By The People

There are fundamental flaws in how American government operates today,
contrary to the Constitution and the vision of a representative republican form of governance.
I intend doing something about it: by educating and informing others who
are not even aware of the dangers.

Tuesday, March 22, 2016

Some People Think Everything Is Political, or Some People Think It's All Just A Game, or Tell That to Those That Gave It All



Since there was no armed take over, no stand off, no shoot out, no threat made to anyone, by the Hammonds or the Bundy's or anyone else involved with the Malheur Refuge Incident. The more one reads the official reports and commentary made by various officials and participants the more things seem terribly wrong and incorrect. Murder, deceit, lies, false statements, missing evidence, collusion, negligence in office, failure to uphold oath of office, corruption, conflict of interest, Government kick-back, at the local, state, and national levels and more, much more are being reported everyday. Very little by the Government controlled Privately Owned Major Media.

Americans are constantly held captive by distractions and misdirection (Television, Team Sports, Non-existent threats, success, and who won, just to name a few), and it is they who will suffer for their inattention to what is now happening all around them. while Americans are dreaming of sugar plums and creamy tarts, those with no heart and hob-nailed boots are carrying out the plans for complete domination.

"...nationhood as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority."
Strobe Talbott, Deputy Secretary of State 1994-2001 

"That the UN wants you to give up your national independence and become a Global Citizen?" 
(Ref: United Nation New Centre - Sept. 12, 2003

The UN has targeted the local church for eradication by regulating it out of business. 
(Ref: United Nations Conference on Human Settlements, May 31-June 11, 1976, Agenda Item 10).

UN plans call for replacing all Christian based religions with a one world religion based on the Gaia hypothesis, the paganistic worship of "mother earth" having its origin and roots in The Temple of Understanding. 
(Ref: UN Millennium Peace Summit of Religious and Spiritual Leaders, Aug. 28-31, 2000, New York)"
Source: UN-FREEZONE.ORG



The Esteemed Readers, who read of Mr. Finicum's tragic demise or watched the moment by moment events unfold in the drone video recording or the cell phone recording of the events unfolding inside the truck Mr. Finicum was driving, might be wondering what is the force driving the Megalomaniacal Insanity cloying at Americans; their property, their Rights, their minds, and their lives?  Many articles of information regarding the how; when, where, why, and who have been published on the Fix America internet site.

With the failure of the League of Nations to ensnare America a new enterprise was immediately begun, The United Nations. Established in 1945 by 51 countries, the stated purpose of the United Nations was, "to preserve peace through international cooperation." That being said, then why is the UN meddling in the domestic affairs of sovereign Nations?  This exercise did not rely on gaining American acceptance, it simply controlled the National financial and monetary system and then bankrupted the system. All of this and so much more was carried out by Lawyers operating unlawfully without the knowledge and informed consent of the American people. Deceit, lies, false statements, collusion, conspiracy, negligence in office, failure to uphold oath of office, corruption, conflict of interest, Government kick-back was carried out in order to allow the UN d.b.a. IMF to purchase the bankrupt Corporation (The United States of America, Inc.) and all of it's alleged assets. All of this and so much more are all still in full swing with no end in sight.

"The UN is militantly anti-property rights?

The UN is dominated by socialist, communist, and other collectivist regimes that are hostile to private property, the basis of our freedom and prosperity. Karl Marx wrote in the Communist Manifesto that "the theory of the Communists may be summed up in the single sentence: abolition of private property." Marx continued: "In one word, you reproach us with intending to do away with your property. Precisely so; that is just what we intend."

The UN intends to carry out Marx's plan?

In true Marxist fashion, the report of the UN "Habitat I" Conference declares that private land ownership "contributes to social injustice.... Public control of land use is therefore indispensable...." Agenda 21, the UN's massive environmental manifesto, envisions a UN empowered to control and micro-manage our planetary environment and the actions of every person on Earth. It says: "All countries should undertake a comprehensive national inventory of their land resources" and "develop national land-management plans." The UN's Assessment would "reallocate" property rights and have "stakeholder groups," instead of property owners, make decisions on private land use.

Our own U.S. government is adopting many of the UN's anti-property 
rights and policies and treaties?

The U.S. has signed Agenda 21 and has begun implementing the UN's "Wildlands Project," an incredible plan to push millions of Americans off their land to make vast nature preserves out of half of the nation. Also, under the UN's 1988 Convention on Narcotics, the U.S. has adopted unconstitutional "asset forfeiture" laws that allow seizure of property without due process.

UN treaties could destroy our heritage of freedom?

Nobel Prizewinning economist, Friedrich A. Hayek, noted that "the system of private property is the most important guaranty of freedom, not only for those who own property, but scarcely less for those who do not. It is only because the control of the means of production is divided among many people acting independently that nobody has complete power over us, that we as individuals can decide what to do with ourselves."
Source: UN-FREEZONE.ORG

From the unlawful takeover of the American Union (The united States of America) by a succession of Foreign Corporations deliberately controlling all American financial concerns through a cyclical monetary system of eternal debt and bankruptcy, this sickness has spread across America to the current owners of the United States of America, Inc. (a.k.a. UNITED STATES) The UNITED NATIONS DBA (International Monetary Fund) IMF, DBA The United States of America, Inc. (a private corporation incorporated in France). Fueled by greed, money, and easily obtained power, this type of activity draws the easily controlled mental defectives (narcissists, megalomaniacs, sociopaths, psychopaths [those who exhibit an overwhelming need to control and manage everyone around them, and who will use whatever means are at hand to accomplish those ends]. 

"To achieve One World Government it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, their loyalty to family traditions and national identification."
Brock Chisholm, while director of UN World Health Organization

The same succession of Foreign Corporations infiltrated the political structure of the united States of America (both parties and the overlying structure that controls them) and then each State and it's political structure by means of umbrella Corporations or Franchises, in many cases right down to the city level (a perfect example is Burns, Oregon (where it is painfully clear that local government is corrupt to the core and has no concern for the people on the land, except to control them and move them  off the land). Through concepts such  as; regionalism, Core education, wildlife conservation, endangered species, environmental protection, resource management, smart cities, smart grid, Homeland Security, TSA, NDRP, argumentum ad nauseam - argumentum ad infinitum.

Education:

"As long as the child breathes the poisoned air of nationalism, education in world-mindedness can produce only rather precarious results."
-UNESCO-produced pamphlet in the Toward World Understanding series

"The people who have taught us to believe whatever they were told by their parents or their teachers are the people who are the menace to the world."
-Dr. G. Brook Chrisholm, former Director General of the UN's World Health Organization

"Families must also become the medium for promoting new values and behavior consistent with the rights of individual family members, as established by various United Nations instruments." 
-Program for the UN's "International Year of the Family," 1994


Wildlife Conservation-Endangered Species-Environmental Protection:

"Does ... the Wildlands Project advocate the end of industrial civilization? 

Most assuredly. Everything civilized must go."
-Editor John Davis, 'Wild Earth', UN Wildlands Project's journal, 

"The collective needs of non-human species must take precedence over the needs and desires of humans."
- Wildlands Project Co-architect Reed Noss

"Humanity must undergo a radical change in its attitudes, values, and behavior ... a new global ethics is taking form, and it is finding expression in international law."
- International Union for the Conservation of Nature's Earth Ethics magazine (Spring 1996)

The same succession of Foreign Corporations infiltrated the other two Branches of Governance. The legislative Branch was slowly and unlawfully changed from it's mandated authority of enacting laws within it's jurisdiction to passing Public Policy Statutes and finally Administrative Public Policy Statutes and Regulations. The Judicial Branch of Governance slowly moved from it's mandated authority of American Common Law jurisdiction of the Land to the Admiralty Law jurisdiction of the Sea. These current Administrative Tribunals (courts) are not Lawful. Time and time again facts are presented over and over that prove these and other facts and current Administrative Tribunals (courts) ignore it all or do not respond (because they can not argue with facts). Tribunals (courts) can only unlawfully argue legal issues which are not laws.

"WAR ON THE WORLD

American blood and taxes are being used for military operations unrelated to U.S. defense?

A May, 2000 Joint Chiefs of Staff report states that since 1990 more than 55 "Operations Other Than War" (military engagements now called "peace-keeping" or "humanitarian" missions), have cost U.S. taxpayers over $21 billion -- more than $4 billion in 2000 alone.  Of course, there is no price tag imaginable for American soldiers who have been killed in UN-sanctioned, UN-led "Operations Other Than War" such as Somalia.

That our own government is committed to making the UN more powerful than any nation on Earth?

In 1961, President John F. Kennedy presented to the UN a three-stage disarmament program entitled Freedom From War. "In Stage III," said this State Department document, "progressive controlled disarmament... would proceed to a point where no state [nation] would have the military power to challenge the progressively strengthened UN Peace Force." The disarmament program originally presented in Freedom From War has never been withdrawn. It remains the official policy of the United States.

The UN is being given control of our military?

U.S. forces have been sent to the Persian Gulf and Somalia to carry out UN resolutions. They were sent to the Balkans under the authority of NATO, a regional subsidiary of the UN. In the Balkans and Somalia, they have been placed under foreign commanders who view the secretaries-general of the UN and NATO -- not the U.S. President -- as their commander in chief.

U.S. military personnel are being prepared to become United Nations soldiers?

About 300 U.S. Marines stationed at Twenty-Nine Palms, California, got a reality check in 1994 when they were required to participate in a "Combat Arms Survey" asking how they felt about statements such as:

1. "[T]he President of the United States has the authority to pass his responsibilities as Commander-in-Chief to the UN Secretary General";

2. "I would swear to the following code: 'I am a United Nations fighting person...'"; and 

3. "I would fire upon U.S. citizens who refuse or resist confiscation of firearms banned by the U.S. government."

"[The Security Council is authorized to] take such action by air, sea, or land forces as may be necessary to maintain or restore international peace and security."
-UN Charter, Article 42

"Arrangements for the use of this [proposed UN] force should ensure that the United Nations can effectively deter or suppress any threat or use of arms in violation of the purposes and principles of the United Nations."
- UN "Final Document," Adopted - UN General Assembly, 1978 session

"Let me give you this final message. If we use the [U.S.] military, we can make the United Nations a really meaningful, effective voice for peace and stability in the future."
President George Bush, December 1990, prior to the launch of Operation Desert Storm"
Source:  UN-FREEZONE.ORG

The ideas behind such recent movie trilogies as; "The Lord of The Rings", "The Dark Knight", "Captain America", "The Hunger Games", "The Divergent Series; Divergent, Insurgent, Allegiant (being separated into two parts Allegiant and Ascendant)", all deal with and have an underlying theme that spans centuries of people dealing with the very same problems that Americans now face that arise when mentally defective people are placed in charge of anything that has any authority to control (Liberty) or regulate (Freedoms) anyone else.

"The UN's aim has always been to take over our educational system?

The UN launched its Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) in 1946 with the announced intent to usurp parents' rights to educate and train their children. UNESCO heavyweight Dr. Luther Evans stated, "UNESCO's is a radical program.... To make the system of the UN and its specialized agencies work, we must sweep past traditional barriers...." (emphasis added.) Radio newscaster Paul Harvey condemned UNESCO's undermining of patriotism in one of his broadcasts: "Through UNESCO, American children are influenced away from their national allegiance. American children are being indoctrinated with world government."

The UN's Convention on the Rights of the Child would insert government between parents and children?

Proposed for ratification in 1989, its language states that governments shall insure children's rights to "freedom of thought, conscience and religion," "privacy," "rest and leisure," and much more. According to this UN document, parents shall not be allowed to shield their children from harmful groups and philosophies, inspect their rooms for dangerous items, or require them to do their assigned chores.

As article 13 states: "The child shall have the right to freedom of expression; this right shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of the child's choice." Should that kind of "freedom" be mandated for children, parents will have lost any power over what their children may be exposed to.

Harmful UN programs are undermining America's educational system?

In 1990, the "World Conference on Education for All" met in Jomtien, Thailand. Sponsored by UNESCO, UNICEF, the UN Development Program, the UN World Bank and other UN agencies, the conference produced a document entitled "Framework for Action to Meet Basic Learning Needs." Its recommendations became the basis for educational systems in the U.S. known as "Goals 2000," "Outcome-based Education," and "School-to-Work." Congressman Henry Hyde (R-Ill.) has criticized these programs as "a concept for dumbing-down our schools and changing the character of the nation through behavior modification."
Source:  UN-FREEZONE.ORG


Fix America Source Articles:

How - 

When - 

Where - 

Why - 

Who -

Tuesday, March 8, 2016

Video From Inside The Truck Finicum Was Driving


It should be apparent to the Esteemed Readers of Fix America, that based on the evidence known at this time, Robert LaVoy Finicum was murdered in retaliation for defying the unlawful regulative orders of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), a Puerto Rican Corporation. It is relatively unimportant at this time just which agency or NGO (non-government organization) fired. The truly important point is no one discharged any firearm of any type except one or more Government, or State Agency, or NGO. All of the bullshit legaleze about officers fearing for their lives when faced by an unarmed already wounded American with his hands raised is outrageous!  The 9mm drop gun ostensibly found by the FBI is a laughable outcome of agencies or NGOs covering their protruding asses.     





The others that were arrested on charges of "federal felony charge of conspiracy to impede officers of the United States from discharging their official duties through the use of force, intimidation or threats" is at the very least questionable.



Those alleged charges have nothing to do with the peaceful occupation of the Malhuer National Wildlife Refuge, nor the rally for the injustices done to the Hammonds, or the Hammond's 'terrorist arson charges and conviction' as alleged by the BLM and the corporate Administrative Public Policy Tribunals that handed down the conviction against the Hammonds.

The refusal of the federal government to allow inspection or photography of the bullet riddled pickup truck Mr. Finicum was driving or provide government or NGO dash cam and body cam evidence is understandable; considering that it is evidence that will surely and undoubtedly be presented at the various trials to prove the government's allegations. 

The entire incident has been just one of many demonstrations to come of raw naked killing force meant to frighten and intimidate the Americans-on-the-Land into giving up their unalienable rights, their constitutionally protected rights, and eventually their property and finally their liberty.

This type of unlawful government or NGO action will strip you and me of our unalienable rights, rights which can only be taken by force, and only if Americans are incapable of self-defense. It is for all Americans who cherish the freedoms and liberty they have so dearly fought for to resist giving in to the fear of an out-of-control tyrannical government. 

Wednesday, March 2, 2016

Hammond Ranch Update

EXCLUSIVE: Massive Cover-up – BLM leases Hammond ranch land to Russia through Clinton Foundation donors for uranium

By: Greg White  Date: February 11, 2016




"The Hammond Ranch controversy continues to sink into a rabbit hole without end. Evidence has surfaced that the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has been taking land with plans to lease it to Clinton Foundation donors.

Russia gradually gained control of Uranium One, a major mining company, in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, while Hillary Clinton served as Secretary of State. Canadian records reveal that the company’s chairman used his own family foundation to make four donations to the Clinton Foundation during that time, resulting in a sum contribution of $2.35 million. Secretary Clinton approved the deal for Russia soon after her family’s slush fund received the donations. Now, Vladimir Putin controls 20 percent of all uranium production capacity in the U.S.


Undisclosed contributions made to the Clinton Foundation

These contribution were not made known to the public by the Clintons, even though Hillary Clinton made a deal with President Obama to disclose all the donors. Other individuals associated with the company made donations too.

Furthermore, after Russia declared that it was taking over Uranium One, Bill Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank, which promoted Uranium One stock.

A gold mine for uranium

It is not known whether the donations were responsible for the uranium deal, but the timing is suspicious. Since Hammond Ranch is a gold mine for uranium, it’s unsurprising that the Clinton Foundation would want to lease the land to Russia through donors.

This would also explain why U.S. authorities have been coming down so hard on protesters. Officials aren’t prosecuting individuals because of the Hammond controversy. Officials are coming down on protesters because they are occupying a valuable piece of land; a piece of land that was promised to the Russians.

According to The New York Times: “Whether the donations [to the Clinton Foundation] played any role in the approval of the uranium deal is unknown. But the episode underscores the special ethical challenges presented by the Clinton Foundation, headed by a former president who relied heavily on foreign cash to accumulate $250 million in assets even as his wife helped steer American foreign policy as secretary of state, presiding over decisions with the potential to benefit the foundation’s donors.”


Sources include:

CanadaFreePress.com

Evil.news

LibertyBlitzkrieg.com

NewsTarget.com "