It is predictions and prophecy that guides many. It seems that when you believe so strongly in something, that it will occur. Many people believe in the End Times, and they have pretty most the same idea of what that is supposed to look like.
I see a possibility of an alternative outcome. But it will take a great amount of people who are willing to look beyond the doom and gloom prophets many people now follow. I see the possibility that people all over the world will begin to awaken.
For so long, the world has been fighting a spiritual tug-of-war as different religions claim exclusive dominion over the souls of humanity. Followers of Jesus, Mohammed, and Moses all believe their way is the only way to salvation. But what if they are all wrong?
It is quite arrogant for people to cling to beliefs that put the Earth at the center of the Universe. At some point in the past there lacked a basic knowledge of the cosmos and the Earth was even considered to be flat, and punishment of death do those that dared to think otherwise.
As a nation, we face the most important election in our history. The United States was founded on fundamental principles that stated our rights our derived from our Creator, in whatever form that may be to you as an individual. It doesn't matter what God or religion you believe in. As far as individual rights are concerned in the context of a government, our Constitution makes it your right to choose. But keep in mind, others have that same right also. And most important is the fact that because both you and they share the same rights, you don't have to share the same beliefs and opinions, nor can you force your beliefs and opinions on others. That is a clear violation of their God-given rights.
But throughout history, there are always those who feel that "they" know what is best for others. Whether it be a church or an entire religion, whether it be the local, state or federal government, there are always those who think their way is best for the community or for society. I feel there are some basic rights that get infringed upon when one special interest group tries to force their beliefs on everyone.
Which brings us back to why the world must and will change. It is a matter of choice. Some choose to back a group thought process and tell us that they are "free thinkers" and that they just happen to agree with most of the group. If the group is of a special interest, then that it to the exclusion of all others who are not in that particular group or who just don't agree with their opinions.
This nation as an example to the rest of the world, was to allow everyone group to live as they feel best for themselves but without interfering with everyone else. But that was also against the wishes of those groups who wished to control all the groups, and who wanted to homogenize society into a group of obedient workers and managers. They assumed the roles of executive officers and with privileges that denied the majority their basic God-given rights.
Bans on anything the government wants to control is against basic human rights. Allowing one group special privileges over all others is an infringement on the rights of others. Often I hear or read about people who feel that they have been wronged by others who have not allowed basic rights. The simple solution is to allow them rights but not to grant special privileges to them.
The world is in crisis. Economies are toppling the world over. Political and religious conflicts occur daily, with humans murdering humans simply because they differ in thinking. It is all a manipulation and it is made easy because most people deny that it exists. People refuse to believe that their government would harm them. Especially when their government is formed under their beliefs in God. Somehow they equate the religious leaders as being all knowing and always right about what God wants from you.
Did you ever bother just asking God? Do you really think that any other human has a more direct communication with God than you or I? Doesn't it seem rather arrogant to think that if God wanted to tell the world something, that it would be through one religion as opposed to all others?
There is religious war being waged today. It is being waged on many fronts as Islam and Christianity clash and Judaism it caught in the middle. But more important to the idea of God-given rights, it the ideological and philosophical war being fought. That the two are intertwined is obvious. Each religion has its own set rules, or prohibitions. And the forcing of those prohibitions as laws of government directly infringe on the God-given rights of all others, who are of a different faith than the current majority or the loudest protester.
As we are less than a week away from the 2012 Presidential Election, it appears that there are lines being drawn to differentiate between the two most prominent candidates in the media. Yet there are so parallels between these two, I find it less than amusing that the major likenesses are most ignored.
Both Barack Obama and Mitt Romney are for big government and tight control over the citizens. Individual rights mean nothing to either of them although they each pay lip service to it, and defend the denial and suspension of rights when the illusion of security is at risk.
Make no mistake; there is no difference when it comes to enforcing laws like the Patriot Act or National Defense Authorization Act. Both agree that if they feel it necessary, an Executive Order can be written that will by-pass the normal channels of legislation to do whatever it is they want to do.
While on the surface they seem so far apart on many issues that are relevant, they both support the same methods that got us in this mess, whether it is taxes and regulation, or defining a class of people to single out as being good or bad for the nation.
Is it too late to convince registered voters of both major parties to abandon the party and vote for a different candidate? How about a Libertarian? How about Gary Johnson?
Thursday, October 25, 2012
Tuesday, October 23, 2012
The lies Romney told years ago are now coming back to haunt him. When I mentioned this in many posts, most people called me a “Paulbot” claiming that Romney, the man who finished third in the 2008 RNC race, was the best candidate the GOP had. They were wrong then and they are still wrong now.
There was and is only one candidate that Obama and his “handlers” knew would defeat the President in November. That is what the post, Obama Issues "Kill Order" Regarding Ron Paul and Russia Prepares for Nuclear World War III was all about. They all knew that Ron Paul was gaining support from the younger voters and the independents who were fed up with the farce of the so-called two-party system.
In caucuses and primaries across the nation, Ron Paul was gaining on all of the other nominees. In order to stop him, the votes were rigged; the rules were changed by the RNC to disenfranchise delegates supporting Ron Paul. All manner of corruption and media propaganda was used to stop Ron Paul from gaining the nomination.
It is always difficult to defeat an incumbent, more so when the players are cheating. But there is a solution. Vote for Ron Paul!
No matter how much the media and the parties tell you about their candidates, the truth is plain to see by all who wish to see it. Ron Paul is the People’s Candidate because his past and present reflect his commitment to obeying the Constitution and respecting the rights of individuals.
Ron Paul has a solid plan to restore the United States to liberty and prosperity. Outlined here in the post Dr. Ron Paul's Plans To Reduce The Cost Of Government he displays a logical and reasonable approach to make America great once again, both for the People of the United States and in the eyes of the world. All he needs from us is our support and vote.
Monday, October 22, 2012
Change is the one constant that we all can depend on. Whether it is the weather or the seasons, the pressing issues of the moment, change is inevitable.
Many people resist change. “Why can’t it be like it was?” It is because like the seasons, we all change also. Some will change for the better as they experience and learn and others will resist changing no matter what they experience or learn to the contrary of their beliefs.
Nonetheless, change will occur. And in the context of what we live in as a world, the change that has been coming is not the change that most intelligent people feel comfortable with. But it remains constant.
Here in the United States, we get to elect a new President every four years, and if we are pleased with the performance during that term, we can elect the President for another term of four years. And how shall we measure that performance?
Some will say that during Obama’s term, their lives are better. Most will probably say otherwise. I include myself in the latter group, as I have witnessed the rise in unemployment, much of which is unreported since many of those who collected compensation have exhausted their benefits and are no longer counted as unemployment claims or job applicants for that matter. Many jobs have just disappeared over the last four years.
Some will claim that the Affordable Patient Protection Act will help millions who currently have no health insurance to be covered. My experience is that the price paid for that coverage is less coverage for those who have been paying premiums and even those who have been using subsidized or government provided health care in the past. I have felt the change on a personal level by being denied coverage for dental and vision, and even for a medical device prescribed by a specialist.
The justification for denial of care is an accounting policy, not a medical one. And as more of the Obamacare policies come on line there will be more complaints and less coverage all coming at a higher cost to those who will be paying so that others, currently like me, will have coverage. But once again, having coverage and being denied treatment is still like having no coverage at all.
The candidates debate issues, many of which are targeting particular groups of voters. What they are not debating is the basic liberties and rights that are being taken from the American people. Sure they have justifications for doing so. They always can justify their actions and many people will believe they are justified in doing so.
So I am proposing change in our government, not just in who sits in the Oval Office, but those who legislate in both houses of Congress. I propose taking Democrats and Republicans out of office and replacing them with citizens like ourselves who have no vested interest in creating laws that benefit their lobbyists and themselves at the consequence of so many millions of America people.
I propose that doctors and not politicians help write health care policy without the interference of groups like the American Medical Association and their pharmaceutical manufacturing supporters.
Saturday, October 20, 2012
It is easy to assume that most Americans are looking for an alternative to four more years of President Obama and his administration; however it is not clear in what direction the mainstream alternative will take us.
It is quite obvious that Mitt Romney is the choice of the Republican Party, yet it is also obvious the lengths they have taken to subvert challenges to his candidacy at all costs. Even the formidable Tea Party lobby has been usurped by the ‘neo-cons’ who have chosen to back a candidate who clearly was not even a second choice just four years ago. Now they expect a short-term memory public will jump on the bandwagon just to replace the incumbent President. With taglines like, “Anyone but Obama!” it is believed that high fuel prices and high unemployment will cause many Democrats and independent voters to back the GOP candidate.
This a reaction without a reasonable basis. It was evident on 2008 that the GOP did not want Ron Paul as their candidate. Instead they backed the most liberal choice in John McCain and the current candidate finished third in the convention behind former Governor Mike Huckabee. In the caucuses and debates that led to the primaries, and finally to the Republican National Convention, evidence of corruption and fraud went unnoticed and under reported by the privately-owned major media, who fell in line with party propaganda to boost a ‘flip-flopping’ Mitt Romney into the presidential candidacy.
In the post, Obama Issues "Kill Order" Regarding Ron Paul and Russia Prepares for Nuclear World War III , evidence surfaced in foreign media that the Obama camp was adamant about keeping Ron Paul off the ballot, as they knew he was the most formidable foe the President would face in the November elections. It was Ron Paul who they feared would topple the regime and begin the real revolution to restore the Republic.
Apparently that sentiment is still stoking the fires as we are less than a month away from the polls, we still find the power structure continues to divide the American vote. Several States have unlawfully refused to allow Ron Paul on the ballot, and now some are saying that Ron Paul write-in votes will not be counted. Furthering the division is the Libertarian Party who backed Gary Johnson, an early dropout for the Republican nomination, who all of a sudden is thumping a platform that is the hallmark of the Ron Paul campaign and the Revolution Movement.
Reasonable people seldom make rash decisions, so it must be well planned and implemented by a propaganda campaign that attacks on many fronts, confusing the voter with so many rhetorical points. With all of the points of attack, I see one that is ignored; liberty is omitted in all the rhetoric. The economy and education, healthcare and women’s rights, national security and terrorism, are all good points to address although how these issues are solved by government leaves many wondering what happened to our basic rights. But before it can be brought up in public forum, another crisis must be handled, once again obscuring the real issues in the face of another immediate danger or threat to national security.
The fate of the entire world rests on the choices America makes in this coming Presidential Election. The very essence of freedom teeters on the edge of a precipice with no safety net. The future of mankind will be determined by an election not unlike elections that brought Adolph Hitler and other dictators to power. But this time it is not one nation alone, it is a global maneuver that has been decades in the making.
Will America react or will they exercise reason? We will all know in a few weeks!
Wednesday, October 17, 2012
The propaganda has become part of education in public schools and is enforced by federal mandates and standards. If schools or districts do not comply, they face withheld funding or worse. School system mandates have prevented parents from being responsible for their own children.
The privately-owned major media has been controlled by certain policies the government advocates. What they call news agencies put forward is filtered and if it does not conform to policy is downplayed or eliminated. Emmy Award winning journalist Amber Lyon left CNN having stated that CNN promotes propaganda and not journalism. Longtime anchor Lou Dobbs resigned from CNN for the same reasons.
Because the news networks are influenced or directed by policy,the truth no longer matters. it is difficult to find real news reported by the major media outlets. The wire services, AP and Reuters for example, are used as sources of news by all of the major newspapers and privately-owned major media networks.
With the purchase of ABC by Disney, we now have another 'Mickey Mouse' media outlet, and I apologize to Mickey Mouse for the reference. I do not apologize to the many ignorant participants of the farce, who are selling this garbage to the public or the public that is buying it.
Tuesday, October 16, 2012
This blog reported the concerted effort by both Democrats and Republicans to keep Ron Paul off the ballots. The reason was evident that he was the only one that can beat Obama head-to-head. Anyone with a pulse can see that now that Romney has shown some life as a contender in spite of the fact that he is more like Obama than different, further division of the voters seems necessary to keep Obama in office so he can complete the destruction of the United States he started in 2008.
Fast and Furious gun sales to Mexican gangsters pushed onto Eric Holder but defended by the White House, and we know how Defense Secretary Leon Panetta totally ignored Congress, in fact, told Congress that he gets his orders from NATO and the UN. Now we have a Hillary Clinton-run Department of State that is trying to take the blame for the killing of U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens, and while it is her responsibility, she takes her directives from the President.
Would a President Romney have handled this differently? I don't know that because Romney has changed his mind more often that a mother changes her baby's diapers. What I do know is that a President Ron Paul would not have allowed the killings to happen in the first place, because his policy is clear regarding "meddling" in foreign nations.
The division is not about right/left or even the few issues that privately-owned major media keeps shoving at us. It's really a matter of principles of liberty, the foundations of our republic, the very survival of our nation. That is the real issue that we need to focus on this election.
Do Americans really trust Romney and Ryan will be much of an improvement over Obama? Based on results, Ryan has proved to me he can lie as well as the left, in fact he did lie to the Tea Party folks that backed his election on his promise to reduce deficit spending and not raise the debt ceiling. He voted for the debt ceiling increase. Ron Paul has a history of voting strictly on constitutional grounds, even when his constituents thought otherwise, and they elected him again and again not because of what he promised or gave them, but because he always demonstrates integrity and honesty.
Sunday, October 14, 2012
History shows that no matter how bitter the battle and how costly the victory, the public will soon forget and feel they can once again trust others to protect them.
That happened with the victors of the Revolutionary War as the general public relaxed and allowed others to deal with the protection of the new Republic. They soon forgot how important it was to their own liberty to be wary and remain vigilant. There are always those who attempt to subvert the will of the people through deceit and force.
The entire chronology of the events that leads up to the present will be too lengthy to display in a blog article. However it does demonstrate the steps that were taken to slowly take control of the nation and the methods employed were devious.
Controlling the People’s money was the primary goal employed. The failed Aldrich Bill was later reintroduced as the Federal Reserve Act, and the public was duped into believing in was the cure for economic collapse. Reality has demonstrated the contrary in that it is the cause and not the cure.
Getting the individual States to lose the Senatorial selection played a major part in defeating the Republic. The 17th Amendment needs to be repeals so that there is a more equitable balance of power in the Congress.
Of course that alone will not restore liberty to the States and the People respectively, but it will serve to repair the foundation of federal government that become shaky when the amendment was ratified. Some question the validity of that ratification, and I mention it here so my readers may further research and determine the veracity of it for themselves.
The education of the young was another part of society that became a “responsibility” of the federal government through the effective lobby of the corporate leaders in America, why felt by controlling what was taught and how student were “supposed” to think, it would benefit the corporate need for disciplined workers. By further standardizing education into primary and secondary, and then post-secondary further segregated from the former two, they made that college and University education expensive so that the average worker could not afford it for themselves or their children. It was an effective process to separate People into “classes.”
The premise of “life, liberty and property” became “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” where happiness became synonymous with having two weeks vacation after all the living expenses were paid, and the assumption of property ownership was unlawfully replaced with deeds issued by the corporate state. Think you “own” your house? Try refusing to pay property taxes and see how long you remain in possession of it. It is the State’s property so long as you pay your lease fees which are called property taxes.
Motor vehicles are not owned by the People, they are registered to the lessee, and the lessee pays fees to register said vehicle in their name as the responsible party.
Instead of protecting the religious rights of the People, the modern interpretation of the Constitution fools the People into thinking that banning any religious displays in public is protection. Under the guise of not wanting to offend others with contrary beliefs the rights to religious expression are thereby suppressed. That is unless of course, the religion happens to be Muslim and the political environment wants to appear tolerant by becoming intolerant to expression of all other faiths. It is this very thing that the Constitution was to prevent.
People step up and dare to challenge the system of delusion only to be beat back with anger, arrest, harassment, and ridicule. No suppression or retribution is unwarranted when the government and its puppet masters need to quell the uprising against them.
So we are left with this:
Obey the government no matter what they tell you or become a dissenter, an insurgent, a rebel, a terrorist. Regardless of how you feel, the government will choose what category you fall into based on the level of your resistance to slavery. They will determine whether you can be interred and “re-educated” or if you are threat to society because you cannot be reprogrammed, and therefore must be eliminated from being a disruptive influence on others.
Wednesday, October 10, 2012
What God gives us the government wants to take away. There is no reason for Americans to think that government grants you rights. Our Declaration of Independence makes that perfectly clear.
We are led to believe that laws that “protect” us from terrorists are in our best interests, even when they infringe on our rights. Nothing can be further from the truth. Our rights are unalienable and granted by our Creator, and unless we willingly or unwillingly give up those rights, by deception or force, no individual or group of individuals can take them from us.
While we can point to more recent usurpation(s) of constitutional law such as the Patriot Act and the National Defense Authorization Act as infringements on the rights of We the People, the beginnings trace further back into our nation’s history. Now we also have H. R. 347 which limits free speech.
With the passage of the unconstitutional Federal Reserve Act in 1913 and the subsequent laws of Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s New Deal, our liberty has slowly been taken away from us. By accepting the Social Security number assigned to each and every one of us, we have been reduced from a sovereign individual to a possession of the government. Even our births and marriages have been cataloged with a number assigned so that we may be tracked and taxed accordingly.
There was never a repeal of the apportioned taxing laws of the Constitution, only unlawful amendments that make it seem lawful. The issue is complicated by the fact that these unconstitutional laws are accepted by Americans by deception of corporate and contract laws that have corrupted the government structure itself.
There are no provisions in the Constitution for the government to control education. If was deemed necessary I am certain that our founders would have included such in the founding documents. There is no mention in all of those founding documents of “persons” because a “person” is a fictitious entity created under corporate law, instituted by the Uniform Commerce Code. These unconstitutional laws actually bypass the Constitution and create a corporate system that is based on Admiralty or Maritime Law, also known as the laws of the seas.
Our Constitution and the limits of federal government were based on natural law or the Law of Nations. There is an important distinction between these two very different forms of government. Further information may be found on a very good website called De-tax Canada which gives in-depth coverage to the methods employed by the powerful banking elites to control the world’s population through subversion and deceit. Every aspect of society has been infiltrated and corrupted by the bankers and their henchmen.
Now the government is making pacts or treaties with the United Nations to support the Small Arms Ban Treaty which is yet another infringement on the rights of Americans to own and bear arms. Don’t be fooled into thinking that this is just an Obama thing. This is being done regardless of which Democrat or Republican is in the White House and our representatives in Congress are just going along with it.
When will it end? It won’t end until either we are all subjects of a world government power structure or we revolt against these atrocities and take back our nation from the grips of those who seek to destroy the United States.
The real threat to America is not from Islamic terrorists; It’s from the people we entrusted with protecting us.
Tuesday, October 9, 2012
"From the 1893 Dictionary of Law:
Treason. Betrayal, treachery, breach of faith or allegiance.
Treason may exist only as between allies: it is a general appellation to denote not only offenses against the king and government, but also accumulation of guilt which arises whenever a superior reposes a confidence in a subject or inferior, between whom and himself there subsists a natural, a civil, or even a spiritual relation, and the inferior so abuses that confidence, so forgets the obligations of duty, subjugation, and allegiance, as to destroy the life of the superior.
When disloyalty attacks majesty itself it is called, by way of distinction, high treason, equivalent to the 'crimen loesoe majestatis' of the Romans.
High treason is the most heinous civil crime a man can commit. If indeterminate, this alone is sufficient to make a government degenerate into arbitrary power."
Copied from the website: Detax Canada - http://www.detaxcanada.org/treason.htm
Is the President of the United States guilty of high treason? What about the Secretaries of Defense and State? And may we also include the Attorney General in this grouping? If you are of the opinion that the Constitution of the United States is the law of the land, then it must be evident that the above mentioned offices have violated the Constitution and hence the trust of the American People to whom they vowed to protect.
We can view the actions of Eric Holder as criminal as he had violated law by allowing known criminals to obtain weapons through illegal means. Americans have been murdered with these weapons and yet the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms along with the Department of Justice have not been held accountable by Congress or the President. In fact, many of them including Barack Obama have covered up and stalled investigations into the matter.
In blatant violation of the Constitution regarding declaration of war, Secretary of Defense, Leon Panetta told Congress that he will take such orders from NATO and the UN. And Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton and the President are signing UN Small Arms Ban treaties also a direct violation of the Second Amendment.
And all most Americans do is complain to one another instead of marching on their State capitals and demanding their Governors protect them from just a runaway federal administration that resembles more of a cabal or cartel.
This election in November may be the last one as there is no chance for the United States to remain sovereign while giving in to such an international order as is the United Nations and the central banks that are now in control. Even candidate Romney has indicated his support for the central banks, saying that the Federal Reserve System is better than having Congress responsible for the Treasury.