By The People

There are fundamental flaws in how American government operates today,
contrary to the Constitution and the vision of a representative republican form of governance.
I intend doing something about it: by educating and informing others who
are not even aware of the dangers.

Wednesday, August 31, 2016

To and Fro, Who Will Take The Final Blow?

Anyone who has a penny's worth of common sense should understand what kind of TURMOIL and APPREHENSION Judge Anna Brown's kangaroo Tribunal and proclamation have caused, not to mention the FEAR of Government reprisal. As the Esteemed readers understand from the previous post, 'Up Is Down Left Is Right, or Government Is Good, Fight! Fight! Fight!', Judge Brown's announcement that witnesses will be considered Unindicted Co-conspirators runs in every direction except along the path to Truth and Justice. The American Legal System serves no one except itself at the cost of the American People and has done so for, at the very least, 81 years (see source references), but that is another issue. The Governments efforts to justify the means to arrive at unlawful ends is a small part and parcel of the unlawful conversion of Public Wealth (read as land grab - selling off Natural Resources for private gain) perpetrated by the Obama Administration's Secretary of State, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

The selling off of Natural Resources that belong to the Sovereign States and the American 
People is just one of the methods used by the U.S. Federal Government (a Foreign Corporation) to plunder America and rob by force the wealth of the people. The 'Uranium one scandal' is well enough known that anyone can learn more about it, but that is another issue. Please, excuse my digression:  The entire concept of JUSTICE and LAW was discarded when Government Enforcers shot LaVoy Finnicum, who had his hands up, three times in the back. This was done to halt the protests and petitions landowners have with the BLM (a Puerto Rican Corporation) and the UNITED STATES Inc (a French Corporation). Hired by the UNITED STATES Inc. and charged or mandated with Managing Public Lands and Property, the BLM has instead followed the prescribed concepts behind the Strong Cities Network (SCN), namely, Regionalism (see Notes Below) this regional integration de facto contributes to those economic forces that build globalization. This Regionalism which forces people off the lands they own and into cities (Please See;  'Fighting Extremism: The Strong Cities Network, or Fundamentally Changed America: More Changes Are Necessary, or Mindless Americans Need No Sovereignty: Soetoro/Obama Knows Best', and 'Land of the Ignorant , Or Home of the Destitute', and the book 'Rockefeller--Regionalism: The shadow behind Oregon's LCDC: an encyclopedia about political intrigue') coupled with U.N.'s uninhabited “buffer zones” around several U.S. national parks (See Article Below) more readily allows the BLM and Government Claims to Private and Public Lands.

As can easily be understood, all this unlawful Government activity at the local level; the false allegations, the charges, change in venue, Unindicted co-conspirators, is just a symptom of and diversion from a much larger real conspiracy to Plunder America, Rob the States and The People of wealth and line the pockets of the people running this FARCE with the ill-gotten gains.

"Guerilla Media Network
Home Of The Pete Santilli Show
AUGUST 31, 2016

Witnesses In Bundy Case Terrified Over Judge Ruling For Live Feed Of Trial Into Burns Oregon

Witnesses for both the defense and the prosecution, set to testify in the controversial trial 
over the Occupation of the Malheur Refuge, are terrified by the idea of possible retaliation 
from the community, if Judge Anna Brown allows the BLM to move forward with their plans for providing a “live feed” of the trial, to what one Portland Paper (OPB) is calling the “VICTIMS” of the standoff.

In a frantic call to GMN this morning one witness expressed their concerns by saying, the Judge obviously doesn’t understand the dynamics of the situation in Burns, which brought hundreds of protesters there in the first place.  The Government has gone to great lengths to protect informants and FBI agents from public scrutiny in fear of their safety — Why then are other witnesses not being allowed the same protection?

Burns Oregon is a community divided and the deck is stacked in favor on the “anti-Bundy side” making the life of over 40% of the population in Harney County a living nightmare.

Children are being bullied, business owners are being threatened and the fact they are going to add fuel to the fire by broadcasting this trial to what many perceive as aggressive employees of the United States Government is horrifying, said one witness.

“We are terrified; These people running the show in Portland are failing to protect the very 
people they say were terrorized by the occupation.”

The witnesses are quick to point out that it’s not just those who will be testifying for the 
defense who are concerned; Those set to testify against the Occupation are also expressing deep concern over their well being as the government prepares to put them on camera and blast their testimony out to a community that's already on the edge.

” I never wanted to testify in this trial, says another witness and the government is forcing 
me. What happens to me if somebody gets the wrong idea?” explained a witness for the Government

After the Occupation ended the media and the Judge lost interest in Burns and Harney County in general, and the witnesses say this ruling shows the complete disconnect between the court and her attorneys assigned to represent their best interest on both sides in this trial.  Witnesses took note that not one Defense Attorney objected to the government's request for a live feed into Burns leaving them all to questions just who this trial is for, and just how much they care about them as human beings.

Whether you fall on the side of the government in this one, or the Occupiers, witnesses on both sides agree that a live feed of this trial is irresponsible and creates a terrifyingly dangerous potential for them in Harney County and definitely puts lives in danger.

GMN spoke to an attorney close to the case, but not representing any clients involved, and his opinion was as follows;

"If you are going to allow a live feed it is appalling that it is going to be for those who are 
so openly bias.  If we are going to allow a live feed for the obviously anti-protestor group 
then what is stopping the court from allowing the whole of America to watch this proceeding?

It is unfair that once again the government is allowed to run the narrative and does not allow for others on the supporting side to have an opportunity to watch in support of these witnesses who have so much much to lose in Harney County.

I too was shocked that not one Defense Attorney objected on behalf of the safety of their 

A message from Harney County went out to Judge Anna Brown and various Attorneys involved in the case this morning;

"I just want to express my concern in regards to the news of a trial being live streamed to the local BLM office. I personally have a HUGE problem with this. Those of us who have been subpoenaed will only be showcased as “domestic terrorist” sympathizers allowing the already bigoted community of government workers to ostracize, alienate, and ridicule us more than they already have. In my opinion, this is a gross abuse of power by the judge and just shows an assignment of elitism to the government workers they have so loosely characterized as 'victims'. Unless you have lived in Burns, Hines, or Harney County it is difficult to understand what is really going on here. In January our community suffered from a spiderweb of fractures that have just grown deeper as the months have passed. Many of us have suffered in our businesses because of our actions and expression of our opinions during the occupation. The spread of hatred has even boiled over to our children who are suffering at school at the hands of these 'victims' and their children.

Despite my feelings and or the reason I was subpoenaed, my concern is for the safety of my children and the ability to maintain my home and business in Harney County. My kids have to go to school with the wives of many BLM employees. My business is dependent on locals. What will Judge Brown offer as a solution when my children are slighted of an opportunity because their teacher is married to a BLM employee who watched my testimony live in the comfort of his office and he didn’t agree with me?  What will Judge Brown offer as a solution when my business is forced to close its doors because of lost contracts with either government agencies or locals that have relation to disgruntled BLM employees?  It is my opinion that allowing and condoning the live stream of the trial to the local BLM office is a blatant disregard for the safety and wellbeing of all witnesses that have been subpoenaed  ~ Witness Signed"

Witnesses who will be testifying for both the Prosecution and the Defense are asking community groups and social media platforms, on both sides, to please call the Attorneys and Prosecutors in this case and ask them to respectfully ask Judge Brown to drop the plans providing a live feed into Harney County. In a case where witness tampering through intimidation is already a problem, witnesses believe this ruling has opened the door for more of the same. It’s time officials in Portland base their decisions concerning Harney County on reality and stop making this about them and remember the people they are supposed to be representing. - End Article"

"4 included Comments - The Pete Santilli Show

With anxiety brewing in America from those who seek justice, to those who refuse justice to be equally administered, there is no doubt in my mind, that the long arms of the law in Washington D.C. are more concerned with their agenda of world domination at the expense of one great country, the BLM is just a rock in their shoes that they don't want to be bothered with, because the outcome has already been written. When is enough, enough before dialogue ceases and the inevitable will begin.

Anything having to do with the United States government and the American people, are like oil and water, and right now the odds are against the people.

Lynn Kopa Balogh 
Remember YOU and your group invaded their neighborhood and tried to take over with an Idaho militia and. set up a shadow government to overpower the local elected judges and sheriff with guns no less. Now your crying foul?

PatriotGranny to Lynn Kopa Balogh 
#LoadOfCrap Not to mention, even if that were true, and it's not, it wouldn't be the fault of the witnesses. Overpower the local elected judges and sheriff with guns..... LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!! Where do you people come up with this stuff. Completely DELUSIONAL!

SUPER 68 IS DOWN to Lynn Kopa Balogh
No one from the Idaho III%ers nor the Oregon III%ers nor the PPN were involved with occupying the refuge... The Bundy Bunch conspired to use the support rally for the Hammonds as a front to facilitate occupying the refuge.

All the Idaho and Oregon III% members along with members of the PPN organized the 02 January 2016 support rally for the Hammonds. In fact, most folks were furious that the Bundy Bunch came into OUR house (Oregon) and made their own rules. They took the Hammond issue and made it about them.

Every day now we hear updates about how the poor Bundy's are being abused in prison. First of all, the Bundy's are NOT in prison, they are in a county lockup.

Funny that we hear daily about the poor Bundy's being abused in jail, yet not a PEEP about the Hammonds who are in a real prison.

PPN/Idaho III%ers/Oregon III% members NEVER participated in the occupation but they did show up in Burns to try and mediate between the Bundy's and law enforcement"


"New Regionalism represents the current wave of regional integration, which has been characterized by substantial qualitative, quantitative and formal changes in regional integration. Modern analysis of regionalism (namely when based upon the Political Economy Approach) suggests that regional integration de facto contributes to those economic forces that build globalization and increase global competition. As a mater of this fact, the New Regionalism currently changes its character markedly. Today, especially due to the influence of globalization, regionalism is seen as a tool of open economic relations’ liberalization that should ensure both national and regional competitive position in the globalized world. Moreover, both theoretical and empirical analysis of regionalism (i.e. namely comparative analysis of its different cases) leads to the same conclusions. The question however remains, whether today’s European Union corresponds to the most recent trends in regionalism and thus if it is a strong enough tool, which can help European economies to utilize globalization opportunities and to face its threats. Political Economy analysis of the New Regionalism shows important aspects of its reform, and is thus the most important perspective of this paper."

An Abstract for 'Political Economy of the New Regionalism: Global and European Perspective'

Source References:


U.N.-designated panel calls for increased 'buffer zones'

JON DOUGHERTY Published: 07/15/1999 at 1:00 AM

Last year a United Nations-designated panel, at the behest of the Clinton administration, called for the creation of uninhabited “buffer zones” around several U.S. national parks. Since then roughly two dozen U.S. parks and preserves, covering millions of acres of public land, have been included in the plan.

Now, however, new plans to expand these zones are in the works, and the outrage has reached a near fever pitch among experts who say these U.N.-designated sites are merely attempts to “globalize” huge portions of the United States — with taxpayers picking up the tab.

Henry Lamb of Eco-Logic — a watchdogorganization that monitors U.N. activities and U.S. sovereignty issues— told WorldNetDaily that one example — at Yellowstone National Park, where the creation of a larger buffer zone is well under way — was “just a sign of things to come.”

“Inside Yellowstone, the U.S. Park Service is shutting down campgrounds as the park is being prepared to become the core of a huge biosphere reserve, as part of the United Nations global biodiversity plan,” he said. “Once established, no human activity will be permitted in the area,” even though U.S. taxpayers must continue to fund the maintenance and upkeep of Yellowstone and other popular outdoor tourist sites.

Lamb said that in order to increase the buffer zone around Yellowstone, the Park Service drove local businesses away by refusing to maintain access roads. When the businesses folded as a result of heavy financial losses, the land was bought with taxpayer money and a larger zone of inaccessibility was created by default.

“Once they buy the land, the government is obviously not going to resell it,” he said, thus creatin permanently larger buffer zones.

“The purpose of establishing sites as U.S. national parks was to have people in them enjoying them,” Lamb added. “But the Clinton administration has completely bought into this U.N. notion that our land ought to be their land, managed by them. And as such, it ought to be uninhabited as well.”

He said if most Americans “knew what was going on (with their national parks), the uproar would be deafening.”

In the case of Yellowstone, Lamb said the government’s acquiescence to the U.N.’s agenda cost a gold mining company about $30 million and in the end prevented them from mining one ounce of known gold reserves, even though the government indicated they initially would have allowed it.

“The owners of the Crown Butte New World gold mine, which is outside of Yellowstone National Park,” he said, “were told by the government to comply with a list of environmental requirements before they could move in and begin mining.”

But after being threatened with non-stop litigation from environmental groups funded by U.N. agencies that could have lasted decades, the mining company finally agreed to a deal that leaves at least $650 million of known gold reserves in the ground instead. That deal provided the company with about $65 million dollars for “more exploration.” Of that amount, the government said about $21 million had to be used for “environmental clean-up.”

Lamb said that Congress has consistently ignored Clinton administration orders and directives designed to implement many of the U.N. mandates. Clinton, he said, is implementing U.N. directives via executive order and presidential directive “because then he doesn’t have to worry about getting Senate treaty ratification.”

At present a U.N.-sponsored biodiversity treaty, designed to limit U.S. public access to so-called “World Heritage Sites” and “Biodiversity sites” is languishing in the Senate. No action is scheduled on its ratification.

Lamb added that in the course of the next several years, with no congressional oversight, the addition of more U.S. parks to the “Heritage” and “Biodiversity” sites lists will follow.

“It is a well-documented fact that the U.N. is trying to gain control over vast amounts of U.S. territories to herd more people into cities where they are more manageable,” Lamb said. “That can’t be done without at least tacit approval from Congress, regardless of the political agenda of any administration.”

Lamb said he has “allies” in Congress that are opposed to the implementation of this, and other, U.N.-mandated land use plans.

“But they’re relatively few and as such equally unsuccessful” in stopping such initiatives, he added."

Another One Bites The Dust -30-

Sunday, August 28, 2016

A Brighter Day for America; or, Will Roberts follow Scallia?

If you have read the related posted articles, see below, you realize why Soetoro/Obama 
is guilty of treason against the united States of America. Esteemed Readers from more than one hundred countries located around the world, are familiar with the content of these articles and have been wondering why the US Congress has not Impeached the Fraud occupying the White House or why the Fraud has not been charged with Treason?  They Need not wonder why any longer:  the Chief Justice of The United States Supreme Court has finally seen the light of day. 

"Supreme Court Justice John Roberts Signs Off On Obama’s Removal For Treason… 
His Career Is Over July 28, 2016

Chief Justice John Roberts has just signed off on something huge. He has signed 
off on Obama possibly being impeached for multiple counts of treason.

The charges against Obama are stated below and really speak for themselves. Many 
violations stem from gun control, immigration and many many more. I hope you enjoy 
this lovely read! An end to an end to Obama!

According to a leaked document, Obama is guilty of the following crimes (that we 
know of):

Article 1, Sect. 1

1. Used Executive Privilege in regards to Fast & Furious gun running scandal. When 
Government misconduct is the concern Executive privilege is negated.

2. Issued 23 Executive Orders on gun control – infringement of the 2nd Amendment.

3. Executive Order bypassing Congress on immigration – Article 1 Section 1, ALL 
Legislative power held by Congress.

4. NDAA – Section 1021. Due process Rights negated. Violation of 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 
and 7th Amendments. White House: ‘War on terrorism’ is over Thursday, August 6, 2009

5. Executive Order 13603 NDRP – Government can seize anything.

6. Executive Order 13524 – Gives INTERPOL jurisdiction on American soil beyond law 
enforcement agencies, including the FBI.

7. Executive Order 13636 Infrastructure Cyber security – Bypassing Congress
Violations: Article 1 Section 1, Art. 4 sect. 4,

8. Signed into law the establishment of “NO Free Speech Zones” – noncompliance is a 

9. Attempt to tax political contributions –

1st. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting 
the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the 
right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress 
of grievances.

Article I Section 7. All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of 
Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills.

Violations: 1st Amendment, Art.1 sect. 7

10. Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) Law – Obama directed DOJ ( Dept. of Justice ) to 
ignore the Constitution and separation of powers and not enforce the law.

Violations:  Article III, Section 3 – 
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court. The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attained. White House: ‘War on terrorism’ is over Thursday, August 6, 2009

11. Drone strikes on American Citizens – 5th Amendment Due process Rights negated.
Article II Section 2. The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.

[The Trading with the Enemy Act (Public Law 65-91, 65th Congress, Session I, Chapters 105, 106, October 6, 1917) ] 18 USC 241 – Sec. 241
Violations : Art. 2 sect.2 , 5th amendment, 18 USC 241 – Sec. 241

12. Bypassed Congress and gave EPA power to advance Cap-n-Trade
Article I Section 1. All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of 
the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.

Violations: Art. 1 Sect. 1

13. Attempt for Graphic tobacco warnings (under appeal) –
Art. 1 sect. 8 Section 8. The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defense and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States; (see list)

1st Amendment. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Violations: 1st Amendment. Art. 1 sect. 8

14. Four Executive appointments – Senate was NOT in recess (Court has ruled unconstitutional yet the appointees still remain)

Art. 1 sect 2 Section 2. The House of Representatives shall be composed of Members chosen every second Year by the People of the several States, and the Electors in each State shall have the Qualifications requisite for Electors of the most numerous Branch of the State Legislature.

Art. 1 sect . 5 Each House shall be the Judge of the Elections, Returns and Qualifications of its own Members, and a Majority of each shall constitute a Quorum to do Business; but a smaller Number may adjourn from day to day, and may be authorized to compel the Attendance of absent Members, in such Manner, and under such Penalties as each House may provide.

Violations: Art. 1 sect 2 & 5 ,

15. Obama took Chairmanship of UN Security Council –
Art 1 Sect. 9. Section 9. The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person.

Violation : Art 1 Sect. 9.

16. Obamacare ( A.C.A. ) mandate – SCOTUS (U.S. SupremeCourt ) had to make it a tax because there is no Constitutional authority.

Art. 2 sect. 1 Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation:–”I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

Violations : Art. 2 sect. 1 , Amendments 1, 2, 9, 10, & 14, Art. 1 sect. 7

18. Healthcare waivers – No president has dispensing powers

1st. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

2nd. A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the 
people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

9th. The enumeration in the Constitution (narrative), of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

10th. The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

14th. The Fourteenth Amendment, guaranteeing equal protection for all citizens, was necessary to secure for freed slaves the same rights as whites. Simply ending slavery was not enough. Prior to the Civil War, it was automatic in many states to treat blacks, whatever their status, as second-class citizens. A ruling by a court in Virginia in 1824 stated, without any effort at dissimulation, that, “And, yet, nobody has ever questioned the power of the legislature to deny to free blacks and mulattoes one of the fist privileges of a citizen — that of voting at election.”

Art 1: Sect. 7 All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills.

Violations: 1st, 2, 9,10, & 14th Amendment, Art 1: Sect. 7

19. Refuses to acknowledge state’s 10th Amendment rights to nullify Obamacare ( Affordable Care Act ).

Article I Section 1. All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.

Violation: Art. 1 sect. 1 , Art. 2. sect. 1 , 10th Amendment

20. Congress did not approve Obama’s war in Libya. Article I, Section 8, First illegal war U.S. has engaged in. Impeachable under Article II, Section 4. Obama falsely claims UN can usurp Congressional war powers.

Violations: Article I, Section 8, Art.2 sect. 1

21. Obama has acted outside the constitutional power given him – this in itself is unconstitutional.

Violations: Art. 2 sect 1

22. With the approval of Obama, the NSA and the FBI are tapping directly into the servers of 9 internet companies to gain access to emails, video/audio, photos, documents, etc. This program is code named PRISM. NSA also collecting data on all phone calls in U.S. Violation of 4th Amendment.

Violations: 4th Amendment.

23. Plans to sign U.N. Firearms treaty – 2nd Amendment.

Violation: 2nd ,4th, 9th, 10th , & 14TH Amendment, Art.1 Sect. 4 , Art. 2 sect. 1

24. The Senate/Obama immigration bill (approved by both) raises revenue – Section 7. All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives;

Violations: Art. 1 sect 4th, 7 , & 8th, Art. 2 sect. 1, Art. 4 sect. 4,

25. Obama refuses to uphold the Business Mandate Law (ACA) for a year. President does not have that authority 

– Article. I. Section. 1. All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States. 
The president ”shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed” Article II, Section 3."


Past Related Posts:

Short of Poison Tipped Darts - Saturday, February 18, 2012

Red Lines In The White House, or WAR For Peace - Part 1 - Thursday, September 5, 2013

Red Lines In The White House, or Selecting The Truth - Part 2 - Saturday, September 7, 2013

Red Lines in The White House, Or Stirring A Pot of Lies - Part 3 - Monday, September 9, 2013

Red lines In The White House, or Criminals, Corruption, and god - Part 4 - Monday, September 16, 2013

What Tomorrow Will Bring: A Tirade: Not Que Sera Sera Part 1 - Thursday, April 3, 2014

What Tomorrow Will Bring: A Tirade: What Life Shall Orders Demand? Part 2 - Friday, April 4, 2014

What Tomorrow Will Bring: A Tirade: Rule by Force and Lies Part 3 - Saturday, April 5, 2014

What Tomorrow Will Bring: A Tirade: Afterthoughts and Words Part 4 - Saturday, April 5, 2014

Meanwhile, Back on The Ranch - Wednesday, March 12, 2014

How to Plant The Seeds of Destruction: or What Did You Say: Who Owns What and Why? Part 1 - Tuesday, April 1, 2014

How to Plant The Seeds of Destruction: or By Hob's Tongue-The Duce You Say! Part 2. - Apr 2, 2014

How to Plant The Seeds of Destruction: or The Corporate Logic of Insanity Part 3A - Apr 2, 2014

How to Plant The Seeds of Destruction or No One Remembered to Close the Gate Part 5 - Wednesday, April 2, 2014

How to Plant The Seeds of Destruction: or The Icelandic Solution No One Remembers Part 6. - Apr 2, 2014

Predators and the Unsuspecting Prey; or, Governments And People Who Pray To Them - Wednesday, January 6, 2016

The Truth Will Set You Free - Thursday, February 6, 2014

Hook, Line, and Sinker - Part 1 - Saturday, February 15, 2014

Hook Line and Sinker: The Plans Are Revealed Part 2 - Sunday, March 2, 2014

Another One Bites the Dust, -30-

Saturday, August 27, 2016

Up Is Down Left Is Right, or Government Is Good, Fight! Fight! Fight!

Anna Brown's kangaroo Tribunal (an unlawful court held by a group of people in order to try someone regarded, especially without good evidence, as guilty of violating the Law) in Portland Oregon is using every underhanded tactic to convict the defendants before the trial. As the Esteemed Readers that have been following the proceedings of the Bundy/Hammond Malheur Wildlife Refuge Protest already know, Ridiculous charges, false allegations, and a parody of due process are only the beginning efforts of this unlawful Legal charade. The Latest effort of Public Policy Administrator Brown and the U.S. Prosecuting Attorney has placed every potential witness of the protest under the cloud of possible arrest on the same false charges and more. The Administrative Legal Tribunal has announced that anyone who actually went to the Malheur Wildlife Refuge is an unindicted co-conspirator

An unindicted co-conspirator, or unindicted conspirator, is a person or entity that is alleged in an indictment to have engaged in conspiracy, but who is not charged in the same indictment; but, once identified, may have alleged actions be declared as somehow supposedly illegal and charges brought in a different indictment. This type of pre-indictment labeling of course colors or taints every potential witness as somehow participating in the supposedly illegal activities that led to the  allegations and indictment of charges. To the mind of the potential witness, this type of Labeling can only place every witness in jeopardy of being indicted. In the eyes of the prosecuting Attorney, all witnesses for the defense are potential targets for new indictments based on skewed allegations and false charges. 

"The legal term "unindicted co-conspirator," or unindicted conspirator, is a person or entity that is alleged in an indictment to have engaged in conspiracy, but who is not charged in the same indictment. Prosecutors choose to name persons as unindicted 
co-conspirators for a variety of reasons including grants of immunity, pragmatic 
considerations, and evidentiary concerns.

The United States Attorneys' Manual generally recommends against naming unindicted 
co-conspirators, although their use is not generally prohibited by law or policy.[1] 
Some commentators have raised due process concerns over the use of unindicted 
co-conspirators.[2] Although there have been few cases on the subject, the Fifth 
Circuit Court of Appeals addressed these concerns in United States v. Briggs.[3]

The term unindicted co-conspirator was familiarized in 1974 when then president Richard 
Nixon was named as an unindicted co-conspirator in indictments stemming from the 
Watergate Investigation. Nixon was not indicted due to concerns about whether the 
United States Constitution allowed the indictment of a sitting President (see Executive 


1. United States Attorneys' Manual, 9-11.130, available at (2008)

2. See Ira P. Robbins, Guilty without Charge: Assessing the Due Process Rights of 
Unindicted Co-Conspirators, 2004 Fed. Cts. L. Rev. 1 (2004)

3. 514 F.2d 794 (5th Cir. 1975).

From Wikipedia"

There is no Justice in any of this activity, it is meant to sway public opinion against anyone charged, or intimidate anyone willing to bare witness to the actions of the protesters and in the process of witness leave themselves open to possible charges. The ultimate goal of all of this activity is to force landowners off their land and to lay claim to public property so those in power can reap financial reward by selling something that does not belong to them. Gold, Uranium, Clinton, Uranium One, "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men (women) are almost always bad men (women)." 

There Are No Such Things As Constitutional Rights

You have no constitutional rights and never did. If you thought that you did, then you need to be educated. Let's examine the definitions.

Thomas Jefferson Viewed the Constitution as a Contract Between the States

" Where did D.C. come from? The parties to the contract, known as the Constitution for the United States of America, are the individual states. Neither the federal government, nor the people, as comprising one nation, are a party to the agreement between the several States. Be sure to research how the Federal Corporation is usurping the powers of the people AND the states!"

The Declaration of Independence states:  "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --"

"“The several states composing the United States of America are not united on the principle of unlimited submission to their general government; but…by a compact under the style and title of a Constitution for the United States, and of amendments thereto, they constituted a general government for special purposes [and] delegated to that government certain definite powers,…and…whensoever the general government assumes undelegated powers, its acts are unauthoritative, void, and of no force…To this compact each state acceded as a state, and is an integral party, its co-states forming, as to itself, the other party…”"

"“A Law repugnant to the Constitution is void.” With these words written by Chief Justice Marshall, the Supreme Court for the first time declared unconstitutional a law passed by Congress and signed by the President. Nothing in the Constitution gave the Court this specific power. Marshall, however, believed that the Supreme Court should have a role equal to those of the other two branches of government."

Your unalienable rights are neither granted by the government nor are they granted by a contract (The Constitution), they are "something integral with a whole" part of simply being (they are natural birthrights), which by agreement of the contract, are NOT to be INFRINGED by the government. Therefore ALL FEDERAL STATUTES that are INFRINGEMENTS, CONVERSIONS, or USURPATIONS of your UNALIENABLE RIGHTS are repugnant to the Constitution and are NULL and VOID.

So why do We the People obey these Statutes?  It is the deliberate misrepresentation of these statutes as though they are Laws that lead the people to consent by their ignorance and silence. Are the threats of force, loss of Liberty, confiscation of property, or the conversion of unalienable rights into privileges, which are used by the U.S. government, the determining factors in deciding whether the people or the contracted government will ultimately protect those unalienable rights?


Saturday, August 20, 2016

It Can Happen Here, and Now It May Be Too Late

When are Americans going to wake up and realize that our country has been infiltrated and taken over by a group of foreigners (A foreign-owned for profit Corporation - (the UNITED STATES) who wants to place this country under martial law. Once the roundup of people begins and people are on the way to the FEMA Detention Camps, it will be too late to take back the country.

Once Martial Law is declared by the Fraud Occupying the White House, a completely different set of Laws go into effect. The  U.S. Congress is dissolved, the Supreme Court is dissolved, and all that remains is the Fraud Occupying the White House and the NDRP, NDAA, Patriot Act, and Obama's private army, Homeland Security and the TSA. 

If you think or believe for just one moment these treasonous people care even a little about the People of the united States of America, you are dead wrong and incorrect. The Esteemed Readers Should prepare right now for the worst. Fix America has been warning Americans for the last 8 years that the Declaration of Martial Law is just around the corner. 

There is no Corner remaining.


Please scroll down for video

President Obama signed an executive order that could potentially give him the power to institute martial law in the United States in times of peace or during a national threat.

The National Defense Resources Preparedness Executive Order will give Obama power over “resources and services needed to support such plans and programs.”

Many Americans were shocked to find out that this order gives the president practically unlimited power over US citizens and their property. All in the name of national security of course.


In the order it states, “in the event of a potential threat to the security of the United States actions are necessary to ensure the availability of adequate resources and production capability, including services and critical technology, for national defense requirements.”

According to a White House press release, the US “must have an industrial and technological base capable of meeting national defense requirements and capable of contributing to the technological superiority of its national defense equipment.”

Here is the list:<li>Obama Administration uses IRS to target conservative, Christian and pro-Israel organizations, donors, and citizens.</li><li>In an unprecedented attack on the First Amendment, the Obama Justice Department ordered criminal25 Violations of Law By President Obama and His Administration If you’d been following the news from California following Tuesday’s Anaheim riots spurred by a protest of a nonexistent police force continuum that lead to two fatal shootings of suspects in the Southern California city, chances are you haven’tShocking: Is California's Anaheim Under Martial Law?
In the order the Secretary of Agriculture can allocate material such as “food resources, livestock resources, and the distribution of farm equipment and commercial fertilizer.”

The same goes for all forms of energy, health resources, transportation, and even water resources.

According to the White House press release the purpose is to “delegate authorities and addresses national defense resource policies and programs under the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended (the “Act”).”

The sneaky tactics couldn’t have come at a worst time, especially after the newly signed HR 347 or the “Trespass bill” and even more terrifying the National Defense Authorization Act that allows the president to detain and torture American citizens without due process.

Although many see this as another power grab by the Obama administration this isn’t the first time that a US president has signed an executive order such as this.

His new motion is just an update to executive orders signed in 1994 by President Clinton, which invoke similar powers in a time of crisis.

Even Clinton’s EO 12919 was an amendment to EO 10789 which was issued by the Eisenhower administration back in 1958.

Therefore lawyers claim that this Executive Order wouldn’t grant the president authority he didn’t have before signing it.

William A. Jacobson, an associate clinical professor at Cornell Law School said to, “If someone wants to make the argument that this is an expansion of presidential powers, then do so based on actual language.”

“There is enough that Obama actually does wrong without creating claims which do not hold up to scrutiny,” Jacobson added.

But that’s exactly the language of this order that terrified too many of those who bothered to read it in full.

Even if the president never uses this power, the fact that he has such unlimited authority over Americans and their property doesn’t sound comforting to people assuming they live in the land of free.
Think Jade Helm's Bad? Wait Till You Hear About This Police Force Made on the Heels of JadeHelm

For those who think this is “nothing to worry about”, watch this video of the equipment SECRETLY BEING TRANSPORTED THRU CANADA ( via )!

JADE HELM: Train with Massive Military Equipment Headed for West Coast from Canada""

Related Links: