Monday, October 26, 2015
Let us face the facts, if we listen to today's truthful Democrats, Hillary is a Goddess as clean as the driven snow. Honest beyond comprehension, truthful to the point of pain, transparent as the surface of a soap bubble, knowledgeable beyond any ancient sage, incapable of any wrongdoing, adhering at all times to laws and rules, etc. are just a small sample of the things that could be said. If we listen to today's truthful Republicans, Hillary stands at the side of Lucifer Himself: a true henchman capable of anything that will further the world song of discord and ingratiate herself to the voting public.
Hillary Clinton Exposed, Movie She Banned From Theaters Full Movie
Although these facts are at best questionable, what can be said with historical certainty is that the Republicans and Democrats all work for the same corporation: The UNITED STATES Inc. Financial; International Monetary Fund-Federal Reserve System-Internal Revenue Service, Political; Republicans-Democrats-anyone who supports the Structure in Place, Armed Forces; NAVY-ARMY-AIR FORCE-MARINES-SPECIAL FORCES-any FORCE in Place to support the agenda of the UNITED STATES Inc., Judicial; US Supreme Court-STATE Supreme Courts-STATE Courts-County Courts-City Ordinance Policy Boards-all Courts that adhere to a mixture of Admiralty Law and Roman Civil Law or Statutes-Codes-Ordinances-or anything else they wish to create-anything but the System of Common Law which is the only system that is Constitutionally authorized, Education; whatever text or course content, true or not, that supports the endeavors of the corporation.
It really does not matter who becomes the president or assumes any other public or appointed office: the structure underneath is corrupt and rotten to the core. The structure of the corporate UNITED STATES was designed by and is run and supported by foreign interests. The list of masters is as long as what is being considered. The United Nations, The World Court, World Health Organization, International Monetary Fund, The World Bank, The Trilateral Commission, The Royal Institute of International Affairs, The Bilderberg Group, Council on Foreign Relations, The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations, The Club of Rome, The Committee of 300, Pharmaceutical industries, Military Industrial Complex, Agri-business, Petrochemical Industry,
The UNITED STATES is not a nation of LAWS it is a nation of Administrative Public Policy Statutes, US Codes, Uniform Commercial Codes, and anything else they wish to create like Oppositional Defiance Disorder, which will be considered a legally committable condition. Americans: disarm them and round them up and put them in asylums for suffering from fictitious mental disorders, after all, we can't have mentally deranged people who have opinions running around with guns. You might just remember Operation Jade Helm and it's operational objective.
"SEPTEMBER 12, 2014
BY DEAN JAMES
GOVERNMENT ARRESTING PEOPLE FOR ANTI-OBAMA FACEBOOK POSTS!
This article will make you angry. The US Government is actively seeking those who criticize government, specifically Barack Obama, and arresting them without charging them. They are remanded to mental health institutions where they are given “training” on how to view the world.
Remind you of a little book that George Orwell wrote?
It gets worse.
Most of the victims of the government’s kidnapping scheme are veterans.
From The Rutherford Institute:
In the four years since the start of Operation Vigilant Eagle, the government has steadily ramped up its campaign to “silence” dissidents, especially those with military backgrounds. Coupled with the DHS’ dual reports on Rightwing and Leftwing “Extremism,” which broadly define extremists as individuals and groups “that are mainly anti-government, rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local authority, or rejecting government authority entirely,” these tactics have boded ill for anyone seen as opposing the government.
One particularly troubling mental health label being applied to veterans and others who challenge the status quo is “oppositional defiance disorder” (ODD). As journalist Anthony Martin explains, an ODD diagnosis
“denotes that the person exhibits ‘symptoms’ such as the questioning of authority, the refusal to follow directions, stubbornness, the unwillingness to go along with the crowd, and the practice of disobeying or ignoring orders. Persons may also receive such a label if they are considered free thinkers, nonconformists, or individuals who are suspicious of large, centralized government… At one time the accepted protocol among mental health professionals was to reserve the diagnosis of oppositional defiance disorder for children or adolescents who exhibited uncontrollable defiance toward their parents and teachers.”
The case of 26-year-old decorated Marine Brandon Raub—who was targeted because of his Facebook posts, interrogated by government agents about his views on government corruption, arrested with no warning, labeled mentally ill for subscribing to so-called “conspiratorial” views about the government, detained against his will in a psych ward for standing by his views, and isolated from his family, friends and attorneys—is a prime example of the government’s war on veterans.
Raub’s case exposes the seedy underbelly of a governmental system that is targeting Americans—especially military veterans—for expressing their discontent over America’s rapid transition to a police state.
Here is a news story by RT (Russian Times) about Brandon Raub. Apparently the corporate media in the United States won’t tell his story:
ARRESTED FOR ANTI-OBAMA POSTS
To underscore how big this story truly is, John Whitehead
of the Rutherford Institute is the lead attorney defending
the innocent victims targeted by the Obama Thought Police.
Whitehead is quite famous for his defense of the Bill of
Rights for the past several decades.
This is big.
Obama wants everybody to think like a brain-dead zombie while he transforms America into Orwell’s 1984.
These things and many, many more are only the tip of the iceberg that will forever sink the Ship of America.
Saturday, October 10, 2015
Fighting Extremism: The Strong Cities Network, or Fundamentally Changed America: More Changes Are Necessary, or Mindless Americans Need No Sovereignty: Soetoro/Obama Knows Best
Many of Fix America's Esteemed Readers may only dimly remember the anomalous situations involved in the Ruby Ridge Massacre; or the anomalous situations involved in The Branch Davidian Massacre; or the anomalous situations involved in the Oklahoma City Bombing, or the anomalous situations involved in The World Trade Center Attack, or the anomalous situations involved in the Attack on the Pentagon, or the anomalous situations involved in the Sandy Hook Massacre, or the anomalous situations involved in The Boston Marathon Bombing, and other questionable events.
The Ruby Ridge Massacre and The Branch Davidian Massacre were, for no apparent reason, both out and out murder. When The FBI released the final report regarding the New Town Massacre, the official finding revealed no people were killed, murdered, or wounded. In other incidents people supposedly killed at earlier events were photographed at later events. People with arms or legs blown off in one event were mysteriously photographed earlier in life with the same missing limbs. This is not to say or imply that people were not killed: they were.
Many people were investigating High Government Officials and their involvement in illegal financial transactions involving hundreds of Billions of dollars at the World Trade Center Attack, The collapse of Building 7, and The Attack on The Pentagon: they all died and most of the records were destroyed. Many of the preceding and following events were False Flag Operations and Psychological Operations that were and are being carried out against the American People.
Other questionable events that at best were based on poor or bad judgement like; Operation Fast and Furious, the 911 Benghazi Attack, Osama Bin Laden execution and the death of Seal team Six, the Arming of various Foreign Rebels (Al Qaeda, Al Nusra), and providing fighting transportation for ISIS are more examples of actions that have caused the death of Americans and in some cases will continue to cause Americans their Lives.
All of these events have been carried out by extremists who have murdered or killed countless thousands and care not at all about the American People, their inalienable rights, or their Rights under the Original Constitution. The Federal Government has already converted Americans' enumerated inalienable rights under the original Constitution of thirteen Amendments into Civil Rights, a privilege, of US Citizens under the Corporate Constitution of twenty-seven Amendments. Since the takeover of our Nation, all of the enumerated rights have been violated or abrogated.
The intention of those in charge is to destroy America and everything it represents, and replace it with a subservient Empire based on the fraud of the Democracy being forced on other countries and a central banking system based on fiat currency. They intend to end any authority the Sovereign States may possess and the Sovereignty of the American People replacing everything with ten regions governed by appointees answerable only to the ruler of the nation, a Tyrant.
The now completed (?) Operation Jade Helm had several sub-operations. One of the major objectives was to carry out the exercise of rounding up people who speak out against various policies, acts, resolutions, laws, regulations, and a host of administrative public policies, but most of all anyone speaking out against the leaders of the bloated and corrupt Corporate Federal Government and pack them into rail cars heading for FEMA relocation Centers. Or could it be possible that the intent of Operation Jade Helm was to move everything into position for some future use or event?
The person occupying the White House promised so many things: prosperity, transparency, and dozens of other wonderful sounding things of progress and change. Instead of those things the Fraud Soetoro/Obama illegally authored more than two hundred Executive Orders, most notably Executive Order 13603. Under that EO No American owns anything: there are no exceptions, the government owns everything; cars, houses, land, food, animals, the clothes on your back, and you, who will be relocated to work without pay in labor camps. And the NDRP government isn't any form of government you will recognize. Read the NDRP.
Please do not believe me: do your own homework dig as deep as you can and find the truth for yourself.
After all is said and done, just who are revealed to be the extremists, the turncoats, the traitors to America? Americans? How can that be possible? The United States Federal Government has Formally declared that all Americans are Terrorists and Enemies of the State. And now, we have this latest affront to Americans. Read on and be aware.
"FLAT OUT UNCONSTITUTIONAL – THE E-BOOK
Alert! U.N. Military Invading America with Obama’s Blessing!
OCTOBER 6, 2015 ~ AMP1776
Every American should be infuriated! Thanks to Pamela Geller at D.C. Clothesline, as well as other sources, we learned that the Obama administration is allowing the Sharia Law compliant United Nations to start establishing a presence in American cities with a Global Police Force, ostensibly to fight extremism, called the Strong Cities Network.
First of all, our cites already have police forces. Also, the American people are very well armed. American civilians have more arms than the rest of the world combined. There is nothing that the U.N. has to offer us that we don’t already do better. The level of unconstitutionality this reaches is beyond belief. The Constitution does not enumerate any authority to the federal government to police Americans, let alone bring in foreign militaries to do it. It doesn’t matter what false premise the Obama Administration uses to justify it. There is no justification that passes Constitutional muster.
Even if policing were not the plan for the U.N. Global Police Force, allowing any foreign military presence to base itself on American soil would require a treaty. The U.N. does not hold any authority over the United States of America on our soil.
According to Article 6, The Constitution and any treaties made under the authority of the United States are the highest law in the land. The only way this could pass a constitutional smell test would be for a treaty to be made with other nations, agreeing to this police force. But we know there is no such treaty, because Obama doesn’t make treaties, he makes unconstitutional DEALS, aka Executive Agreements, as he did with the Iran Nuke Deal. Making a treaty requires 2/3 of the Senate to Consent. Article 2, Section 2, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution, while describing the powers enumerated to the President says, “He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur.” When did 2/3 of the Senate concur with quartering foreign soldiers on American soil?
This is treason. This president has gone so far rogue that any other man in his position would have been impeached long ago. Everyone in Congress is either afraid to do anything about it, quite simply because they don’t want to be part of taking down the first black president, or they are complicit and traitors themselves.
I urge everyone to contact your congressmen, both your representatives in the House and your two Senators and demand this be stopped! This cannot happen! We can’t just roll over and allow our country to be invaded by a foreign army while our treasonous President Obama and Attorney General Loretta Lynch, laugh about it. Nothing that this administration has done so far, no matter how vile, evil, treacherous, or treasonous should scare you more than this. The Iran Nuke Deal was chump change compared to this, but it set the unconstitutional precedent for Executive Agreements to take the place of treaties, so that this could happen. Call your Congressmen! Write to your Congressmen. Do the same with your governors, state legislators, mayors, sheriffs and police chiefs. Contact everyone. Make them all aware and put a stop to this. This isn’t a matter of drawing a line in the sand. There can be no line in the sand, because these foreign warriors can’t be allowed to even step foot on our sand. The line has to be drawn in the ocean.
Giving credit where it is very much due and very much appreciated, I am posting the text for the Department of Justice Release below, copied from the D.C. Clothesline link from Pamela Geller. We owe Ms. Gellar a deep debt of gratitude for staying on top of these things! Please visit her site for more details on the story itself. My post is less about the details, which are already available, and more for the purpose of explaining its unconstitutionality and garner a call to action! Spread this and share it EVERYWHERE!
Also, remember that it is your responsibility to protect yourself. Police are never there when you need them. Some police it seems will be here even though we DON’T need them. Embrace your right as an American to keep and bear arms. If you do not own a gun, buy one. If you do own a gun, buy another. Join classes for various types of gun training, such as safety and self defense.
It’s fun for the whole family!
AMP (Anna Maria Perez)
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: The Department of Justice, 28, 2015 (thanks to Debra)
Launch of Strong Cities Network to Strengthen Community Resilience Against Violent Extremism
Cities are vital partners in international efforts to build social cohesion and resilience to violent extremism. Local communities and authorities are the most credible and persuasive voices to challenge violent extremism in all of its forms and manifestations in their local contexts. While many cities and local authorities are developing innovative responses to address this challenge, no systematic efforts are in place to share experiences, pool resources and build a community of cities to inspire local action on a global scale.
“The Strong Cities Network will serve as a vital tool to strengthen capacity-building and improve collaboration,” said Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch. “As we continue to counter a range of domestic and global terror threats, this innovative platform will enable cities to learn from one another, to develop best practices and to build social cohesion and community resilience here at home and around the world.”
The Strong Cities Network (SCN) – which launches September 29th at the United Nations – will empower municipal bodies to fill this gap while working with civil society and safeguarding the rights of local citizens and communities.
The SCN will strengthen strategic planning and practices to address violent extremism in all its forms by fostering collaboration among cities, municipalities and other sub-national authorities.
“To counter violent extremism we need determined action at all levels of governance,” said Governing Mayor Stian Berger Røsland of Oslo while commenting on their participation in the SCN. “To succeed, we must coordinate our efforts and cooperate across borders. The Strong Cities Network will enable cities across the globe pool our resources, knowledge and best practices together and thus leave us standing stronger in the fight against one of the greatest threats to modern society.”
The SCN will connect cities, city-level practitioners and the communities they represent through a series of workshops, trainings and sustained city partnerships. Network participants will also contribute to and benefit from an online repository of municipal-level good practices and web-based training modules and will be eligible for grants supporting innovative, local initiatives and strategies that will contribute to building social cohesion and resilience to violent extremism.
The SCN will include an International Steering Committee of approximately 25 cities and other sub-national entities from different regions that will provide the SCN with its strategic direction. The SCN will also convene an International Advisory Board, which includes representatives from relevant city-focused networks, to help ensure SCN builds upon their work. It will be run by the Institute for Strategic Dialogue (ISD), a leading international “think-and-do” tank with a long-standing track record of working to prevent violent extremism:
The SCN provides a unique new opportunity to apply our collective lessons in preventing violent extremism in support of local communities and authorities around the world”, said CEO Sasha Havlicek of ISD. “We look forward to developing this international platform for joint innovation to impact this pressing challenge.”
“It is with great conviction that Montréal has agreed to join the Strong Cities Network founders,” said the Honorable Mayor Denis Coderre of Montreal. “This global network is designed to build on community-based approaches to address violent extremism, promote openness and vigilance and expand upon local initiatives like Montréal’s Mayors’ International Observatory on Living Together. I am delighted that through the Strong Cities Network, the City of Montréal will more actively share information and best practices with a global network of leaders on critical issues facing our communities.”
The Strong Cities Network will launch on Sept. 29, from 4:00 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. EDT, following the Leaders’ Summit on Countering ISIL and Violent Extremism. Welcoming remarks will be offered by the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Prince Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein and Mayor Bill de Blasio of New York City, who will also introduce a Keynote address by U.S. Attorney General Lynch. Following this event, the Strong Cities International Steering Committee, consisting of approximately 25 mayors and other leaders from cities and other sub-national entities from around the globe, will hold its inaugural meeting on Sept. 30, 2015, from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. EDT."
Thursday, September 17, 2015
I was so disappointed in the way the debate was handled, I really could not sleep last night. I tossed and turned thinking about how badly Rand Paul was treated, not just by Donald Trump, which is somewhat expected by now from the bully billionaire, but from the CNN panel of moderators who only allowed him to speak when his name was mentioned by the other nominees.
Pompous platitudes and innuendos abounded, while Dr. Paul was given the obligatory opportunity to defend himself slightly. It appeared that Trump at center stage was in complete control of the panel.
I finally dragged myself out of bed at 11:00 AM to have some coffee, and ran across the following article, which perked me up a bit.
I present it in its entirety to the Esteemed Readers of this blog for their assessment.
"Donald Trump does not like Rand Paul.
In the weirdest non sequitur of a often-incoherent second Republican presidential debate, the billionaire front-runner for the party nomination declared, “Rand Paul shouldn’t even be on this stage. He’s number 11. He’s got 1 percent in the polls. There’s too many people onstage already.”
As he has been on so many points, Trump was entirely wrong on this one.
Paul distinguished himself with coherent questioning of mass incarceration, calls for criminal-justice reform, and aggressive referencing of the injustices that extend from a failed drug war. The senator from Kentucky had one of the best moments of the debate when, during a back-and-forth over Jeb Bush’s youthful inhaling of marijuana, Paul put things into perspective for the former Florida governor: “Kids who have privilege like you do don’t go to jail. But the poor kids in the inner city still go to jail.”
And when the debate turned to foreign policy, Paul made more sense than the rest of the runners combined.
“I’ve made my career as an opponent of the Iraq War,” declared the senator, who reminded the crowd that “The Iraq War backfired and did not help us.”
“I’m not sending our sons and our daughters back to Iraq.” —Rand Paul
Those lines did not earn Paul a lot of applause Wednesday night. This Grand Old Party does not well remember—nor respect—the wisdom of Dwight Eisenhower’s warnings about a military-industrial complex or the example of “old-right” Republicans who opposed military adventurism.
But Paul displayed a steady awareness of that history. His great contribution to the debate was to offer an alternative to the bombast and bluster that came Wednesday night from many of the other contenders—and that, frankly, comes on a regular basis from prominent figures who position themselves across the political spectrum.
The senator warned, “”If you want boots on the ground, and you want them to be our sons and daughters, you’ve got 14 other choices. There will always be a Bush or Clinton for you if you want to go back to war in Iraq.”
While others spoke of putting boots back on the ground in the Middle East, he dissented, saying, “The first war was a mistake and I am not sending our sons and daughters back to Iraq.”
Paul’s dissents extended beyond objections regarding the Iraq imbroglio—as was appropriate during the course of a debate that produced plenty of objectionable statements from the crowd of Republican front runners and pretenders.
Early in the evening, several of the contenders were stumbling over one another in express their readiness to rip up the Iran nuclear agreement, with Senator Ted Cruz trumping them all by promising, “If I am elected president, on the very first day in office, I will rip to shreds this catastrophic Iranian nuclear deal.”
A few minutes later, in a break from what New Jersey Governor Chris Christie referred to as “this childish back-and-forth” with Trump and Fiorina over who was the worse CEO, Fiorina said there would be no back-and-forth with the president of Russia. “Having met Vladimir Putin, I wouldn’t talk to him at all,” she announced. “We’ve talked way too much to him.”
This is where Paul really stepped up.
Noting the location—the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library in Simi Valley, California—Paul said with regard to the “wouldn’t talk to him” line: “Well, think if Reagan had said that during the Cold War? We continued to talk with the Russians throughout the Cold War which [was a] much more significant [challenge than] where we are now.”
Should we continue to talk with Iran? Yes. Should we cut up the [Iran nuclear] agreement immediately? That’s absurd. Wouldn’t you want to know if they complied? Now, I’m going to vote against the agreement because I don’t think there’s significant leverage, but it doesn’t mean that I would immediately not look at the agreement, and cut it up without looking to see if whether or not Iran has complied.
The same goes with China. I don’t think we need to be rash, I don’t think we need to be reckless, and I think we need to leave lines of communication open. Often we talk about whether we should be engaged in the world, or disengaged in the world, and I think this is an example of some who want to isolate us, actually, and not be engaged.
We do need to be engaged with Russia. It doesn’t mean we give them a free pass, or China a free pass, but, to be engaged, to continue to talk. We did throughout the Cold War, and it would be a big mistake not to do it here.
There was a similar moment when the question of intervention in Syria arose.
The Kentuckian said:
I think this gets to the point of wisdom on when to intervene and when we shouldn’t. Had we bombed Assad at the time, like President Obama wanted, and like Hillary Clinton wanted and many Republicans wanted, I think ISIS would be in Damascus today. I think ISIS would be in charge of Syria had we bombed Assad.
Sometimes both sides of the civil war are evil, and sometimes intervention sometimes makes us less safe. This is real the debate we have to have in the Middle East.
Every time we have toppled a secular dictator, we have gotten chaos, the rise of radical Islam, and we’re more at risk. So, I think we need to think before we act, and know most interventions, if not a lot of them in the Middle East, have actually backfired on us.
There are plenty of issues on which Rand Paul is wrong. He is not so steadily anti-war as his father, former congressman and 2012 presidential contender Ron Paul, or as “old-right” Republicans like North Carolina Congressman Walter Jones Jr.
There are plenty of things that Paul has said and done that merit skepticism, and opposition.
But the senator—and his dissenting views with regard to foreign policy—belonged on the main stage Wednesday night. Indeed, it was Rand Paul, not Donald Trump, who made Wednesday night’s gathering of Republican presidential contenders a debate. "
Thanks to John Nichols, The Nation’s Washington correspondent.