How to Plant The Seeds of Destruction: or The Corporate Logic of Insanity Part 3A

From another point of view it follows that:

From a different (but-true-never-the-less) legal point of US Legal History it is recorded that:

U.S. Law is Private Merchant Law, leaving the people as Surety and Debtor on the bankruptcy.

Law is contract, universally and in the U.S., so we must follow the progression of contractual agreements which constitute the underlying U.S. Law. (this article cannot address all individual laws and cases or you would not have time in a life to review it, even though ignorance of the millions of laws, statutes, codes, etc… is no excuse in Private Admiralty Jurisdictions.)

In basically chronological order, the following progression of contracts, and an interpretation of them follows:

The USA, a corporation of the English Crown (this may actually be The Crown Temple in London;  however that is a nightmare to unscramble and understand: if any of the Esteemed Readers have researched this issue please contact the Fix America moderator with source information), is bankrupt, and has been since at least 1788. The Articles of Confederation states in Article 12:  “All bills of credit emitted, monies borrowed, and debts contracted by, or under the authority of Congress, before the assembling of the United States, in pursuance of the present confederation, shall be deemed as considered a charge against the United States, for payment and satisfaction whereof the said United States, and the public faith are hereby solemnly pledged.” The “Founding Fathers,” as constitutors, acknowledged and reorganized the debt in the US Constitution 1787, Article VI, hence “constitution.” Bankruptcy occurred on January 1, 1788 based on 21 loans that the United States of America received from the King of England dating from February 28, 1778 through July 5, 1782, the repayment of which had been ratified by Congress on January 22, 1783. 

The United States Bank, created in 1791, was a private bank, with 18,000 of 25,000 shares owned by England.

No de jure, constitutional Congress has existed since March 27, 1861 when seven (7) Southern States walked out of Congress leaving Congress without a quorum for adjourning and therefore ending sine die. That which is called “Congress” today assembles and acts under the authority of the President acting in capacity of being Commander-In-Chief of the Armed Forces, under emergency war-powers rule, i.e. “law of necessity,” i.e. no law (see 12 Stat 319, which has never been repealed and exists in Title 50 USC §§ 212, 213, 215, Appendix 16, 26 CFR Chapter 1 § 303.1-6(a), and 31 CFR Chapter 5 § 500.701 Penalties).

Since the above-referenced date, March 27, 1861, Americans have been under Fascist rule via presidential executive order under the aforementioned Emergency War Powers, 12 USC 95 a, b. Every “citizen of the United States” is now “legally” established as an “enemy” via the Amendatory Act of March 9, 1933, 48 Stat. 1, amending Trading With Enemy Act of October 6, 1917, H.R. 4960, Public Law No. 91.

December 6th, 1865, the 14th Amendment was proclaimed as ratified (even though it never properly was, see below). The 14th amendment, which is private Roman Catholic Ecclesiastical Trust Law, constitutes a constructive, cestui que trust, a public charitable trust, “PCT,” that was expressly designed to bring every corporate franchise artificial person called a “citizen of the United States” into an inseparable merging with the government until the two are united (with the power inhering in the government, not the people). A cestui que trust is fundamentally different from a regular trust, which is express in nature and consists of a contractual indenture involving three (3) parties: Grantor (Creator or Trustor), Trustee, and Beneficiaries. In an express trust, legal ownership is transferred by written contract between Grantor and Trustee in which the Grantor surrenders ownership of property to the legal person, the Trust, to be managed by the Trustee on behalf of those who are to benefit from the arrangement, the Beneficiaries. 

A cestui que trust, on the other hand, differs from an express trust in several crucial ways:

a. It is not formed by express contract, i.e. overt agreement expressed in writing, but by legal construction, i.e. fiat.

b. A cestui que trust has no Grantor, but, being a constructive trust created by operation of law, i.e. by make-believe, has only co-trustees and co-beneficiaries. The co-trustees are the parties with the duties for managing property for the “public good,” i.e. for the benefit of those designated as co-beneficiaries.

The Legislative Act of February 21, 1871, Forty-first Congress, Session III, Chapter 62, page 419, chartered a Federal company entitled “United States,” a/k/a “US Inc.,” a “Commercial Agency” originally designated as “Washington, D.C.,” in accordance with the so-called 14th Amendment, which the record indicates was never ratified (see Utah Supreme Court Cases, Dyett v Turner, (1968) 439 P2d 266, 267; State v Phillips, (1975) 540 P 2d 936; as well as Coleman v. Miller, 307 U.S. 448, 59 S. Ct. 972; 28 Tulane Law Review, 22; 11 South Carolina Law Quarterly 484; Congressional Record, June 13, 1967, pp. 15641-15646). A “citizen of the United States” is a civilly dead entity operating as a co-trustee and co-beneficiary of the PCT, the constructive, cestui que trust of US Inc. under the 14th Amendment, which upholds the debt of the USA and US Inc. in Section 4.

In conformity with the above-referenced creation of United States (1871) and the 14th Amendment,  the Legislature of each State created a limited-liability corporation, chartered in a private, military, international, commercial, admiralty/maritime jurisdiction, entitled “STATE OF…” e.g. “STATE OF CALIFORNIA,”  as evidenced by, inter alia, the change in the seal and the creation of a new constitution, e.g. Constitution of the State of California (1879), concerning which,  re California:

a. A general partnership agreement, hereinafter  “General Partnership,” exists between the California Republic (1849), and STATE OF CALIFORNIA (1879), with STATE OF CALIFORNIA acting as governmental controller.

b. STATE OF CALIFORNIA now acts as an agent/instrumentality of United States, collecting whole life insurance premiums, known as “taxes,” for the International Monetary Fund, based, inter alia, upon the Limited Liability Act of 1851 and the bankruptcy of United States of 1933, see House Joint Resolution 192 of June 5, 1933; Public Law 73-10; Perry v. U.S. (1935), 294 U.S. 330-381, 79 L Ed 912; 31 USC 5112, 5119.

Inasmuch as all law is contract, the contract involved in a constructive trust is an implied contract. An implied contract can be ratified by two (2) means:

a. Acquiescence by silence, i.e. the “government”  asserts its intentions concerning your life, rights, and property and you assent, don’t rebut, and compliantly go along with what they claim. In 1871 the Government changed the nature of its contract with the people from law as defined by the original Constitution of 1787 that recognizes law (common law), admiralty (on the sea only), and equity (functioning by voluntary contract between all participating parties), and began relating to people as if they were “citizens of the United States” within/under the private, commercial, international, military jurisdiction of the new de facto corporation, i.e. US Inc. They offered people a “new deal,” and almost everyone bought it (based on naive and foolish trust and assuming that everything was OK).

The people were thereby denied access to law and placed on the ship of state of US Inc. where the captain’s word is law and no one has any rights.
As Jefferson phrased the matter, “As government grows, liberty recedes.”

b. You expressly accept “benefits” offered by the government, and thereby finalize the contract by deed. This is similar to finalizing a contract with a restaurant by sitting down at a table, reading a menu, and then ordering and consuming a meal. By your deeds you affirm to the restaurant that you will pay for the meal in accordance with the price stated on the menu. No written contract is signed, but a contract is formed nevertheless.

By the above two (2) means people give implied assent that they are bound by an alleged contract with US Inc. in accordance with the terms and conditions that inhere in being treated as a “citizen of the United States” under the 14th Amendment, and are therefore placed into permanent legal status as a Debtor and Surety for U.S. Inc.. 

In such a position people leave the ground of sovereignty and all capacity for asserting their unalienable rights in favor of being presumed as having exercised their sovereignty and free-will autonomy for the purpose of going along with the government’s assertion that they sacrifice everything for the “public good,” i.e. the PCT. 

By so doing people lose their standing in law, i.e. they “die a civil death in the law.” They are placed in the legal position of mortmain (i.e. as if deceased) and are shorn of capacity for asserting their rights, since the presumption is that they have already exercised those rights for the purpose of being placed in the position they are in, i.e. property of the government with a lien against you and everything your life labor could ever create, including your children. 
The private being (the real individual) is sacrificed for the good of the public (the imaginary collective).

When people die such a civil death in law, they are like ghosts, and thereby incapable of managing their own affairs and enjoying their unalienable rights. Like the estate of a decedent, they are then managed by the executors/administrators of the estate, in probate. Such is the condition of every “citizen of the United States” today in law, managed by the government agencies acting as executors/administrators of their estates in bankruptcy, legal incapacity, and civil death as assets of the bankrupt US. The US is property of the private Real Parties of Interest, the Creditors in bankruptcy.

The 14th Amendment was allegedly established for the purpose of creating a citizenship for the liberated blacks, and other disenfranchised people, who otherwise had no citizenship because they could not comply with the requirements for state citizenship. 

What actually happened was that the blacks were taken off of the Southern slave plantations and placed into the slave plantation of US Inc., a far worse lot in life. The government then gradually absorbed everyone else—including state citizens—into the same condition.

1871-1913. Officers of the actual government held office in dual capacity, i.e. in both USA and US Inc. status.

1912. Bonds issued by US Inc. came due but US Inc. did not have the resources for paying their creditors (the seven families that founded the Federal Reserve Bank), so US Inc.’s owner (the actual government) was required to pay the balance. The national government was also without sufficient funds to meet US Inc.’s obligations, so the creditors settled for all of the assets of both US Inc. and the national government instead of foreclosure on and liquidation of the entire country. By so doing they expropriated the nation—both USA and US Inc. Sic transit America.

1912. US Inc. forms an agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank (It is important to note that both of these entities are private corporations which removes the general allegations of treason or fraud from this relationship). Through this agreement US Inc. must function in debt, even though they have neither funds nor resources for financing their operation.

1912. The first corporate only Senators are seated in the next election year by popular vote of the US Inc. registered voters. The original-jurisdiction national Senators of the States did not assume office that year and at least one third of the nation’s Senators seats were lawfully and voluntarily vacant.

February 3rd, 1913. US Inc. passes its 16th Amendment and Congress orders the Secretary of State to enter it as ratified even though the States had not ratified it according to Law. The Secretary complied. It should be noted that this would not have been lawful if it were a national Constitution amendment, however it was perfectly legal within the colorable, de facto corporation. It should also be noted that where the national Constitution already had a 16th amendment and where the Supreme Court says that the new 16th Amendment did not do anything, this corporate amendment must simply be a space filler entered such that US Inc.’s Constitution (1871) would have the same number of amendments as that of the national Constitution (1787).

April 8th, 1913. US Inc. passes its 17th amendment and Congress orders it to be entered as ratified in the exact same manner as they did with US Inc.’s 16th Amendment. This amendment changes where US Inc.’s Senators are elected. This amendment is not even lawfully possible as a national Constitution amendment for several reasons, not the least of which is that the amendment would have required that Congress first pass an amendment that stated that they had the power to say where Senators are elected before they could even deliberate on such a subject matter, after which they would then have to have competent ratifications performed on such amendments in accord with constitutional limits, not as was done with US Inc.’s 16th Amendment.

December 23, 1913. The Congress, late at night with only a small cadre of supporters present, passed the Federal Reserve Act, surrendering the creation and management of the nation’s currency into the hands of a cartel of private—and mostly foreign—bankers. 

Currency is the single most essential and critical commodity in the world, embodying more law and principles of commerce than any other. Since all interactions are “commerce,” and the medium of doing business in commerce is currency, money is in a very significant sense the measure of all things. By abandoning control and management of the money supply the nation surrendered all capacity for claiming sovereignty. The government lost its independent treasury (one of the requirements in law for national sovereignty). The United States Government became a mere fiefdom, or administrative arm, of the bankers, who now owned the store.

Passage of the Federal Reserve Act was a major milestone on the “road to serfdom” that this entire progression outlines. The conspiratorial nature of matters is exemplified in comments by one of the major actors in the triumph of the Federal Reserve, Edward Mandell House, who had this to say in a private meeting with Corporate President in occupation Woodrow Wilson:

“[Very] soon, every American will be required to register their biological property in a national system designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging. By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda, which will effect our security as a charge back for our fiat paper currency. Every American will be forced to register or suffer not being able to work and earn a living. They will be our chattel, and we will hold the security interest over them forever, by operation of the law merchant under the scheme of secured transactions. Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, forever to remain economic slaves through taxation, secured by their pledges. They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be none the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two should figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability.

After all, this is the only logical way to fund government, by floating liens and debt to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges. This will inevitably reap to us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor to this fraud which we will call “Social Insurance.” Without realizing it, every American will insure us for any loss we may incur and in this manner, every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly. The people will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and, we will employ the high office of the President of our dummy corporation to foment this plot against America.” 

"To-say-the-very-least, Words with an ominous ring, have come to pass, and now Americans pay taxes and fines and fees. Remember to add to the bottom of the list the so called PPACA (Obamacare) tax. 

Not one of the following sample of taxes (or other methods of collecting financial wealth or property) existed 100 years ago, and our nation was the most prosperous in the world. We had absolutely no national debt, had the largest middle class in the world, and Mother could stay at home to raise the children and teach them things of virtue. What happened? Can you spell "politicians?"

List of a few of taxes which are paid:

  Accounts Receivable Tax
  Building Permit Tax
  CDL license Tax
  Cigarette Tax
  Corporate Income Tax
  Dog License Tax
  Excise Taxes
  Federal Income Tax
  Federal Unemployment Tax (FUTA)
  Fishing License Tax
  Food License Tax
  Fuel Permit Tax
  Gasoline Tax (44.75 cents per gallon)
  Gross Receipts Tax
  Hunting License Tax
  Inheritance Tax
  Inventory Tax
  IRS Interest Charges (tax on tax)
  IRS Penalties (tax on tax)
  Liquor Tax
  Luxury Taxes
  Marriage License Tax
  Medicare Tax
  Personal Property Tax
  Property Tax
  Real Estate Tax
  Service Charge Tax
  Social Security Tax
  Road Usage Tax
  Sales Tax
  Recreational Vehicle Tax
  School Tax
  State Income Tax
  State Unemployment Tax (SUTA)
  Telephone Federal Excise Tax
  Telephone Federal Universal Service Fee Tax
  Telephone Federal, State and Local Surcharge Taxes
  Telephone Minimum Usage Surcharge Tax
  Telephone Recurring and Non-recurring Charges Tax
  Telephone State and Local Tax
  Telephone Usage Charge Tax
  Utility Taxes
  Vehicle License Registration Tax
  Vehicle Sales Tax
  Watercraft Registration Tax
  Well Permit Tax
  Workers Compensation Tax


General Reference:
Lieber Code-General Orders No 100
U.S. Code
I.R.S. Code
State's (Your) Tax Code

Another one bites the dust, 30.

How to Plant The Seeds of Destruction: or By Hob's Tongue-The Duce You Say! Part 2

It is difficult to understand the turn of events that has led to this state of affairs; but turn they have, crushing almost everything in their path. It is even more difficult to understand why this halter of control and oppression has not been noticed by Americans. The People of this Country have suffered enough. The People have paid with the sweat of their brow, the blood of their young, the products of their labor, and the wealth of their families and their posterity, and often with their own lives to those who claim to rule by the Rights given by the Succession of Popes based not on the Word of God, but on the self-serving word of a man named Peter who set up a church that has murdered millions upon millions of people and has all but destroyed the planet for the Power to Control the lives Others and obtain the Wealth of Others. 

Truly, look into yourselves and into your heart of hearts and determine if you have any right to control the lives of others. if you believe you do not have this right, then you are in conflict with those that believe otherwise. 
This presumption does not negate the right to control your own life nor to defend (if it becomes necessary unto death) your own life or the life of others if threatened with deadly force. 

If you do believe you have that right, then you are among those that will march into the home of another and take whatever you want, including their life. It should be critically remembered that this action could occur to your home. That is the lesson taught by Darwinism, the law of the jungle where only the strongest and most aggressive survive: true chaos acts in the dark of night or the light of day.

It is time to recognize the truth for what it is.

The following is true and a matter of public record. The legal meanderings and history are, to-say-the-least, daunting. It would be a very interesting book if ever written. However, the series of events that have taken place from the stance of history and from a legal point of view, in brief, are:

By the time of the 11th administration of the United States of America, under George Washington, the new nation had struggled under more than one differing systems of governance. It was time for the adoption of the best set of mechanical parts and the ways they would be allowed to interact.

Yet still, there were people who understood the corrupt advantages the English System of Mercantilism represented.

1781 to 1860 - The original United States that was in operation until 1860; a collection of sovereign Republics in union. Under the original Constitution the States controlled the Government of the Federal Republic; the Federal Government did not control the States and had very little authority.

1871 - The original United States was usurped by a separate and different UNITED STATES formed in 1871, which only controls the District of Columbia and its territories (the Incorporated States-STATE OF X), and which is actually a corporation (the UNITED STATES CORPORATION) that acts as our current government.

The UNITED STATES CORPORATION operates under Corporate/Commercial/Public Law rather than Common/Private Law.

The original Constitution was never removed; it has simply been dormant since 1871. It is still intact to this day. This fact was made clear by Supreme Court Justice Marshall Harlan (Downes v. Bidwell, 182, U.S. 244 1901) by giving the following dissenting opinion: “Two national governments exist; one to be maintained under the Constitution, with all its restrictions; the other to be maintained by Congress outside and Independently of that Instrument.”

The CORPORATE CONSTITUTION of the UNITED STATES CORPORATION bypasses the original U.S. Constitution for the United States of America, which explains why our Congressmen and Senators don’t abide by it, and the President can write Executive Orders to do whatever he wants. They are following corporate law that completely strips Sovereigns of their God given unalienable rights. 

Corporate/Commercial/Public Law is not sovereign (private), as it is an agreement between two or more parties under contract. 

Common Law (which sovereigns operate under) is not Commercial Law; it is personal and private.

A Timeline of events which has lead to the current UNITED STATES CORPORATION.

1788 (January 1), The United States was officially bankrupt.

1790 (August 4), Article One of the U.S. Statues at Large, pages 138-178, abolished the States of the Republic and created Federal Districts. In the same year, the former States of the Republic reorganized as Corporations and their legislatures wrote new STATE CONSTITUTIONS, absent defined boundaries, which they presented to the people of each state for a vote... the new STATE CONSTTUTIONS fraudulently made the people “CITIZENS” of the new CORPORATE STATES. A CITIZEN is also defined as a “corporate fiction.”

1845, For reasons unknown at this time, Congress passed legislation that would ultimately allow Common Law to be usurped by Admiralty Law. The GOLD fringe placed around court flags demonstrates this is still true. Before 1845, Americans were considered Sovereign Individuals who governed themselves under Common Law.

1860 – Congress was adjourned Sine Die – Lincoln could not legally reconvene Congress.

1861, President Lincoln declared a National Emergency and Martial Law, which gave the President unprecedented powers and separated the Executive Branch from the other Branches of 'Government.'

This has NEVER BEEN REVERSED.

1863, the Lieber Code was established taking away your property and your rights.

1864-1867, Several Reconstruction Acts were passed forcing the states to agree the 14th Amendment had been ratified, which made everyone slaves.

1865, the capital was moved to Washington, D.C., a separate country – not a part of the United States of America.

1871, The United States became a Corporation with a new constitution and a new corporate government, and the original constitutional government was vacated to become dormant, but it was never terminated. The new constitution had to be ratified by the people according to the original constitution, but it never was. The whole process occurred behind closed doors. The people are the source of financing for this new government.

1917, the Trading with the Enemy Act (TWEA) was passed. This insightful video from [link to movielocker.com/4084)] states the following: 

“This act was implemented to deal with the countries we were at war with during World War I. It gave the President and the Alien Property Custodian the right to seize the assets of the people included in this act and if they wanted to do business in this country they could apply for a license to do so. By 1921, the Federal Reserve Bank (the trustee for the Alien Property Custodian) held over $700,000,000 in trust.” 

Understand that this trust was based on our assets, not theirs.

1933, 48 Stat 1, of the TWEA was amended to include the United States Person because they wanted to take our gold away. Executive Order 6102 was created to make it illegal for a U.S. Citizen to own gold. In order for the Government to take our gold away and violate our Constitutional rights, we were reclassified as ENEMY COMBATANTS.”

1933, there was a second United States bankruptcy. In the first bankruptcy the United States collateralized all public lands. In the 1933 bankruptcy, the U.S. government collateralized the private lands of the people (a lien) – they borrowed money against our private lands. They were then mortgaged. That is why we pay property taxes.

From a speech in Congress in The Bankruptcy of the United States Congressional Record, March 17, 1993, Vol. 33, page H-1303, a Representative addressing the House stated:

“…It is an established fact that the United States Federal Government has been dissolved by the Emergency Banking Act, March 9, 1933, 48 Stat. 1, Public Law 89-719; declared by President Roosevelt, being bankrupt and insolvent. H.J.R. 192, 73rd Congress m session June 5, 1933 – Joint Resolution To Suspend The Gold Standard and Abrogate The Gold Clause dissolved the Sovereign Authority of the United States and the official capacities of all United States Governmental Offices, Officers, and Departments and is further evidence that the United States Federal Government exists today in name only.

The receivers of the United States Bankruptcy are the International Bankers, via the United Nations, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. All United States Offices, Officials, and Departments are now operating within a de facto status in name only under Emergency War Powers. With the Constitutional Republican form of Government now dissolved, the receivers of the Bankruptcy have adopted a new form of government for the United States. This new form of government is known as a Democracy, being an established Socialist/Communist order under a new governor for America. This act was instituted and established by transferring and/or placing the Office of the Secretary of Treasury to that of the Governor of the International Monetary Fund. Public Law 94-564, page 8, Section H.R. 13955 reads in part: “The U.S. Secretary of Treasury receives no compensation for representing the United States…

Prior to 1913, most Americans owned clear, allodial title to property, free and clear of any liens of mortgages until the Federal Reserve Act (1913) “Hypothecated” all property within the Federal United States to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, in which the Trustees (stockholders) held legal title. The U.S. Citizen (tenant, franchisee) was registered as a “beneficiary” of the trust via his/her birth certificate. In 1933, the Federal United States hypothecated all of the present and future properties, assets, and labor of their “subjects,” the 14th Amendment U.S. Citizen to the Federal Reserve System. In return, the Federal Reserve System agreed to extend the federal United States Corporation all of the credit “money substitute” it needed.

Like any debtor, the Federal United States government had to assign collateral and security to their creditors as a condition of the loan. Since the Federal United States didn't have any assets, they assigned the private property of their “economic slaves,” the U.S. Citizens, as collateral against the federal debt. They also pledged the unincorporated federal territories, national parks, forests, birth certificates, and nonprofit organizations as collateral against the federal debt. All has already been transferred as payment to the international bankers.

Unwittingly, America has returned to its pre-American Revolution feudal roots whereby all land is held by a sovereign and the common people had no rights to hold allodial title to property. Once again, We the People are the tenants and sharecroppers renting our own property from a Sovereign in the guise of the Federal Reserve Bank. We the People have exchanged one master for another.”

1944, Washington D.C. was deeded to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) by the Breton Woods Agreement. 
The IMF is made up of wealthy people that own most of the banking industries of the world. It is an organized group of bankers that have taken control of most governments of the world so the bankers run the world. Congress, the IRS, and the President work for the IMF. The IRS is not a U.S. government agency. 

It is an agency of the IMF. (Diversified Metal Products v. IRS et al. CV-93-405E-EJE U.S.D.C.D.I., Public Law 94-564, Senate Report 94-1148 pg. 5967, Reorganization Plan No. 26, Public Law 102-391.)

Reference Book List:

U.S. History

General Reference from Previous articles:

What was the purpose for the creation of our Nation? 

'escape from deprivation of the right to liberty and freedom, right of religious freedom, and the right to think and speak without fear of reprisal.'


Another one bites the dust, 30.

The End is Near!

It has been my experiences over the past four decades to question everything that is said by the media and by government. Half truths and omissions of facts, outright lies are passed on as facts more often than not. So it was up to me to educate myself by research to discover for myself what truth is.

The November Election is more than just about who will be our President for the next four years. It is about whether we as Americans want to be a free and sovereign people or wards of a corporate-controlled state, ruled by those who hold protection of profits as greater than the rights of the people they swore to protect.

The time of your vote counting for something has long past. In the present day, it is a fraud of free elections when political parties make the rules and hold elections that represent the party and not the people. We are faced now with the most important choices this nation has come up against since the resolve to break from the tyranny of the British Crown. We are faced with the choice of losing our rights entirely and having a dictator instead of a chief executive in the form of a president that is held in check by the judicial and legislative branches of a federal government.

We no longer operate under constitutional government. Our federal and state governments are corporations and operate under admiralty or maritime law. We the free and sovereign individuals have been tricked into becoming property of the state and our rights have been usurped by the laws and mandates of corporations.

Most Americans still believe they have rights. We do not. Slowly those rights have been taken away by legislation that is the very laws that were written by the British barristers, who have infiltrated every level of government through trickery. The title of Esquire, granted to those who are members of the Bar Associations, are themselves loyal not to the Constitution of the United States, but to the laws of the corporate state created by the banksters in Europe to control the currency of the nations.

Did we truly win independence from Great Britain or were we fooled into believing we were truly free? I would tend to think that the former is true. And we now have in place a President who if elected for another term, will take complete control and we will have no rights at all, only privileges granted if we are obedient subjects.

Some will have us believe that we can stop this from happening by electing Mitt Romney, a true corporate statist and member of the Council on Foreign Relations, another group of globalists who want to make the United States a province of a North American Union under laws of the United Nations and the global elitists that control them.

A minority of people even suggest that backing Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson would stop the decline in our economy and restore constitutional integrity to government. I look at facts and not just the speculation.

Facts demonstrate that the only person who has consistently demonstrated integrity and honesty in both his personal and professional lives is Ron Paul. In fact he was denied the nomination by both parties and not just the GOP, although it does make we wonder why they picked Romney over all the others. Romney finished a distant third in the 2008 delegation and convention behind both eventual candidate John McCain and former Governor Mike Huckabee. Now we know how poorly McCain lost to Obama, and now the GOP wants us to support Romney?

Romney’s running mate Paul Ryan has demonstrated his dishonesty by voting for a raise in the debt ceiling after he promised the Tea Party who endorsed him and supported his victory in Congress that he would not vote for an increase. Speaker of the House, John Boehner also lied to his constituents and America by “compromising” with the Democrats in control of the Senate.

So when will Americans finally wake up and take responsibility and vote the party politicians out of office? We don’t have much time to reverse the disaster we are surely heading for.

If Things Were Right: Like a Phoenix Rising From The Ashes

In the vision of our founders, demonstrated by the careful word crafting in the compositions that we now call Founding Documents, the explicit limits to federal government are plain. In all of them the rights to all were equal, not that all are equal. One who works for wages, or takes up a trade or starts their own business is not equal to someone who feels those workers, trades, and businesses all must pay to support them because they are entitled. Charity is voluntary not mandatory.


Freedom is something you must both earn and pay for if you are to keep it. The rights of others cannot be infringed upon by you as you would not have your rights be infringed upon by others, without your wanting and willingness to take action to defend those rights. What right did you give to the federal government to use your tax dollars to give to foreign nations? And at what point did you feel obligated to fund "entitlement" programs for people that are not U.S. citizens or simply plain lazy Americans who use excuses instead of brains or physical dexterity to at least earn their own keep?


Somewhere in our not so distant past we began to lose our rights. Property rights, individual rights, privacy rights, and most of the Constitutional rights were deliberately and systematically taken away and there wasn't even a heated public debate to defend those rights. The right to determine where our tax dollars are spent was something that was much simpler to understand when the Constitution limited taxation with apportionment and a budget had to be approved by the elected representative employees and the People of the many States were heard through the voices of those elected Representatives to that post of service. They aren't our leaders at all, they are supposed to listen to their constituents and follow their majority opinion. If they are not following our lead, we need to remedy the problem.


If things were right in this country, our currency would be stable regardless of what other nations currencies are worth. It would be based on a standard weight of tangible asset the worth of which is based on real industrial value and not a formula that requires a four-year Harvard Degree in Economics.


If things were right we would think $100.00 as a weekly wage was doing pretty good. Fuel prices would be less than 25 cents per gallon and a brand new American built automobile would cost less than $5,000.00 with all of the optional extras.


If things were right, education would be the total responsibility of the parents and not the state. Home schooling, charter schools, and eventually that leads to no public (tax funded) schools at all. All the libraries in the world made available on DVD and online for the world to gain knowledge. The classics as written by those who wrote them and not just the opinions of those lessons written by others.  Discussions and debates could take place at a meeting place or online since that enables communications across the continents.

If things were right, we could easily transition from petrochemical fueled vehicles to HHO fuel cell powered electric vehicles. The technology that today is real but at a reasonable cost instead of the premium price that few can afford to pay.


If things were right, regulatory obstacles would be fewer and those additional and unnecessary fees and certifications forced on manufacturers would be eliminated.That would make employment an opportunity that would always be here for younger generations to go out into the world to seek their goals and dreams.

If things were right, I would have work to do and would be self-sufficient instead of desperately trying to produce the rent for every month. I also would be typing less and talking more as the host of an online talk show. But reality is not the same as being right.

If things were right, the known, simple, inexpensive treatments to cure cancer and other illnesses that are so often fatal would be common knowledge and inexpensively available to everyone. If only things were right.


It is the right, and the patriotic duty for all sovereign American individuals to voice their grievances for remedy to those who represent them in our federal government instead of restricted free speech rights and form letters. That remedy begins when we cast our ballots to choose just who will represent us and carry out our mandate for a responsible compliant government and not an irresponsibly reticent and complacent government.

Democrats and Republicans as political parties have taken away our ability to be fairly represented. Those candidates who do not embrace and expound the party ideology are removed from candidacy with the support of the privately-owned major media, who spoon feed spin to the public with the party line of choices while they ostracize the nominees who do not toe that party line.

I have worked for and have been involved with government at all levels and feel there is no level that is not corrupted by lobbying and campaign funding from special interests. While at the same time the media, funded by lobbies and special interests will point the fingers of spin at individuals, groups, and corporations, the problems worsen and never improve.

The presidential election in November, 2012 will be noted as an important historic turning point in the history of the United States of America. It will determine whether America will rise from the ashes like a phoenix, or become absorbed by the global elitists who have been taking over the world  through their banks and the corporations they created.

If we keep voting the same warring bigger government unlimited spending party people into office, we will lose our sovereignty and become slave labor to the statists.

Update:

Now that the election is over and Obama stole another four years from the People, will we have any opportunity to regain our prosperity and liberty? Or will we continue to plummet to third-world status?

Obama promised in 2008 that he will "fundamentally change America" and so far he has. The problem is it was not the change that most of us believed in nor wanted.

Attention: The World's Last Chance

This coming November, the American People will decide the future of the nation and the so-called free world. This is going to be more than a contest between the two dominating political parties and the liberal or conservative agendas each purport to uphold.

No, this November's Presidential election will decide whether the United States of America will be a sovereign nation, or like many of its European brethren, succumb to a Corporate State such as is the European Union. There is no other alternative when you take an honest look at what the choices are and how the privately-owned major media further inhibits choice by focusing on the chosen few that will make little difference in truly changing the course of this nation and restoring it to the thriving republic that was both the envy and the goal of every other nation.

There are other nations who have people awakening to the beat of the drums of liberty, but the sounds of guns and artillery fire are drowning them out. How we handle our own freedom will determine more than our own fate.

Barack Hussein Obama a.k.a. Barry Soetero, a.k.a. The illegitimate occupier of the Presidency, has done more to undermine the well-being of the United States than all of our enemies could do in over two hundred years. That includes destroying the manufacturing base that was the industrial backbone that kept America thriving. And it also includes the collusion with the privately-owned Federal Reserve System to bankrupt the United States and force the nation to acceptance of a new currency and a new government. In other words, the end of the Republic that was once based on the Constitution.

I listen very carefully as all of his would be opponents debate and orate the issues and the dangers of another four years of an Obama White House. Romney touts his experience in business as a positive. In business I am sure he is adept, but the record indicates that his ability to work with a liberal majority leaves much to be desired. If the issue was only health care then Dr. Ron Paul would seem to be the most qualified to deal with that issue. If it was merely a matter of repealing laws and freeing up businesses to operate without suffocating government regulations and taxes then Newt Gingrich would seem adequate. If it wasn't for his proven dishonesty and marital infidelity he might make a good cabinet member.

Then there is former Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum who is portrayed as a good Catholic family man with impeccable morals and a social policy that would take the same strict religious doctrines and imp[pose them as federal law. Like both Romney and Gingrich, Santorum is all for attacking Iran preemptively to protect our ally Israel, even knowing that Israel stated by way of the speech given by Benjamin Netanyahu to Congress, that Israel does not need the U.S. to help. Since neither we nor Israel depends on any oil from Iran why do we even care? When Israel discovered Syrian nuclear intentions they handled it. And America condemned their actions in the White House and Congress. Only Congressman Ron Paul stood and defended Israel's right to defend itself without requiring any permission from the U.S.

Although his opponents and all of the media call him an isolationist and claim that his foreign and military policies will leave the nation defenseless, Ron Paul receives more support in contributions and currently voter support from the military than all of the other GOP candidates and the President combined. Why is that so? Could they possibly know more about what is going on in battle than what is reported in the media? Do you think that just because a foreign news source shows a differing perspective that theirs is any more correct or unbiased as the ones we see here on our national networks? Don't you think that their media is also biased, only not in favor of the bullies of the globe?

There are many issues that can be debated and discussed through the next millennium and some may get resolved and others will not. The only issue that really matters to all Americans is whether we want to be a nation of free and sovereign individuals or slaves. Yes, really I do mean slaves because that is what will happen if America defaults. The banks are licking their chops already because they have been given so much of our money that at least the next two or three generations will be paying the debts incurred in the present.

Only Ron Paul has put out a truly comprehensive and yet simple plan to restore our nation to Constitutional law and save its solvency. His $1 Trillion dollar cuts in his first year in office will do more to restore economic stability that all of the other plans including the nation destroying current one. And removing five cabinet departments will deregulate mores businesses which will promote growth in the private sector. It will be needed as President Paul will be bringing troops home from around the world, no longer being the policemen for every nation that “wants protection” from their enemies. They must shoulder the economic burden, not U.S. Taxpayers, with their money and the lives of their family members.

I am not a Democrat nor a Republican so as a local favorite talk show host likes to say, “I don't have a dog in the fight.” However, I am an American, a natural and native-born son. And as the city of my birth is also credited as being the birthplace of a nation, it is my patriotic duty to also uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States of America, from all enemies both foreign and domestic. And while I do not hold office nor am I a sworn enforcement officer, it would be negligent of me not to make known to the public any infraction of the law that is perpetrated on the People.

I do not trust that the man who now calls himself President of the United States is qualified to hold that office any longer. He has demonstrated his inability to govern in every manner possible; leaving our nation an embarrassment as a once great power, now a bankrupt nation, not only in financial capital but moral capital as well.

We have candidates that are propped up by the GOP as the best to beat Obama, but truth be known, he is already defeated:  it only remains to choose who will lead us with policies of freedom and choice, of reducing government and not expansion, who will restore sound economic and monetary policies. In addition, a candidate who will embrace commerce and trade as the principle means of enjoying friendship with foreign nations and not military threats.

If we are to spread liberty throughout the world, it must be accomplished by example and not by force. We cannot force China to stop manipulating its own currency to remain competitive as Mitt Romney suggests, we need to have the capability restored for Congress to do the same thing so that our U.S. dollar remains strong and viable against the rest of the world's currencies. Ron Paul is the only candidate that fully understands this and has a plan to restore sound money.

Yet there is one more important reason why all freedom loving Americans need to follow what our troops are telling us and not the privately-owned major media. And that is Ron Paul will have a very strong military defense without having over one-half million troops stationed in foreign lands. And he will be strong on freedom for all Americans and will ask Congress to repeal the Patriot Act, the NDAA, will remove the TSA from all airports and place the security burden on the airlines where it belongs.

Ron Paul's answer to income tax is to repeal it also. Ending the Federal Reserve System and the Internal Revenue Service will mean that Congress and the Treasury Department will have more responsibility with accountability directly to the People. Many of the federal programs that funded States will no longer be necessary so the States and their residence will have more of their own money to do what is best for them and not what some bureaucrats in Washington think is best. That includes repeal of laws that restrict liberty of individuals and others that were never meant to be the jurisdiction of a national government.

So the choices are: Ron Paul and the restoration of liberty and the means for the United States to once again thrive or: A slow or rapid fall into a bankrupt nation that will be taken over and become a few provinces of a greater North American Union, complete with a new set of privileges for some and restrictions for all of the slave population that is fit enough to provide work. The rest will be a burden to the Corporate State and therefore an expense that cannot justify continuance.

And the Democrats accuse the Republicans of throwing Grandma over a cliff!

Your Choice Should Be America

Whenever some well-meaning person questions my convictions, I usually make time to explain why I believe as I do.

When the English Monarchy and the Church were both exercising control over empires, nations, and individuals' thoughts, there came to be an increasing number of people that felt they had lost what little control over their own lives they had managed to gain. These people decided, in one way or another, it was time to take control of their own lives and they came from many parts of the old world to settle in the new world. However, because the old world continued to exercise, what the new world settlers felt unfair and confining, control in various forms, they decided to begin a Great Experiment to be free.

The aftermath of the conflict between the old and new world was the establishment of The Perpetual Union (which is no longer in effect) and the later United States Of America. The important ideas, ideals, and concepts were composed and written down as two founding documents the Declaration of Independence and The Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union (A.C.P.U. which is no longer in effect) and the later Constitution of the United States of America. These two sole sources of intents and purposes define America and American Citizens. If, by letter or spirit, either one or both are under attack, by inaction in defense of, or by action to corrupt letter or spirit of, the very way of life in America becomes threatened.

Why do Americans pick between Democrats and Republicans? Why do we patronize the privately-owned major media who regards Americans as having so little intellect that they have to tell us what the candidates stand for and which ones are important? Are we so engrossed in that kind of authoritarian nonsense that we have to rely on others to make choices for us? The "fair and balanced" claim by one network is betrayed by their bias for party favorites to the detriment of any others that may challenge typical Washington politics. All of the major media ignores candidates from any other party, and have even ridiculed one of the most outstanding statesman of our time.

Why do we tolerate public employees who were elected to serve the nation by presenting the best American ideals and addressing the most important issues facing our country and providing solutions to attain those goals, but instead did otherwise? The interests of American Citizens; home and hearth, financial soundness, and personal rights and freedoms are the concerns of all. These important ideas and issues are held as important concepts, as well as many others, within the Constitution. That document and our country largely have been ignored, by the party favorites and only recently have they even mentioned the very real problems we face. It is only obvious that Romney, Santorum, and Gingrich have changed the tune they hum. Instead of their usual stance, pompously prancing about proclaiming themselves our leaders while taking advantage of anything they can, they are now on uncertain ground and are now parroting the only candidate that has said the same things for thirty years. Romney, Santorum, and Gingrich have never been our "leaders" at best they were our representative employees!

It doesn't require a genius intellect to know that neither party has provided a difference in identifying problems nor finding approaches to solutions that have beneficial results, except to grow government in ways that were never intended. What they have provided over the past three or four decades, regardless of their supposed liberal or conservative policies, is an expansion of government in every direction; controlling through legislation, mandates, regulations, taxation, and executive orders has been the result. So far the solutions offered by big government thinking is more jobs in government (most of which are temporary) and borrowing money to fund what they cannot do by increasing taxation. The economic stimulus has been to guarantee enormous loans to companies with poor management and business models that have failed at the taxpayer's expense. Solyndra, Evergreen Solar, M F Global - J P Morgan are all examples.

The generalized root beliefs of today's current American Democratic philosophy are those dangerously close to, if not, socialism. Any of the various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods, or a system of society or group living in which there is no private property and in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state, which is a stage of society in Marxist theory that is transitional between capitalism and communism and is distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done are not American in concept or ideals.

The generalized root beliefs of today's current American Republican philosophy are those dangerously close to, if not, Fascism. The political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and which stands for a centralized autocratic government or dictatorial control which is effected by policies or practices of, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition are not American in concept or ideals.

And still the voters select from these same two diseased pools of philosophically political sociopaths.

The generalized root method of enacting today's current American Business philosophy are those of Corporatism. The organization of a society into industrial and professional corporations serving as organs of political representation and exercising control over persons and activities within their jurisdiction. This concept was borrowed from the business practices of the English Crown and is not American in either concept or ideal.

The generalized root beliefs of today's current American Business philosophy are those of Capitalism. The economic system characterized by private or partner ownership of capital goods, by investments that are determined by private decision, and by prices, production, and the distribution of goods that are determined mainly by competition in a free market is the mainstay in America.

It seems clear that "conservative" Republicans want to save us from the "liberal" Democrats and the "liberal" Democrats want to save us from the "conservative" Republicans. In the end, both parties seek to dismantle freedom and constitutional government in order to accomplish their own agendas. They only differ in style; in substance they are twins. While fiercely opposing each other, both parties seek but one thing: unbridled power and control.

As things stand now, we do not need to fear al Qaeda, Iran, or North Korea as urgently as we need to fear the abuse of power from within our own government. There is no question that we have the military power and strength to fight off any foreign enemy. The bigger question is, do we have the moral strength and ethical power to fight off those within our own country who would strip us of our freedoms? How we answer that question will determine our destiny.

It's our choice: we can continue to vote for candidates that are members of the two major party philosophies, or we can vote for candidates, regardless of party affiliation, who will represent the best interests of America and its Citizens. That does not automatically disqualify a candidate from a major party, it does mean that it is the responsibility of the voter to vet the candidates to determine the ones who have demonstrated their honesty, integrity, and eligibility that have honored their oaths of office to uphold and defend the Constitution (if they have been in office), and who have a record of performance that demonstrates they have made those hard decisions.

It should be obvious I will never vote for Romney, Santorum, or Gingrich to be my employee to hold any public office. I carefully looked at their morals, ethics, qualifications, and their voting records. Instead, and because of a thirty year length record of voting for American ideals and concepts, I am voting for Dr. Ron Paul.

The Alternative Isn't Ominous

I never really gave a thought about the term birth control until quite recently. But while listening to some of the discussion and debates on the issue that has become the recent diversion from what is really wrong, it occurred to me that "birth control" sounds ominous. When I hear the term mentioned it brings up horrible images of government control over who may have children.

The issue is really not about contraception, or abortion, or religious freedom. It is only about the individual's right to exercise the right of choice. This right is guaranteed under the U.S. Constitution and no government has any right to claim authority in the matter. This current person occupying the Presidency has done more to erode liberties than any other since Franklin Delano Roosevelt when he gave us all up to the Federal Reserve and the international banks behind it.

The Truth behind popular American History is easily uncovered. A fair researcher with the tools available to him at any public library and that has read this, will easily find all the true data required to form their own opinions about what is really going on and what is really at stake. I think most Americans do not realize that they are an election away from losing most of their liberties and rights. After all, they already lost their homes, savings, and the earnings of their grandchildren to the same people that want freedoms and rights for themselves and no one else.

Is there nothing that can be done? Will America cease to be a free and sovereign nation? Will it become just another part of another banker-backed corporate State like the ones in the European Union? The Bilderberg Group has stated our country will be a part of the North American Union and the new currency has already been printed and is called the Amero. Nothing really will change except there will be no more Constitution, in its place will be a set of rules and permissions that will define what a citizen is and what he can do. You will no longer be a free individual. You will be a number, like the ones on any of the cards you carry in your wallet, or the one they use to tax you and follow all of your banking transactions. But under the new system, you do not earn a wage or salary with a chance of making more by working harder or longer hours. You will be given what "they" feel is enough to live on and no more.

Perhaps, you will get a day off when you turn in one of your fellow workers for talking about something that the government doesn't like or has made a crime. Won't that be fun?

This upcoming election is your opportunity to make the choice to elect Dr. Ron Paul as your 45th President of the United States of America and after his election all that has happened in the past will be a bad dream. Dr. Paul has plans that have been presented to the public. Of course, you will have to also elect a House and Senate that will uphold their oaths of office to defend the U.S. Constitution, and will work with Dr. Paul to repair the damage that already has happened. Then it will up us in the future, to elect a President and Congress that will keep our country and its' citizens safe and insure our freedom!

The alternative isn't ominous, it's the end of liberty and freedom.