By The People

There are fundamental flaws in how American government operates today,
contrary to the Constitution and the vision of a representative republican form of governance.
I intend doing something about it: by educating and informing others who
are not even aware of the dangers.

Tuesday, February 21, 2012

Attention: The World's Last Chance

This coming November, the American People will decide the future of the nation and the so-called free world. This is going to be more than a contest between the two dominating political parties and the liberal or conservative agendas each purport to uphold.

No, this November's Presidential election will decide whether the United States of America will be a sovereign nation, or like many of its European brethren, succumb to a Corporate State such as is the European Union. There is no other alternative when you take an honest look at what the choices are and how the privately-owned major media further inhibits choice by focusing on the chosen few that will make little difference in truly changing the course of this nation and restoring it to the thriving republic that was both the envy and the goal of every other nation.

There are other nations who have people awakening to the beat of the drums of liberty, but the sounds of guns and artillery fire are drowning them out. How we handle our own freedom will determine more than our own fate.

Barack Hussein Obama a.k.a. Barry Soetero, a.k.a. The illegitimate occupier of the Presidency, has done more to undermine the well-being of the United States than all of our enemies could do in over two hundred years. That includes destroying the manufacturing base that was the industrial backbone that kept America thriving. And it also includes the collusion with the privately-owned Federal Reserve System to bankrupt the United States and force the nation to acceptance of a new currency and a new government. In other words, the end of the Republic that was once based on the Constitution.

I listen very carefully as all of his would be opponents debate and orate the issues and the dangers of another four years of an Obama White House. Romney touts his experience in business as a positive. In business I am sure he is adept, but the record indicates that his ability to work with a liberal majority leaves much to be desired. If the issue was only health care then Dr. Ron Paul would seem to be the most qualified to deal with that issue. If it was merely a matter of repealing laws and freeing up businesses to operate without suffocating government regulations and taxes then Newt Gingrich would seem adequate. If it wasn't for his proven dishonesty and marital infidelity he might make a good cabinet member.

Then there is former Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum who is portrayed as a good Catholic family man with impeccable morals and a social policy that would take the same strict religious doctrines and imp[pose them as federal law. Like both Romney and Gingrich, Santorum is all for attacking Iran preemptively to protect our ally Israel, even knowing that Israel stated by way of the speech given by Benjamin Netanyahu to Congress, that Israel does not need the U.S. to help. Since neither we nor Israel depends on any oil from Iran why do we even care? When Israel discovered Syrian nuclear intentions they handled it. And America condemned their actions in the White House and Congress. Only Congressman Ron Paul stood and defended Israel's right to defend itself without requiring any permission from the U.S.

Although his opponents and all of the media call him an isolationist and claim that his foreign and military policies will leave the nation defenseless, Ron Paul receives more support in contributions and currently voter support from the military than all of the other GOP candidates and the President combined. Why is that so? Could they possibly know more about what is going on in battle than what is reported in the media? Do you think that just because a foreign news source shows a differing perspective that theirs is any more correct or unbiased as the ones we see here on our national networks? Don't you think that their media is also biased, only not in favor of the bullies of the globe?

There are many issues that can be debated and discussed through the next millennium and some may get resolved and others will not. The only issue that really matters to all Americans is whether we want to be a nation of free and sovereign individuals or slaves. Yes, really I do mean slaves because that is what will happen if America defaults. The banks are licking their chops already because they have been given so much of our money that at least the next two or three generations will be paying the debts incurred in the present.

Only Ron Paul has put out a truly comprehensive and yet simple plan to restore our nation to Constitutional law and save its solvency. His $1 Trillion dollar cuts in his first year in office will do more to restore economic stability that all of the other plans including the nation destroying current one. And removing five cabinet departments will deregulate mores businesses which will promote growth in the private sector. It will be needed as President Paul will be bringing troops home from around the world, no longer being the policemen for every nation that “wants protection” from their enemies. They must shoulder the economic burden, not U.S. Taxpayers, with their money and the lives of their family members.

I am not a Democrat nor a Republican so as a local favorite talk show host likes to say, “I don't have a dog in the fight.” However, I am an American, a natural and native-born son. And as the city of my birth is also credited as being the birthplace of a nation, it is my patriotic duty to also uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States of America, from all enemies both foreign and domestic. And while I do not hold office nor am I a sworn enforcement officer, it would be negligent of me not to make known to the public any infraction of the law that is perpetrated on the People.

I do not trust that the man who now calls himself President of the United States is qualified to hold that office any longer. He has demonstrated his inability to govern in every manner possible; leaving our nation an embarrassment as a once great power, now a bankrupt nation, not only in financial capital but moral capital as well.

We have candidates that are propped up by the GOP as the best to beat Obama, but truth be known, he is already defeated:  it only remains to choose who will lead us with policies of freedom and choice, of reducing government and not expansion, who will restore sound economic and monetary policies. In addition, a candidate who will embrace commerce and trade as the principle means of enjoying friendship with foreign nations and not military threats.

If we are to spread liberty throughout the world, it must be accomplished by example and not by force. We cannot force China to stop manipulating its own currency to remain competitive as Mitt Romney suggests, we need to have the capability restored for Congress to do the same thing so that our U.S. dollar remains strong and viable against the rest of the world's currencies. Ron Paul is the only candidate that fully understands this and has a plan to restore sound money.

Yet there is one more important reason why all freedom loving Americans need to follow what our troops are telling us and not the privately-owned major media. And that is Ron Paul will have a very strong military defense without having over one-half million troops stationed in foreign lands. And he will be strong on freedom for all Americans and will ask Congress to repeal the Patriot Act, the NDAA, will remove the TSA from all airports and place the security burden on the airlines where it belongs.

Ron Paul's answer to income tax is to repeal it also. Ending the Federal Reserve System and the Internal Revenue Service will mean that Congress and the Treasury Department will have more responsibility with accountability directly to the People. Many of the federal programs that funded States will no longer be necessary so the States and their residence will have more of their own money to do what is best for them and not what some bureaucrats in Washington think is best. That includes repeal of laws that restrict liberty of individuals and others that were never meant to be the jurisdiction of a national government.

So the choices are: Ron Paul and the restoration of liberty and the means for the United States to once again thrive or: A slow or rapid fall into a bankrupt nation that will be taken over and become a few provinces of a greater North American Union, complete with a new set of privileges for some and restrictions for all of the slave population that is fit enough to provide work. The rest will be a burden to the Corporate State and therefore an expense that cannot justify continuance.

And the Democrats accuse the Republicans of throwing Grandma over a cliff!

Monday, February 20, 2012

"Extreme Prejudice", CIA asset turned Whistle Blower, Susan Lindauer's book is A MUST READ

The CIA 'Asset' turned whistle blower, Susan Lindauer, has a new book 'EXTREME PREJUDICE' which relates the very real story behind the U.S. government's knowledge of the planned attack prior to 9/11 as early as July 2001. President Clinton had created a 'back channel of communication' for Susan to negotiate with Iraq. Iraq wanted peace, but because the administration could not reveal the origin of the 9/11 threat, the U.S. Declared war. However, the book outlines 'why' the U.S. preferred war over peace. The Middle East was experiencing 'peace' throughout this period leading up to the U.S./Iraq war. Susan outlines everything and it is very eye opening and very sad. I now have an extremely dim view of the U.S. government.

This woman was arrested under the PATRIOT ACT (which is becoming more common every day) after trying to warn of the 9/11 attack and was jailed for over a year on a military base without hearing or trial. The main reason the charges were dropped was the lack of any real evidence of wrongdoing on the part of Susan Lindauer, but more importantly, the fact that if any case had been tried in the required Federal District Court then the government ran the very real risk the court would most likely find the Patriot Act UNCONSTITUTIONAL.

Ten years later, after the damage has been done, she can finally speak. Susan also tried to warn the government of the 1993 World Trade Center attack but instead of appreciating her knowledge of it the government began to investigate her and attempt to terrorize her.

The type of material which holds any amount of truth is banned by mainstream media which is owned by one of the wealthiest families in the world, the Rockefellers. This is why you won't see the nightly news covering any of this material, but it must be known. Iraq offered the United States so much, even access to oil, and an agreement that they would buy millions of dollars in U.S. motor vehicles every year to support our economy...there is a long list.

Instead, the U.S. (Under Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld) chose war which devastated American families, the U.S. economy, the Canadian
economy and most tragically Iraqi families and the destruction of their country, so that the Military-Industrial-Complex could keep and grow their presence in an ever widening arena of influence and power. There is a whole economy in and of itself to weapons production and the U.S. military. This economy would not survive without constant warfare and most certainly not in a time of peace.

The Justice Department stopped recording the number of Iraqi civilian deaths due to sanctions. Children under the age of 5... well that number when last recorded was in the millions. Isn't that Genocide... of course it is.

GOP Chairman Should be Allowed Time to Think

After carefully reading the reports regarding Charlie Webster's (GOP Chairman for Maine), account of the Maine recount effort, It has become painfully obvious the totals don't add up. As a matter of fact, once again various towns vote totals have been left out of the total count. This, according to the chairman, was due to the impossibility of any kind of communications being possible with various towns to find out what totals they might have to report.

It should also be noted that several caucus polling locations in which small numbers of voters (7 to 20 people) cast their ballots... astonishingly picked up more voters (5 to 10 people) that had not been counted and reported in the first official totals, which left out totals from various counties and towns. It can only be understood that any improprieties the RNC may have directed Charlie Webster to accomplish are nothing more than suspected vote fraud on a massive state wide scale. Especially considering all of the votes cast by those extra voters that totaled more than the original total number of voters that were casting ballots the first time were cast for Mitt Romney.

The RNC should be very happy, even though various towns were not included in the recount at all, that Charlie Webster, GOP Chairman, did his very best. The RNC should not be worried about any suspected vote fraud having been accomplished. The aftermath is clear, according to Charlie Webster, GOP Chairman, all the ballots were not counted except those amazing extra ones and a county or two.

The people that oversaw this poorly orchestrated affair and made sure that everything turned out just right should be allowed time to think about the entire debacle, where they belong, in prison.

Saturday, February 18, 2012

Short of Poison Tipped Darts

Little Barry has problems and issues, just one is regarding his eligibility issue as President. The tangled tale weaves into and around various people that have names that appear more than once.

In 2000 and 2004, the wording in the official certification:

"This is to certify that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution and are the duly chosen candidates of both the state's and the national Democratic Parties by balloting at the Presidential Preference Poll and Caucus held _____ in the State of Hawaii and by acclamation at the National Democratic Convention held ______ in _______."

In 2008 the wording of the certification of the Hawaii Democratic Party read differently:

"This is to certify that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the national Democratic Parties balloting at the Presidential Preferences Poll and Caucus held on February 19, 2008 in the State of Hawaii and by acclamation at the National Democratic Convention held August 27, 2008 in Denver, Colorado."

The 2008 certification of Obama left out these words: “of the United States Constitution and are the duly chosen candidates of both the state and...”

Nancy Pelosi chairperson of the DNC declared and then certified Little Barry (BHO) legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the national Democratic Parties balloting at the Presidential Preferences Poll and Caucus. A confrontation broke out when Kevin Cronin, Chief Elections Officer, Hawaiian Office of Elections, sent a letter stating "Little Barry" was not qualified to be on the ballot for the 2008 presidential Election, and Brian Schatz Chairman of the Democratic Party of Hawaii, refused to take corrective action. The dead lock was broken when Hawaii refused to certify Little Barry as a presidential candidate, and a woman, Elena Kagan, signed the papers for him to be certified to run for President.

By omitting these critical words, The Democratic Party of Hawaii said that Little Barry is not bound by The Constitution of the United States. It also follows that Little Barry therefore does not have to be a Natural born Citizen, in fact he does not have to be a U.S. citizen of any kind, (not to serve as) but to be president of the United States, if he was elected. It is also of interest to note that although most Democratic Electoral College electors were aware of this Hawaii eligibility issue, not one elector raised an objection. On January 6th, 2009, when Congress voted to certify the election by the Electoral College, not one congressman chose to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States, as was their duty, and question the state of Hawaii's certification. It should have astounded the public how they all just fall in line. No questioning. No objectivity. No digging into Little Barry's past, but the privately-owned major media was not reporting any of this nationally. By that point in time, most if not all of Congress, believed the problem could not possibly have merit because no one could have gotten that far into the election process without red flags being raised and waived by the privately-owned major media.

On January 20, 2009, at 12:00 PM Little Barry attempted to take the oath of office on the Bible that Abraham Lincoln used for his first inauguration in 1861, but repeated some of the words twice and supposedly broke the concentration of Chief Justice John G. Roberts. He did not take the oath properly and correctly on Inauguration Day. On Wednesday Jan 21, 2009, in a private ceremony, Little Barry took the oath of office on the Qur'an and swore to God (Allah) in front of Chief Justice John G. Roberts. See:  Why John Roberts (likely) Protecting Obama Care!

The Deed was done, but if every state signed the form the Democratic P
arty provided, then there isn't a single state that did certify that Little Barry is constitutionally eligible to be President. They would all be guilty of collusion in a real legal conspiracy of national proportion and should be charged both collectively and singly with failure to uphold and defend the Constitution and conspiracy to commit treason against the People of the United States of America during a time of War (pick one), as well as treason. The DNC (Democratic Party) kept the original document and made a different one to send to the states for them to sign. This is no magician's hat trick, this is a Coup d'etat by the DNC (Democratic Party) to illegally install an ineligible person by illegally certifying falsified documents in order to take over the Presidency and install single party rule.

On January 26, 2009, Little Barry, as President, appointed Elana Kagan Solicitor General, and while working in that capacity she was heavily involved in policy discussions on how to make sure Little Barry's Health Care Plan (Obamacare) passed through Congress as emails now reveal. It is now in question as to why the emails were not released at Kagan’s Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearings during June of 2010.

On May 10, 2010, Obama nominated her to the Supreme Court to fill the vacancy from the impending retirement of Justice John Paul Stevens. After Senate confirmation, Elana Kagan was sworn in on August 7, 2010, by Chief Justice John G. Roberts. Elana Kagan's formal investiture ceremony before a special sitting of the United States Supreme Court took place on October 1, 2010.

She has to decide whether her role as Little Barry's Solicitor General at the time the law was drawn up and passed could be seen as an unacceptable conflict of interest. The law says, “Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.” It goes on to say they should also quit a case “where he has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party.”

Justice Kagan, herself, is now responsible for making the decision whether or not she should recuse herself from the case when the Supreme Court hears challenges to President Barry's signature law next spring. A decision on the constitutionality of the law is expected by late June or July, just in time for the two political parties’ National Conventions.

“No justice wants to say that he or she didn't have prior contact with the case only to be proven wrong in the near future. No Justice is going to try and pull a fast one, especially in today’s high tech society where the truth will eventually be found out.”

-Russell Wheeler, visiting fellow, the Brookings Institute

One would wonder, just what... she will do. Short of Poison Tipped Darts from an Assassin's Blowgun, this little Group of Machiavellians could not have done better.

Friday, February 17, 2012

Who Would Have More Votes?

Headlines tell the stories of the recent rash of vote fraud being perpetrated on the nation.  2010 was a busy year for prosecutors dealing with vote fraud issues, and 2012 is shaping-up nicely to be a record year for indictments and convictions.

It has now been reported and in a very clear fashion that the caucuses in Iowa, New Hampshire, Maine, Nevada, were all severely compromised not only in regard to fraudulent voter registration, fraudulent street lists, and individual voters registered and reported as voting in two or more States, but violations of caucus rules, fraudulent counting tallies, fraudulent tallied numbers reporting, and in addition to to those problems, unreported and uncounted county or district tallies, missing district ballots, etc. The list of violations and types of fraud continues growing as information is collected. Virginia authorities have identified the Gingrich campaign of fraudulent registration practices. Other states' authorities have identified many irregularities or frauds of various kinds. The numbers are in the hundreds of thousands of votes with numbers growing.

Vote fraud is a serious problem. Every American citizen is denied of civil rights every time vote fraud occurs. The injury is felt when legally cast votes are negated by the fraudulently cast votes. This leads to the core American belief of “one person, one vote” being frivolous and places elections in doubt as vote fraud pervades our election process. Vote fraud is not a victimless crime, everyone becomes the victim.

Some of these frauds are so extensive that federal authorities have begun investigations. It is now without doubt that many state GOP committee leaders have reported Romney as having won whichever, when it fact he had not. In fact, a large majority of the frauds has called to mind the saying "the-ends-justify-the-means." The ends in this situation are Romney, or Santorum, or Gingrich coming out ahead in numbers depending on where the numbers were tallied. These criminal activities of the RNC and the collusion of the privately-owned major media to sway the citizens, by reporting false numbers and in a few instances reporting final vote tallies before the tallies were finished being counted, into thinking Romney, Santorum, or Gingrich are being voted for more often than another candidate.

It is interesting to note that a new study finds that millions of the names on U.S. voter rolls appear in more than one state... or on tombstones. The Pew Center on the States found and has reported millions of invalid registrations remain on the books, including an "army of (potential) zombie voters" who remain registered long after they died. Voter registration in the following data are just one gateway to election fraud, and place in question the integrity of our elections. Here is a part of the problem:  1.8 million Deceased Americans whose voter registration remains active, 2.75 million People registered in more than one state, 68,725 Voters registered in three states, 1,807 Voters registered in more than three states, 51 million Americans who are eligible to vote, but remain not registered, 12 million People registered under addresses that are old or have errors severe enough that mailings are unlikely to reach them, 24 million Voter registrations that are inaccurate or no longer valid — nearly 13 percent of the names currently on voter rolls nationwide, a total of 76 Percent of eligible adults who are registered to vote in the U.S. Most, if not more than these kinds of, problems have been an ongoing problem for tens of decades.

Americans must take it upon themselves to insure integrity in the election process since clearly the election officials are alowing it to happen and restore the importance of voting. In regard to voters, this will require the implementation of safeguards such as photo identification requirements, an adequate period for elections officials to verify voter registrations before the elections, and a close eye on the abuse of absentee voting. In regard to the process, this will require printed rules that are understandable. In regard to the procedure, an adherence to Robert's Rules of Order. It is up to us as citizens to ensure that every legally cast vote counts.

Who would rig an election so that their opponents would have more votes?

Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Change and The Brighter Future To Come: or Barry's Best Foot Forward: or American Business As Usual

When Solyndra hit the wall of insolvency, all that could be heard were the echoes of the person occupying the Presidency: "this loan will generate hundreds of jobs insuring Solyndra a brighter future". The $535 million loan was expanded by another $75 million and Solyndra’s expenditures, just to build the plant, cost an estimated $733 million. With those words and figures in mind, more than a thousand people are jobless many are losing or have lost their homes and for them times are, indeed, really tough. More than 900 are still without steady employment.

After the bankruptcy on September 6, a House of Representatives subcommittee hearing was called to ask questions of company officials. The company's CEO, Brian Harrison, and chief financial officer, W.G. Stover, were called and both invoked their Fifth Amendment rights and in response to questions said nothing.

The interesting point of this debacle is not concerning the Solyndra employees, not concerning the increase in future jobs at Solyndra, not concerning the private investors in Solyndra, not concerning the "Made in America" products, not concerning the increase in "Jobs in America", and certainly not concerning solar panels or the "Green Industry." And unquestionably not concerning who the criminals are, how much money they got, and why they aren't all in prison.

As memos, Emails, and testimony have clearly shown without doubt, the concern of all the major players involved everywhere, as if it were just a board game to win at any cost, were solely political and had nothing to do with making our Nation strong in manufacturing or profitable for the citizens who work to make a life for themselves and their families. The sleazy dealings of the White House, political appointees at the DOE, and campaign contributors being repaid for helping the person occupying the Presidency. With the political favors repaid, taxpayers left to pay the costs, move on, nothing to see here, more change is necessary. 

You don't need sunglasses to see all that remains are just another business failure and lives that lay in ruins.

Tuesday, February 14, 2012

Your Choice Should Be America

Whenever some well-meaning person questions my convictions, I usually make time to explain why I believe as I do.

When the English Monarchy and the Church were both exercising control over empires, nations, and individuals' thoughts, there came to be an increasing number of people that felt they had lost what little control over their own lives they had managed to gain. These people decided, in one way or another, it was time to take control of their own lives and they came from many parts of the old world to settle in the new world. However, because the old world continued to exercise, what the new world settlers felt unfair and confining, control in various forms, they decided to begin a Great Experiment to be free.

The aftermath of the conflict between the old and new world was the establishment of The Perpetual Union (which is no longer in effect) and the later United States Of America. The important ideas, ideals, and concepts were composed and written down as two founding documents the Declaration of Independence and The Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union (A.C.P.U. which is no longer in effect) and the later Constitution of the United States of America. These two sole sources of intents and purposes define America and American Citizens. If, by letter or spirit, either one or both are under attack, by inaction in defense of, or by action to corrupt letter or spirit of, the very way of life in America becomes threatened.

Why do Americans pick between Democrats and Republicans? Why do we patronize the privately-owned major media who regards Americans as having so little intellect that they have to tell us what the candidates stand for and which ones are important? Are we so engrossed in that kind of authoritarian nonsense that we have to rely on others to make choices for us? The "fair and balanced" claim by one network is betrayed by their bias for party favorites to the detriment of any others that may challenge typical Washington politics. All of the major media ignores candidates from any other party, and have even ridiculed one of the most outstanding statesman of our time.

Why do we tolerate public employees who were elected to serve the nation by presenting the best American ideals and addressing the most important issues facing our country and providing solutions to attain those goals, but instead did otherwise? The interests of American Citizens; home and hearth, financial soundness, and personal rights and freedoms are the concerns of all. These important ideas and issues are held as important concepts, as well as many others, within the Constitution. That document and our country largely have been ignored, by the party favorites and only recently have they even mentioned the very real problems we face. It is only obvious that Romney, Santorum, and Gingrich have changed the tune they hum. Instead of their usual stance, pompously prancing about proclaiming themselves our leaders while taking advantage of anything they can, they are now on uncertain ground and are now parroting the only candidate that has said the same things for thirty years. Romney, Santorum, and Gingrich have never been our "leaders" at best they were our representative employees!

It doesn't require a genius intellect to know that neither party has provided a difference in identifying problems nor finding approaches to solutions that have beneficial results, except to grow government in ways that were never intended. What they have provided over the past three or four decades, regardless of their supposed liberal or conservative policies, is an expansion of government in every direction; controlling through legislation, mandates, regulations, taxation, and executive orders has been the result. So far the solutions offered by big government thinking is more jobs in government (most of which are temporary) and borrowing money to fund what they cannot do by increasing taxation. The economic stimulus has been to guarantee enormous loans to companies with poor management and business models that have failed at the taxpayer's expense. Solyndra, Evergreen Solar, M F Global - J P Morgan are all examples.

The generalized root beliefs of today's current American Democratic philosophy are those dangerously close to, if not, socialism. Any of the various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods, or a system of society or group living in which there is no private property and in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state, which is a stage of society in Marxist theory that is transitional between capitalism and communism and is distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done are not American in concept or ideals.

The generalized root beliefs of today's current American Republican philosophy are those dangerously close to, if not, Fascism. The political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and which stands for a centralized autocratic government or dictatorial control which is effected by policies or practices of, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition are not American in concept or ideals.

And still the voters select from these same two diseased pools of philosophically political sociopaths.

The generalized root method of enacting today's current American Business philosophy are those of Corporatism. The organization of a society into industrial and professional corporations serving as organs of political representation and exercising control over persons and activities within their jurisdiction. This concept was borrowed from the business practices of the English Crown and is not American in either concept or ideal.

The generalized root beliefs of today's current American Business philosophy are those of Capitalism. The economic system characterized by private or partner ownership of capital goods, by investments that are determined by private decision, and by prices, production, and the distribution of goods that are determined mainly by competition in a free market is the mainstay in America.

It seems clear that "conservative" Republicans want to save us from the "liberal" Democrats and the "liberal" Democrats want to save us from the "conservative" Republicans. In the end, both parties seek to dismantle freedom and constitutional government in order to accomplish their own agendas. They only differ in style; in substance they are twins. While fiercely opposing each other, both parties seek but one thing: unbridled power and control.

As things stand now, we do not need to fear al Qaeda, Iran, or North Korea as urgently as we need to fear the abuse of power from within our own government. There is no question that we have the military power and strength to fight off any foreign enemy. The bigger question is, do we have the moral strength and ethical power to fight off those within our own country who would strip us of our freedoms? How we answer that question will determine our destiny.

It's our choice: we can continue to vote for candidates that are members of the two major party philosophies, or we can vote for candidates, regardless of party affiliation, who will represent the best interests of America and its Citizens. That does not automatically disqualify a candidate from a major party, it does mean that it is the responsibility of the voter to vet the candidates to determine the ones who have demonstrated their honesty, integrity, and eligibility that have honored their oaths of office to uphold and defend the Constitution (if they have been in office), and who have a record of performance that demonstrates they have made those hard decisions.

It should be obvious I will never vote for Romney, Santorum, or Gingrich to be my employee to hold any public office. I carefully looked at their morals, ethics, qualifications, and their voting records. Instead, and because of a thirty year length record of voting for American ideals and concepts, I am voting for Dr. Ron Paul.

Saturday, February 11, 2012

The Alternative Isn't Ominous

I never really gave a thought about the term birth control until quite recently. But while listening to some of the discussion and debates on the issue that has become the recent diversion from what is really wrong, it occurred to me that "birth control" sounds ominous. When I hear the term mentioned it brings up horrible images of government control over who may have children.

The issue is really not about contraception, or abortion, or religious freedom. It is only about the individual's right to exercise the right of choice. This right is guaranteed under the U.S. Constitution and no government has any right to claim authority in the matter. This current person occupying the Presidency has done more to erode liberties than any other since Franklin Delano Roosevelt when he gave us all up to the Federal Reserve and the international banks behind it.

The Truth behind popular American History is easily uncovered. A fair researcher with the tools available to him at any public library and that has read this, will easily find all the true data required to form their own opinions about what is really going on and what is really at stake. I think most Americans do not realize that they are an election away from losing most of their liberties and rights. After all, they already lost their homes, savings, and the earnings of their grandchildren to the same people that want freedoms and rights for themselves and no one else.

Is there nothing that can be done? Will America cease to be a free and sovereign nation? Will it become just another part of another banker-backed corporate State like the ones in the European Union? The Bilderberg Group has stated our country will be a part of the North American Union and the new currency has already been printed and is called the Amero. Nothing really will change except there will be no more Constitution, in its place will be a set of rules and permissions that will define what a citizen is and what he can do. You will no longer be a free individual. You will be a number, like the ones on any of the cards you carry in your wallet, or the one they use to tax you and follow all of your banking transactions. But under the new system, you do not earn a wage or salary with a chance of making more by working harder or longer hours. You will be given what "they" feel is enough to live on and no more.

Perhaps, you will get a day off when you turn in one of your fellow workers for talking about something that the government doesn't like or has made a crime. Won't that be fun?

This upcoming election is your opportunity to make the choice to elect Dr. Ron Paul as your 45th President of the United States of America and after his election all that has happened in the past will be a bad dream. Dr. Paul has plans that have been presented to the public. Of course, you will have to also elect a House and Senate that will uphold their oaths of office to defend the U.S. Constitution, and will work with Dr. Paul to repair the damage that already has happened. Then it will up us in the future, to elect a President and Congress that will keep our country and its' citizens safe and insure our freedom!

The alternative isn't ominous, it's the end of liberty and freedom.

Tuesday, February 7, 2012

What America Means to Me: or Some Essential Parts of It

I was born in the late 1940's and grew up in the '50's. My formal education began with Jacks & Jill's during 1950 and continued unabated with few summer or winter breaks until I graduated from school and enlisted with The U.S. Navy in '68. I attend school during my entire enlistment and received an honorable discharge during '72 and remained on temporary duty (TDRL) until placed on the retired list in 1974. I decided to continue the pursuit of formal education until graduation 1998. Since that time, I have informally continued my education where my interests dictate.

As I became a young man, my day would typically consist of the common household activities, rising, bathing, dressing and taking breakfast at that point school began. My time at school followed a rigid pattern concerning certain traditions. At the commencement of each day, all students gathered, hands were placed over hearts and the national anthem began and the raising of the U.S. Flag commenced. Before the beginning of the first class, the class would stand beside their desks and, with hand over heart, sing the Pledge of Allegiance. Class followed class until dinner and then classes resumed until time for supper. All students then gathered and the lowering of the U.S. Flag and taps was sound. This ceremonial tradition continued daily, until I transferred into public school during the eighth grade,  where there was little tradition and even less respect.

Years later I took the Oath of Military Service when I Joined the U.S. Navy.

I hold great respect for the Flag, the Pledge of Allegiance, and the oath I took;   however, I have even greater respect for the instrument which our Nation was formed under, The Constitution for the united States of America. In detail, it describes the parts of government and their composition. This document also contains the manner in which the parts are allowed to interact. The Constitution for the united States of America also contains a Bill of Rights which applies to all U.S. Citizens. Amendments have been adopted and repealed since its enactment, which may or may not have had worth. It was written in common English of the time in a manner which was expected to be understood by every U.S. Citizen. This does not mean that all citizens could read but could understand what was being said when another read it out loud.

It holds the foundation of ideas and concepts our nation of people represent.

Many other documents of the time contain a much more detailed account and commentary of arguments, both for and against, the various ideas and concepts involved in the composition. The Constitution for the united States of America remains the only single source document that defines America. All other documents of any nature are subordinate. To be sure, there are many other source documents which support its reasoned construction. The United States Declaration of Independence another U.S. sole source document, which itself has many other documents of the time and previous times with which it is supported. These support documents contain many ideals or ideas which were conceptually incorporated in the composition of its construction.

The People of the United States are the primary governing body. They delegate the day to day responsibility of governance to the Federal Republic through representatives and the combination is bound together under the Constitution for the united States of America. The process of selecting representatives is determined by casting individual votes.

Every U.S. Citizen has the right and responsibility to uphold and defend the U.S Constitution against all enemies. If this single source document and the integral components are allowed to be violated in any way, its' worth is in question. If the Constitution for the united States of America falls due to inattention to its maintenance the Nation falls and the American concept and actuality of a United States of America ceases to exist. It becomes something else that is defined by something else. I vote for the most qualified representatives and candidates that will uphold and defend the Constitution for the united States of America above all else.

I do not believe in political parties and have changed my affiliation many times in order to vote for the candidate best qualified with a proven record of decisions ,that will uphold and defend the Constitution for the united States of America, and that will be beneficial to the Nation.

I Trust Statesmen;  I Do Not Trust Politicians.

I cast my vote to maintain the Constitution for the united States of America first, everything else becomes secondary. If a candidate has a record of any unethical, immoral or improper action of any kind while in or out of office that has damaged the letter or spirit of Constitution for the united States of America, I will not and have never voted for that candidate. I will die first before that consideration is undertaken.