Anyone who has a penny's worth of common sense should understand what kind of TURMOIL and APPREHENSION Judge Anna Brown's kangaroo Tribunal and proclamation have caused, not to mention the FEAR of Government reprisal. As the Esteemed readers understand from the previous post, 'Up Is Down Left Is Right, or Government Is Good, Fight! Fight! Fight!', Judge Brown's announcement that witnesses will be considered Unindicted Co-conspirators runs in every direction except along the path to Truth and Justice. The American Legal System serves no one except itself at the cost of the American People and has done so for, at the very least, 81 years (see source references), but that is another issue. The Governments efforts to justify the means to arrive at unlawful ends is a small part and parcel of the unlawful conversion of Public Wealth (read as land grab - selling off Natural Resources for private gain) perpetrated by the Obama Administration's Secretary of State, Hillary Rodham Clinton.
The selling off of Natural Resources that belong to the Sovereign States and the American
People is just one of the methods used by the U.S. Federal Government (a Foreign Corporation) to plunder America and rob by force the wealth of the people. The 'Uranium one scandal' is well enough known that anyone can learn more about it, but that is another issue. Please, excuse my digression: The entire concept of JUSTICE and LAW was discarded when Government Enforcers shot LaVoy Finnicum, who had his hands up, three times in the back. This was done to halt the protests and petitions landowners have with the BLM (a Puerto Rican Corporation) and the UNITED STATES Inc (a French Corporation). Hired by the UNITED STATES Inc. and charged or mandated with Managing Public Lands and Property, the BLM has instead followed the prescribed concepts behind the Strong Cities Network (SCN), namely, Regionalism (see Notes Below) this regional integration de facto contributes to those economic forces that build globalization. This Regionalism which forces people off the lands they own and into cities (Please See; 'Fighting Extremism: The Strong Cities Network, or Fundamentally Changed America: More Changes Are Necessary, or Mindless Americans Need No Sovereignty: Soetoro/Obama Knows Best', and 'Land of the Ignorant , Or Home of the Destitute', and the book 'Rockefeller--Regionalism: The shadow behind Oregon's LCDC: an encyclopedia about political intrigue') coupled with U.N.'s uninhabited “buffer zones” around several U.S. national parks (See Article Below) more readily allows the BLM and Government Claims to Private and Public Lands.
As can easily be understood, all this unlawful Government activity at the local level; the false allegations, the charges, change in venue, Unindicted co-conspirators, is just a symptom of and diversion from a much larger real conspiracy to Plunder America, Rob the States and The People of wealth and line the pockets of the people running this FARCE with the ill-gotten gains.
"Guerilla Media Network
Home Of The Pete Santilli Show
AUGUST 31, 2016
Witnesses In Bundy Case Terrified Over Judge Ruling For Live Feed Of Trial Into Burns Oregon
Witnesses for both the defense and the prosecution, set to testify in the controversial trial
over the Occupation of the Malheur Refuge, are terrified by the idea of possible retaliation
from the community, if Judge Anna Brown allows the BLM to move forward with their plans for providing a “live feed” of the trial, to what one Portland Paper (OPB) is calling the “VICTIMS” of the standoff.
In a frantic call to GMN this morning one witness expressed their concerns by saying, the Judge obviously doesn’t understand the dynamics of the situation in Burns, which brought hundreds of protesters there in the first place. The Government has gone to great lengths to protect informants and FBI agents from public scrutiny in fear of their safety — Why then are other witnesses not being allowed the same protection?
Burns Oregon is a community divided and the deck is stacked in favor on the “anti-Bundy side” making the life of over 40% of the population in Harney County a living nightmare.
Children are being bullied, business owners are being threatened and the fact they are going to add fuel to the fire by broadcasting this trial to what many perceive as aggressive employees of the United States Government is horrifying, said one witness.
“We are terrified; These people running the show in Portland are failing to protect the very
people they say were terrorized by the occupation.”
The witnesses are quick to point out that it’s not just those who will be testifying for the
defense who are concerned; Those set to testify against the Occupation are also expressing deep concern over their well being as the government prepares to put them on camera and blast their testimony out to a community that's already on the edge.
” I never wanted to testify in this trial, says another witness and the government is forcing
me. What happens to me if somebody gets the wrong idea?” explained a witness for the Government
After the Occupation ended the media and the Judge lost interest in Burns and Harney County in general, and the witnesses say this ruling shows the complete disconnect between the court and her attorneys assigned to represent their best interest on both sides in this trial. Witnesses took note that not one Defense Attorney objected to the government's request for a live feed into Burns leaving them all to questions just who this trial is for, and just how much they care about them as human beings.
Whether you fall on the side of the government in this one, or the Occupiers, witnesses on both sides agree that a live feed of this trial is irresponsible and creates a terrifyingly dangerous potential for them in Harney County and definitely puts lives in danger.
GMN spoke to an attorney close to the case, but not representing any clients involved, and his opinion was as follows;
"If you are going to allow a live feed it is appalling that it is going to be for those who are
so openly bias. If we are going to allow a live feed for the obviously anti-protestor group
then what is stopping the court from allowing the whole of America to watch this proceeding?
It is unfair that once again the government is allowed to run the narrative and does not allow for others on the supporting side to have an opportunity to watch in support of these witnesses who have so much much to lose in Harney County.
I too was shocked that not one Defense Attorney objected on behalf of the safety of their
witnesses."
A message from Harney County went out to Judge Anna Brown and various Attorneys involved in the case this morning;
"I just want to express my concern in regards to the news of a trial being live streamed to the local BLM office. I personally have a HUGE problem with this. Those of us who have been subpoenaed will only be showcased as “domestic terrorist” sympathizers allowing the already bigoted community of government workers to ostracize, alienate, and ridicule us more than they already have. In my opinion, this is a gross abuse of power by the judge and just shows an assignment of elitism to the government workers they have so loosely characterized as 'victims'. Unless you have lived in Burns, Hines, or Harney County it is difficult to understand what is really going on here. In January our community suffered from a spiderweb of fractures that have just grown deeper as the months have passed. Many of us have suffered in our businesses because of our actions and expression of our opinions during the occupation. The spread of hatred has even boiled over to our children who are suffering at school at the hands of these 'victims' and their children.
Despite my feelings and or the reason I was subpoenaed, my concern is for the safety of my children and the ability to maintain my home and business in Harney County. My kids have to go to school with the wives of many BLM employees. My business is dependent on locals. What will Judge Brown offer as a solution when my children are slighted of an opportunity because their teacher is married to a BLM employee who watched my testimony live in the comfort of his office and he didn’t agree with me? What will Judge Brown offer as a solution when my business is forced to close its doors because of lost contracts with either government agencies or locals that have relation to disgruntled BLM employees? It is my opinion that allowing and condoning the live stream of the trial to the local BLM office is a blatant disregard for the safety and wellbeing of all witnesses that have been subpoenaed ~ Witness Signed"
Witnesses who will be testifying for both the Prosecution and the Defense are asking community groups and social media platforms, on both sides, to please call the Attorneys and Prosecutors in this case and ask them to respectfully ask Judge Brown to drop the plans providing a live feed into Harney County. In a case where witness tampering through intimidation is already a problem, witnesses believe this ruling has opened the door for more of the same. It’s time officials in Portland base their decisions concerning Harney County on reality and stop making this about them and remember the people they are supposed to be representing. - End Article"
"4 included Comments - The Pete Santilli Show
Joe
With anxiety brewing in America from those who seek justice, to those who refuse justice to be equally administered, there is no doubt in my mind, that the long arms of the law in Washington D.C. are more concerned with their agenda of world domination at the expense of one great country, the BLM is just a rock in their shoes that they don't want to be bothered with, because the outcome has already been written. When is enough, enough before dialogue ceases and the inevitable will begin.
Anything having to do with the United States government and the American people, are like oil and water, and right now the odds are against the people.
Lynn Kopa Balogh
Remember YOU and your group invaded their neighborhood and tried to take over with an Idaho militia and. set up a shadow government to overpower the local elected judges and sheriff with guns no less. Now your crying foul?
PatriotGranny to Lynn Kopa Balogh
#LoadOfCrap Not to mention, even if that were true, and it's not, it wouldn't be the fault of the witnesses. Overpower the local elected judges and sheriff with guns..... LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!! Where do you people come up with this stuff. Completely DELUSIONAL!
SUPER 68 IS DOWN to Lynn Kopa Balogh
No one from the Idaho III%ers nor the Oregon III%ers nor the PPN were involved with occupying the refuge... The Bundy Bunch conspired to use the support rally for the Hammonds as a front to facilitate occupying the refuge.
All the Idaho and Oregon III% members along with members of the PPN organized the 02 January 2016 support rally for the Hammonds. In fact, most folks were furious that the Bundy Bunch came into OUR house (Oregon) and made their own rules. They took the Hammond issue and made it about them.
Every day now we hear updates about how the poor Bundy's are being abused in prison. First of all, the Bundy's are NOT in prison, they are in a county lockup.
Funny that we hear daily about the poor Bundy's being abused in jail, yet not a PEEP about the Hammonds who are in a real prison.
PPN/Idaho III%ers/Oregon III% members NEVER participated in the occupation but they did show up in Burns to try and mediate between the Bundy's and law enforcement"
Notes:
"New Regionalism represents the current wave of regional integration, which has been characterized by substantial qualitative, quantitative and formal changes in regional integration. Modern analysis of regionalism (namely when based upon the Political Economy Approach) suggests that regional integration de facto contributes to those economic forces that build globalization and increase global competition. As a mater of this fact, the New Regionalism currently changes its character markedly. Today, especially due to the influence of globalization, regionalism is seen as a tool of open economic relations’ liberalization that should ensure both national and regional competitive position in the globalized world. Moreover, both theoretical and empirical analysis of regionalism (i.e. namely comparative analysis of its different cases) leads to the same conclusions. The question however remains, whether today’s European Union corresponds to the most recent trends in regionalism and thus if it is a strong enough tool, which can help European economies to utilize globalization opportunities and to face its threats. Political Economy analysis of the New Regionalism shows important aspects of its reform, and is thus the most important perspective of this paper."
An Abstract for 'Political Economy of the New Regionalism: Global and European Perspective'
Source References:
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/history/americas-economic-history/judge-rules-administrative-court-
system-illegal-after-81-years/
http://thepetesantillishow.com/witnesses-in-bundy-case-terrified-over-judge-ruling-for-live-feed-of-trial-into-burns-oregon/
http://www.wnd.com/1999/07/1808/
"NATIONAL PARKS OFF-LIMITS
U.N.-designated panel calls for increased 'buffer zones'
Last year a United Nations-designated panel, at the behest of the Clinton administration, called for the creation of uninhabited “buffer zones” around several U.S. national parks. Since then roughly two dozen U.S. parks and preserves, covering millions of acres of public land, have been included in the plan.
Now, however, new plans to expand these zones are in the works, and the outrage has reached a near fever pitch among experts who say these U.N.-designated sites are merely attempts to “globalize” huge portions of the United States — with taxpayers picking up the tab.
Henry Lamb of Eco-Logic — a watchdogorganization that monitors U.N. activities and U.S. sovereignty issues— told WorldNetDaily that one example — at Yellowstone National Park, where the creation of a larger buffer zone is well under way — was “just a sign of things to come.”
“Inside Yellowstone, the U.S. Park Service is shutting down campgrounds as the park is being prepared to become the core of a huge biosphere reserve, as part of the United Nations global biodiversity plan,” he said. “Once established, no human activity will be permitted in the area,” even though U.S. taxpayers must continue to fund the maintenance and upkeep of Yellowstone and other popular outdoor tourist sites.
Lamb said that in order to increase the buffer zone around Yellowstone, the Park Service drove local businesses away by refusing to maintain access roads. When the businesses folded as a result of heavy financial losses, the land was bought with taxpayer money and a larger zone of inaccessibility was created by default.
“Once they buy the land, the government is obviously not going to resell it,” he said, thus creatin permanently larger buffer zones.
“The purpose of establishing sites as U.S. national parks was to have people in them enjoying them,” Lamb added. “But the Clinton administration has completely bought into this U.N. notion that our land ought to be their land, managed by them. And as such, it ought to be uninhabited as well.”
He said if most Americans “knew what was going on (with their national parks), the uproar would be deafening.”
In the case of Yellowstone, Lamb said the government’s acquiescence to the U.N.’s agenda cost a gold mining company about $30 million and in the end prevented them from mining one ounce of known gold reserves, even though the government indicated they initially would have allowed it.
“The owners of the Crown Butte New World gold mine, which is outside of Yellowstone National Park,” he said, “were told by the government to comply with a list of environmental requirements before they could move in and begin mining.”
But after being threatened with non-stop litigation from environmental groups funded by U.N. agencies that could have lasted decades, the mining company finally agreed to a deal that leaves at least $650 million of known gold reserves in the ground instead. That deal provided the company with about $65 million dollars for “more exploration.” Of that amount, the government said about $21 million had to be used for “environmental clean-up.”
Lamb said that Congress has consistently ignored Clinton administration orders and directives designed to implement many of the U.N. mandates. Clinton, he said, is implementing U.N. directives via executive order and presidential directive “because then he doesn’t have to worry about getting Senate treaty ratification.”
At present a U.N.-sponsored biodiversity treaty, designed to limit U.S. public access to so-called “World Heritage Sites” and “Biodiversity sites” is languishing in the Senate. No action is scheduled on its ratification.
Lamb added that in the course of the next several years, with no congressional oversight, the addition of more U.S. parks to the “Heritage” and “Biodiversity” sites lists will follow.
“It is a well-documented fact that the U.N. is trying to gain control over vast amounts of U.S. territories to herd more people into cities where they are more manageable,” Lamb said. “That can’t be done without at least tacit approval from Congress, regardless of the political agenda of any administration.”
Lamb said he has “allies” in Congress that are opposed to the implementation of this, and other, U.N.-mandated land use plans.
“But they’re relatively few and as such equally unsuccessful” in stopping such initiatives, he added."
Another One Bites The Dust -30-
No comments:
Post a Comment