By The People

There are fundamental flaws in how American government operates today,
contrary to the Constitution and the vision of a representative republican form of governance.
I intend doing something about it: by educating and informing others who
are not even aware of the dangers.

Showing posts with label Grand Jury. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Grand Jury. Show all posts

Friday, April 4, 2014

What Tomorrow Will Bring: A Tirade: What Life Shall Orders Demand? Part 2





These are orders that will directly affect everything and will have a direct effect on all our lives, now and in the future. PLEASE READ IN ALL DIRECTIONS, and take a minute or two of your time to comprehend what you are reading!

EXECUTIVE ORDERS issued by U.S. Presidents in the recent 100 years+:

Teddy Roosevelt 3, 
F.D. Roosevelt 11 in 16 years,
Truman 5 in 7 years,
Eisenhower 2 in 8 years,
Kennedy 4 in 3 years,
Johnson 4 in 5 years,
Nixon 1 in 6 years, 
Ford 3 in 2 years,
Carter 3 in 4 years,
Reagan 5 in 8 years,
Bush 3 in 4 years,
Clinton 15 in 8 years,
George W. Bush 62 in 8 years
Obama - 923 in the first 40 months!

Yes, there is a reason that the person occupying the White House* is determined to take all powers away from Congress. What is Soetoro/AKA Obama really trying to accomplish?  Remember what he told Russia's Putin: "I'll be more flexible after I'm re-elected." Think of what is meant by the subjects of some of the Executive Orders. The Executive Orders are all public information, please make the time to read them in order to be aware of the intent and prepare yourself for the actions that will be taken;
10990 - Allows the government to take over all modes of transportation and control of highways and seaports, 
10995 - Allows the government to seize and control the communication media,
10997 - Allows the government to take over all electrical power, gas, petroleum, fuels and minerals, 
10998 - Allows the government to take over all food resources and farms, 
11000 - Allows the government to mobilize civilians into work brigades under government supervision,
11001 - Allows the government to take over all health, education and welfare functions, 
11002 - Designates the registration of all persons. Postmaster General to operate a national registration, 
11003 - Allows the government to take over all airports and aircraft, including private and commercial aircraft, 
11004 - Allows the Housing and Finance Authority to relocate communities, build new housing with public funds, designate areas to be abandoned, and establish new locations for populations, 
11005 - Allows the government to take over railroads, inland waterways and public storage facilities, 
11049 - Assigns emergency preparedness function to federal departments and agencies, consolidating 21 operative Executive Orders issued over a fifteen year period, 
11051 - Specifies the responsibility of the Office of Emergency Planning and gives authorization to put all Executive Orders into effect in times of increased international tensions and economic or financial crisis (please recall that the Department of Justice is an extension of the Executive Branch, and no other),
11310 - Grants authority to the Department of Justice to enforce the plans set out in Executive Orders, to institute industrial support, to establish judicial and legislative liaison, to control all aliens, to operate penal and correctional institutions, and to advise and assist the President,
11921 - Allows the Federal Emergency Preparedness Agency to develop plans to establish control over the mechanisms of production and distribution, of energy sources, wages, salaries, credit and the flow of money in U.S. financial institution in any undefined national emergency. It also provides that when a state of emergency is declared by the President, Congress cannot review the action for six months,
NDRP, - Please see the article, 'Busy Bees Make A Shiny New Hive - or Welcome To Your New Government Run By The President, The Secretary of Homeland Security, and The Secretary of Defense', March 20, 2012.

Executive Orders become law if unchallenged by the Congress 30 days after they are submitted. They must also be published in the Federal Register. The Listing of Executive orders in the Congressional Library runs in a numeric order starting with the first Executive orders passed until the most current. When the person illegally occupying the White House* took office his E.O. list started from #EO-13489.
Verify and read these "executive orders" for yourself and then read the NDRP and remember there are more than 900 more to read and think about, 'Moving Democracy Forward for Change? ' 
You've all heard the story of cooking the 'Frog in the Pot.'  Watch Soetoro/Obama's actions, not his words (he lies)!  By his actions he will show you where he wants America headed. Most Americans have absolutely no idea what is happening. The American people need to understand that Soetoro/Obama's executive orders represents a fundamental change in the United States of America, just as he promised.




The person illegally occupying the White House* has written Executive Orders abolishing the Constitution for the united States of America. The E.O.s have passed into law unquestioned and uncontested by the US. Congress. The U.S. Constitution has been replaced over time in a piecemeal fashion with the Patriot Act, NDAA, and the E.O. NDRP and other E.O.s, which forces the U.S. Congress and the Judiciary to disband. In addition to this intolerable situation, this person illegally occupying the White House* has proposed a new 2,300 page Constitution which is waiting in the side wings to be presented at the right moment. With the suspension of Habaes Corpus and the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, the promise of forced labor camps and re-education programs are just around the corner and have been established and are only waiting to be filled by the people (hard working slaves) that remain. How can anyone be astonished that DHS-TSA-FEMA considers and has been teaching that the Framers of the Constitution and the Founding Fathers should be called terrorists??

In too many respects, the person illegally occupying the White House* has demonstrated his complete lack of understanding of the "constitution for all 57 states" and feels that a new 2,300 page constitution needs to be moved forward in order for change to occur. What was at one time thought to be a simple slip of the tongue has shown itself for what it truly is... genuine ignorance and a heartfelt ambivalence, or more often disregard for the Constitution for the united States of America, the Unanimous Declaration of Independence and any supporting historical documents.  In contrast to his proposed constitution, in detail, The U.S. Constitution describes the parts of governance and their composition. This document also contains the manner in which the parts are allowed to interact. The U.S. Constitution also contains a Bill of Rights which applies to all U.S. Citizens. Amendments have been adopted, ratified (some illegally) and repealed (which may or may not have had worth) since its ratification. The U.S. Constitution was written in common English of the time and in a manner which was expected to be understood by every U.S. Citizen. This does not mean that all citizens could read but could understand what was being said when another read it out loud. 




It holds the foundation of ideas and concepts of self governance our nation of people represent. Many other documents of the time contain a much more detailed account and commentary of arguments, both for and against, the various ideas and concepts involved in the composition. The U.S Constitution remains the only single source document that defines the united States of America. All other documents of any nature are subordinate. To be sure, there are many other source documents which support its reasoned construction. The United States Declaration of Independence is another U.S. Sole source document, which itself has many other documents of the time and times previous with which it is supported. These support documents contain many ideas and ideals which were conceptually incorporated in the composition of this construct (written instrument, instrumentality).




The People of the United States are the primary governing body: not the System of Governance. The People delegate the day to day responsibility of governance to the Federal Republic (a plurality of Sovereign States:  not a monolithic entity) through representatives and this combination is bound together by and under the U.S Constitution. The process of selecting representatives is determined by casting individual votes. Every U.S. Citizen has the right and responsibility to uphold and defend the U.S Constitution against all enemies. If this single source document and the integral components are allowed to be violated in any way, its' worth is in question. If the U.S Constitution falls due to inattention to the maintenance of the concepts, the Nation falls and the American concept and actuality of a United States of America ceases to exist. It becomes something else that is defined by something else (a 2,300 page something else which is, I am sure, incomprehensible (like the 2,700 page PPACA which itself has grown and has been changed illegally since it was passed) with its now more than 40,000 (and increasing) supporting regulations and laws.

"The Constitution does not protect our guns, our guns protect the Constitution."  

Allen Croft

U.S. senators who represent your will, voted on the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty. God forbid that the USA would ever cede any of its rights to the UN! In a 53-46 vote, the Senate narrowly passed a measure that will stop the United States from entering into the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty. We came four votes away from the U.S. Senate giving our Constitutional rights over to the United Nations.

The Statement of Purpose from the Bill reads:   

"To uphold Second Amendment rights and prevent the United States from entering into the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty."

The U.N. Small Arms Treaty, which has been championed by the Obama Administration, would have effectively placed a global ban on the import and export of small firearms. The ban would have affected all private gun owners in the U.S. and had language that would have implemented an international gun registry on all private guns and ammunition. Astonishingly, 46 out of our 100 United States Senators were willing to give away our Constitutional rights to a foreign power, depriving U.S. Citizens of thier right to own and bare arms and to allow for the creation of a U.N. armed police force and to come into this country to assist in the collection of weapons from us, you and me!

Here listed are the 46 senators who voted to give your rights to the U.N.:

Baldwin (D-WI)
Baucus (D-MT)
Bennett (D-CO)
Blumenthal (D-CT)
Boxer (D-CA)
Brown (D-OH)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Cardin (D-MD)                   
Carper (D-DE)
Casey (D-PA)
Coons (D-DE)
Cowan (D-MA)
Durbin (D-IL)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Franken (D-MN)
Gillibrand (D-NY)
Harkin (D-IA)
Hirono (D-HI)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kaine (D-VA)
King (I-ME)
Klobuchar (D-MN)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Leahy (D-VT)
Levin (D-MI)
McCaskill (D-MO)
Menendez (D-NJ)
Merkley (D-OR)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Murphy (D-CT)
Murray (D-WA)
Nelson (D-FL)
Reed (D-RI)
Reid (D-NV)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Sanders (I-VT)
Schatz (D-HI)
Schumer (D-NY)
Shaheen (D-NH)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Udall (D-CO)
Udall (D-NM)
Warner (D-VA)
Warren (D-MA)
Whitehouse (D-RI)
Wyden (D-OR)

These Senators voted to allow armed U.N. Police Forces to come into our country and take OUR guns (weapons of defense). They need to lose their next election. We have been betrayed. 46 Senators Voted to Give our 2nd Amendment Constitutional Rights to the U.N.

[It should be remembered that on December 17, 2009 Soetoro/AKA Obama relinquished various rights (due process, property, search and seizure, arrest, etc.) of U.S. Citizens to another international police Force. Article with emendation.




AMENDING EXECUTIVE ORDER 12425 DESIGNATING INTERPOL AS A PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION ENTITLED TO ENJOY CERTAIN PRIVILEGES, EXEMPTIONS, AND IMMUNITIES
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act (22 U.S.C. 288), and in order to extend the appropriate privileges, exemptions, and immunities to the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL), it is hereby ordered that Executive Order 12425 of June 16, 1983, as amended, is further amended by deleting from the first sentence the words “except those provided by Section 2(c), Section 3, Section 4, Section 5, and Section 6 of that Act” and the semicolon that immediately precedes them.

"Barack Obama has quietly ceded US sovereignty to the International Police Force and rendered due process under the Constitution irrelevant.

In 1983, President Ronald Reagan issued an Executive Order which gave permission to the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL) to operate within the boundaries of the United States. Reagan’s EO put INTERPOL under the same basic guidelines as the CIA, FBI, ATF and other Federal law enforcement agencies which now follow DHS directives.

Two weeks ago, without any announcement, debate, discussion or inquiry from journalists, President Obama issued an amendment to Executive Order 12425. The amendment removed part of Reagan’s order that kept INTERPOL from having full diplomatic immunity while operating within the United States.

In other words: Under Reagan and right up until two weeks ago, INTERPOL was authorized to operate within the USA but they did not have full diplomatic immunity and had to adhere to certain laws set forth for investigative agencies. Laws that prohibit authorities from violating our constitutionally protected rights.

A one-paragraph executive order may seem inconsequential to many, but this action has far reaching implications and threatens the sovereignty of America.

Reagan opened the door to allow Interpol to operate in partnership with the U.S. but with significant constitutional safeguards. Specifically, Interpol’s property and assets remained subject to search and seizure by American law enforcement, and its archived records remained subject to public scrutiny under provisions of the Freedom of Information Act.

Interpol had to answer to the FBI and U.S. courts under Reagan’s order. These safeguards were stripped away by Obama’s action the week before Christmas without debate or explanation. Obama picked the holiday season to make this radical change to minimize media coverage.

This order marks a significant change in federal policy and usurps the constitutional power of our government by yielding it to an international organization.

Michael van Der Galien writes,

“This foreign law enforcement organization can operate free of an important safeguard against government and abuse. Property and assets, including the organization’s records, cannot now be searched or seized. Their physical operational locations are now immune from U.S. legal and investigative authorities.”

Obama has given an international organization unsupervised freedom to investigate Americans on our own soil without recourse or the supervision of our own government.

Andy McCarthy writing for the National Review asks some very significant questions:

“Why would we elevate an international police force above American law? Why would we immunize an international police force from the limitations that constrain the FBI and other American law-enforcement agencies? Why is it suddenly necessary to have, within the Justice Department, a repository for stashing government files which, therefore, will be beyond the ability of Congress, American law-enforcement, the media, and the American people to scrutinize?”

The U.S. Constitution clearly states that it is the supreme law of our land and allowing the International Criminal Courts (ICC) to supersede the U.S. Constitution violates America’s sovereignty.

Secondly, the War on Terror is unpopular with Europeans and the ICC may attempt to prosecute heroic American soldiers with trumped up war crimes. Obama is putting brave American men and women at grave risk.

In this new executive order is that Interpol’s operations center for the United States is housed in the Justice Department. Many of the agents might be Americans who will work under Interpol.

This order has potentially created the new civilian security force that Obama proposed during his campaign. This group of law enforcement officials is no longer subject to the restraints of the Constitution.

The order guarantees that Interpol officers have immunity from prosecution for crimes they may commit in the United States.

While Obama is extending due process rights to terrorists he is weakening those same rights for American citizens. If a citizen were to be prosecuted by Interpol their newly granted immunity would interfere with the discovery process. Since Interpol files are immune to disclosure, a citizen could be denied his right to see the information used to prosecute him or her.

Obama’s executive order has done more to weaken civil liberties than the horrid Patriot Act. The silence in the mainstream media on this issue should frighten all freedom loving Americans. Obama just signed away parts of our precious legal protections."
By: M.J. Harris, From:
http://thelibertyguardian.com/2010/01/executive-order-international-police-now-have-full-immunity-in-us/]

Time is short for what tomorrow will bring.

General Reference:

*Why, you might ask, do I use the Phrase, "person illegally occupying the White House" so often?  Barry Soetoro/ AKA Barack Hussein Obama II is not a U.S. Citizen of any kind:  he is a foreign national. He did not meet Hawaii's election qualification requirements to run as a Presidential candidate. He does not meet U.S. Constitutional requirements to be President of the united States of America:  He cannot legally hold that office, therefore he can only occupy the office by threat of force. I have posted many articles regarding this issue. He was tried, found guilty, and convicted on this issue by a Properly Convened Grand Jury. But who remains to enforce the Judgment? 


Poetic Reference:



Excelsior!
by
Henry Wadsworth Longfellow

The shades of night were falling fast, 
As through an Alpine village passed 
A youth, who bore, 'mid snow and ice,
A banner with the strange device, 
Excelsior!

His brow was sad; his eye beneath, 
Flashed like a falchion from its sheath, 
And like a silver clarion rung 
The accents of that unknown tongue, 
Excelsior!

In happy homes he saw the light 
Of household fires gleam warm and bright; 
Above, the spectral glaciers shone, 
And from his lips escaped a groan, 
Excelsior!

"Try not the Pass!" the old man said; 
"Dark lowers the tempest overhead, 
The roaring torrent is deep and wide!" 
And loud that clarion voice replied, 
Excelsior!

"O stay," the maiden said, "and rest 
Thy weary head upon this breast!" 
A tear stood in his bright blue eye, 
But still he answered, with a sigh, 
Excelsior!

"Beware the pine tree's withered branch! 
Beware the awful avalanche!" 
This was the peasant's last Good-night, 
A voice replied, far up the height, 
Excelsior!

At break of day, as heavenward
The pious monks of Saint Bernard
Uttered the oft-repeated prayer,
A voice cried through the startled air,
Excelsior!

A traveler, by the faithful hound, 
Half-buried in the snow was found, 
Still grasping in his hand of ice 
That banner with the strange device, 
Excelsior!

There in the twilight cold and gray, 
Lifeless, but beautiful, he lay, 
And from the sky, serene and far, 
A voice fell, like a falling star, 
Excelsior!



Another one bites the dust, 30.

Wednesday, April 2, 2014

How to Plant The Seeds of Destruction or No One Remembered to Close the Gate Part 5


At this juncture, it should be painfully and depressingly obvious that due to governmental deceit, inattention to maintenance of the Constitution, and no vigilance, by the People, The Republic fell during 1871. the People were deceived and betrayed by various officials.
The American People have been unwittingly living a lie.

Since 1871 and up to the present time, it should be understandably clear the System of Governance, as defined by the Constitution of 1787, was usurped by officials within that system and various individuals outside of that system in order to create a Corporate Government to transfer the wealth of the Nation to themselves and their posterity, while setting up a system of never ending and increasing debt. The interest on that debt and the monies collected in other schemes was used to increase their wealth and influence, while continuing to make inroads into the very fabric from what the Nation had been woven.
Forty-five years ago I was told that my concerns were nothing more than mental masturbation, senseless verbal fornication, that I was just toying with words. My concerns have not in any way diminished, in fact, they have only increased. The wheel-work of life turns in curious ways and I would only ask The Esteemed Readers of Fix America what they think is in movement? Given the information and opinion within the articles; 'That which Pushes the Mind Is Not Always Felt', 'How to Plant The Seeds of Destruction', and 'What Tomorrow Will Bring' and the auxiliary books and their information and opinion, what is the most logical conclusion which can be extracted that explains the actions that have taken place and the situations that are unfolding before our eyes?
What outcome can prevail for The American People?

OUR Nation IS IN JEOPARDY RIGHT NOW!
How Can We Retake What Is Rightfully Ours?
The Supreme Court has said the De Jure Government offices still exist but the people have failed to occupy them.

The First suggested Method Is Untenable:

Remember Downs v. Bidwell and the dissenting opinion of Justice Marshall Harlan? He stated that two national governments exist; one to be maintained under the Constitution, with all its restrictions. This is one that We the People need to force our elected public officials to occupy – De Jure rule.
We need to change that by organizing Grand Juries and putting our officials back under De jure rule and out of the Corporate (or Military) Rule under which they are currently operating. Unfortunately, this has no force of law under the Corporate 'Government.' The United States Corporation is supposed to operates under Corporate/Commercial/Public Law rather than Common/Private Law and the current 'Government' will not even abide by that system of jurisdiction.
Our elected officials will then have to operate under the limits of their Oath of office to uphold the Constitution of the United States and the respective State Constitutions, circa 1860. When they violate the Oath it’s a capital crime. Although the method of properly convening a grand jury has force of law under the original U.S. Constitution, it means little-to-nothing under the Corporate Constitution. Doesn't anyone remember that the person occupying the White House was found guilty by a grand jury (please see the article, Obama Indicted: Fugitive at Large)
"Fugitive at large, Barry Soetoro, AKA Barack Hussein Obama II is now a wanted criminal. Plagued by an identity issue, problems with Social Security Numbers, problems with U.S. Citizenship, problems with lawsuits from Local Courts to Superior Courts, problems with his job, Barry's problems are ever multiplying along with the costs engendered by his issues and problems, has been convicted and is now facing ten years of incarceration. He was served at the White House; however, he has yet to surrender to authorities or be apprehended in order that incarceration can begin," From the Article:  
The reason we go back to 1860 is because that is the last time we had lawful laws in this country.
Where do the people get their power to convene a Grand Jury? The Magna Carta, 1215. Our Founding Fathers looked back to history for precedent when they decided they wanted to change their government. What they found was the Magna Carta Liberatum, the Great Charter of Freedoms. It set a precedent that changed the face of England forever, by establishing that the King was not above the law.
King John of England signed the Magna Carta after immense pressure from the Church and his barons (the people). The King often lived above the law, violating both Feudal and Common Law, and was heavily criticized for his foreign policy and actions in England. The Barons, with the support of the Church, pressured King John to spell out a list of their rights and guarantee that those rights would be enforced. The Barons provided a draft, and after some negotiation, King John put his seal to the Magna Carta in Runnymede, in June of 1215.

Section 61 set rules for establishing the Grand Jury. It states: Since we have granted all these things for God, for the better ordering of our kingdom, and to allay the discord that has arisen between us and our barons (people), and since we desire that they shall be enjoyed in their entirety, with lasting strength, forever, we give and grant to the barons the following security: The barons shall elect twenty-five of their number to keep, and cause to be observed with all their might, the peace and liberties granted and confirmed to them by this charter. If we, our chief justice, our officials, or any of our servants offend in any respect against any man, or transgress any of the articles of the peace or of this security, and the offense is made known to four of the said twenty-five barons, they shall come to us.”
This is the basis for Grand Juries in the United States of America, but only under common law jurisdiction which has been supplanted by
Corporate/Commercial/Public Law

The UNITED STATES CORPORATION CAN NOT BE REPAIRED!
The UNITED STATES CORPORATION is a corrupt Corporate 'Government', that believes and takes actions on that belief, that it is above the laws it has created and can do anything what-so-ever it pleases.
Since the CORPORATION is a private concern and is in no way obligated to follow or adhere to the will-of-the-People, I can only suggest that you write to your State or National Congressmen and wait for a reply.

A Different Suggested Method:
Remember Downs v. Bidwell and the dissenting opinion of Justice Marshall Harlan? He said that two national governments exist; one to be maintained under the Constitution, with all its restrictions. This is one that We the people must repopulate by proper election to re-establish the De Jure System of Self Governance that was vacated during 1871.
I can only suggest that no letters of any concerns need to by written to anyone. I can suggest that you think about things and inspect all the activity covered at the website of 'The Republic for The United States of America.
It is only a suggestion while you wait for that reply from the first suggestion.

General Reference:

Republic for the United States
Contact Information:
Telephone:
Toll Free: (855)RUSA411
(855)787-2411


Internet Websites:

Reference Book List:

Hamilton's Curse, by Thomas J DiLorenzo, 2008




An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the
Wealth of Nations, by Adam Smith, 1776




Laissez-faire economics

Tocqueville

Ludwig von Mises



General Reference from Previous articles:

What America Means to Me: or Some Essential Parts of It
'I have even greater respect for the instrument which our Nation was formed under, The Constitution of the United States of America.
In detail, it describes the parts of government and their composition. This document also contains the manner in which the parts are allowed to interact.
The Constitution of the United States of America also contains a Bill of Rights which applies to all U.S. Citizens. Amendments have been adopted and repealed since its enactment, which may or may not have had worth. It was written in common English of the time in a manner which was expected to be understood by every U.S. Citizen.
This does not mean that all citizens could read but they could understand what was being said when another read it out loud.
It holds the foundation of ideas and concepts our nation of people represent. Many other documents of the time contain a much more detailed account and commentary of arguments, both for and against, the various ideas and concepts involved in the composition. The Constitution of the United States of America remains the only single source document that defines America. All other documents of any nature are subordinate. To be sure, there are many other source documents which support its reasoned construction. The United States Declaration of Independence is another U.S. Sole source document, which itself has many other documents of the time and previous times with which it is supported. These support documents contain many ideals or ideas which were conceptually incorporated in the composition of its construction.
The People of the United States are the primary governing body. They delegate the day to day responsibility of governance to the Federal Republic through representatives and the combination is bound together under the Constitution of the United States of America. The process of selecting representatives is determined by casting individual votes. Every U.S. Citizen has the right and responsibility to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States of America against all enemies. If this single source document and the integral components are allowed to be violated in any way, its' worth is in question. If the Constitution of the United States of America falls due to inattention to its maintenance, the Nation falls and the American concept and actuality of a United States of America ceases to exist. It becomes something else that is defined by something else. I vote for the most qualified representatives and candidates that will uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States of America above all else.'


Another one bites the dust, 30.

Monday, August 5, 2013

Fixing Government: Grand Jury Presentments


UPDATED:  7/10/2016

What recourse do the people of America have when every branch of government, and the bureaus, departments and agencies we have entrusted with maintaining law and order under the the US Constitution are filled with incompetent and negligent elected and appointed officials to such an extent that many should be considered criminals, who have no regard for the rule of law?





Obama has stated on several occasions how he will bypass Congress by Executive Order (and has done just that on many occasions), to accomplish his social Utopian policies and goals. Just as Congress passed the unconstitutional Federal Reserve Act in 1913, so to did they pass the unconstitutional Affordable Care Act, never having read or vigorously debated it, which was then signed into law by the President. It even survived a Supreme Court challenge, after Justice Roberts changed a few words and then declared the act a tax; even though, a first year law student can see how blatantly unconstitutional the act is, as was covered in Power Grab by Dictator of National Healthcare.  


There is much less about healthcare in this Act-Law-Tax and much more to do about taking your freedom of choice and depriving citizens of their rights and money.

Scandal after scandal has hit this nation since 2008 and yet the privately owned major media ignores the atrocities and instead focuses on any trivial event to distract and deflect any interest in the important issues facing this nation. The owned major media needs to focus on the boy, as his handlers groomed him to be, who would be King.

Now, the issue at hand is what We the People can do to correct many of these problems.


The answer lies within the Constitution. Contained within the Fifth Article of Amendment is the method by which the People have the right and the ability to bring charges against a criminal within the government. Any government official at any level within government can be brought up on charges by the People through a convened Grand Jury.

"With government corruption and treasonous acts running rampant, particularly with regard to President Obama and his administration, many have asked what ordinary American citizens can do to legally mete out justice. Short of violent revolution, there is only one strong legal mechanism that can be invoked. That is the so-called "citizens grand jury," by which Americans themselves can enforce the law. This is our only recourse to hold the president and his accomplices truly accountable for their actions. Over the years, impeachment has not worked, nor has any other means to address crimes at the presidential and other high levels of government.

In this regard, the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution establishes that "no person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury." A proper understanding of the effect of this requirement begins with the common law, since, as Supreme Court Justice Learned Hand stated in In re Kittle, "we took the [grand jury] as we found it in our English inheritance, and he best serves the Constitution who most faithfully follows its historical significance."

The grand jury dates back at least to 1166, under the Norman kings of England. These earliest grand juries were convened to provide answers from local representatives concerning royal property rights, but developed into a body of 12 men who presented indictments at the request of either private individuals or the king's prosecutor. (Susan W Brenner & Gregor G. Lockhart, "Federal Grand Jury: A Guide to Law and Practice," 4 [1996]). The Magna Carta granted individuals the right to stand before a grand jury to be charged of their crimes. (Id)





By 1681, an important characteristic of the grand jury had developed: the rule of secrecy. This characteristic set up the grand jury as a bulwark against government abuse. Grand juries were designed to exclude all outside persons, including the government's prosecutors, ensuring that all phases of an investigation (not just deliberation) remained secret. Thus, English grand juries functioned to prevent prosecutorial abuses by blocking the king's attempts to prosecute.

This tradition was continued and expanded by colonial grand juries. In America, the grand jury originally began as a defense against the monarchy and was arguably even more independent than the English grand jury of the 1600s. American grand juries initiated prosecutions against corrupt agents of the government, often in response to complaints from individuals. For example, a Massachusetts grand jury refused to indict the organizers of the Stamp Act rebellion. (See Roger Roots, "If It's Not A Runaway, It's Not A Real Grand Jury," 33 Creighton L. Rev. 821, 832). Four years later, another Massachusetts grand jury indicted some British soldiers located within the city boundaries for alleged crimes against the colonists, but refused to treat certain colonialists who had been charged by the British authorities for inciting desertion in a like manner. Similarly, a Philadelphia grand jury condemned the use of the tea tax to compensate British officials, encouraged a rejection of all British goods and called for organization with other colonies to demand redress of grievances.

By the dawn of the 20th century, the powerful role of the grand jury had come to be established law. In 1902, a Minneapolis grand jury, acting on its own initiative, hired private detectives and collected enough evidence to indict the mayor and force the police chief to resign.

In Frisbie v. United States, Supreme Court Justice David Brewer declared that "in this country it is for the grand jury to investigate any alleged crime, no matter how or by whom suggested to them, and after determining that the evidence is sufficient to justify putting the suspected party on trial, to direct the preparation of the formal charge or indictment." [157 U.S. 160 (1895)]

Again, in Hale v. Henkel, Supreme Court Justice Henry Brown stated that "we deem it entirely clear that under the practice in this country, at least, the examination of witnesses need not be preceded by a presentment or indictment formally drawn up, but that the grand jury may proceed, either upon their own knowledge or upon the examination of witnesses, to inquire for themselves whether a crime cognizable by the court has been committed." [201 U.S. 43 (1906)]

More recently, in United States v. Williams, Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia held, writing for the majority of the court, that "[t]he grand jury's functional independence from the Judicial Branch is evident both in the scope of its power to investigate criminal wrongdoing and in the manner in which that power is exercised. 'Unlike [a] court, whose jurisdiction is predicated upon a specific case or controversy, the grand jury "can investigate merely on suspicion that the law is being violated, or even because it wants assurance that it is not."'" [504 U.S. 36, 48 (1992) (quoting United States v. R. Enterprises, Inc., 498 U.S. 292, 297 (1991)]

Speaking of the origins of the grand jury, Scalia also found that "the grand jury is mentioned in the Bill of Rights, but not in the body of the Constitution. It has not been textually assigned, therefore, to any of the branches described in the first three Articles. It is a constitutional fixture in its own right. In fact the whole theory of its function is that it belongs to no branch of the institutional government, serving as a kind of buffer or referee between the government and the people. Although the grand jury normally operates, of course, in the courthouse and under judicial auspices, its institutional relationship with the Judicial Branch has been, so to speak, at arm's length. Judges' direct involvement in the functioning of the grand jury has generally been confined to the constitutive one of calling the grand jurors together and administering their oaths of office." [ Id. at 47]

Although the customary practice for summoning a federal grand jury is by a court (see Rule 6 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, or FRCP), such action is mandatory "when the public interest so requires." Regardless, the FRCP does not preclude citizens from exercising their own rights to impanel grand juries under the Constitution. [See, i.e. Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803), establishing the doctrine of judicial review.] Thus, it is clear that citizens themselves can impanel a grand jury, and if a true bill of indictment results, the courts are technically required to commence proceedings and the executive branch to enforce the court's edicts. However, if the courts refuse and the executive branch does not carry out its duties by, for instance, arresting the criminally accused, Americans do have a right to make "citizens arrests," hold trials and legally mete out punishment in their own right. Indeed, this is what occurred in the western part of the United States, in particular, during our early years as a nation — before there was a developed federal court system and executive branch.

Given the increasingly corrupt and treasonous actions of our public officials, which have nearly destroyed our republic, and the almost complete breakdown of the justice system as run by the government, the time has come for we Americans to rise up and use the God-given rights left to us by our founders. We can do this by using citizen-impanelled and administered grand juries to hold presidents like Obama and others at the highest levels of government accountable for the crimes that have driven our nation to the brink of extinction.", by Larry Klayman.

The post How To Bring Back Real Grand Juries explains this in some detail. There is Supreme Court precedence to validate the authority of We the People.  In that article it references Larry Klayman who was interviewed to see if there was any merit to this claim of Grand Jury presentments by ordinary people. It was assumed that a Grand Jury could only be convened on the order of a prosecutor or court order. But Mark, the author of the post at The Daily Paul, quotes the explanation of Mr. Klayman:

"We the people have been providentially provided means of legal recourse to address the criminal conduct of persons themselves entrusted to dispense justice," Klayman told WND.

He said in the Supreme Court ruling in United States v. Williams, in 1992, "Justice Antonin Scalia, writing for the majority, confirmed that the American grand jury is neither part of the judicial, executive nor legislative branches of government, but instead belongs to the people. It is in effect a fourth branch of government 'governed' and administered to directly by and on behalf of the American people, and its authority emanates from the Bill of Rights."


Klayman said the Founding Fathers wanted the grand jury to not be part of the judicial branch, and they wanted a path citizens could follow to seek redress of their grievances without having to ask permission of the state, as the state will nearly always seek to protect its own establishment interests.

"Thus, citizens – ordinary Americans – have the unbridled right to impanel their own grand juries and present 'True Bills,' which are indeed indictments, to a court, which is then required to commence a criminal proceeding upon which the accused has full constitutional right to present a defense and seek to prove her innocence," Klayman said.

"Importantly, even the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, which allow federal prosecutors to present indictments after a grand jury has issued them, does not preclude citizens from so doing."

Grand Juries are pivotal to keeping corrupt government in check. They are the ones that charge corrupt public servants with crimes.

Klayman quoted from the Williams decision: "Rooted in long centuries of Anglo-American history … the grand jury is mentioned in the Bill of Rights, but not in the body of the Constitution. It has not been textually assigned, therefore, to any of the ... branches described in the first three Articles. It 'is a constitutional fixture in its own right.' … In fact, the whole theory of its function is that it belongs to no branch of the institutional Government, serving as a kind of buffer or referee between the Government and the people."

"In this way, the 'Rule of Law,' not violence, may seek to preserve the Republic, and to avoid armed revolt among the people as occurred in 1776," Klayman said.


The 1992 case brings important tools to the American People, both local and federal grand juries under the Bill of Rights, are needed to investigate the crimes being carried out by government! 

The questions for my fellow Americans is this:


When will people realize that Grand Jury presentments are the tools of Last Defense and begin convening? Who will charges be drawn against?

Reference Manuals for Citizens Grand Juries:

Citizens Grand Jury ManuaL for the Court

Citizens Grand Jurors' Handbook

Common Law Restoration