By The People

There are fundamental flaws in how American government operates today,
contrary to the Constitution and the vision of a representative republican form of governance.
I intend doing something about it: by educating and informing others who
are not even aware of the dangers.

Tuesday, October 25, 2016

Americans Don't Need to Vote, or Dead People Will Vote For Americans

Reports of voting machine fraud are being reported in multiple voting districts in several states.Notably, Texas, which has early voting, has been having electronic machine votes switched from Trump to Clinton. The Polling officials have been instructed to use the phrase 'Calibration Error' to explain why the machines are incorrectly tallying votes. Experts far and wide are beginning to speak-up:  in digital machines, there is no such thing as 'Calibration' and it follows directly that there can be no 'Error':  the machines have been programmed to switch the vote. Then again all of this has been known since the Bush/Gore Election fiasco.

It is an established fact that after the machine is programmed and secured the machine can be reprogrammed both locally and remotely in several ways. Testimony before congress by various experts confirmed that this is possibly and after inspecting several of the different makes of machines the experts agreed the machines programming had been modified. When state and local officials in Florida looked into the reports it was decided to ask the general programming population if anyone could write such a program. It was determined when several amateur programmers came forward with demonstration programs, that rigging the machines was child's play. after all was said and done; testimony, different sample programs, demonstrations of rigging any vote in any direction or swinging it to any candidate, Congressional Testimony, State Testimony and Demonstrations, NOTHING WAS DONE. NOTHING WAS DONE!

According to a recent report by the Pew Center the American voter registration system is in dire need of an upgrade or changed to something that is not susceptible to rigging.

Approximately 24 million—one of every eight—voter registrations in the United States are no longer valid or are significantly inaccurate.

More than 1.8 million deceased individuals are listed as voters.

Approximately 2.75 million people have registrations in more than one state.

So severe is the problem of Election Fraud The United Nations has been petitioned. American citizens concerned about Democratic election fraud and voter suppression have launched a petition to the UN requesting emergency electoral monitoring and supervision for the remainder of the 2016 presidential election cycle.

A letter that will be delivered with the petition to the UN Electoral Assistance Division (EAD) says that the integrity of the electoral process in the US has been compromised in order to place an undemocratically chosen candidate in power, and points out the massive discrepancies between exit polls and official results – more than enough to have foreign elections declared fraudulent.

Upon receipt of the petition, the EAD will be legally obliged to acknowledge and investigate the allegations.  With lawsuits, university studies, hacked documents, and now the United Nations hounding Clinton, no wonder Bernie Sanders is quietly confident of winning the contested Democratic convention in Philadelphia.

The letter reads:

'We the people of the United States of America are officially requesting the United Nations to monitor our remaining 2016 presidential election. So far we have seen evidence of massive election fraud all across the country, which gives us reason to believe that the fraud will continue. Our president Barack Obama and the U.S. State Department have done nothing about the obvious rigging of our elections, which gives us reasonable suspicion that our government and the integrity of our electoral process has been compromised in order to place their chosen candidate in power against the will of the American people.

The U.S. State Dept. says that a discrepancy in exit polls of more than 2% indicates fraud, we have had discrepancies above that margin in at least 16 of the state primaries all the way up to a discrepancy of 23%. These discrepancies have only happened in one of our political parties and they have all been in favor of one candidate. On top of the exit poll discrepancies there has been reports of ballots cast in the names of deceased citizens, patients of mental hospitals, and elderly people with dementia. There has been reports of registration purging, switching of party affiliations, vote flipping, and massive voter suppression. Not to mention the millions of voters who have not been allowed to vote because they do not claim any party affiliation. Multiple major universities have calculated that in order to get our current results without election fraud, the odds would be 1 in 70 billion.

This level of election fraud is usually only done covertly and in 3rd world countries, now it’s being done openly and blatantly in the United States. Our democracy is being stolen and we very well maybe on the brink of a dictatorship, we can no longer trust our government and we need help from the outside. So we are respectively requesting the U.N. to step in and assess the integrity of our electoral process. We also request that you review the apparent fraud of our current results and ensure credibility and transparency moving forward. We feel that your help is imperative to avoid an inevitable major conflict in the U.S. due to corruption in our government.'

According to the UN Electoral Assistance Division, the premise of their work is Article 21 (3) of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which says: “The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government; this will shall be expressed in periodic and genuine elections.”

Is the will of the people forming the basis of the authority of government in the United States being enforced?  One hundred years ago people were hung by the neck for election fraud. 

HILLARY IS RIGGING THE ELECTION!  Surprised?  You shouldn’t be. Hillary is tied to the one company that has the power to sway this entire election – Smartmatic owned by George Soros. Smartmatic manufactures the voting machines that will be used this November. Yes, George Soros, the Wanted Dead Or Alive billionaire  CROOK who is one of Hillary’s biggest donors. The VOTING MACHINES WILL BE USED IN THESE 16 CRUCIAL STATES:

District of Columbia
New Jersey

RIGGING THIS ELECTION IS THE ONLY CHANCE SHE HAS!  How does Hillary expect to be President when the entire population refuses to believe she won the election honestly?

Democrats claim it is impossible to determine the full extent of voter fraud in the country. The liberal views voter fraud as if it's a mythical creature that has rare "sightings" every now and then. Election Fraud and Voter Fraud is pervasive:  everywhere.

As with so many other issues of dishonest activity by Government Officials, Election Fraud and Voter Fraud, despite the chest pounding and swearing of oaths, continues and nothing has been done. What are the penalties for committing voter fraud?  Falsely claiming to be a citizen on a voter registration form is a felony that violates three different federal statutes. Voting by a non-citizen under 18 U.S.C. §611 is a strict liability offense. In other words, it “does not require proof that the offender was aware that citizenship is a prerequisite to voting.” The punishment for violating 18 U.S.C. §611 involves a fine and prison time that is up to a year. The same is true for those who violate 18 U.S. Code § 594, which makes it a felony to engage in voter intimidation. Few, if any, are being prosecuted for the Felonies they commit.

Sources of Information:

Friday, October 21, 2016

Fuddy's Final Payment or Another One Bites the Dust

It is, without a doubt, amazing just how many people surrounding or opposing the 
person occupying the White House, William Jefferson Clinton, and Hillary Rodham 
Clinton have a serious tendency to become dead. Found suicided and fatal plane 
crashes account for many of the deaths. Even though it is a dated article, it is worth 
thinking about.

"Obama Birth Certificate Shocker: Evidence that Deceased Hawaii Health Director 
Loretta Fuddy Was Paid Off?
by DEAN GARRISON — MAY 8, 2014, Freedom Outpost

Loretta Fuddy was the Health Director responsible for approving and releasing the 
"Certificate of Live Birth" that was sent to Barack Obama. Since that time, many 
have come to the conclusion that this birth record is a forgery. Fuddy died in 
December under bizarre circumstances.

As you may recall, Loretta Fuddy was the sole fatality in a Hawaiian plane crash 
late in 2013. The media narrative of those events quickly fell apart:

In the irony to end all ironies, the L.A. Times published an article entitled Hawaii plane crash fuels Obama 'birther' theories, on December 12th, and within the context of that article may have spilled the beans on why "birthers" should be questioning this story.

On the 13th I reported that Loretta Fuddy was the woman who was responsible for the release of Barack Obama's long-form Hawaii birth certificate. [Editor's Note: this was not accurately stated in my original article. A birth certificate and "Certificate of Live Birth" are not the same.] Of the 9 people on the Cessna that crash landed in open water she was the only one who died. Is it coincidence?

The L.A. Times reports:

Fuddy, 65, was among nine people in a Cessna that crashed into the ocean Wednesday, 
shortly after leaving Kalaupapa Airport on the island of Molokai about 3:15 p.m. The eight others on the plane, including the pilot, were rescued, but Fuddy " remained in the fuselage of the plane," Honolulu Fire Capt. Terry Seelig told KHON-TV. "It's always a difficult situation when you're not able to get everybody out."

Why is this paragraph important?

Simply because it contradicts everything that we have been told.

We were told two things specifically that Terry Seelig has proclaimed to be incorrect.

We were told that Fuddy held hands with her deputy Keith Yamamoto in her final moments. We even have a priest on record who corroborates that account. We were led to believe that due to a variety of circumstances that this plane may never be recovered.
Both of the above accounts come from an Associated Press contributed article. Here are the key quotes that directly contradict the report of Fire Captain Terry Seelig as quoted in the Los Angeles Times.

In the final moments of her life, Hawaii Health Director Loretta Fuddy clung to the hand of her deputy after a small plane taking them back to Honolulu crashed in the ocean off the island of Molokai.

Fuddy, who gained notoriety in 2011 for her role in making President Barack Obama's 
birth certificate public, was one of nine people onboard the flight that went down Wednesday. She was the only one who died.

In the water, Fuddy held hands with deputy director Keith Yamamoto as he tried to help her relax, said the Rev. Patrick Killilea, who consoled Yamamoto after the ordeal.

"He recounted how he said he helped Loretta into her life jacket and he held her hand for some time," the priest said. "They were all floating together and she let go and there was no response from her."

Schuman said he did not yet know why the engine failed because he has not been able to see the plane. The aircraft had no previous problems, he said.

Federal Aviation Administration spokesman Ian Gregor said investigators planned to speak with the pilot, whose name was not released, and some passengers about the crash as they seek more details.

However, the location of the wreckage, combined with wind and wave conditions, likely means it won't be recovered, said NTSB spokesman Eric Weiss. It seems that the fire chief didn't receive the "Fuddy talking points."

Now some more bizarre allegations are circulating.

Could it be that Loretta Fuddy was paid for producing a "birth certificate" that never existed? reports:

Since her death, portions related to Loretta Fuddy in the sealed affidavit filed in U.S. Federal Court have been made public. Of particular interest are her financial reports detailing her income and expenses in 2011 and 2012. Each report is filed in January for the previous year.

According to Mr. Vogt, a large and as yet unanswered income disparity was found between the two reports. In short, during her first year as Hawaii's Director of Health, which is also the time she authenticated Obama's COLB, Ms. Fuddy's gross income was reportedly less than $100,000. Nonetheless, her financials show that she apparently paid down her mortgage and decreased her liabilities by at least $50,000 and perhaps as much as $75,000 more than what she grossed that year. Where did that money come from? While there may well be a legitimate explanation for this disparity, it was not disclosed on the financial forms she filed with the Hawaii State Ethics Commission.
If I understand this correctly, the woman made less than $100,000 yet managed to pay down her mortgage by well over $100,000 in a single year. For example, it sounds as if she could have made $90,000 and paid $140,000 toward her mortgage. How does that happen? That money came from somewhere. Could it be legitimate? Absolutely. But it doesn't look good.

The Mr. Vogt who is referenced above is Doug Vogt who brought some attention to Fuddy's financials in an interview just one week before her death. Just one week? That seems to be a little more than coincidental.

You may recall that Tim Adams, a Hawaii Elections official, submitted a sworn affidavit of his own in 2011. His claim is that no Hawaii birth certificate ever existed:

In a sworn affidavit dated and witnessed on January 20, 2011,  Adams states, "Senior 
officers in the City and County of Honolulu Elections Division told me on multiple 
occasions that no Hawaii long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate existed 
for Senator Obama in the Hawaii Department of Health and there was no record that 
any such document had ever been on file in the Hawaii Department of Health or any 
other branch or department of the Hawaii government."

So let's summarize what we know to be true at this point:

A Hawaii government official swears that no Hawaii long-form birth certificate ever existed.

Loretta Fuddy issues a "certificate of live birth" (not to be confused with an official birth certificate which would include extras like foot prints).

Loretta Fuddy allegedly came into some extra money that she applied to her mortgage.

Doug Vogt revealed that Fuddy came into some extra money in a radio interview.

A week later Fuddy is dead and the media totally botches the story.

What conclusion are we supposed to come to?

Why is it that some people who appear to have vital information about Barack Obama 
end up dead?

Maybe it is just another one of those astounding coincidences that seem to happen 
over and over with big name politicians."
ER: Montgomery Sibley Updates Obama ID Fraud; Fuddy Paid $50K
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Fuddy Backgrounder

'Fuddy, was a member of the Subud Cult of Indonesia, she also was in Washington State at the same time the Dunham Family lived there, she worked for the Subud Cult HQs in Washington State at the time Ann Dunham was attending her first year of College at Washington State, it is possible that she met Fuddy there and also R.M. Mohammad (Pak) Subud.  You need to research and look at the photo's of Subud and Obama then tell me who's your daddy, for it damn sure was not Obama Sr, nor Frank Marshall Davis, with that said, he is not half Black, he is have Indonesian and half White, it is a known fact that Ann Dunham was a promiscuous young woman, and there in no doubt that she has been with Blacks the theory goes that she really did not know who the father was and therefore with the hopes it was a Black Man she was arranged with Frank Marshall Davis's help to arrange a mutual arrangement with Obama Sr. (for him it was a win, win situation) they went to Kenya where she gave birth in the hopes that Barry resembled the Obama's and the plan was to leave him there to grow up but when he was born the Obama Family knew right away that he was not related to the Obama Clan and therefore refused to raise him and that is why she returned within a week of his birth back to Hawaii and then back to Washington State with a 2 week old baby. LOOK IT UP. [A little background is in order]

Okay, a little info on Loretta Fuddy, she was a member of the Subud Cult of Indonesia founded by R.M. Mohammad (Pac) Subud, a very interesting man if you read up on him. At the time the Dunham Family lived in Washington State , this was at... the time Ann Dunham started college at Washington State (NOT HAWAII) Ann Dunham was known to frequent the Coffee Houses, was promiscuous was noted as saying in High School I don't have to be married to have a baby to one of her classmates. She was known to run in Socialist/Communist Circles at Washington State and the Black Panthers, and the newly formed Nation of Islam in Washington State. Is it possible that there was a meeting between Fuddy and Ann Dunham which led to a Meeting and affair with R.M. Muhammad (Pac) Subud, the leader of the Subud Cult which is World Wide, he would have been 60 at the time. Shortly after is when the Dunham Family packed up bag and baggage and moved to Hawaii the mother leaving a position as bank vice president and taking on a job once in Hawaii as a teller in a bank, LARGE PAY CUT WHY?? If what I am purposing is in fact true, Obama is not half Black, he is half Indonesian and half White, but Ann Dunham had no idea who the father was, in steps Frank Marshall Davis who set up the arrangement with Obama Sr. as a go-between for the Dunham Family not knowing who the father was of Ann Dunham's baby. Hoping that it was a Black since she was known to go that way, Obama Sr. decided to help since it would be a win, win for him within the standings of the Kenyan way, the more wives the higher your standing in the community. it is recorded from various people who knew Obama Sr. in Hawaii that they never seen Obama Sr. with Ann Dunham in public or in any other place, this was noted by two of Obama Sr's closest friends one White, the other Hawaiian. The hopes were that the baby was of half  Black, and the plan originally was if that was true, when born he was going to be left in Kenya to grow up with the Obama Family, but when born it was noted that he was not even close to resembling Obama Sr., so the family refused to take him, therefore Ann Dunham after Barry was a week old flew back to Hawaii and a week later she and Barry flew to Washington State and she re-enrolled in college at Washington State, she only attended college in Hawaii during her pregnancy, and then again later when she returned and me Lolo Soetoro who she married and he adopted Barry, and he was also Indonesian but a nice guy, that is why Ann Dunham divorced him because he was more of a man of the earth where she was radical, none the less while in Indonesia she worked at a school which she hired members of the Subud Cult as teachers. It is said that a swab was taken of a glass that Barry drank out of in England when he was a Senator, and that the swab proved that he was not related to Ann Dunham's Mother and Father, therefore is it possible that Ann Dunham was not their child but adopted or obtained another way since both were Communists, and atheists and there has never been a marriage license produced to show that they were married. Loretta Fuddy's Subud name was Deliana Fuddy. For the speculation to be true, one must assume that in 1960, Subud and Stanley Ann Dunham met, somewhere, and he, got her, pregnant thus leading to a child who would, after several name changes…Barack Hussein Obama, Barack Obama, Barry Obama, Steven Dunham , Barry Soetoro and the name first noticed back in 2011 regarding an application for a passport extension filed by Stanley Ann Soetoro in 1968.

THAT name was found in the section for either including or exempting a child’s name from the passport and the name she placed THERE before crossing it out was, Barack Hussein Obama (Soebarkah)

Soebarkah, is has been suggested, is a combination name Soe (from Soetoro, Obama’s “adoptive” father) Bar (from the Islamic Aramaic meaning, SON) and Kah (which roughly translates from Indonesian as “was” or, in some cases, in names is used to denote a QUESTION regarding “WHO?”) It has also been suggested “Soebarkah” was a name provided by the Subud cult as Loretta Fuddy went by the Subud name of “Deliana” FuddyAt some point before traveling to Indonesia, she met and was impregnated BY…Subud…NOT by Obama Sr. which would explain why Obama Sr. was never a part of Obama JR.’s life.

Could Subud had fathered a child (Soebarkah) by someone other than his wife? Subud, before his “spiritual epiphany” was a Muslim and we are all aware of the monogamous fidelity of that ideology not to mention the dubious history of such strength of character in cult leaders…Especially in those who feel kinship with the Almighty.Since the teenage Dunham was sexually promiscuous anyway…Simply claim the child wasn’t HIS and she would then assume it belonged to someone ELSE…In this case…Obama Sr.

However, several years later, Dunham-Obama would have had to notice that her son looked nothing like the man she THOUGHT was the father and, the OTHER man she knew she had been with at the same time was…Subud…Living in Indonesia. Is there any better explanation for why this young woman, with no ties to that country, would go to live there?

That would also explain how Barack Hussein Obama, adopted IN Indonesia by the 
INDONESIAN LOLO SOETORO, was able to attend school IN Indonesia as his records 
indicated, with Indonesian citizenship.

He was Indonesian all along. It would also account for the attempted name inclusion on the passport extension application with Soebarkah, in parentheses, then crossed out.Such a theory, speculative, as we must speculate where no verifiable evidence is available, also would go a long ways toward covering the whole fraudulent birth certificate issue as a child, born in Kenya, would not HAVE a Hawaiian birth certificate and who better to “authenticate” the forged certificate that Loretta…”DELIANA” Fuddy…A woman who WAS the CHAIRWOMAN OF SUBUD USA FROM 2006 UNTIL 2008 IN SEATTLE??? A woman who may…MAY…Have known the TRUTH regarding the “son” of Stanley Ann Dunham-Obama-Soetoro. She being the one to produce the long version of the Birth Certificate that has been proven by multiple experts to be a forgery, and since she did a poor job in preparing the document that was proven fake and now would be under the microscope on why she would do such a thing had to disappear, what better way, plane crash not so great as to kill all on board but just one DELIANA FUDDY.'
by De Oppresso Liber


Monday, October 17, 2016

Who Needs The Truth When You Have Mockingbird?

US Govt Just Legalized Operation Mockingbird — FBI Can Now Impersonate the Media

Claire Bernish 

"FBI agents conducting undercover investigations have now been given the green light to impersonate journalists, the Justice Department determined last week — effectively legalizing the government’s most notorious propaganda program, Operation Mockingbird.

Last Thursday, the Department of Justice Office of Inspector General published what’s become the subject of outrage for journalists, civil and constitutional rights advocates, and legal experts  — “A Review of the FBI’s Impersonation of a Journalist in a Criminal Investigation.”

Allowing agents to infiltrate media organizations for any reason threatens to utterly undermine public trust, kill the very concept of journalistic integrity, and throttle the flow of information from sources and whistleblowers concerned with the legitimacy of journalists they contact.

As shocking as the finding sounds, it only validates the practice — in fact, the report centers around a case from 2007 in which an FBI agent pretended to be an Associated Press journalist to identify an elusive suspect online. At the time, the FBI “did not prohibit agents from impersonating journalists or from posing as a member of a news organization,” the report states.

But even the ubiquitous, mainstream AP — whose outlet became an unwitting pawn for the agency — sharply criticized the DOJ’s announcement.

“The Associated Press is deeply disappointed by the Inspector General’s findings, which effectively condone the FBI’s impersonation of an AP journalist in 2007,” Associated Press Vice President Paul Colford said in a statement cited by US News. “Such action compromises the ability of a free press to gather the news safely and effectively and raises serious constitutional concerns.”

In 2007, a high school student near Seattle emailed a series of bomb threats to his school, but his use of proxy servers thwarted police efforts to learn his identity — so they asked for assistance from the FBI’s Northwest Cybercrime Task Force.

Agents devised a plan, and, as the Intercept summarized, “An undercover agent sent the student email impersonating an editor for the Associated Press. The email included links to a fake news site designed to look like the Seattle Times.”

When the student followed the links, malware revealing his actual location installed itself.

It wasn’t until an ACLU technologist accidentally discovered copies of the bogus news stories in 2014 — buried in pages the Electronic Frontier Foundation obtained from the FBI via a Freedom of Information Act request in 2011 — that the plot to pose as journalists came to light, generating massive controversy and consternation.

Furthering the contempt, FBI Director James Comey penned a letter to the editor of the New York Times defending the agency’s impersonation, dismissively stating “we do use deception at times to catch crooks, but we are acting responsibly and legally.”

The Associated Press and Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press didn’t believe either the veracity or legality of Comey’s statement, and sued the FBI to disclose documents relating to the practice — ultimately obtaining a redacted memo in which the agency acknowledged the agents violated the FBI’s own guidelines. However, the memo also stated that violation, under the circumstances, was not “unreasonable.”

A review was launched by the OIG, but Thursday’s conclusion simply confirmed the FBI’s previous finding it had done nothing wrong — and may proceed with future journalistic deception.

In June this year, the FBI firmed up its rules for when an agent can pretend to be a journalist — but the added rules haven’t quelled the ire.

As long as agents receive approval from the head of the FBI field office, the Undercover Review Committee, and the deputy director of the FBI — who then must meet with the deputy attorney general — they are free to pose as journalists during undercover investigations.

“We believe the new interim policy on undercover activities that involve FBI employees posing as members of the news media is a significant improvement to FBI policies that existed,” states the inspector general.

But no one outside the FBI or DOJ’s Office of Inspector General who grasps the grievous threat to free speech and press — or the potential slippery slope law enforcement co-opting the media represents — agrees anything short of an abolishment on the practice could be acceptable.

“The FBI guidelines adopted in 2016 in response to this incident still permit the FBI to impersonate news organizations and other third parties without their consent in certain cases, and fail to address the host of other dangers associated with FBI hacking,” Neema Singh Guliani, ACLU legislative counsel, said in a statement cited by US News.

“The Reporters Committee for the Freedom of the Press is deeply troubled by today’s disclosure,” David Boardman, RCFP steering committee chairman, wrote in a statement last Thursday, “that the FBI believes that there is a place in this country for federal agents to impersonate journalists. Such a policy can seriously damage the public’s trust in its free press and the ability of journalists to hold government accountable. We urge the Justice Department to take seriously the need for reform and the importance of protecting the integrity of the newsgathering process.”

Anyone with cursory knowledge of the U.S. government’s nefarious programs to control its citizenry will undoubtedly see similarities between the FBI’s fake journalism plot and the post-World War II CIA propaganda campaign, Operation Mockingbird.

To ensure support for its operations and views, the CIA clandestinely recruited American journalists and media outlets, funded the creation of student and cultural organizations, launched purely propaganda-based print media, and, ultimately, worked its way into political campaigns and employed similar methods abroad.

Mainstream outlets like the New York Times, the Washington Post, CBS, and many others, actively and willingly disseminated propaganda disguised as news — through suppression, censorship, and selective focus, etc. — in the interest of the government.

Mockingbird covertly influenced national opinion for years, nefariously planting the CIA’s narrative on the unwitting collective public mind before finally being at least partially exposed over a decade later. It wasn’t until a congressional investigation in 1975 the putative full extent of the program was revealed. Although the CIA claimed it would no longer recruit journalists and media organizations into its folds, Mockingbird has oft been rumored never to have stopped.

Besides the revelations in this article concerning the FBI, documents revealed the government actively tried to influence public thought about Wikileaks and its founder, Julian Assange, in 2011.

It would seem Mockingbird endures to this day — and whatever premise the government claims as reason to become the American media — the public remains, for the large part, its oblivious, captive audience.