By The People

There are fundamental flaws in how American government operates today,
contrary to the Constitution and the vision of a representative republican form of governance.
I intend doing something about it: by educating and informing others who
are not even aware of the dangers.

Saturday, August 27, 2016

There Are No Such Things As Constitutional Rights

You have no constitutional rights and never did. If you thought that you did, then you need to be educated. Let's examine the definitions.

Thomas Jefferson Viewed the Constitution as a Contract Between the States

" Where did D.C. come from? The parties to the contract, known as the Constitution for the United States of America, are the individual states. Neither the federal government, nor the people, as comprising one nation, are a party to the agreement between the several States. Be sure to research how the Federal Corporation is usurping the powers of the people AND the states!"

The Declaration of Independence states:  "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --"

"“The several states composing the United States of America are not united on the principle of unlimited submission to their general government; but…by a compact under the style and title of a Constitution for the United States, and of amendments thereto, they constituted a general government for special purposes [and] delegated to that government certain definite powers,…and…whensoever the general government assumes undelegated powers, its acts are unauthoritative, void, and of no force…To this compact each state acceded as a state, and is an integral party, its co-states forming, as to itself, the other party…”"

"“A Law repugnant to the Constitution is void.” With these words written by Chief Justice Marshall, the Supreme Court for the first time declared unconstitutional a law passed by Congress and signed by the President. Nothing in the Constitution gave the Court this specific power. Marshall, however, believed that the Supreme Court should have a role equal to those of the other two branches of government."

Your unalienable rights are neither granted by the government nor are they granted by a contract (The Constitution), they are "something integral with a whole" part of simply being (they are natural birthrights), which by agreement of the contract, are NOT to be INFRINGED by the government. Therefore ALL FEDERAL STATUTES that are INFRINGEMENTS, CONVERSIONS, or USURPATIONS of your UNALIENABLE RIGHTS are repugnant to the Constitution and are NULL and VOID.

So why do We the People obey these Statutes?  It is the deliberate misrepresentation of these statutes as though they are Laws that lead the people to consent by their ignorance and silence. Are the threats of force, loss of Liberty, confiscation of property, or the conversion of unalienable rights into privileges, which are used by the U.S. government, the determining factors in deciding whether the people or the contracted government will ultimately protect those unalienable rights?


No comments:

Post a Comment