fallen for the mind control persuasion programs dished out by this group.

Borrow more money! Go further into debt! You can get out, around, or through this;  if you will just do the right thing! Sell what you own so you can feed your family. Don't vote for the one presidential candidate that knows how to correct these problems! Vote for Romney, Santorum, Gingrich, Perry, Bachmann, Cain, Or anyone but that other guy...what's his name! He's too radical, revolutionary, isolationist! Short, thin, whatever may sway or frighten the people to vote for our puppets.

Citizens must vote for someone who believes in the United States of America, who has followed the United States Constitution and will continue to uphold it's principles by action. Someone who understands that borrowing money, instead of limiting spending, is a disaster just waiting to happen. Someone who understands that our government is bloated and needs to be trimmed. Someone who understands our government is taking control from the people. Someone who understands that the government is too domestically invasive.

The GOP has already said anyone is okay, except Dr. Paul. why would they say that? It might just be that they have no control over him and are very afraid that the government gravy train they run and upon which they have been riding is about to be derailed by someone who will uphold the U. S. Constitution and repair the damage that has already been done.

It is easy to understand that if anyone else is okay: they already know the ones they want are already under control or can be persuaded, unlike Dr. Paul. Is it time for Americans to stop voting for the favorite with the most hair, or the youngest favorite, or any favorite who tells listeners exactly what they want to hear? Wake UP! Smell the oncoming meals served at more than eight hundred FEMA detention camps and concentration centers ALL OVER THE COUNTRY!

Google it and become involved: Before it is too late!

Who Spent Millions?

Romney, with a background as a former head of a private equity firm, who spent millions in Iowa in 2008 only to lose, has not campaigned hard there until recent days. Mitt Romney's company applied for and received a one million dollar grant from American Taxpayers to pay for his company's employees medical plan! Mitt Romney is worth $250 millions of dollars, but yet he feels he needs to milk the American Taxpayer for another million! Mitt, can you say,"sleazy corporate welfare?" Romney is likely to make a strong cash haul and surpass $20 million in fund-raising in the final three months of 2011, a Republican source said. That amount would almost certainly put him far in front of Republican Party Favorites.

And this is the guy the GOP is pushing? who says he is "going to fix Washington!" If Romney becomes President, nothing will change and our country will borrow more, bail out more, tax more and the Union will go down in the flames of heaps of burning worthless Federal Reserve notes! Romney's largest contributors are wall street firms like Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley. I can only hope the fix isn't in: "Romney-ism" is the problem with Washington and not the cure!

See for yourself at opensecrets.org

In my opinion, Dr. Paul should be the only one on the ballot in any state. As far as Rick Perry is concerned, If You are running in an election that has rules and can't follow the rules, committing to deadlines, and then expect to sue your way into Virginia, then like Romney but in different ways, he's showing how unqualified he is.

Gingrich implied that Ron Paul supporters (which would have to include the large number of US active duty military supporting Paul) are "not" decent Americans: Gingrich is an ugly joke!  Santorum is too anti-gay and anti-Muslim to beat anyone. 

You can't go around bashing religions and citizens of the world and expect to gain global respect... anywhere. Bachmann has no brain and just flings whatever random thoughts she has out there whenever and wherever. 

I'm pushing for Dr. Paul to win the nomination and presidency with a VP spot open. Dr. Ron Paul has plans to repair the budget and get rid of the deficit and consolidate our military. The others do not!