By The People

There are fundamental flaws in how American government operates today,
contrary to the Constitution and the vision of a representative republican form of governance.
I intend doing something about it: by educating and informing others who
are not even aware of the dangers.

Showing posts with label authority. Show all posts
Showing posts with label authority. Show all posts

Saturday, August 27, 2016

There Are No Such Things As Constitutional Rights




You have no constitutional rights and never did. If you thought that you did, then you need to be educated. Let's examine the definitions.

Thomas Jefferson Viewed the Constitution as a Contract Between the States

" Where did D.C. come from? The parties to the contract, known as the Constitution for the United States of America, are the individual states. Neither the federal government, nor the people, as comprising one nation, are a party to the agreement between the several States. Be sure to research how the Federal Corporation is usurping the powers of the people AND the states!"




The Declaration of Independence states:  "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --"

"“The several states composing the United States of America are not united on the principle of unlimited submission to their general government; but…by a compact under the style and title of a Constitution for the United States, and of amendments thereto, they constituted a general government for special purposes [and] delegated to that government certain definite powers,…and…whensoever the general government assumes undelegated powers, its acts are unauthoritative, void, and of no force…To this compact each state acceded as a state, and is an integral party, its co-states forming, as to itself, the other party…”"

"“A Law repugnant to the Constitution is void.” With these words written by Chief Justice Marshall, the Supreme Court for the first time declared unconstitutional a law passed by Congress and signed by the President. Nothing in the Constitution gave the Court this specific power. Marshall, however, believed that the Supreme Court should have a role equal to those of the other two branches of government."

Your unalienable rights are neither granted by the government nor are they granted by a contract (The Constitution), they are "something integral with a whole" part of simply being (they are natural birthrights), which by agreement of the contract, are NOT to be INFRINGED by the government. Therefore ALL FEDERAL STATUTES that are INFRINGEMENTS, CONVERSIONS, or USURPATIONS of your UNALIENABLE RIGHTS are repugnant to the Constitution and are NULL and VOID.

So why do We the People obey these Statutes?  It is the deliberate misrepresentation of these statutes as though they are Laws that lead the people to consent by their ignorance and silence. Are the threats of force, loss of Liberty, confiscation of property, or the conversion of unalienable rights into privileges, which are used by the U.S. government, the determining factors in deciding whether the people or the contracted government will ultimately protect those unalienable rights?


References:

http://musicians4freedom.com/2011/05/thomas-jefferson-viewed-the-constitution-as-a-contract/

https://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?flash=true&doc=19

Friday, July 8, 2016

U.S. Military Pilots Just EXPOSED Obama’s Secret…THIS Is Why ISIS Hasn’t Been Taken Out!



From:  http://www.proudcons.com/


It all makes sense now as to why we have failed to take out ISIS by conducting airstrikes that would blow terrorist organizations into oblivion. Americans have always know we could do it, but we never knew why it didn’t have. Now we know…

Simply put, Obama would not allow our military to perform airstrikes. We were ready. Targets in sight, ready to stop the worst terror the world has even known, but Obama waived off the strikes 75% of the time.


Here is what has been reported…
From Free Beacon:
U.S. military pilots who have returned from the fight against the Islamic State in Iraq are confirming that they were blocked from dropping 75 percent of their ordnance on terror targets because they could not get clearance to launch a strike, according to a leading member of Congress.
Strikes against the Islamic State (also known as ISIS or ISIL) targets are often blocked due to an Obama administration policy to prevent civilian deaths and collateral damage, according to Rep. Ed Royce (R., Calif.), chair of the House Foreign Affairs Committee.
The policy is being blamed for allowing Islamic State militants to gain strength across Iraq and continue waging terrorist strikes throughout the region and beyond, according to Royce and former military leaders who spoke Wednesday about flaws in the U.S. campaign to combat the Islamic State.
“You went 12 full months while ISIS was on the march without the U.S. using that air power and now as the pilots come back to talk to us they say three-quarters of our ordnance we can’t drop, we can’t get clearance even when we have a clear target in front of us,” Royce said. “I don’t understand this strategy at all because this is what has allowed ISIS the advantage and ability to recruit.”
When asked to address Royce’s statement, a Pentagon official defended the Obama administration’s policy and said that the military is furiously working to prevent civilian casualties.
“The bottom line is that we will not stoop to the level of our enemy and put civilians more in harm’s way than absolutely necessary,” the official told the Washington Free Beacon, explaining that the military often conducts flights “and don’t strike anything.”
So there you have it. The reason ISIS is as strong as it is today is because of Obama. He would not allow our military to do their jobs and now we have ISIS terrorists running all over the globe killing people on a daily basis.

SHARE this on Facebook below…America needs to know!

Monday, January 25, 2016

CONSTITUTIONAL SHAKEDOWN IN BURNS, OREGON


 
The Hammond Family



Fix America has been following the Malheur Wildlife Refuge incident, the Hammond Ranch Incident, and the Bundy Ranch Incident closely and has come across an excellent article authored by John  Marshall parts I and II are here presented for educational purposes of the public.


By John Marshall
January 21, 2016
NewsWithViews.com

"I would like to start by saying the Soros controlled communistic media is lying through their teeth to cover up criminality on part of the Justice dept and the government.

This is not an armed stand-off nor was it an armed takeover. An armed takeover would involve weapons being drawn and forcibly taking over a location or building and persons. No weapons were ever brandished or used, so this was not the case at all. There is also no one that is confronting them, so technically it is not a standoff either. It is just an occupation and restoration of our God given rights.

The Malheur Wildlife Refuge is left open in the winter and is not staffed during that time. The Militia is occupying the refuge center and have renamed it the Resource Center to help the ranchers get back their lands and livelihoods. This is also the location that was used by the BLM to carry out their dastardly deeds.

They are currently working to get a common law judge and a common law grand jury in place to handle this problem and free the Hammonds. They are also cleaning up the place that looks like no one has ever done such a thing. There is a huge rat infestation with droppings everywhere and equipment is just struan about and the place is just filthy.

This is how the government takes care of the buildings and equipment that you paid for.

This refuge, that is kept open and operating with the public's money, is not being maintained or cared for at any time of the year. It appears as though it has never been cleaned since it has opened five years ago but the BLM wants to manage our land? Well, they have effectively created the same disorder and mess for our farmers ranchers lands.

The lying dying controlled press loves buzz words like heavily armed, standoff, takeover, domestic terrorism for sensationalism and hype because they are a dying press with viewer ship as low as a small radio station on Monday morning.

Harry Reid from Nevada who was involved in the Bundy Ranch standoff calls our constitutional militia domestic terrorist. No terrorism has taken place! To the contrary, Harry Reid is a domestic terrorist calling for the execution of the militia as did Chris Christy the schlep from New Jersey who thinks they should all be wiped out. And Montel Williams had to join the fun by calling for them to be wiped out also. What is wrong with these vermin's minds or do they even have one?

No one has been injured but the ranchers and farmers by the government, no violence has taken place, and no damage has been done, yet the globalist minions on the programming tube want to see them murdered. Have they no scruples? Apparently not!

If anything, this ordeal is showing the world who the real enemies of this republic are. The George Soros controlled left communistic media, their empty talking heads, the presstitutes, and the elected officials who brand our constitutional militia as terrorist are in fact the real terrorist against this republic while state governments stand idly by.

Harry Reid also had a hand in the Bundy Ranch standoff because he was instrumental in getting hundreds of families off their lands they've owned for generations and in this case the Bundy's were the last men standing.

Harry Reid it turns out was trying to give the land to China to build a solar and wind farm that Harry 's son would run. Now Harry Reid wants the constitutional militia murdered? Why is Harry Reid still running around free? How can someone call for the murder of someone on national television and still roam free? Soros controlled press that's how. Reid is the epitome of corruption and should be made an example of with a rope. ( after a fair and impartial trial of course, something the Hammonds did not receive.)

There is an ocean of ignorant press, lying and twisting things to demonize the militias, and that should send up red flags for any constitutionally minded person because it could mean you're next.

I want to inject some reality and truth into this courageous situation and you tell me who the terrorist are;

The Bundy operation is supported by hundreds of hard working Americans taking back their lands from federal government overreach. That includes past victims and patriots who realize it's time to exercise their oath and their God given rights.

The lands, to clarify the incorrect assumption that the federal government owns the land, are public lands owned by the State of Oregon not the federal government they have no deed to the land. Article 1 section 8 clause 17 states the federal government cannot own land except for ten square miles designated as a military base or outpost and they have to go through the state legislature to obtain that deed and they have to compensate the owners fairly. In this situation and hundreds of others, the government has failed to do that.

For all of these injustices, where are the States? Counties? Sheriffs? Governors? Attorneys General? District Attorneys? I’m hearing from some people, but getting DEAD SILENCE from our “representatives”, excepting congressman Greg Walden. See the video below.



Some facts here from The Citizens Wire to the issue of burns;

• Miller homestead wildfire 2012 burned 160,000 acres
• Barry Point fire in Lake County 93,000 acres
• Summer 2015 799,974 acres burned in Oregon
• Malheur Long Draw fire burned 557,000 acres.

"The federal government will frequently go on private land without permission to back-burn...that happens all the time...nobody went to prison for that..."

"Hammonds are in prison tonight for setting a back fire...139 acres...They will sit in prison...5 years."

There are many videos showing the government starting these supposed wild fires in Washington, Oregon and California.

This is a case of land and resource theft and the government knows it, that's why they are silent as a kid caught red handed.

The feds have just usurped the land away from farmers and ranchers all over the west and the states and sheriffs do nothing to protect their citizens from the government, so with petitions ignored and all redress of grievances ignored, this occupation has happened in response to their inactions. If BLM is allowed to continue, so will the occupations and protests.

Judge Ann Aiken the second sentencing judge who should know what double jeopardy is, was responsible for getting the sage grouse on the endangered species list that was used to claim lands away from the owners like the Hammonds under the false pretence of environmentalism and saving endangered species.

This is how agenda 21 operates using environmental Nazis and rigged federal courts to steal land and resources. Look up the council on bio-diversity and read agenda 21, you can download the PDF from the UN website.

Many lands stolen from farmers for instance have ended up in the hands of big Agra who are aggressively trying to shut down small farmers and ranchers around the country so they can be the one world food source. Most health conditions associated with food came about after big Agra started processing our food.

In the case of Southern Oregon ,the environmental Nazis had successfully shut down numerous mills stating the spotted owl needed old growth forest to reproduce which was a lie as the spotted owl was breeding itself out of existence with the larger Bard owl anyway. So now as before they try again with the sage grouse which is not endangered at all but instead a useful tool of the globalist and agenda 21. There are people in the environmental movement who study all the wildlife in an area to determine what they can exploit to steal land and resources. I'm sure there's are some well intentioned people in the environmental movement, but the fail to realize they are useful idiots.

These assaults are leaving decimated economies in their wake while not providing some kind of alternative training for the generations of timber and ranching families unable to do anything else. So many go homeless, get involved in the drug trade, or become vagrants while the counties are sheepishly wondering how this happened and what are they going to do with all the homelessness and vagrants. The counties created it now fix it.

The Sheriff David Ward who acts like the cowardly lion may not realize he has the power to keep the feds at bay and out of their county, but in this region of the country we have too many sheriffs dishonoring their oaths to the constitution while allowing the usurpations to take place. If sheriff Ward really wants them to go home, then start by freeing the Hammonds and that may happen.

Any sheriff dishonoring their sworn oath should be recalled immediately to prevent further damage to our lands, livelihoods, and freedom. Side note; the BLM agent that lied on the stand against the Hammonds was named David Ward also.

The sensationalized stories on the mind sucking tube are full of lies, half truths and outright cognitive dissidence on part of the controlled media monsters.

The truth is, this is all about jurisdiction and the fact the federal government does not have jurisdiction over a states lands. Territories yes, but once it becomes a state on an equal footing the federal government loses all control.

One problem is, the states are too afraid to say anything for fear of losing funding the federal government bribes them with, but the ironic thing is the federal government is bribing the states with their own money they gave to the government which is lent back at interest.

Why do the states put themselves in that compromising position when they could just keep that money as a sovereign state and tell the feds to take a hike. The federal reserve, the state legislators, the governor, the attorney general, and the state and county governments are to blame for all of this. They are the complicit who let this happen at the expense of the public's livelihoods, their freedoms.

Those state entities and individuals are the reason the government is allowed to trample the constitution by turning a blind eye, therefore, making them complicit in all this tyranny. So as a result, the elected officials violating their oaths should be removed, never able to be in public office again. For part two click below

In Oregon we do not possess any common law court systems instead it's a federal admiralty court system that can care less about what happens on the land since it's maritime law, the law of the sea, where the constitution doesn't apply, so the agents of the crown (lawyers) and corporations are free to trash our supreme law of the land. This is why Ammon is looking to set up a common law court system that is rightfully the court system for the land. But since the War Powers Act the federal government has been running admiralty courts because we are constantly under a state of war in fact we haven't left a state of war since WW1.

To understand the charges, a charge of arson has to prove malicious intent, there was no such thing ever, it was an accident the first time that burned approximately 139 acres of public land that had no one on it, no buildings were destroyed, and no injuries occurred and the Hammonds put it out themselves. Arson was used by federal prosecutor with no jurisdiction to get the Hammonds off their land.

Also, the second fire was done in defense of the Hammond Ranch after BLM thugs tried to burn them out as they have done to countless other ranchers and farmers, so a back fire was lit to keep the flames from approaching the house and that's when it got away from them and federal fire fighters had to put it out on public land, again burning only sage brush and some small trees. No injuries, no persons, and no structures were in danger or harmed.

Do people realize, that the Hammonds were tried twice, double jeopardy, for the same crime by reclassifying them as terrorist by Amanda Marshall the federal prosecutor appointed by Obama?

Did you know, the Hammonds had already done their time the first time but the federal prosecutor said it wasn't enough, so she sent them back for the full five year sentence as part of federally mandated minimum sentencing for eco terrorism.

Do people realize federal minimum sentences are unconstitutional especially where there’s no jurisdiction and mitigating circumstances? Do you know that all unfunded mandates to the states are illegal as well?

Dwight Hammond 73 and Steven his son 46 will not see the outdoors for the remainder of time spent, which means the son will get out first and the father who received a lighter sentence initially of 3 months, will still be in prison defenseless for another seven months after Steven leaves. This is an egregious miscarriage of justice and the federal judge Aiken and prosecutor Marshall should be disbarred. I dare those able to initiate this to do it. If any harm comes to either of those men while in custody, then charges should be brought up on the judges, BLM, Forestry Service, and the fed prosecutor.

Did you know, Amanda Marshall the federal prosecutor was under investigation and has resigned claiming health reasons, (PTSD lie) She should ask the Hammonds about PTSD? She inflicted it! While working, she was involved with a co-worker that she continually harassed at all hours of the night with texts and phone messages? I think she ducked out to avoid prosecution.

Do you know, that Amanda Marshall over stepped her jurisdiction by insisting to overrule the original judge's order where he stated, "the mandatory sentence was cruel and unusual punishment"?

Do people realize that the Hammonds received threats from Amanda Marshalls justice dept stating," If you talk to anyone about this we will send Dwight and Steven to a less than desirable prison". That would essentially be a death sentence for Dwight Hammond 73.

Did you know, that the second Judge Ann Aiken that ignored the double jeopardy order was appointed by Clinton? That should speak volumes since it was Clinton that got the ball rolling on the UN's Agenda 21 in the early nineties.

Do people realize, setting prescribed burns to rejuvenate the land is common practice for ranchers as was the case in the accident of the first fire in 2001. The BLM however, were doing their burns in July not in the fall when it's normally done.

Do people realize the BLM has burned over a million acres illegally to flush out ranchers in the area and other parts of the country so as to confiscate land and resources from innocent hard working ranchers and farmers not to mention the firefighter lives they put in jeopardy?

Do people know that the BLM claimed first rights to the Hammond ranch land if they go bankrupt from all the litigation the BLM has caused them to pay for. That's over a million dollars so far, that the state of Oregon should pay back to the Hammonds with interest after they are released from their unjust confinement. BLM has no legal claim nor has the jurisdiction. BLM also has no policing or arresting powers yet they intimidate innocent people with threats of arrest.

Where are the charges for impersonating a law enforcement officer? Where are the eco-terrorism arson charges for the BLM? They certainly had malicious intent starting fires in July. Just watch this video and you will see for yourself the tactics of this out of control agency as they go about their routine. In the case of this video there are no prior charges, no judge or jury, no due process, and no redress of grievances, no compensation. Just dead cattle and burned out homes and buildings.



Do people realize this is UN agenda 21 and Cloward and Piven at work to take land and resources from the owners to give it to corporate Chinese interests for the fraudulent debt created by the federal reserve thugs, so the Chinese and others can obtain the huge cash of uranium and rare earth minerals that’s under the ground there in Harney County?

The Chicoms are currently buying up all the rare earth minerals from around the world they can get their hands on. The world is being dived up by the globalist interests and we the people are not included in their plans.

Do people realize in the case of the Bundy’s it was later discovered that Harry Reid was trying to get the land to give to a Chinese company for a solar and wind farm that his son would run? That's some extreme cronyism.

Do people realize the government cannot own land unless the process for a military base or some out post is done through the state legislature and the owners are properly compensated while being limited to ten square miles? Article 1 section 8 clause 17.

Do people realize this is not within the jurisdiction of the federal government to take land or own it?

This is about the takeover of America using agenda 21 but the media scum want to vilify an innocent ranching family to hide the illegal persecution, prosecution, confinement, and theft of their land and resources.

Does the public at large realize they are all under attack from the real terrorist like the BLM, the UN, the American Planning Association, ICLEI, and the Forestry Dept. responsible for stealing land and resources, burning out hundreds of ranchers, farmers, and intimidating civilians.

It’s all on film how they burn down houses and put towns like French Glen in danger and kill cattle burning them alive. The BLM also killed hundreds of head of cattle belonging to the Bundy’s, no due process, no jury, no trial, no charges, no compensation. You don't hear any of this in the controlled media.

Do people understand this is theft by this tyrannical government using agenda 21?

DO PEOPLE REALIZE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT HAS NO JURISDICTION OVER STATES LANDS? NONE!

The constitution is the supreme law of the land and it has not been violated by the Bundy’s or the Hammonds at any point, but the media presstitutes continue with their controlled fictitious statements of illegalities on part of the Bundy’s and Hammonds.

In fact, a state reps was reading off charges at a town hall meeting in Burns recently about the situation without due process, while the accused were never told of these charges nor have they been charged. That town hall meeting was quite communistic telling a reporter Pete Santilli to shut up before they threw him out for mentioning the constitution ( the Chicoms would be proud of them) and by the way none of the real important people were there to speak out as those town folks asked for it to all go away without regard for the constitutionality or the rights of the Hammonds. Those people are profusely ignorant!

Ammon Bundy and the crew have stated they want this to be a peaceful restoration of the land and resources back to the rightful owners and they will stay as long as it takes but that they are prepared to defend themselves from a tyrannical government. They are located 50 miles south of Burns to keep from interfering with daily life there, but the school district nannies shut the school down fearing for the children.

Talk about scare tactics and overreacting, using the children's safety excuse like the sycophants always profess to be protecting them while perverting them and turning their brains into mush with a dose of common core. The school has since been reopened.

To all you ignorant and otherwise brain dead public turn off your television, better yet get rid of it and READ the supreme law of the land, it is what governs this republic not the nihilistic corrupt government.

If we do not abide by this doctrine then soon this lawless society will fall into total anarchy just the way the globalist want. Order out of chaos is their mantra, and you the public will be the ones to allow it to happen if you do nothing. Call your state representatives and tell them to free the Hammonds immediately.

Together we stand, divided we fall, now come on people, let's get on the ball, and work together, come on, come on, let's work together, right now people...because together we will stand with every boy, girl, woman, and man. (Canned Heat)

Let's put the real terrorist in prison, lets prosecute the guilty that control our government like George Soros (Schwartz) who is instrumental in all the corruption and unrest around the globe. Lets kick the government to the curb and replace it before we have to water the profoundly thirsty tree of liberty. God Bless the militia and God Bless America!."

© 2016 John Marshall - All Rights Reserved

Sunday, January 24, 2016

LET US UNDERSTAND JUST A FEW THINGS




Let us understand just a few things that are of paramount importance.

1. The united States of America belongs solely to Americans living on the land. 

It does NOT belong to the IMF, the World Bank, or the UNITED STATES, Inc.

2. Americans are Sovereign Individuals and are guaranteed the conventions and rights as stated in the Constitution for the united States of America.

They are NOT property to be owned by anyone. 

3. The Constitution for the united States of America 1788 with a Ratified Amendment added March 12, 1819 is the controlling document of governance for the Republic of the united States of America.

It was during the administration of Abraham Lincoln that Congress lost quorum and adjourned Sine Die. Lincoln unlawfully re-convened Congress with appointed congressmen which negated and made null and void all actions of Congress since that time. (see Note Below)

It is NOT the Constitution of the UNITED STATES of 1871 which is a corporate Document.

4. The Supreme Law of the Land is American Common Law.

It is NOT the Federal Government Statutory structure;  USC, UCC, Admiralty Law, Roman Civil Law, International Law, Sharia Law, or Administrative Public Policy dicta.

5. The form of the Nation is a Constitutionally bound representative Federal Republic. 

It is NOT a Democracy and it is not a Privately owned foreign Corporation.

Note: The sole objective of the war of 1812, which was to destroy records and prevent the American People form discovering Treasonous activity on the part of the Federal government, was satisfied by English Troops who burned part of the library of Congress which was housed in the White House and contained the documents of agreement between foreign Governments and organizations which allowed a change of ownership of the united States of America and the changes to the system of Jurisprudence practiced in the united States of America, namely the slow migration from American Common Law to Admiralty Law and Roman Civil Law .


"http://www.abodia.com/2/United-States-is-a-corporation.htm

The United States is a corporation
You are here:  www.abodia.com/2/United-States-is-a-corporation.htm
US is a Corp.    Supreme Court confirms    Federal Zone (zip codes)
District of Columbia, corporation possession of the Queen of England
1788 Original               Constitution for the united states,      original organic, of the people government.
1871 Amended version    CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES,    US is a private corporation.

The UNITED STATES was formed in 1871, which controls only the District of Columbia and the territories it purchases or acquires; Puerto Rico, Guam, Virgin Islands.  Many think that income taxes, and some laws do not effect people in the sovereign states of the union as they are outside of the control / jurisdiction of the United States corporation.  The United States of America is different from the "United States" [corporation].

The terms UNITED STATES and/or United States of America and/ or United States Government are all a private corporation, even with registered trademark.

The US corporation (originally called the District of Columbia) does not effect or control the 50 sovereign states that are protected from the federal government by the US Constitution for the United States adopted in 1788.

There are 2 United States, one formed in 1787, the collection of the several sovereign states of the union, and another separate and different one formed in 1871, which only controls the District of Columbia and it’s territories.  Others may can give you specific references and explain this further.  Here is an outline of the concepts.

The date is February 21, 1871 and the Forty-First Congress is in session. I refer you to the "Acts of the Forty-First Congress," Section 34, Session III, chapters 61 and 62. On this date in the history of our nation, Congress passed an Act titled: "An Act To Provide A Government for the District of Columbia." This is also known as the "Act of 1871." What does this mean? Well, it means that Congress, under no constitutional authority to do so, created a separate form of government for the District of Columbia, which is a ten mile square parcel of land.

The Constitution for the United States of America was adopted on September 17, 1787, by the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and ratified by conventions in each U.S. state in the name of "The People".

- - -
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=129&invol=141
U.S. Supreme Court

STOUTENBURGH v. HENNICK, 129 U.S. 141 (1889)
129 U.S. 141

STOUTENBURGH, Intendant of Washington Asylum, v. HENNICK.

January 14, 1889


Sections 1 and 18 of the act of congress of February 21, 1871, entitled 'An act to provide a government for the District of Columbia,' (16 St. 419,) are as follows: 'Section 1. That all that part of the territory of the United States included within the limits of the District of Columbia be, and the same is hereby, created into a government by the name of the District of Columbia, by which name it is hereby constituted a body corporate for municipal purposes, and may contract and be contracted with, sue and be sued, plead and be impleaded, have a seal, and exercise all other powers of a municipal corporation not inconsistent with the constitution and laws of the United States and the provisions of this act.' 'Sec. 18. That the legislative power of the District shall [129 U.S. 141, 144]   extend to all rightful subjects of legislation within said District, consistent with the constitution of the United States and the provisions of this act, subject, nevertheless, to all the restrictions and limitations imposed upon states by the tenth section of the first article of the constitution of the United States; but all acts of the legislative assembly shall at all times be subject to repeal or modification by the congress of the United States, and nothing herein shall be construed to deprive congress of the power of legislation over said District in as ample manner as if this law had not been enacted.' These sections are carried forward into the act of congress of June 22, 1874, entitled 'An act to revise and consolidate the statutes of the United States, general and permanent in their nature, relating to the District of Columbia, in force on the first day of December, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and seventy-three,' as sections 2, 49, 50.

- - - also note:
And Whereas: The Constitution does provide that Congress has the power to exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever over such district not exceeding ten miles square, as may, by session of particular states and the acceptance of Congress, become the seat of government of the United States. 

And Whereas: On February 21, 1871, the Forty First Congress passed an act entitled "An Act to Provide a Government for the District of Columbia," legislating the organization of a municipal corporation to run the day to day affairs of the District of Columbia, the seat of government, which transferred the United States of America, the Republic, into "a corporate entity" entitled UNITED STATES, in capital letters, having "no" jurisdiction outside the District of Columbia. 

And Whereas: Congress adopted the text of the federal constitution as the constitution or charter of this municipal corporation. This municipal corporation was granted the power to contract to provide municipal services to the inhabitants of the District of Columbia and necessarily as an operation of the privileges and immunity clause of Article Four of the Constitution, any other person who chooses to contract for its services.

- - Is there fraud in our ranks ?

The Webster’s Dictionary states that Fraud means Deceit, Trickery, intentional perversion of truth in order to induce another to part with something of value or to surrender a legal right.

The Blacks Law Dictionary states pretty much what the Webster’s Dictionary does but adds about two pages full of information.  My favorite part is: A false representation of a matter of fact, whether by words or by conduct, by false or misleading allegations, or by concealment of that which should have been disclosed, which deceives and is intended to deceive another so that he shall act upon it to his legal injury.
- - - -
February 21, 1871 Congress Passes an Act to Provide a Government for the District of Columbia, also known as the Act of 1871*
With no constitutional authority to do so, Congress creates a separate form of government for the District of Columbia, a ten mile square parcel of land (see, Acts of the Forty-first Congress," Section 34, Session III, chapters 61 and 62).

The act -- passed when the country was weakened and financially depleted in the aftermath of the Civil War -- was a strategic move by foreign interests (international bankers) who were intent upon gaining a stranglehold on the coffers and neck of America.
Congress cut a deal with the international bankers (specifically Rothschilds of London) to incur a DEBT to said bankers. Because the bankers were not about to lend money to a floundering nation without serious stipulations, they devised a way to get their foot in the door of the United States.

The Act of 1871 formed a corporation called THE UNITED STATES. The corporation, OWNED by foreign interests, moved in and shoved the original Constitution into a dustbin. With the Act of 1871, the original Constitution for the united States (1788) was defaced in effect vandalized and sabotage when the title was capitalized and the word "for" was changed to "of" in the title THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (1871) is the constitution of the INCORPORATED UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. 

It operates in an economic capacity and has been used to fool the People into thinking it governs the Republic. It does is not!

Capitalization is significant when one is referring to a legal document. This seemingly "minor" alteration has had a major impact on every subsequent generation of Americans.

What Congress did by passing the Act of 1871 was create an entirely new document, a constitution for the government of the District of Columbia, an INCORPORATED government. This newly altered Constitution was not intended to benefit the Republic. It benefits only the corporation of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and operates entirely outside the original Constitution.

Instead of having absolute and unalienable rights guaranteed under the original Constitution, we the people now have "relative" rights or privileges. One example is the Sovereign's right to travel, which has now been transformed (under corporate government policy) into a "privilege" that requires citizens to be licensed.

By passing the Act of 1871, Congress committed TREASON against the People who were Sovereign under the grants and decrees of the Declaration of Independence and the original Constitution.
- - - -
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/dccases/metrorrc.htm   gives this discussion

  JUDICIAL INTERPRETATIONS

District of Columbia
  
     On May 3rd, 1802 an Act was passed to incorporate the City of Washington. (2  Stat. at  L. 195.)
In 1871  an important  modification was  made in the form of the district  government --  a Legislature  was established, with all the  apparatus of  a distinct  government.   By  the  Act  of February 21st,  of that  year, entitled  "An  Act  to  Provide  a Government for  the District of Columbia (16 Stat. at L. 419), it was enacted (sec. 1) that all that territory of the United States included within the limits of the District of Columbia be created into a  government by  the name  of the  District of  Columbia by which name  it was  constituted a "a body corporate for municipal purposes," with power to make contracts, sue and be sued, and "to exercise  all   other  powers  of  a  municipal  corporation  not inconsistent with the Constitution and laws of the United States.

This Constitution  lasted until June 20th, 1874, when an Act was passed entitled "An Act for the Government of the District of Columbia, and  for other purposes." (18 Stat. at L. 116)  By this Act the  government established by the Act of 1871 was abolished.
p 234

     By a  subsequent Act,  approved June 11th, 1878 (20 Stat. at L. 102),  it was  enacted that  the District  of Columbia  should "remain and  continue a  municipal corporation,"  as provided  in section two  of the  Revised Statutes  relating to said District, and the  appointment of  commissioners was  provided for, to have and  to  exercise  similar  powers  given  to  the  commissioners appointed under  the Act  of 1874. All rights of action and suits for and against the  District were  expressly preserved in status quo.  p. 234

     All municipal  governments are  but agencies of the superior power of  the State  or government by which they are constituted, and are  invested with  only such  subordinate  powers  of  local legislation and  control as  the superior Legislature sees fit to confer upon them.  p. 234

     The people are the recognized source of all authority, state or municipal, and to this authority it must come at last, whether immediately  or  by  circuitous  route.  Barnes  v.  District  of Columbia, 91 U.S. 540, 545 [23: 440, 441]. p 234

     Chief Justice Marshall, speaking for this court, in the case of Hepburn  v. Ellzey,  6 U.S. 2 Cranch, 445 [ 2:332 ], where the question was  whether a  citizen of the District could sue in the circuit courts of the United States as a citizen of a State.  The court did  not deny  that the  District of Columbia is a State in the sense of being a distinct political community;  but held that the word  "State" in  the  Constitution,  where  it  extends  the judicial power to cases between citizens of the several "States," refers to  the States  of the Union.  It is undoubtedly true that the District  of Columbia  is a separate political community in a certain sense,  and in that sense may be called a State;  but the sovereign power  of this  qualified State  is not  lodged in  the corporation of the District of Columbia, but in the government of the United  States.   Its supreme  legislative body  is Congress. The subordinate legislative powers of a municipal character which have been  or may  lodged in  the city  corporations, or  in  the District of  Columbia, do not make those bodies sovereign.
- - -
Text of the District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871
Aa copy of the pages here: 

http://www.nikolasschiller.com/blog/index.php/archives/2009/01/30/2215/
- - - -
The United States Isn't a Country
—It's a Corporation ! by Lisa Guliani

http://www.serendipity.li/jsmill/us_corporation.htm
more here:
http://www.wariscrime.com/2009/01/15/news/the-usa-isnt-a-country-its-a-corporation/

- - - - -
Constitution for the United States of America
http://www.barefootsworld.net/constit1.html
- - - - - -
United States - US- U.S.-USA-America ( a possession of the Queen of England)

Means: (A) a federal corporation . . . Title 28 USC Section 3002(5) Chapter 176. It is clear that the United States . . . is a corporation . . . 534 FEDERAL SUPPLEMENT 724.

`It is well settled that "United States" et al is a corporation, originally incorporated February 21, 1871 under the name "District of Columbia," 16 Stat. 419 Chapter 62. It was reorganized June 11, 1878; a bankrupt organization per House Joint Resolution 192 on June 5, 1933, Senate Report 93-549, and Executive Orders 6072, 6102, and 6246; a de facto (define de facto) government, originally the ten square mile tract ceded by Maryland and Virginia and comprising Washington D. C., plus the possessions, territories, forts, and arsenals.

The significance of this is that, as a corporation, the United States has no more authority to implement its laws against "We The People" than does Mac Donald Corporations, except for one thing -- the contracts we've signed as surety for our strawman with the United States and the Creditor Bankers. These contracts binding us together with the United States and the bankers are actually not with us, but with our artificial entity, or as they term it "person", which appears to be us but spelled with ALL CAPITAL LETTERS.

All this was done under,

VICE-ADMIRALTY COURTS.

In English Law. Courts established in the queen's possessions beyond the seas, with jurisdiction over maritime causes, including those relating to prize.

The United States of America is lawfully the possession of the English Crown per original commercial joint venture agreement between the colonies and the Crown, and the Constitution, which brought all the states (only) back under British ownership and rule. The American people, however, had sovereign standing in law, independent to any connection to the states or the Crown. This fact necessitated that the people be brought back, one at a time, under British Rule, and the commercial process was the method of choice in order to accomplish this task. First, through the 14th Amendment and then through the registration of our birth certificate and property. All courts in America are Vice-admiralty courts in the Crown’s private commerce.

Supreme Law Library : The Federal Zone : index
"Supreme Law Library. The Federal Zone: Cracking the Code of Internal Revenue Electronic Eleventh Edition [Note: Small numbers indicate number of bytes in ..."
www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/index.htm
2. Supreme Law Firm
"The Supreme Law Firm holds informative seminars nationwide, and maintains the ... His massive book entitled "The Federal Zone: Cracking the Code of Internal ..."
www.supremelaw.org/
- - - - - -
The Illegal Quasi-Government in Washington D.C.
The "Federal" Government is a Separate Nation and should be called the United States, Incorporated.
http://home.iae.nl/users/lightnet/creator/federalgovernment.htm
- - - - - -
Fraud in government ? Wake up, learn, act, become a sovereign, free again
http://www.nmcservices.net/governmentfraud.html


If you doubt anything, learn to check it !

Go to Truth Seekers (below) At top left, click on Search
Learn how to find anything quickly on internet w/ Thought Print ©
Back to Truth Seekers"

Sunday, January 3, 2016

Americans on the Land; or Footprints in a Sandstorm




With incidences like the Sugar Pine Mine, Bundy Ranch, and the Hammond Ranch, confrontations and/or disputes between the Corporate Federal Government or it's Agencies or Private Corporate Contractors like the Bureau of Land Management and Americans living on the land are on the increase and will continue until the Corporate Federal Government or it's Agencies or Private Contractors like the Bureau of Land Management can not obtain any more. 

The problem arises from the misunderstanding US Citizens have regarding ownership of land. 

Only land that is secured by a Patent Land Title (a Homestead Filing also helps) is owned by US Citizens or State Citizens. A deed of Title is nothing more than a Color of title, of which there are several differently named. Unless you own all of the colors of title you do not own the land:  someone else does. This is reflected in the requirement of paying property tax. In effect, if you pay property tax of any kind you are renting the property from the owner.

Americans have lost essentially all their freedoms. Their unalienable Rights have been abrogated by the ruling Corporate Federal Government by violating their own Corporate Constitution. 

Americans' Liberty is on the edge of being taken by force;  FEMA Camps or other means of incarceration.

The Lawful Common Law System (Common Law Courts with Constitutionally elected Judges) has been replaced by the Legal System (Administrative Public Statutory Policy Tribunals) that have no jurisdiction outside the ten mile square District of Columbia (recently renamed).

The Right to Travel has been restricted by Drivers Licenses, Insurance, and Regulations.

Lawful money (gold and Silver Coin) has been replaced by worthless fiat foreign currency (Federal Reserve Notes).

The Right to own Property has been unlawfully withdrawn:  no state will issue Alodial Title for land (Except a few that will issue a color of Allodial Title, i.e. you must pay all future taxes based on your life expectancy and when you die the title reverts back to the State).

Unless someone tells Americans to Homestead their land and to apply for a Land Patent, they are left with nothing but the obligation to pay land or property taxes. At this time, now, Banks and the Federal Government own more than seventy five percent of all land within the Continental United States and are filling for land Patents as fast and soon as possible, as this gives them complete ownership and the apparent ability to charge taxes. They are greedy to own as much as they can.

Let us take just a moment to look at a small portion of the history of the American legal System to understand how and why the Federal Government believes it has the authority to strip the People of their right to own land.


Selected Historical Outline:

1st: 
Martial Law is declared by President Lincoln on April 24th, 1863, with General Orders No. 100; under martial law authority, Congress and President Lincoln institute continuous martial law by ordering the states to either conscribe troops and or provide money in support of the North or be recognized as enemies of the nation; this martial law Act of Congress is still in effect today.  This martial law authority gives the President (with or without Congress) the dictatorial authority to do anything that can be done by government in accord with the Constitution of the United States of America.  This conscription act remains in effect to this very day and is the foundation of “Presidential Executive Orders”  authority; it was magnified in 1917 with The Trading with the Enemy Act (Public Law 65-91, 65th Congress, Session I, Chapters 105, 106, October 6, 1917). and again in 1933 with the Emergency War Powers Act, which is ratified and  enhanced almost every year to this date by Congress.  Today, these Acts address the people of the United States themselves as their enemy.

2nd:
The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 created a private corporation (hereinafter “Corp. U.S.”, Trademark name, “United States Government”) owned and operated by the actual government for the purpose of carrying out the business needs of the government under martial law.  This was done under the constitutional authority for Congress to pass any law within the ten mile square of Washington, District of Columbia (link to PDF image file of the full 1871 Act).

3rd:
In said Act, Corp. U.S. adopted their own constitution (United States Constitution), which was identical to the national Constitution (Constitution of the United States of America) except that it was missing the national constitution’s 13th Amendment and the national constitution’s 14th, 15th and 16th amendments are respectively numbered 13th, 14th and 15th amendments in the Corp. U.S. Constitution.  At this point take special notice and remember this Corp. U.S. method of adopting their own Constitution, they will add to it in the same manner in 1913.

4th:
Corp. U.S. began to generate debts via bonds etc., which came due in 1912; but, they could not pay their debts; so, the 7 families that bought up the bonds demanded payment and Corp. U.S. could not pay.  Said families settled the debt for the payments of all of Corp. U.S.’ assets and for all of the assets of the Treasury of the United States of America.

5th:
As 1913 began, Corp. U.S. had no funds to carry out the necessary business needs of the government; so, they went to said families and asked if they could borrow some money.  The families said, “No.” (Corp. U.S. had already demonstrated that they would not repay their debts in full).  The families had foreseen this situation; and, had the year before finalized the creation of a private corporation of the name “Federal Reserve Bank”.  Corp. U.S. formed a relationship with the Federal Reserve Bank; whereby, they could transact their business via note rather than with money.  Notice that this relationship was one made between two private corporations and did not involve government (see: The Clearfield Doctrine); that is where most people error in understanding the Federal Reserve Bank system—again, except by contract with Corp. U.S., it has no government relation at all. The private contracts that set the whole system up even recognize that; if anything therein proposed is found illegal or impossible to perform it is excluded from the agreements and the remaining elements remain in full force and effect.

6th:
Almost simultaneously with the last fact (also in 1913), Corp. U.S. adopts (as if ratified) their own 16th amendment. Tax protesters challenge the IRS tax collection system based on this fact;  however, when we remember that Corp. U.S. originally created their constitution by simply drafting it and adopting it, there is no difference between that adoption and this—such is the nature of corporate enactments. You must also note that this amendment has nothing to do with our nation, with our people or with our national Constitution;  which already had its own 16th amendment. The Supreme Court ruled that it did nothing that was not already done other than to make plain and clear the right of the United States (Corp. U.S.) to tax corporations. We agree; considering that the IRS was created under the authority of Corp. U.S.

7th:
Next (also 1913) Corp. U.S., through Congress, adopts (as if ratified) its 17th amendment.  This amendment is not only not ratified, it is not constitutional; the nation’s Constitution forbids Congress from even discussing the matter of where Senators are elected: which is the subject matter of this amendment.  According to the United States Supreme Court, for Congress to propose such an amendment they would first have to pass an amendment that gave them the authority to discuss the matter.

8th:
Accordingly, in 1914, the Freshman class and all Senators that successfully ran for reelection in 1913 by popular vote were seated in Corp. U.S. Senate capacity only; respectively, the original jurisdiction Senate seats from their respective States remained vacant; because, neither the State Senates nor the State Governors appointed new original jurisdiction Senators to replace them; which is still required by the national Constitution for placement of a national government Senator.

9th:
In 1917, Corp. U.S. enters W.W. I and passes their Trading with the Enemies Act.

10th:In 1918, President Wilson is reelected by the Electoral College; but, Electoral College elections are required to be confirmed by the constitutionally set Congress;  and, where the new Corp. U.S. only Senators were allowed to participate in the Electoral College vote confirmation, the only authority that could possibly have been used for electoral confirmation was limited to corporate only. Therefore, President Wilson was not confirmed into office for his second term as the President of the United States of America; rather, he was only seated in the Corp. U.S. Presidential capacity as the President of the United States. Therefore the original jurisdiction government’s seats were vacated because the people didn’t seat any original jurisdiction government officers. It is important to note here that President Wilson retained his capacity as Commander in Chief of the military. Many people wonder about this fact imagining that such a capacity is bound to the President of the nation; however, When John Adams was President he assigned George Washington to the capacity of Commander in Chief of the military in preparation for an impending war with France. During this period, Mr. Adams became quite concerned because Mr. Washington became quite ill and passed on his acting military authority through his lead General Mr. Hamilton; and, Mr. Adams was concerned that if war did break out Mr. Hamilton would use that authority as Commander in Chief to create a military dictatorship out of the nation. Mr. Adams worked extra hard to, and, averted the war through diplomacy;  and, the title of Commander in Chief was returned to the President. (See: John Adams, by David McCullough, this book covers Mr. Adams concerns over this matter quite well. Mr. Adams was a fascinating man.)

11th:
In 1933, Corp. U.S. is bankrupt; which forced what was called “a banking holiday” to exchange money backed Federal Reserve Notes with “legal tender” Federal Reserve Notes; accordingly, the Trading with the Enemies Act was adjusted to recognize the people of the United States of America as enemies of Corp. U.S.

12th:
In 1935, the Social Security Act was formed to provide Corp. U.S. the “excess capital” needed to at least start paying some of the interest Corp. U.S. owed in the bankruptcy. Thereafter, if you were to ask the Social Security Administration for a relationship with their program (by filing an S5 form), they would [with the express purpose of generating Beneficiary funds to United States General Trust Fund (GTF) the Social Security Administration] create an entity with a name (that sounds like your name but is spelled with all capital letters) and an account number (Social Security number). They give you the Social Security card and let you know that the card does not belong to you but you are to hold it for them until they want it back. If you are willing to accept that responsibility over the card you activate the card by signing it, which gives you the ability to act as the fiduciary for the cards actual owner Corp. U.S. and you can use the card’s name and number to thus, transact business relations for the card’s actual owner. You are also to note that though the card verifies its agency (you as the single person with authority to control the entity so created) it is not for use as identification. On review: notice the Social Security Administration was the creator of the entity (cardholder), they offered you the opportunity to serve its Trustee capacity (by lending it actual consciousness and physical capacity), they gave you something (the card) that does not belong to you to hold in trust and they reserved the actual owner of the thing (Corp. U.S.) as the beneficiary of the entity —by definition, this only describes the creation and existence of a Trust.  More importantly: the name they gave this Trust is not your name, the number they gave the Trust is not your number and your lending actual consciousness and physical capacity to this Trust’s Trustee capacity does not limit you or your capacity to separately act in your natural sovereign capacity in any way— what you do, when you do it and how you do it is still totally up to you.

13th:
In 1944, under the Bretton Woods Agreement, Corp. U.S. granted the International Monetary Fund (hereinafter, "IMF") drawing account access to the United States Treasury in exchange for the Corp. U.S. President acquiring control over the governors and general managers of the IMF; respectively, making Corp. U.S. a foreign controlled private corporation.

14th: 
In 1962, considering the states were forced to carry out their business dealings in terms of Federal Reserve Notes (foreign notes), which is forbidden in the national and State constitutions, out of that necessity, the states began protecting themselves from the people by forming corporations like Corp. U.S. Accordingly, those newly formed corporate state administrations began adopting Corp. U.S. suggested uniform codes and licensing structures that allowed better and more powerful control over the people, which thing the original jurisdiction governments of this nation had no capacity to do.  Our Constitutions secure that the governments do not govern the people; rather, they govern themselves in accord with the limits of Law as it is derived from the people through the constitutions.  The people govern themselves. Such is the foundational nature of our Constitutional Republic.

15th:
By 1972, every State government in the union of States had formed such private corporations (hereinafter, “Corp. State”), in accord with the IMF’s admonition; and, the people ceased to seat original jurisdiction government officials in their State government seats.

Now, having stated these historical facts, we ask the Esteemed Readers not 
to believe any of it;  rather, prove these facts for yourself. We then ask you to think about what you have verified for yourself. When you find that there is no error in this selected historical outline, remember the simple facts and let no one dissuade you from the truth. when you speak about these private foreign corporations remember that is what they are and stop calling them government.

Further, it is very important that we stop trying to fix them; instead, hold them accountable to the law that already exists [see: “Call to Action”).  Even more important we must reseat our original jurisdiction government and spread the word about the truth.  By reseating our State and national governments in their original jurisdiction nature, we gain the capacity to hold these private foreign corporations accountable.  They owe us a lot of money and property, in fact they owe us more money than there is available in the world. In fact, it is impossible for them to pay and that gives us the leverage we need to take back our nation and put things right.  

The difficulty is in getting the attention of the American people to wake up to the truth.  That is why Fix America presents articles of importance for it's Esteemed Readers.

It is time to take an additional moment to outline part of the Legal System with regard to the Hammond Ranch conflict by introducing a letter to Sheriff ward of Harney County, Oregon:



"An Open Letter to Sheriff Ward of Harney County Oregon and
to All County Sheriffs in America from Judge Anna

Dear Sheriff Ward,

I am writing to you today to ascertain your office and position with respect to the Hammonds and the developing situation at the Bundy Ranch with respect to "Federal Officers".

My name is Anna Maria Riezinger, also known as Anna von Reitz because my actual name is German and a mile long. I am an American Common Law Superior Court Judge in Alaska where operation of the Seventh Amendment Courts started up again in conjunction with the Common Law Grand Juries more than a year ago and I also serve as a Federal Postal District Court Judge for the Western Region. As you can clearly see by reading the Seventh Amendment all matters pertaining to living people and their property must be addressed to Common Law Courts. How then, are the Hammonds being addressed by federal admiralty courts?

The answer lies in the past.

During the Civil War the normal court system owed the people in the South shut down and did not immediately reopen. Commanders in the military districts in ten states appointed civilian tribunals to function under "Special Admiralty" -----a euphemism. For the purposes of these military tribunals, people and property could be addressed in an arbitrary fashion without regard for the Law of the Land. This was very convenient for the administrators and very unfortunate for the people. In 1866 the Supreme Court addressed the situation in Milligan Ex Parte and decided that so long as the American Common Law Courts were running there was no excuse for the use of any form of martial law. Be advised that the American Common Law Courts are up and running.

But both the military administrators and the judges and most particularly, the Bar Associations, had a taste of arbitrary power and the bit in their teeth back then --- and a concerted effort to shut the Common Law Courts down began, so as to usurp their jurisdiction and "move the venue" of the local courts off the land and into the international jurisdiction of martial law and the sea, where power could be exerted against the people and their assets on the land in a comparatively arbitrary fashion. By 1965 the rats had achieved their ends and almost all Common Law Courts in America were either shut down or functioning with only two offices ---justice of the peace and notary publics.

This allowed the members of the Bar Associations to impose admiralty law on the people and to avoid the guarantees of the Constitution. The use of "Special Admiralty" in a courtroom is signified by the heavy gold fringe on the flag. A word here about the Bar Associations and some facts about the ABA that deserve to be far more widely known, also some information about the current Court System that you probably don't know:

The American Bar Association is an offshoot of the London Lawyer's Guild, an avowed Communist organization.  The American Bar Association and the IRS are both owned and operated by Northern Trust, Inc.  They are private, foreign debt collection agencies, not units of government, not "professional associations", and certainly not "non-profit organizations".  As an organization representing a foreign (British) government, the Bar Associations are only allowed to function here via a Treaty (the last one in 1947) that they have abundantly violated. Their members are required to present Foreign Agent Statements as part of their credentials in open court, which they hardly ever do.

As a result of their misdeeds and usurpation against the Law of the Land and the people and their violations of both their corporate charter and their Treaty, a commercial obligation lien of $279 trillion dollars has been assessed against the American Bar Association, the International Bar Association, and the "US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE"----which, it turns out, is just another private
subcontractor performing "governmental services" and doing a criminally bad job of it.

The "US District Courts" are also private for-hire subcontractors that run all the related courts in their districts. Please see Title 28, Sections 80 to 131. All these "State" Courts and "County" Courts are being run as franchises of the "US District Court"---and they are all private corporate institutions having no public office or function at all, and being related to the actual state and county only insomuch as they are operating within the geographical boundaries of a state and a county. This can be readily proven by looking up the Dun and Bradstreet Numbers, CAGE numbers, and corporate filings of these organizations. And, as was recently demonstrated by the Lufkin Case in Texas, neither the "US District Court" nor its "State" and "County" affiliates have any authority to collect debts outside the ten square miles of the District of Columbia.

We should also clear up another misunderstanding. Back in 1864, the "United States Congress" acting as a Board of Directors for The United States of America, Inc., changed the meaning of several words by executive fiat, without telling the rest of us. For their purposes and from June 30, 1864 onward, the words "state" and "State" and "United States" are code for "District of Columbia Municipal Corporation". Thus, instead of "US District Court" you should be reading "District of Columbia  Municipal Corporation District Court" and the "Idaho State Supreme Court" for example, should be read as "Idaho District of Columbia Municipal Corporation Supreme Court".

Are you beginning to feel as if you have landed in the Land of Oz?
Yes, all this means that until you make some important decisions, you aren't working for the people of your county as an elected public peace officer. You are working as an employee of a federal corporation franchise in a private capacity. Your election is being "interpreted" as an election to an office in a private corporation. You are presently acting as a mall cop. You have no public office, no public bond, and no public oath. If you are like most members of the "law enforcement community" you are not even licensed or bonded or insured in a private capacity by your cheapskate employers. You are working for The Man, not the people.

And all this got off track 150 years ago.

So all those "federal agents" who are harassing the Hammonds and who are offering to arrest them and transport them to a private prison facility? They are private corporate employees of a franchise or subcontractor of the District of Columbia Municipal Corporation having no more authority than a floorwalker at JC PENNY, despite their pretensions otherwise. They are misinformed as to their authority and also misinformed regarding the identity of the Hammonds. These "federal agents" are literally foreign with respect to the Hammonds and have no jurisdiction related to them at all.

As part of the overall outrageous circumstance and fraud scheme the members of the American Bar Association have also contrived to change the citizenship of American State Citizens ----people born on the land of the Continental United States like the Hammonds have been "kidnapped on paper" and their civil records have been falsified--- which is in violation of international law, the Law of War, and the United Nation's Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which both the Federal United States and the British Government have signed.

An examination of the paperwork will reveal that virtually every single American State Citizen has been deemed a "foundling" and ward of the state, the unwanted child of an unwed mother ---- almost 400 million of us, and not a Daddy to be found? This is the result of a systematic and repugnant scheme by international commercial banks and the ABA, and again, all serving to change the natural venue on the land to a court venue in the international jurisdiction of  the sea.

The fact is that although human slavery has been outlawed worldwide since 1926, it is not against the law to enslave a corporation.

So what have the criminals among us contrived to do? To "redefine" living people as corporations ---- specifically as foreign situs trusts doing business under names styled like this: John Quincy Adams, and ESTATE trusts operating under names styled like this: JOHN QUINCY ADAMS, and now, most recently, Puerto Rican public transmitting utilities styled like this: JOHN Q. ADAMS.

Look at the paperwork in your hands seemingly addressed to the Hammonds. Depending on the style used to write their names, you can tell whether the documents are addressed to foreign situs trusts owned and operated by the "State of Oregon, Inc." , a Cestui Que Vie Estate Trust owned and operated by the "STATE OF OREGON, INC." or a public transmitting utility owned and operated by "OREGON"---- a franchise of the UN Corporation.

Please bear in mind that these "legal fiction entities were created without the Hammond's knowledge or permission and they are completely, 100%, the 
responsibility of those who created them. If the HAMMONDS referenced are ESTATE trusts belonging to the "STATE OF OREGON" it is high time for someone who is responsible for the "STATE OF OREGON" to pay any debts related to the franchise without delay ---- and without bothering the living people these franchises are named after.

It also behooves them to leave the living people and their property strictly alone and forego any pretense that the living Americans known as the Hammonds have knowingly or willingly agreed to act as Federal United States Citizens or have any agreed upon responsibility to act as "co-trustees" of the Public Charitable Trust, which they most likely don't make use of and don't even know that it exists.

Bottom line --- these "courts" and their presentments and "orders" have nothing whatsoever to do with the Hammonds as living people, nor their actual physical property assets at all. They have to do with the mis-administration of public trusts and "legal persons" operated by private, mostly foreign-owned corporations which are attempting to entrap and enslave Americans and lay false claims against their property via probate fraud, identity theft, and coercion.

This is the kind of criminality and fraud we are dealing with, Sheriff Ward, and at the end of the day, the pedal hits the metal in your office.

The British Government contrived the means to "press gang" the "land assets"   ---living people and their property assets--- of America into the jurisdiction of the sea during the Second World War. They enslaved us and our property assets under false pretenses and via the use of legal chicanery "for the war effort"--- and after the war, they simply continued on with these abuses. You have a choice.

You can continue to operate as a good little debt slave of the Queen acting on "automatic" and taking orders regardless of where those orders come from  ---- that is, you can act as a corporate mall cop in a private capacity and take your licks when the people catch up with you, or you can honor the truth---- that the people of your county elected you in Good Faith, with the understanding that you would enforce the guarantees of The Constitution owed to them and faithfully impose the land jurisdiction of the united States of America on any British agents who put a tentacle outside their actual jurisdiction.

As a Sheriff duly elected by the people of your county and operating the land jurisdiction owed to the Continental United States you have the authority to take your lawful Oath of Office, obtain a bond for your own security, and deputize as many men as you require to restrict the "federal agents" to their actual capacity. It is your duty to inform these foreign agents that the living people known as the Hammonds do not "reside" in any "federal territory" nor act in any capacity subject to the District of Columbia Municipal Corporation. You also have the right to collect Bounty from the Secretary of State and the US District Court under the terms of the 14th Amendment to cover any costs you incurr as a result of having to deal with these improper demands and false claims made by their agents.

If these "federal agents" persist, you have the authority to address the "US District Court" responsible and request their removal from your county. If they still won't behave and honor The Constitution and the actual limits of their own jurisdiction, you have the right and responsibility to arrest the whole kit and caboodle, just as you would arrest the keepers of a tavern operating outside the Public Law.

You also have the right and responsibility to inform the "US District Court" and their franchise affiliates operating the "State" and "County" Courts that the American Common Law Courts and Grand Juries are in operation again and any use of martial law including "Special Admiralty" is no longer excusable.

Acting as an elected Officer of the American Common Law Court indigenous to your county, along with the justices of the peace and the notary public, it is your duty to convene the Common Law Grand Jury chosen at random from among the landowners of your county to investigate crimes, including this one against the Hammonds, and to convene a Common Law Trial Jury if necessary before the Justice of the Peace, to decide any and all matters affecting the living people and actual property assets of the county on the land. If there is no one able and willing to serve as Justice of the Peace in your County, a Justice of the Peace may be appointed by any Federal Postal District Judge in your region. Contact me if you need help.

Please also know that as the Sheriff duly elected by the people of your county you have the authority and responsibility to demand the return of any American State Citizen being held in "federal custody" for a non-capital crime (murder or assault with a deadly weapon) within 72 hours of their arrest. So if the "federal agents" make the mistake of arresting the Hammonds under false pretenses and holding them in a private capacity, it is your right and role to present a Public Custody Order to the "US District" or other court responsible demanding that the Hammonds be released to your custody. You may then use your own discretion whether to keep them in custody or release them on parole pending final resolution of the jurisdictional complaint.

These are matters that affect millions of people and they must be addressed openly and with determination. The British Monarch has acted in Breach of Trust against the Americans, Canadians, Australians, and others. This criminality and the resulting surreptitious use of the Americium Bar Association members as licensed privateers operating on our shores is a serious international crime which is being addressed.  The misrepresentations of Americans as "foundlings" and "bastards" resulting in them being declared wards of the corporate "state" and further misrepresentations leading to them being declared "legally dead" are criminal acts of self-interested fraud carried out against us by avowed "allies" and "friends in perpetuity"-- parties who are bound by the most solemn obligations of international trust and treaty, who have abused America and Americans for their own profit.

This same pattern of lying about us and making false claims against us and seeking to "re-venue" us to foreign jurisdictions has also been attempted against our federation of nation-states as a whole. Two weeks ago, international banks and governmental services corporations in their employ appeared before the UN Trust Committee---North America, and claimed that the States of America no longer exist. They claimed among other things that we no longer have a national currency in circulation. They claimed that all 400 million Americans had voluntarily accepted Federal United States Citizenship. They claimed that our country is "civilly dead" and "de-populated" and that there are no American State Citizens.

This was, of course, done behind our backs by people representing secondary creditors of defunct federal "governmental services corporations" claiming to be the beneficiaries and/or creditors of our estates.

It's time to set the records straight and for us to act in our naked sovereign capacity.

A Declaration of Joint Sovereignty was issued by lawful heirs of the National Trust(s), together with Sovereign Letters Patent in behalf of the United Colonies of America, the united States of America, and the Native American Nations and delivered to the UN Trust Committee--North America and to the UN Security Council, the Pope, the Queen, Ban Ki Moon, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Bank of International 
Settlements.

The criminals responsible for this circumstance are being recognized for who and what they are and the die is cast. We are going to get down to the bottom of this fraud and misrepresentation once and for all. If you wish to be called "Sheriff" of a county in America, you must now step up and earn the title and begin operating the land jurisdiction owed to the Continental United States. You are under moral and lawful obligation to protect the Hammonds against any "federal agent" and to fully inform those agents of the limitations of their jurisdiction while standing on our soil. If there is no American Common Law Court presently operating in your county, it is your duty to organize one without further delay. In most counties there are active Justices of the Peace who still perform private marriage ceremonies and public notaries are still active. You may draft your Grand Jury and if needed, Trial Juries, from among the landowners listed in the county land records. All actions of the actual County  Court should be stamped in red and signed in black. All actions by admiralty courts ---by whatever name they operate under---are stamped in blue.

Sincerely,

Judge Anna Maria Riezinger"

As can now be understood, there is something terribly wrong with the actions of the Corporate Federal Government and it's Agencies or Private Corporate Contractors like the Bureau of Land Management. It will become worse, much worse before it become better.

The preceding means, you must stop acting and communicating like you are anything other than the sovereign you were created to be. Please, stop referring  to Corp. U.S. or the STATE OF 'X' as anything other than the private foreign corporations that they are. It’s time to wake up and learn the truth, time to 
become a moral and honorable society instead of lauding our Piety while we stand guilty of:

a) not knowing the truth;

b) not living the truth;

c) believing God will save us even though we have the 
tools to know the truth and the ability to use those 
tools but we refuse to live by the truth and use the 
tools we have—to save ourselves and thereby remain 
free.

The biggest problem with that: people tend to get all excited about uniting against the tyranny of Corp. U.S. hell bent for a rebellion, then while remaining blind to the truth and having no real remedy, they fall prey to agent provocateurs, Government propaganda and predatory marketers and are convinced to bail out of “the system.” 

Would that we could instead peacefully reseat our original jurisdiction government by following the law.  It really is just that simple.