By The People

There are fundamental flaws in how American government operates today,
contrary to the Constitution and the vision of a representative republican form of governance.
I intend doing something about it: by educating and informing others who
are not even aware of the dangers.

Saturday, August 27, 2016

Up Is Down Left Is Right, or Government Is Good, Fight! Fight! Fight!

Anna Brown's kangaroo Tribunal (an unlawful court held by a group of people in order to try someone regarded, especially without good evidence, as guilty of violating the Law) in Portland Oregon is using every underhanded tactic to convict the defendants before the trial. As the Esteemed Readers that have been following the proceedings of the Bundy/Hammond Malheur Wildlife Refuge Protest already know, Ridiculous charges, false allegations, and a parody of due process are only the beginning efforts of this unlawful Legal charade. The Latest effort of Public Policy Administrator Brown and the U.S. Prosecuting Attorney has placed every potential witness of the protest under the cloud of possible arrest on the same false charges and more. The Administrative Legal Tribunal has announced that anyone who actually went to the Malheur Wildlife Refuge is an unindicted co-conspirator

An unindicted co-conspirator, or unindicted conspirator, is a person or entity that is alleged in an indictment to have engaged in conspiracy, but who is not charged in the same indictment; but, once identified, may have alleged actions be declared as somehow illegal and charges brought in a different indictment. This type of pre-indictment labeling of course colors or taints every potential witness as somehow participating the illegal activities that led to the  allegations and indictment of charges. To the mind of the potential witness, this type of Labeling can only place every witness in jeopardy of being indicted. In the eyes of the prosecuting Attorney, all witnesses for the defense are potential targets for new indictments based on skewed allegations and false charges. 

"The legal term "unindicted co-conspirator," or unindicted conspirator, is a person or entity that is alleged in an indictment to have engaged in conspiracy, but who is not charged in the same indictment. Prosecutors choose to name persons as unindicted 
co-conspirators for a variety of reasons including grants of immunity, pragmatic 
considerations, and evidentiary concerns.

The United States Attorneys' Manual generally recommends against naming unindicted 
co-conspirators, although their use is not generally prohibited by law or policy.[1] 
Some commentators have raised due process concerns over the use of unindicted 
co-conspirators.[2] Although there have been few cases on the subject, the Fifth 
Circuit Court of Appeals addressed these concerns in United States v. Briggs.[3]

The term unindicted co-conspirator was familiarized in 1974 when then president Richard 
Nixon was named as an unindicted co-conspirator in indictments stemming from the 
Watergate Investigation. Nixon was not indicted due to concerns about whether the 
United States Constitution allowed the indictment of a sitting President (see Executive 


1. United States Attorneys' Manual, 9-11.130, available at (2008)

2. See Ira P. Robbins, Guilty without Charge: Assessing the Due Process Rights of 
Unindicted Co-Conspirators, 2004 Fed. Cts. L. Rev. 1 (2004)

3. 514 F.2d 794 (5th Cir. 1975).

From Wikipedia"

There is no Justice in any of this activity, it is meant to sway public opinion against anyone charged, or intimidate anyone willing to bare witness to the actions of the protesters and in the process of witness leave themselves open to possible charges. The ultimate goal of all of this activity is to force landowners off their land and to lay claim to public property so those in power can reap financial reward by selling something that does not belong to them. Gold, Uranium, Clinton, Uranium One, "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men (women) are almost always bad men (women)." 

There Are No Such Things As Constitutional Rights

You have no constitutional rights and never did. If you thought that you did, then you need to be educated. Let's examine the definitions.

Thomas Jefferson Viewed the Constitution as a Contract Between the States

" Where did D.C. come from? The parties to the contract, known as the Constitution for the United States of America, are the individual states. Neither the federal government, nor the people, as comprising one nation, are a party to the agreement between the several States. Be sure to research how the Federal Corporation is usurping the powers of the people AND the states!"

The Declaration of Independence states:  "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --"

"“The several states composing the United States of America are not united on the principle of unlimited submission to their general government; but…by a compact under the style and title of a Constitution for the United States, and of amendments thereto, they constituted a general government for special purposes [and] delegated to that government certain definite powers,…and…whensoever the general government assumes undelegated powers, its acts are unauthoritative, void, and of no force…To this compact each state acceded as a state, and is an integral party, its co-states forming, as to itself, the other party…”"

"“A Law repugnant to the Constitution is void.” With these words written by Chief Justice Marshall, the Supreme Court for the first time declared unconstitutional a law passed by Congress and signed by the President. Nothing in the Constitution gave the Court this specific power. Marshall, however, believed that the Supreme Court should have a role equal to those of the other two branches of government."

Your unalienable rights are neither granted by the government nor are they granted by a contract (The Constitution), they are "something integral with a whole" part of simply being (they are natural birthrights), which by agreement of the contract, are NOT to be INFRINGED by the government. Therefore ALL FEDERAL STATUTES that are INFRINGEMENTS, CONVERSIONS, or USURPATIONS of your UNALIENABLE RIGHTS are repugnant to the Constitution and are NULL and VOID.

So why do We the People obey these Statutes?  It is the deliberate misrepresentation of these statutes as though they are Laws that lead the people to consent by their ignorance and silence. Are the threats of force, loss of Liberty, confiscation of property, or the conversion of unalienable rights into privileges, which are used by the U.S. government the deciding factor in deciding whether the people or the contracted government will ultimately protect those unalienable rights?


Saturday, August 20, 2016

It Can Happen Here, and Now It May Be Too Late

When are Americans going to wake up and realize that our country has been infiltrated and taken over by a group of foreigners (A foreign-owned for profit Corporation - (the UNITED STATES) who wants to place this country under martial law. Once the roundup of people begins and people are on the way to the FEMA Detention Camps, it will be too late to take back the country.

Once Martial Law is declared by the Fraud Occupying the White House, a completely different set of Laws go into effect. The  U.S. Congress is dissolved, the Supreme Court is dissolved, and all that remains is the Fraud Occupying the White House and the NDRP, NDAA, Patriot Act, and Obama's private army, Homeland Security and the TSA. 

If you think or believe for just one moment these treasonous people care even a little about the People of the united States of America, you are dead wrong and incorrect. The Esteemed Readers Should prepare right now for the worst. Fix America has been warning Americans for the last 8 years that the Declaration of Martial Law is just around the corner. 

There is no Corner remaining.


Please scroll down for video

President Obama signed an executive order that could potentially give him the power to institute martial law in the United States in times of peace or during a national threat.

The National Defense Resources Preparedness Executive Order will give Obama power over “resources and services needed to support such plans and programs.”

Many Americans were shocked to find out that this order gives the president practically unlimited power over US citizens and their property. All in the name of national security of course.


In the order it states, “in the event of a potential threat to the security of the United States actions are necessary to ensure the availability of adequate resources and production capability, including services and critical technology, for national defense requirements.”

According to a White House press release, the US “must have an industrial and technological base capable of meeting national defense requirements and capable of contributing to the technological superiority of its national defense equipment.”

Here is the list:<li>Obama Administration uses IRS to target conservative, Christian and pro-Israel organizations, donors, and citizens.</li><li>In an unprecedented attack on the First Amendment, the Obama Justice Department ordered criminal25 Violations of Law By President Obama and His Administration If you’d been following the news from California following Tuesday’s Anaheim riots spurred by a protest of a nonexistent police force continuum that lead to two fatal shootings of suspects in the Southern California city, chances are you haven’tShocking: Is California's Anaheim Under Martial Law?
In the order the Secretary of Agriculture can allocate material such as “food resources, livestock resources, and the distribution of farm equipment and commercial fertilizer.”

The same goes for all forms of energy, health resources, transportation, and even water resources.

According to the White House press release the purpose is to “delegate authorities and addresses national defense resource policies and programs under the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended (the “Act”).”

The sneaky tactics couldn’t have come at a worst time, especially after the newly signed HR 347 or the “Trespass bill” and even more terrifying the National Defense Authorization Act that allows the president to detain and torture American citizens without due process.

Although many see this as another power grab by the Obama administration this isn’t the first time that a US president has signed an executive order such as this.

His new motion is just an update to executive orders signed in 1994 by President Clinton, which invoke similar powers in a time of crisis.

Even Clinton’s EO 12919 was an amendment to EO 10789 which was issued by the Eisenhower administration back in 1958.

Therefore lawyers claim that this Executive Order wouldn’t grant the president authority he didn’t have before signing it.

William A. Jacobson, an associate clinical professor at Cornell Law School said to, “If someone wants to make the argument that this is an expansion of presidential powers, then do so based on actual language.”

“There is enough that Obama actually does wrong without creating claims which do not hold up to scrutiny,” Jacobson added.

But that’s exactly the language of this order that terrified too many of those who bothered to read it in full.

Even if the president never uses this power, the fact that he has such unlimited authority over Americans and their property doesn’t sound comforting to people assuming they live in the land of free.
Think Jade Helm's Bad? Wait Till You Hear About This Police Force Made on the Heels of JadeHelm

For those who think this is “nothing to worry about”, watch this video of the equipment SECRETLY BEING TRANSPORTED THRU CANADA ( via )!

JADE HELM: Train with Massive Military Equipment Headed for West Coast from Canada""

Related Links: