Points of Clarification

Administrator Brown's Kangaroo Tribunal fails, despite a valiant attempt to sway the jury in favor of the prosecution's arguments and subvert justice, to find all statute violators guilty. In order to fully understand the lead-in sentence, a few deliberate misunderstandings and misrepresentations need Clarification. First and foremost is the misunderstanding that has been regurgitated by the Government's Educational System for many, many years:  The Constitution is the 'Law of The Land'. Nothing could be further from the truth than that statement.

The 'Law of The Land' referred to in the Constitution is 'Common Law' as opposed to the 'Law of The Sea' or 'Admiralty Law' which is one portion of what Today's Legal System employs to determine if a violation has occurred. Another deliberate misrepresentation is that of Court. Courts were places where the 'law of the land' was applied and determined. Today's Legal System has no Judges or courts where Law is applied or determined:  the Legal System closed or displaced all Common Law Courts;  however, a few have regained lawful Jurisdiction, Judge Anna von Reitz, Alaska State Superior Court.

The American Legal System convenes an Administrative Public Policy Tribunal and the person presiding over its proceedings is the Administrator. The Administrator, if no Jury is called to take up the matter, (actions or in-actions [the issue or contest]) against Public Policy Statutes (U.S and State Legislative bodies discuss and generate Public Policy Statutes not Law), and determines if legislative statutes have been violated and assigns 
innocence or guilt, fines and fees, and any other penalties. 



The Legal System has misrepresented itself and taken on the appellation of Court (to which it is not entitled since Law is not practiced or applied) and it has misrepresented statute as Law. United States Code (USC), as well as State Statutes, are NOT Law (Common Law) they are Legislative Statutes. In today's Legal Jurisdictions Corporate Citizens are subjected to regulation (control) by Statute:  this applies to all U.S. Citizens (since the United States is Incorporated and Congress generates Statutes) and all State Citizens (since all States are Incorporated and Legislatures generate Statutes).  

Although the Legal System continues to completely disregard lawful matters brought before Administrative Public Policy Tribunals, Americans are beginning to awaken to the Legal Fraud being perpetrated on the American People. Legal Matters vs Lawful Matters are once again beginning to be viewed by the American Public. Discussion and arguments over the meaning and validity of these current concepts and what they meant during earlier times are again being discussed at the dinner table and in the family rooms of America. Americans are being forced to examine the Legal System and the abuses and issues it has fostered. 

These same abuses and issues were once fought over by our forefathers. The 
Declaration of Independence was an instrument of Grievance and a remedy. 

The Revolutionary War and it's outcome (independence from King George [sovereignty for individuals and the inherent rights gained] and the right to The Law of The Land 'Common Law') have once again become prominent issues in need of Points of Clarification.
. 

There Are No Such Things As Constitutional Rights

You have no constitutional rights and never did. If you thought that you did, then you need to be educated. Let's examine the definitions.

Thomas Jefferson Viewed the Constitution as a Contract Between the States

" Where did D.C. come from? The parties to the contract, known as the Constitution for the United States of America, are the individual states. Neither the federal government, nor the people, as comprising one nation, are a party to the agreement between the several States. Be sure to research how the Federal Corporation is usurping the powers of the people AND the states!"

The Declaration of Independence states:  "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --"

"“The several states composing the United States of America are not united on the principle of unlimited submission to their general government; but…by a compact under the style and title of a Constitution for the United States, and of amendments thereto, they constituted a general government for special purposes [and] delegated to that government certain definite powers,…and…whensoever the general government assumes undelegated powers, its acts are unauthoritative, void, and of no force…To this compact each state acceded as a state, and is an integral party, its co-states forming, as to itself, the other party…”"

"“A Law repugnant to the Constitution is void.” With these words written by Chief Justice Marshall, the Supreme Court for the first time declared unconstitutional a law passed by Congress and signed by the President. Nothing in the Constitution gave the Court this specific power. Marshall, however, believed that the Supreme Court should have a role equal to those of the other two branches of government."

Your unalienable rights are neither granted by the government nor are they granted by a contract (The Constitution), they are "something integral with a whole" part of simply being (they are natural birthrights), which by agreement of the contract, are NOT to be INFRINGED by the government. Therefore ALL FEDERAL STATUTES that are INFRINGEMENTS, CONVERSIONS, or USURPATIONS of your UNALIENABLE RIGHTS are repugnant to the Constitution and are NULL and VOID.

So why do We the People obey these Statutes?  It is the deliberate misrepresentation of these statutes as though they are Laws that lead the people to consent by their ignorance and silence. Are the threats of force, loss of Liberty, confiscation of property, or the conversion of unalienable rights into privileges, which are used by the U.S. government, the determining factors in deciding whether the people or the contracted government will ultimately protect those unalienable rights?


References:

http://musicians4freedom.com/2011/05/thomas-jefferson-viewed-the-constitution-as-a-contract/

https://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?flash=true&doc=19

What I Learned Today: Or Elected Servants Think They Are Masters

UPDATE! 

See below!
I was unable to sleep after attending a meeting of the Corvallis City Council. Something was bothering me and I could not fall asleep. And then it hit me!

I listened to a small group of people who had very little or no direct contact with arms tell the Mayor and City Council why they needed to pass an unconstitutional ordinance to prohibit the open carrying of loaded arms within the city limits. All kinds of figures and percentages about gun violence were offered as testimony, while opposition spoke of rights and Constitution, and lawsuits if this ordinance passes a council vote.

So I finally decided that I would take my allocated three minutes to speak. I am sure that I didn't make many friends on the Corvallis City Council. I told them that what they were proposing was a violation of my rights and that I would not obey such a law, in fact, there would be people from all over Oregon who will come and open carry in defiance of this ordinance. I said that the Constitution is not the source of my rights rather it is the duties and responsibilities and limitations placed on the federal government as well as that of the States. It explicitly states that, "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." The Bill of Rights limits all levels of government not just the federal government. The People's rights are paramount.

But it wasn't until the early hours of the morning that it finally became clear. Here were a group of people who were elected by a majority of the people of Corvallis to serve their best interests, who were willing to break the law (Constitution) to pass a law (ordinance) to please a small group of "concerned" citizens who claim that seeing people carry loaded weapons made them afraid and added undo stress in their lives.

Imagine that! City Council thought that fear and stress were adequate justification to infringe on the rights of the majority to appease a special interest minority. I reminded them about a little skirmish that occurred with the British Crown when they came to confiscate weapons from the colonists. 

Today is Election Day and I urge the Esteemed Readers to go out and vote. Go out and vote for the people who will protect your rights and not cater to special interests by taking from you what is rightfully yours. 

If We the People stand up and rescind out consent of the form of governance that has evolved from that which was created, we can restore the system to what it was once meant to be.

UPDATE:

The Corvallis City Council has decided to drop the open carry ban ordinance. It seems that the State is taking up some new gun control legislation and focus on that is required at this time.

Actually it is time that we put these public servants into their proper place. The rights of the People MUST be protected by the servants in government, not usurped because of social pressures. Freedom loving Americans must unite in common defense of our rights and freedoms.

Planned Paranoia: The Fear of Firearms

Laws that prohibit firearms do nothing to prevent nor deter crime. The facts speak for themselves, regardless of what the fear mongers preach. Disarming the People is necessary for complete control. Every tyranny passed ever more restrictive laws until outright confiscation was implemented.

With the passage of unconstitutional laws in the Constitution State, Connecticut has proven my point:  confiscation is eminent and unless We the People rise up, all of our freedoms are lost.

The Esteemed Readers of Fix America are well aware of how we reached this point in America's demise. Starting with Lincoln's martial law which has never really been dismissed, and moving through to the NDRP and executive orders that can only be followed by usurpers of the Constitution, we are at that fork in the road and must choose the path we will follow.

It is always easier to say, 'Que sera, sera!' And just go along. That is what the good people of Germany did as National Socialism festered in their nation. History demonstrates the results in these so-called 'revolutions' against well established governments. Our own founders described this concern in the Declaration of Independence, as they further listed the oppression and usurpation of Common Law and the restrictions placed on natural rights.

The right to keep and bear arms was assumed to be part of the natural rights, those being life, liberty and property.  The fear that a government would at some point attempt to disarm the People, prior to oppressing them, it was insisted to be placed as an enumerated right which governments were forbidden to legislate against.

By highlighting certain crimes in the media, the policy pushers of big and powerful government control instill fear in the public, and use that fear to press for regulations that will prohibit certain types of 'criminals' from having all of their rights. Such is the federal law that prohibits a person charged and convicted of a felony crime from ever owning a firearm. That is unconstitutional, plain and simple.

Gun control advocates will ask, "Do you want ex-cons having guns?" to which I say, "Those who want them will get them, regardless of the law." Breaking the law is why they were convicted in the first place! "But when they get caught with a gun, they get stiffer sentences." To which I say, "If the crime they committed was such that the sentence paid restitution to the victim, instead of allowing the convict to live on taxpayer resources, maybe they would not be repeat offenders!"

Law needs to provide justice. Laws that create criminals from law-abiding people are not just laws. They are created by planning and planting fear in the reporting of crimes, school shootings, mall shootings, now military base shootings. If more people carried weapons there would be less of this, not more.

For many years, I never carried so much as a pocket knife and now I carry a weapon always.  I respect a business's wishes when posted 'No firearms', and I find another place to spend my money and time when I do. I imagine that most of the loudest advocates for gun laws are the ones who need not have a weapon. Their display of fear and paranoia is good reason not to own or bear firearms. 

For the rest of us We the People will decide NOT the government!

Reference Link:
http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/03/all-federal-gun-laws-are-unconstitutional/

What Tomorrow Will Bring: A Tirade: What Life Shall Orders Demand? Part 2

These are orders that will directly affect everything and will have a direct effect on all our lives, now and in the future. PLEASE READ IN ALL DIRECTIONS, and take a minute or two of your time to comprehend what you are reading!

EXECUTIVE ORDERS issued by U.S. Presidents in the recent 100 years+:

Teddy Roosevelt 3, 
F.D. Roosevelt 11 in 16 years,
Truman 5 in 7 years,
Eisenhower 2 in 8 years,
Kennedy 4 in 3 years,
Johnson 4 in 5 years,
Nixon 1 in 6 years, 
Ford 3 in 2 years,
Carter 3 in 4 years,
Reagan 5 in 8 years,
Bush 3 in 4 years,
Clinton 15 in 8 years,
George W. Bush 62 in 8 years
Obama - 923 in the first 40 months!

Yes, there is a reason that the person occupying the White House* is determined to take all powers away from Congress. What is Soetoro/AKA Obama really trying to accomplish?  Remember what he told Russia's Putin: "I'll be more flexible after I'm re-elected." Think of what is meant by the subjects of some of the Executive Orders. The Executive Orders are all public information, please make the time to read them in order to be aware of the intent and prepare yourself for the actions that will be taken;
10990 - Allows the government to take over all modes of transportation and control of highways and seaports, 
10995 - Allows the government to seize and control the communication media,
10997 - Allows the government to take over all electrical power, gas, petroleum, fuels and minerals, 
10998 - Allows the government to take over all food resources and farms, 
11000 - Allows the government to mobilize civilians into work brigades under government supervision,
11001 - Allows the government to take over all health, education and welfare functions, 
11002 - Designates the registration of all persons. Postmaster General to operate a national registration, 
11003 - Allows the government to take over all airports and aircraft, including private and commercial aircraft, 
11004 - Allows the Housing and Finance Authority to relocate communities, build new housing with public funds, designate areas to be abandoned, and establish new locations for populations, 
11005 - Allows the government to take over railroads, inland waterways and public storage facilities, 
11049 - Assigns emergency preparedness function to federal departments and agencies, consolidating 21 operative Executive Orders issued over a fifteen year period, 
11051 - Specifies the responsibility of the Office of Emergency Planning and gives authorization to put all Executive Orders into effect in times of increased international tensions and economic or financial crisis (please recall that the Department of Justice is an extension of the Executive Branch, and no other),
11310 - Grants authority to the Department of Justice to enforce the plans set out in Executive Orders, to institute industrial support, to establish judicial and legislative liaison, to control all aliens, to operate penal and correctional institutions, and to advise and assist the President,
11921 - Allows the Federal Emergency Preparedness Agency to develop plans to establish control over the mechanisms of production and distribution, of energy sources, wages, salaries, credit and the flow of money in U.S. financial institution in any undefined national emergency. It also provides that when a state of emergency is declared by the President, Congress cannot review the action for six months,
NDRP, - Please see the article, 'Busy Bees Make A Shiny New Hive - or Welcome To Your New Government Run By The President, The Secretary of Homeland Security, and The Secretary of Defense', March 20, 2012.

Executive Orders become law if unchallenged by the Congress 30 days after they are submitted. They must also be published in the Federal Register. The Listing of Executive orders in the Congressional Library runs in a numeric order starting with the first Executive orders passed until the most current. When the person illegally occupying the White House* took office his E.O. list started from #EO-13489.
Verify and read these "executive orders" for yourself and then read the NDRP and remember there are more than 900 more to read and think about, 'Moving Democracy Forward for Change? ' 
You've all heard the story of cooking the 'Frog in the Pot.'  Watch Soetoro/Obama's actions, not his words (he lies)!  By his actions he will show you where he wants America headed. Most Americans have absolutely no idea what is happening. The American people need to understand that Soetoro/Obama's executive orders represents a fundamental change in the United States of America, just as he promised.

The person illegally occupying the White House* has written Executive Orders abolishing the Constitution for the united States of America. The E.O.s have passed into law unquestioned and uncontested by the US. Congress. The U.S. Constitution has been replaced over time in a piecemeal fashion with the Patriot Act, NDAA, and the E.O. NDRP and other E.O.s, which forces the U.S. Congress and the Judiciary to disband. In addition to this intolerable situation, this person illegally occupying the White House* has proposed a new 2,300 page Constitution which is waiting in the side wings to be presented at the right moment. With the suspension of Habaes Corpus and the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, the promise of forced labor camps and re-education programs are just around the corner and have been established and are only waiting to be filled by the people (hard working slaves) that remain. How can anyone be astonished that DHS-TSA-FEMA considers and has been teaching that the Framers of the Constitution and the Founding Fathers should be called terrorists??

In too many respects, the person illegally occupying the White House* has demonstrated his complete lack of understanding of the "constitution for all 57 states" and feels that a new 2,300 page constitution needs to be moved forward in order for change to occur. What was at one time thought to be a simple slip of the tongue has shown itself for what it truly is... genuine ignorance and a heartfelt ambivalence, or more often disregard for the Constitution for the united States of America, the Unanimous Declaration of Independence and any supporting historical documents.  In contrast to his proposed constitution, in detail, The U.S. Constitution describes the parts of governance and their composition. This document also contains the manner in which the parts are allowed to interact. The U.S. Constitution also contains a Bill of Rights which applies to all U.S. Citizens. Amendments have been adopted, ratified (some illegally) and repealed (which may or may not have had worth) since its ratification. The U.S. Constitution was written in common English of the time and in a manner which was expected to be understood by every U.S. Citizen. This does not mean that all citizens could read but could understand what was being said when another read it out loud. 

It holds the foundation of ideas and concepts of self governance our nation of people represent. Many other documents of the time contain a much more detailed account and commentary of arguments, both for and against, the various ideas and concepts involved in the composition. The U.S Constitution remains the only single source document that defines the united States of America. All other documents of any nature are subordinate. To be sure, there are many other source documents which support its reasoned construction. The United States Declaration of Independence is another U.S. Sole source document, which itself has many other documents of the time and times previous with which it is supported. These support documents contain many ideas and ideals which were conceptually incorporated in the composition of this construct (written instrument, instrumentality).

The People of the United States are the primary governing body: not the System of Governance. The People delegate the day to day responsibility of governance to the Federal Republic (a plurality of Sovereign States:  not a monolithic entity) through representatives and this combination is bound together by and under the U.S Constitution. The process of selecting representatives is determined by casting individual votes. Every U.S. Citizen has the right and responsibility to uphold and defend the U.S Constitution against all enemies. If this single source document and the integral components are allowed to be violated in any way, its' worth is in question. If the U.S Constitution falls due to inattention to the maintenance of the concepts, the Nation falls and the American concept and actuality of a United States of America ceases to exist. It becomes something else that is defined by something else (a 2,300 page something else which is, I am sure, incomprehensible (like the 2,700 page PPACA which itself has grown and has been changed illegally since it was passed) with its now more than 40,000 (and increasing) supporting regulations and laws.

"The Constitution does not protect our guns, our guns protect the Constitution."  

Allen Croft

U.S. senators who represent your will, voted on the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty. God forbid that the USA would ever cede any of its rights to the UN! In a 53-46 vote, the Senate narrowly passed a measure that will stop the United States from entering into the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty. We came four votes away from the U.S. Senate giving our Constitutional rights over to the United Nations.

The Statement of Purpose from the Bill reads:   

"To uphold Second Amendment rights and prevent the United States from entering into the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty."

The U.N. Small Arms Treaty, which has been championed by the Obama Administration, would have effectively placed a global ban on the import and export of small firearms. The ban would have affected all private gun owners in the U.S. and had language that would have implemented an international gun registry on all private guns and ammunition. Astonishingly, 46 out of our 100 United States Senators were willing to give away our Constitutional rights to a foreign power, depriving U.S. Citizens of thier right to own and bare arms and to allow for the creation of a U.N. armed police force and to come into this country to assist in the collection of weapons from us, you and me!

Here listed are the 46 senators who voted to give your rights to the U.N.:

Baldwin (D-WI)
Baucus (D-MT)
Bennett (D-CO)
Blumenthal (D-CT)
Boxer (D-CA)
Brown (D-OH)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Cardin (D-MD)                   
Carper (D-DE)
Casey (D-PA)
Coons (D-DE)
Cowan (D-MA)
Durbin (D-IL)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Franken (D-MN)
Gillibrand (D-NY)
Harkin (D-IA)
Hirono (D-HI)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kaine (D-VA)
King (I-ME)
Klobuchar (D-MN)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Leahy (D-VT)
Levin (D-MI)
McCaskill (D-MO)
Menendez (D-NJ)
Merkley (D-OR)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Murphy (D-CT)
Murray (D-WA)
Nelson (D-FL)
Reed (D-RI)
Reid (D-NV)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Sanders (I-VT)
Schatz (D-HI)
Schumer (D-NY)
Shaheen (D-NH)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Udall (D-CO)
Udall (D-NM)
Warner (D-VA)
Warren (D-MA)
Whitehouse (D-RI)
Wyden (D-OR)

These Senators voted to allow armed U.N. Police Forces to come into our country and take OUR guns (weapons of defense). They need to lose their next election. We have been betrayed. 46 Senators Voted to Give our 2nd Amendment Constitutional Rights to the U.N.

[It should be remembered that on December 17, 2009 Soetoro/AKA Obama relinquished various rights (due process, property, search and seizure, arrest, etc.) of U.S. Citizens to another international police Force. Article with emendation.

AMENDING EXECUTIVE ORDER 12425 DESIGNATING INTERPOL AS A PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION ENTITLED TO ENJOY CERTAIN PRIVILEGES, EXEMPTIONS, AND IMMUNITIES
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act (22 U.S.C. 288), and in order to extend the appropriate privileges, exemptions, and immunities to the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL), it is hereby ordered that Executive Order 12425 of June 16, 1983, as amended, is further amended by deleting from the first sentence the words “except those provided by Section 2(c), Section 3, Section 4, Section 5, and Section 6 of that Act” and the semicolon that immediately precedes them.

"Barack Obama has quietly ceded US sovereignty to the International Police Force and rendered due process under the Constitution irrelevant.

In 1983, President Ronald Reagan issued an Executive Order which gave permission to the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL) to operate within the boundaries of the United States. Reagan’s EO put INTERPOL under the same basic guidelines as the CIA, FBI, ATF and other Federal law enforcement agencies which now follow DHS directives.

Two weeks ago, without any announcement, debate, discussion or inquiry from journalists, President Obama issued an amendment to Executive Order 12425. The amendment removed part of Reagan’s order that kept INTERPOL from having full diplomatic immunity while operating within the United States.

In other words: Under Reagan and right up until two weeks ago, INTERPOL was authorized to operate within the USA but they did not have full diplomatic immunity and had to adhere to certain laws set forth for investigative agencies. Laws that prohibit authorities from violating our constitutionally protected rights.

A one-paragraph executive order may seem inconsequential to many, but this action has far reaching implications and threatens the sovereignty of America.

Reagan opened the door to allow Interpol to operate in partnership with the U.S. but with significant constitutional safeguards. Specifically, Interpol’s property and assets remained subject to search and seizure by American law enforcement, and its archived records remained subject to public scrutiny under provisions of the Freedom of Information Act.

Interpol had to answer to the FBI and U.S. courts under Reagan’s order. These safeguards were stripped away by Obama’s action the week before Christmas without debate or explanation. Obama picked the holiday season to make this radical change to minimize media coverage.

This order marks a significant change in federal policy and usurps the constitutional power of our government by yielding it to an international organization.

Michael van Der Galien writes,

“This foreign law enforcement organization can operate free of an important safeguard against government and abuse. Property and assets, including the organization’s records, cannot now be searched or seized. Their physical operational locations are now immune from U.S. legal and investigative authorities.”

Obama has given an international organization unsupervised freedom to investigate Americans on our own soil without recourse or the supervision of our own government.

Andy McCarthy writing for the National Review asks some very significant questions:

“Why would we elevate an international police force above American law? Why would we immunize an international police force from the limitations that constrain the FBI and other American law-enforcement agencies? Why is it suddenly necessary to have, within the Justice Department, a repository for stashing government files which, therefore, will be beyond the ability of Congress, American law-enforcement, the media, and the American people to scrutinize?”

The U.S. Constitution clearly states that it is the supreme law of our land and allowing the International Criminal Courts (ICC) to supersede the U.S. Constitution violates America’s sovereignty.

Secondly, the War on Terror is unpopular with Europeans and the ICC may attempt to prosecute heroic American soldiers with trumped up war crimes. Obama is putting brave American men and women at grave risk.

In this new executive order is that Interpol’s operations center for the United States is housed in the Justice Department. Many of the agents might be Americans who will work under Interpol.

This order has potentially created the new civilian security force that Obama proposed during his campaign. This group of law enforcement officials is no longer subject to the restraints of the Constitution.

The order guarantees that Interpol officers have immunity from prosecution for crimes they may commit in the United States.

While Obama is extending due process rights to terrorists he is weakening those same rights for American citizens. If a citizen were to be prosecuted by Interpol their newly granted immunity would interfere with the discovery process. Since Interpol files are immune to disclosure, a citizen could be denied his right to see the information used to prosecute him or her.

Obama’s executive order has done more to weaken civil liberties than the horrid Patriot Act. The silence in the mainstream media on this issue should frighten all freedom loving Americans. Obama just signed away parts of our precious legal protections."
By: M.J. Harris, From:
http://thelibertyguardian.com/2010/01/executive-order-international-police-now-have-full-immunity-in-us/]

Time is short for what tomorrow will bring.

General Reference:

*Why, you might ask, do I use the Phrase, "person illegally occupying the White House" so often?  Barry Soetoro/ AKA Barack Hussein Obama II is not a U.S. Citizen of any kind:  he is a foreign national. He did not meet Hawaii's election qualification requirements to run as a Presidential candidate. He does not meet U.S. Constitutional requirements to be President of the united States of America:  He cannot legally hold that office, therefore he can only occupy the office by threat of force. I have posted many articles regarding this issue. He was tried, found guilty, and convicted on this issue by a Properly Convened Grand Jury. But who remains to enforce the Judgment? 


Poetic Reference:

Excelsior!
by
Henry Wadsworth Longfellow

The shades of night were falling fast, 
As through an Alpine village passed 
A youth, who bore, 'mid snow and ice,
A banner with the strange device, 
Excelsior!

His brow was sad; his eye beneath, 
Flashed like a falchion from its sheath, 
And like a silver clarion rung 
The accents of that unknown tongue, 
Excelsior!

In happy homes he saw the light 
Of household fires gleam warm and bright; 
Above, the spectral glaciers shone, 
And from his lips escaped a groan, 
Excelsior!

"Try not the Pass!" the old man said; 
"Dark lowers the tempest overhead, 
The roaring torrent is deep and wide!" 
And loud that clarion voice replied, 
Excelsior!

"O stay," the maiden said, "and rest 
Thy weary head upon this breast!" 
A tear stood in his bright blue eye, 
But still he answered, with a sigh, 
Excelsior!

"Beware the pine tree's withered branch! 
Beware the awful avalanche!" 
This was the peasant's last Good-night, 
A voice replied, far up the height, 
Excelsior!

At break of day, as heavenward
The pious monks of Saint Bernard
Uttered the oft-repeated prayer,
A voice cried through the startled air,
Excelsior!

A traveler, by the faithful hound, 
Half-buried in the snow was found, 
Still grasping in his hand of ice 
That banner with the strange device, 
Excelsior!

There in the twilight cold and gray, 
Lifeless, but beautiful, he lay, 
And from the sky, serene and far, 
A voice fell, like a falling star, 
Excelsior!



Another one bites the dust, 30.

How to Plant The Seeds of Destruction or No One Remembered to Close the Gate Part 5

At this juncture, it should be painfully and depressingly obvious that due to governmental deceit, inattention to maintenance of the Constitution, and no vigilance, by the People, The Republic fell during 1871. the People were deceived and betrayed by various officials.

The American People have been unwittingly living a lie.

Since 1871 and up to the present time, it should be understandably clear the System of Governance, as defined by the Constitution of 1787, was usurped by officials within that system and various individuals outside of that system in order to create a Corporate Government to transfer the wealth of the Nation to themselves and their posterity, while setting up a system of never ending and increasing debt. The interest on that debt and the monies collected in other schemes was used to increase their wealth and influence, while continuing to make inroads into the very fabric from what the Nation had been woven.

Forty-five years ago I was told that my concerns were nothing more than mental masturbation, senseless verbal fornication, that I was just toying with words. My concerns have not in any way diminished, in fact, they have only increased. The wheel-work of life turns in curious ways and I would only ask The Esteemed Readers of Fix America what they think is in movement? Given the information and opinion within the articles; 'That which Pushes the Mind Is Not Always Felt', 'How to Plant The Seeds of Destruction', and 'What Tomorrow Will Bring' and the auxiliary books and their information and opinion, what is the most logical conclusion which can be extracted that explains the actions that have taken place and the situations that are unfolding before our eyes?

What outcome can prevail for The American People?

OUR Nation IS IN JEOPARDY RIGHT NOW!

How Can We Retake What Is Rightfully Ours?

“The Supreme Court has said the De Jure Government offices still exist but the people have failed to occupy them.

The First suggested Method Is Untenable:

Remember Downs v. Bidwell and the dissenting opinion of Justice Marshall Harlan? He stated that two national governments exist; one to be maintained under the Constitution, with all its restrictions. This is one that We the People need to force our elected public officials to occupy – De Jure rule.

We need to change that by organizing Grand Juries and putting our officials back under De jure rule and out of the Corporate (or Military) Rule under which they are currently operating. Unfortunately, this has no force of law under the Corporate 'Government.' The United States Corporation is supposed to operates under Corporate/Commercial/Public Law rather than Common/Private Law and the current 'Government' will not even abide by that system of jurisdiction.

Our elected officials will then have to operate under the limits of their Oath of office to uphold the Constitution of the United States and the respective State Constitutions, circa 1860. When they violate the Oath it’s a capital crime. Although the method of properly convening a grand jury has force of law under the original U.S. Constitution, it means little-to-nothing under the Corporate Constitution. Doesn't anyone remember that the person occupying the White House was found guilty by a grand jury (please see the article, Obama Indicted: Fugitive at Large)

"Fugitive at large, Barry Soetoro, AKA Barack Hussein Obama II is now a wanted criminal. Plagued by an identity issue, problems with Social Security Numbers, problems with U.S. Citizenship, problems with lawsuits from Local Courts to Superior Courts, problems with his job, Barry's problems are ever multiplying along with the costs engendered by his issues and problems, has been convicted and is now facing ten years of incarceration. He was served at the White House; however, he has yet to surrender to authorities or be apprehended in order that incarceration can begin," From the Article:  

The reason we go back to 1860 is because that is the last time we had lawful laws in this country.

Where do the people get their power to convene a Grand Jury? The Magna Carta, 1215. Our Founding Fathers looked back to history for precedent when they decided they wanted to change their government. What they found was the Magna Carta Liberatum, the Great Charter of Freedoms. It set a precedent that changed the face of England forever, by establishing that the King was not above the law.

King John of England signed the Magna Carta after immense pressure from the Church and his barons (the people). The King often lived above the law, violating both Feudal and Common Law, and was heavily criticized for his foreign policy and actions in England. The Barons, with the support of the Church, pressured King John to spell out a list of their rights and guarantee that those rights would be enforced. The Barons provided a draft, and after some negotiation, King John put his seal to the Magna Carta in Runnymede, in June of 1215.

Section 61 set rules for establishing the Grand Jury. It states: Since we have granted all these things for God, for the better ordering of our kingdom, and to allay the discord that has arisen between us and our barons (people), and since we desire that they shall be enjoyed in their entirety, with lasting strength, forever, we give and grant to the barons the following security: The barons shall elect twenty-five of their number to keep, and cause to be observed with all their might, the peace and liberties granted and confirmed to them by this charter. If we, our chief justice, our officials, or any of our servants offend in any respect against any man, or transgress any of the articles of the peace or of this security, and the offense is made known to four of the said twenty-five barons, they shall come to us.”

This is the basis for Grand Juries in the United States of America, but only under common law jurisdiction which has been supplanted by

Corporate/Commercial/Public Law

The UNITED STATES CORPORATION CAN NOT BE REPAIRED!

The UNITED STATES CORPORATION is a corrupt Corporate 'Government', that believes and takes actions on that belief, that it is above the laws it has created and can do anything what-so-ever it pleases.

Since the CORPORATION is a private concern and is in no way obligated to follow or adhere to the will-of-the-People, I can only suggest that you write to your State or National Congressmen and wait for a reply.

A Different Suggested Method:

Remember Downs v. Bidwell and the dissenting opinion of Justice Marshall Harlan? He said that two national governments exist; one to be maintained under the Constitution, with all its restrictions. This is one that We the people must repopulate by proper election to re-establish the De Jure System of Self Governance that was vacated during 1871.

I can only suggest that no letters of any concerns need to by written to anyone. I can suggest that you think about things and inspect all the activity covered at the website of 'The Republic for The United States of America.

It is only a suggestion while you wait for that reply from the first suggestion.

General Reference:

Republic for the United States

Contact Information:

Telephone:

Toll Free: (855)RUSA411

(855)787-2411

Internet Websites:

Publicinfo@republicfortheunitedstates.org

www.republicfortheunitedstates.org

www.republiccongress.org

Reference Book List:

Hamilton's Curse, by Thomas J DiLorenzo, 2008

An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the

Wealth of Nations, by Adam Smith, 1776

Laissez-faire economics

Tocqueville

Ludwig von Mises

General Reference from Previous articles:

What America Means to Me: or Some Essential Parts of It

'I have even greater respect for the instrument which our Nation was formed under, The Constitution of the United States of America.

In detail, it describes the parts of government and their composition. This document also contains the manner in which the parts are allowed to interact.

The Constitution of the United States of America also contains a Bill of Rights which applies to all U.S. Citizens. Amendments have been adopted and repealed since its enactment, which may or may not have had worth. It was written in common English of the time in a manner which was expected to be understood by every U.S. Citizen.

This does not mean that all citizens could read but they could understand what was being said when another read it out loud.

It holds the foundation of ideas and concepts our nation of people represent. Many other documents of the time contain a much more detailed account and commentary of arguments, both for and against, the various ideas and concepts involved in the composition. The Constitution of the United States of America remains the only single source document that defines America. All other documents of any nature are subordinate. To be sure, there are many other source documents which support its reasoned construction. The United States Declaration of Independence is another U.S. Sole source document, which itself has many other documents of the time and previous times with which it is supported. These support documents contain many ideals or ideas which were conceptually incorporated in the composition of its construction.

The People of the United States are the primary governing body. They delegate the day to day responsibility of governance to the Federal Republic through representatives and the combination is bound together under the Constitution of the United States of America. The process of selecting representatives is determined by casting individual votes. Every U.S. Citizen has the right and responsibility to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States of America against all enemies. If this single source document and the integral components are allowed to be violated in any way, its' worth is in question. If the Constitution of the United States of America falls due to inattention to its maintenance, the Nation falls and the American concept and actuality of a United States of America ceases to exist. It becomes something else that is defined by something else. I vote for the most qualified representatives and candidates that will uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States of America above all else.'

Another one bites the dust, 30.

Professor Laura Hollis of Notre Dame On Obamacare

"The unveiling of the dictatorial debacle that is Obama care absolutely flabbergasts me. It is stunning on so many levels, but the most shocking aspect of it for me is watching millions of free Americans stand idly by while this man, his minions in Congress, and his cheerleaders in the press systematically dismantle our Constitution, steal our money, and crush our freedoms.

The President, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid (with no small help from Justice John Roberts) take away our health care, and we allow it. They take away our insurance, and we allow it. They take away our doctors, and we allow it. They charge us thousands of dollars more a year, and we allow it. They make legal products illegal, and we allow it. They cripple our businesses, and we allow it. They announce by fiat that we must ignore our most deeply held beliefs – and we allow it.

Where is your spine, America?

Yes, I know people are complaining. I read the news on the internet. I read blogs. I have a Twitter feed. So what? People in the Soviet Union complained. People in Cuba complain. People in China complain (quietly). Complaining isn’t the same thing as doing anything about it. In fact, much of the complaining that we hear sounds like resignation: Wow. This sucks. Oh well, this is the way things are. Too bad.

Perhaps you need reminding of a few important facts. Here goes:  

1. The President is not a king. Barack Obama does not behave like a President, an elected official, someone who realizes that he works for us. He behaves like a king, a dictator – someone who believes that his own pronouncements have the force of law, and who thinks he can dispense with the law’s enforcement when he deigns to do so. And those of us who object? How dare we? Racists!

And while he moves steadily “forward” with his plans to “fundamentally transform” the greatest country in human history, he distracts people with cheap, meaningless trivialities, like “free birth control pills”! (In fact, let’s face it: this administration’s odd obsession with sex in general – Birth control! Abortion! Sterilization! Gay guys who play basketball! — is just plain weird. Since when did the leader of the free world care so much about how people have sex, who they have it with, and what meds they use when they have it? Does he have nothing more important to concern himself with?)  

2. It isn’t just a failed software program; it is a failed philosophy. People are marveling that Healthcare.gov was such a spectacular failure. Well, if one is only interested in it as a product launch, I’ve explained some of the reasons for that here. But the larger point is that it isn’t a software failure, or even a product failure; it is a philosophy failure.

I have said this before: Obama is not a centrist; he is a central planner. And this – all of it: the disastrous computer program, the hundreds of millions of dollars wasted, the lies, the manipulation of public opinion, the theft of the public’s money and property, and freedom (read insurance, and premiums, and doctors) — IS what central planning looks like.

The central premise of central planning is that a handful of wunderkinds with your best interests at heart (yeah, right) know better than you what’s good for you. The failure of such a premise and the misery it causes have been clear from the dawn of humanity. Kings and congressmen, dictators and Dear Leaders, potentates, princes and presidents can all fall prey to the same imperial impulses: “we know what is good the ‘the people.’ And they are always wrong.

There is a reason that the only times communism has really been tried have been after wars, revolutions, or coups d’état. You have to have complete chaos for people to be willing to accept the garbage that centralized planning produces. Take the Soviet Union, for example. After two wars, famine, and the collapse of the Romanov dynasty, why wouldn’t people wait in line for hours to buy size 10 shoes? Or settle for the gray matter that passed for meat in the grocery stores? But communism’s watered-down cousin, socialism, isn’t much better. Ask the Venezuelans who cannot get toilet paper. Toilet paper. ¡Viva la Revolución!

Contrary to what so many who believe in a “living Constitution” say, the Founding Fathers absolutely understood this. That is why the Constitution was set up to limit government power. (Memo to the President: the drafters of the Constitution deliberately didn’t say “what government had to do on your behalf.”) They understood that that was the path to folly, fear, and famine.)  

3. Obama is deceitful. Just as the collapse of the computer program should not surprise anyone, neither should we be shocked that the President lied about his healthcare plan. Have any of you been paying attention over the past few years? Obama has made no secret of his motivations or his methods. The philosophies which inspire him espouse deceit and other vicious tactics. (Don’t take my word for it: read Saul Alinsky.) Obama infamously told reporter Richard Wolffe, “You know, I actually believe my own bullshit.” He has refused to be forthcoming about his past (where are his academic records?). His own pastor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, told author Ed Klein, that Obama said to him, “You know what your problem is? You have to tell the truth.”

Did Obama lie when he said dozens of times, “If you like you plan, you can keep it. Period!”?   Of course he did. That’s what he does.  

4. The media is responsible. And had the media been doing their jobs, we would have known a lot of this much, much earlier.  The press is charged with the sacred responsibility of protecting the people from the excesses of government. Our press has been complicit, incompetent, or corrupt. Had they vetted this man in 2008, as they would have a Republican candidate, we would have known far more about him than we do, even now. Had they pressed for more details about Obamacare, Congress’ feet would have been held to the fire. Had they done their jobs about Eric Holder, Fast and Furious, Benghazi, the IRS scandal, NSA spying – or any of the other myriad betrayals of the public trust that this administration has committed, Obama would likely have lost his 2012 reelection campaign. (A fact that even The Washington Post has tacitly acknowledged. Well done, fellas! Happy now?)

Instead, they turned a blind eye, even when they knew he was lying, abusing power, disregarding the limits of the Constitution. It was only when he began to spy on them, and when the lies were so blatant that the lowest of low-information voters could figure it out that they realized they had to report on it. (Even in the face of blatant, deliberate and repeated lies, The New York Times has the audacity to tell us that the President “misspoke.”) They have betrayed us, abandoned us, and deceived us.  

5. Ted Cruz was right. So was Sarah Palin. The computer program is a disaster. The insurance exchanges are a disaster. What’s left? The healthcare system itself. And this, of necessity, will be a disaster, too.  Millions of people have lost their individual insurance plans. In 2015, millions more will lose their employer-provided coverage (a fact which the Obama administration also knew, and admitted elsewhere).  The exorbitant additional costs that Obamacare has foisted on unsuspecting Americans are all part of a plan of wealth confiscation and redistribution. That is bad enough. But it will not end there. 

When the numbers of people into the system and the corresponding demand for care vastly exceed the cost projections (and they will, make no mistake), then the rationing will start. Not only choice at that point, but quality and care itself will go down the tubes. And then will come the decisions made by the Independent Payment Advisory Board about what care will be covered (read “paid for”) and what will not.

That’s just a death panel, put politely. In fact, progressives are already greasing the wheels for acceptance of that miserable reality as well. They’re spreading the lie that it will be about the ability of the dying to refuse unwanted or unhelpful care. Don’t fall for that one, either. It will be about the deaths that inevitably result from decisions made by people other than the patients, their families, and their physicians. (Perhaps it’s helpful to think of their assurances this way: “If you like your end-of-life care, you can keep your end-of-life-care.”)  

6. We are not SUBJECTS. (or, Nice Try, the Tea Party Isn’t Going Away). We have tolerated these incursions into our lives and livelihoods too long already. There is no end to the insatiable demand “progressives” have to remake us in their image. Today it is our insurance, our businesses, our doctors, our health care. Tomorrow some new crusade will be announced that enables them to take over other aspects of our formerly free lives.

I will say it again: WE ARE NOT SUBJECTS. Not only is the Tea Party right on the fiscal issues, but it appears that they are more relevant than ever. We fought a war once to prove we did not want to be the subjects of a king, and the Boston Tea Party was just a taste of the larger conflict to come. If some people missed that lesson in history class, we can give them a refresher."

From the blog: My Underwood Typewriter