Truth and Justice For All!

To the Esteemed Readers and followers of the Fix America Facebook page and this blog, may I present to you the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth!


"Ammon Bundy Totally Vindicated....and Now.....

The Ninth Circuit Court (15-10-117) just ordered the Federales to prove federal subject matter jurisdiction --- not just assume subject matter jurisdiction-- over property "owned" by the federal government.

Federal ownership of land may be (and usually is) merely proprietary--- meaning that the Federales are acting as property managers--- a role that does not create any exclusive use by the federal government and does not create federal subject matter jurisdiction.

This Ninth Circuit case cited above is not directly tied to the Bundy Cases, but addresses the issue of federal subject matter jurisdiction merely presumed to exist on the basis of federal property ownership.

In truth and in fact claims of Federal subject matter jurisdiction require: (1) a Federal use of the land (that is, a use related to the duties directly delegated to the federal government); (2) specific action by the State ceding jurisdiction. Neither one of these conditions were met with regard to the Oregon Wildlife Refuge.

The portions of the Wildlife Refuge including the buildings which the protestors occupied were purchased by the Federales from private land owners back in the 1930's --- under a Congressional Act that not only allowed, but which invited, adverse possession claims such as the protestors brought forward and which additionally ordered the "liquidation" of such properties back to state or private ownership.

Read that as: Federal ownership of the Wildlife Refuge property occupied by the Bundys and others should have been terminated years ago according to the very Acts of Congress which allowed the Federal Government to acquire the property in the first place.

The County Sheriff was always the supreme peacekeeping authority present at the Wildlife Refuge Stand-Off and the officer responsible for protecting the Bundys and enforcing their constitutional guarantees, but instead, Federal Agency personnel---- private corporate subcontractors working for the federal property managers-- were allowed to come in under color of law and assert authority and jurisdiction that they never possessed.

These federal "agents"---- private commercial subcontractors---- were allowed to entrap, ambush, and murder an innocent American rancher, mortally endanger his family, and falsely arrest and imprison all the others for all these months.

And Ammon Bundy stands fully vindicated.

What do I think? I think it is more than past time to prosecute the federal agencies and their personnel to the fullest extent of the organic and public law.

It's time for the men involved in the LaVoy Finicum ambush to be arrested and charged with premeditated murder, conspiracy against The Constitution, and gross violation of Lavoy Finicum's most basic and constitutionally protected rights.

It's time for the mis-named DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, BLM, and FBI corporations, and the appointed politicos responsible for controlling and directing those men involved in spooling up the stand-off and allowing the ambush of LaVoy Finicum to be stripped of any claim of immunity and tried by an international war crimes tribunal for their part in these outrages against Americans who were exercising their right to peaceably assemble and to travel unmolested on the public roads they paid for.

It's time for the numbnutz County Sheriff to be charged with dereliction of duty, breach of trust, breach of contract and breach of oath, willful endangerment, aiding and abetting murder, conspiracy against The Constitution, and false arrest.

Acting in my capacity as an Article X Judge I gave him more than fair Notice prior to all these events taking place and it is firmly established on the public record that I did. There can be no excuse for his failure to know the jurisdictional issues because he was told point blank, not once, but twice. He knew, yet he buckled under the political pressure of federal influence and failed to enforce The Constitution and protect the people who were depending on him.

And because of that Sheriff's failure to exercise his authority and honor and enforce the Law of the Land, a good man, a true American, was ambushed and killed by foreign commercial mercenaries on his way to attend a public meeting.

It's time for that Sheriff to fry in his own oil for it.

It's time for "Governor" Brown to be summarily impeached for moral torpitude, gross incompetence, and conspiracy against The Constitution, to have all pretension of foreign or sovereign immunity stripped away, and to stand trial with the rats from the DOJ and BLM and FBI before an international war crimes tribunal.

It's time for the family of LaVoy Finicum to become multi-millionaires.

It's time for all the others to be set free and for serious compensation to be paid to them and their families for the time they have spent under false arrest and all they have been through and all that they have suffered and risked simply to assert rights and prerogatives that were always theirs to begin with.

It's time for everyone in America to wake up and remember Ruby Ridge, Waco, Oklahoma City, 911, LaVoy Finicum, and so much more----and to see these things in their proper light.

These things are not being done by our government.

These things are being done by British Subjects and by other foreigners and by their hired-gun subcontractors----all in the employ of private, for-profit, mostly foreign bank-owned corporations in the business of providing government services.

The DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, BLM, and FBI are all separate for-profit corporations which have functioned in this instance and in many others as crime syndicates and failed even the most basic tests of competency and good faith. They have violated their charters and besmirched their names and this is not the first time.

I remember reading about Randy Weaver's wife and baby, just as I read about LaVoy Finicum and the siege at Waco and 911.

And I thought then and I think now----these rotten, worthless, criminals are our employees.

They are sticking their filthy paws in our pockets and drawing a paycheck for the "service" of preying upon us--- for racketeering, for falsely arresting, for mischaracterizing, for thieving, for violating our constitutional guarantees, for trespassing upon us and our property, and yes, even for murdering us----all in violation of their commercial contracts and in violation of the treaties allowing them to be here.

They need a jack boot so far up their butts the steel toe sees daylight."

To and Fro, Who Will Take The Final Blow?

Anyone who has a penny's worth of common sense should understand what kind of TURMOIL and APPREHENSION Judge Anna Brown's kangaroo Tribunal and proclamation have caused, not to mention the FEAR of Government reprisal. As the Esteemed readers understand from the previous post, 'Up Is Down Left Is Right, or Government Is Good, Fight! Fight! Fight!', Judge Brown's announcement that witnesses will be considered Unindicted Co-conspirators runs in every direction except along the path to Truth and Justice. The American Legal System serves no one except itself at the cost of the American People and has done so for, at the very least, 81 years (see source references), but that is another issue. The Governments efforts to justify the means to arrive at unlawful ends is a small part and parcel of the unlawful conversion of Public Wealth (read as land grab - selling off Natural Resources for private gain) perpetrated by the Obama Administration's Secretary of State, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

The selling off of Natural Resources that belong to the Sovereign States and the American 
People is just one of the methods used by the U.S. Federal Government (a Foreign Corporation) to plunder America and rob by force the wealth of the people. The 'Uranium one scandal' is well enough known that anyone can learn more about it, but that is another issue. Please, excuse my digression:  The entire concept of JUSTICE and LAW was discarded when Government Enforcers shot LaVoy Finnicum, who had his hands up, three times in the back. This was done to halt the protests and petitions landowners have with the BLM (a Puerto Rican Corporation) and the UNITED STATES Inc (a French Corporation). Hired by the UNITED STATES Inc. and charged or mandated with Managing Public Lands and Property, the BLM has instead followed the prescribed concepts behind the Strong Cities Network (SCN), namely, Regionalism (see Notes Below) this regional integration de facto contributes to those economic forces that build globalization. This Regionalism which forces people off the lands they own and into cities (Please See;  'Fighting Extremism: The Strong Cities Network, or Fundamentally Changed America: More Changes Are Necessary, or Mindless Americans Need No Sovereignty: Soetoro/Obama Knows Best', and 'Land of the Ignorant , Or Home of the Destitute', and the book 'Rockefeller--Regionalism: The shadow behind Oregon's LCDC: an encyclopedia about political intrigue') coupled with U.N.'s uninhabited “buffer zones” around several U.S. national parks (See Article Below) more readily allows the BLM and Government Claims to Private and Public Lands.

As can easily be understood, all this unlawful Government activity at the local level; the false allegations, the charges, change in venue, Unindicted co-conspirators, is just a symptom of and diversion from a much larger real conspiracy to Plunder America, Rob the States and The People of wealth and line the pockets of the people running this FARCE with the ill-gotten gains.

"Guerilla Media Network
Home Of The Pete Santilli Show
AUGUST 31, 2016

Witnesses In Bundy Case Terrified Over Judge Ruling For Live Feed Of Trial Into Burns Oregon

Witnesses for both the defense and the prosecution, set to testify in the controversial trial 
over the Occupation of the Malheur Refuge, are terrified by the idea of possible retaliation 
from the community, if Judge Anna Brown allows the BLM to move forward with their plans for providing a “live feed” of the trial, to what one Portland Paper (OPB) is calling the “VICTIMS” of the standoff.

In a frantic call to GMN this morning one witness expressed their concerns by saying, the Judge obviously doesn’t understand the dynamics of the situation in Burns, which brought hundreds of protesters there in the first place.  The Government has gone to great lengths to protect informants and FBI agents from public scrutiny in fear of their safety — Why then are other witnesses not being allowed the same protection?

Burns Oregon is a community divided and the deck is stacked in favor on the “anti-Bundy side” making the life of over 40% of the population in Harney County a living nightmare.

Children are being bullied, business owners are being threatened and the fact they are going to add fuel to the fire by broadcasting this trial to what many perceive as aggressive employees of the United States Government is horrifying, said one witness.

“We are terrified; These people running the show in Portland are failing to protect the very 
people they say were terrorized by the occupation.”

The witnesses are quick to point out that it’s not just those who will be testifying for the 
defense who are concerned; Those set to testify against the Occupation are also expressing deep concern over their well being as the government prepares to put them on camera and blast their testimony out to a community that's already on the edge.

” I never wanted to testify in this trial, says another witness and the government is forcing 
me. What happens to me if somebody gets the wrong idea?” explained a witness for the Government

After the Occupation ended the media and the Judge lost interest in Burns and Harney County in general, and the witnesses say this ruling shows the complete disconnect between the court and her attorneys assigned to represent their best interest on both sides in this trial.  Witnesses took note that not one Defense Attorney objected to the government's request for a live feed into Burns leaving them all to questions just who this trial is for, and just how much they care about them as human beings.

Whether you fall on the side of the government in this one, or the Occupiers, witnesses on both sides agree that a live feed of this trial is irresponsible and creates a terrifyingly dangerous potential for them in Harney County and definitely puts lives in danger.

GMN spoke to an attorney close to the case, but not representing any clients involved, and his opinion was as follows;

"If you are going to allow a live feed it is appalling that it is going to be for those who are 
so openly bias.  If we are going to allow a live feed for the obviously anti-protestor group 
then what is stopping the court from allowing the whole of America to watch this proceeding?

It is unfair that once again the government is allowed to run the narrative and does not allow for others on the supporting side to have an opportunity to watch in support of these witnesses who have so much much to lose in Harney County.

I too was shocked that not one Defense Attorney objected on behalf of the safety of their 
witnesses."


A message from Harney County went out to Judge Anna Brown and various Attorneys involved in the case this morning;

"I just want to express my concern in regards to the news of a trial being live streamed to the local BLM office. I personally have a HUGE problem with this. Those of us who have been subpoenaed will only be showcased as “domestic terrorist” sympathizers allowing the already bigoted community of government workers to ostracize, alienate, and ridicule us more than they already have. In my opinion, this is a gross abuse of power by the judge and just shows an assignment of elitism to the government workers they have so loosely characterized as 'victims'. Unless you have lived in Burns, Hines, or Harney County it is difficult to understand what is really going on here. In January our community suffered from a spiderweb of fractures that have just grown deeper as the months have passed. Many of us have suffered in our businesses because of our actions and expression of our opinions during the occupation. The spread of hatred has even boiled over to our children who are suffering at school at the hands of these 'victims' and their children.

Despite my feelings and or the reason I was subpoenaed, my concern is for the safety of my children and the ability to maintain my home and business in Harney County. My kids have to go to school with the wives of many BLM employees. My business is dependent on locals. What will Judge Brown offer as a solution when my children are slighted of an opportunity because their teacher is married to a BLM employee who watched my testimony live in the comfort of his office and he didn’t agree with me?  What will Judge Brown offer as a solution when my business is forced to close its doors because of lost contracts with either government agencies or locals that have relation to disgruntled BLM employees?  It is my opinion that allowing and condoning the live stream of the trial to the local BLM office is a blatant disregard for the safety and wellbeing of all witnesses that have been subpoenaed  ~ Witness Signed"


Witnesses who will be testifying for both the Prosecution and the Defense are asking community groups and social media platforms, on both sides, to please call the Attorneys and Prosecutors in this case and ask them to respectfully ask Judge Brown to drop the plans providing a live feed into Harney County. In a case where witness tampering through intimidation is already a problem, witnesses believe this ruling has opened the door for more of the same. It’s time officials in Portland base their decisions concerning Harney County on reality and stop making this about them and remember the people they are supposed to be representing. - End Article"


"4 included Comments - The Pete Santilli Show

Joe 
With anxiety brewing in America from those who seek justice, to those who refuse justice to be equally administered, there is no doubt in my mind, that the long arms of the law in Washington D.C. are more concerned with their agenda of world domination at the expense of one great country, the BLM is just a rock in their shoes that they don't want to be bothered with, because the outcome has already been written. When is enough, enough before dialogue ceases and the inevitable will begin.

Anything having to do with the United States government and the American people, are like oil and water, and right now the odds are against the people.

Lynn Kopa Balogh 
Remember YOU and your group invaded their neighborhood and tried to take over with an Idaho militia and. set up a shadow government to overpower the local elected judges and sheriff with guns no less. Now your crying foul?

PatriotGranny to Lynn Kopa Balogh 
#LoadOfCrap Not to mention, even if that were true, and it's not, it wouldn't be the fault of the witnesses. Overpower the local elected judges and sheriff with guns..... LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!! Where do you people come up with this stuff. Completely DELUSIONAL!

SUPER 68 IS DOWN to Lynn Kopa Balogh
No one from the Idaho III%ers nor the Oregon III%ers nor the PPN were involved with occupying the refuge... The Bundy Bunch conspired to use the support rally for the Hammonds as a front to facilitate occupying the refuge.

All the Idaho and Oregon III% members along with members of the PPN organized the 02 January 2016 support rally for the Hammonds. In fact, most folks were furious that the Bundy Bunch came into OUR house (Oregon) and made their own rules. They took the Hammond issue and made it about them.

Every day now we hear updates about how the poor Bundy's are being abused in prison. First of all, the Bundy's are NOT in prison, they are in a county lockup.

Funny that we hear daily about the poor Bundy's being abused in jail, yet not a PEEP about the Hammonds who are in a real prison.

PPN/Idaho III%ers/Oregon III% members NEVER participated in the occupation but they did show up in Burns to try and mediate between the Bundy's and law enforcement"


Notes:

"New Regionalism represents the current wave of regional integration, which has been characterized by substantial qualitative, quantitative and formal changes in regional integration. Modern analysis of regionalism (namely when based upon the Political Economy Approach) suggests that regional integration de facto contributes to those economic forces that build globalization and increase global competition. As a mater of this fact, the New Regionalism currently changes its character markedly. Today, especially due to the influence of globalization, regionalism is seen as a tool of open economic relations’ liberalization that should ensure both national and regional competitive position in the globalized world. Moreover, both theoretical and empirical analysis of regionalism (i.e. namely comparative analysis of its different cases) leads to the same conclusions. The question however remains, whether today’s European Union corresponds to the most recent trends in regionalism and thus if it is a strong enough tool, which can help European economies to utilize globalization opportunities and to face its threats. Political Economy analysis of the New Regionalism shows important aspects of its reform, and is thus the most important perspective of this paper."

An Abstract for 'Political Economy of the New Regionalism: Global and European Perspective'

Source References:

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/history/americas-economic-history/judge-rules-administrative-court-
system-illegal-after-81-years/
http://thepetesantillishow.com/witnesses-in-bundy-case-terrified-over-judge-ruling-for-live-feed-of-trial-into-burns-oregon/

http://www.wnd.com/1999/07/1808/

"NATIONAL PARKS OFF-LIMITS
U.N.-designated panel calls for increased 'buffer zones'

JON DOUGHERTY Published: 07/15/1999 at 1:00 AM

Last year a United Nations-designated panel, at the behest of the Clinton administration, called for the creation of uninhabited “buffer zones” around several U.S. national parks. Since then roughly two dozen U.S. parks and preserves, covering millions of acres of public land, have been included in the plan.

Now, however, new plans to expand these zones are in the works, and the outrage has reached a near fever pitch among experts who say these U.N.-designated sites are merely attempts to “globalize” huge portions of the United States — with taxpayers picking up the tab.

Henry Lamb of Eco-Logic — a watchdogorganization that monitors U.N. activities and U.S. sovereignty issues— told WorldNetDaily that one example — at Yellowstone National Park, where the creation of a larger buffer zone is well under way — was “just a sign of things to come.”

“Inside Yellowstone, the U.S. Park Service is shutting down campgrounds as the park is being prepared to become the core of a huge biosphere reserve, as part of the United Nations global biodiversity plan,” he said. “Once established, no human activity will be permitted in the area,” even though U.S. taxpayers must continue to fund the maintenance and upkeep of Yellowstone and other popular outdoor tourist sites.

Lamb said that in order to increase the buffer zone around Yellowstone, the Park Service drove local businesses away by refusing to maintain access roads. When the businesses folded as a result of heavy financial losses, the land was bought with taxpayer money and a larger zone of inaccessibility was created by default.

“Once they buy the land, the government is obviously not going to resell it,” he said, thus creatin permanently larger buffer zones.

“The purpose of establishing sites as U.S. national parks was to have people in them enjoying them,” Lamb added. “But the Clinton administration has completely bought into this U.N. notion that our land ought to be their land, managed by them. And as such, it ought to be uninhabited as well.”

He said if most Americans “knew what was going on (with their national parks), the uproar would be deafening.”

In the case of Yellowstone, Lamb said the government’s acquiescence to the U.N.’s agenda cost a gold mining company about $30 million and in the end prevented them from mining one ounce of known gold reserves, even though the government indicated they initially would have allowed it.

“The owners of the Crown Butte New World gold mine, which is outside of Yellowstone National Park,” he said, “were told by the government to comply with a list of environmental requirements before they could move in and begin mining.”

But after being threatened with non-stop litigation from environmental groups funded by U.N. agencies that could have lasted decades, the mining company finally agreed to a deal that leaves at least $650 million of known gold reserves in the ground instead. That deal provided the company with about $65 million dollars for “more exploration.” Of that amount, the government said about $21 million had to be used for “environmental clean-up.”

Lamb said that Congress has consistently ignored Clinton administration orders and directives designed to implement many of the U.N. mandates. Clinton, he said, is implementing U.N. directives via executive order and presidential directive “because then he doesn’t have to worry about getting Senate treaty ratification.”

At present a U.N.-sponsored biodiversity treaty, designed to limit U.S. public access to so-called “World Heritage Sites” and “Biodiversity sites” is languishing in the Senate. No action is scheduled on its ratification.

Lamb added that in the course of the next several years, with no congressional oversight, the addition of more U.S. parks to the “Heritage” and “Biodiversity” sites lists will follow.

“It is a well-documented fact that the U.N. is trying to gain control over vast amounts of U.S. territories to herd more people into cities where they are more manageable,” Lamb said. “That can’t be done without at least tacit approval from Congress, regardless of the political agenda of any administration.”

Lamb said he has “allies” in Congress that are opposed to the implementation of this, and other, U.N.-mandated land use plans.

“But they’re relatively few and as such equally unsuccessful” in stopping such initiatives, he added."


Another One Bites The Dust -30-

Littering?, or Operation OVERKILL!

How many times in any state have drivers passed temporary memorials to fatalities along the roadside?

The Esteemed Readers might guess hundreds of thousands of temporary memorials across America, and that might be an underestimate. These small memorials usually consist of a small wooden cross, a picture, flowers and cards. Do these remembrances constitute terrorist activity?  Do they constitute littering? 

Do these activities constitute true Felony Criminal Mischief (a $5,000.00 dollar fine), or a Class A Misdemeanor (a $400.00 to $1,200.00 dollar fine)?  What will the Administrative Assistant to the State Tribunal (read as Judge in a state court) decide the fine should really be?  If the alleged crime took place on Federal Public Property (a National Forest), Why would the proceedings be held in a State Tribunal?

Are simple temporary memorials within the boundary of State or Federal Highway Easements really serious crimes worthy of $5,000.00 dollar fine?   Is the damage to State or Federal Property in excess of $1,000.00 dollars?

Oregon Public Policy Statutes follow:

§ 164.365¹ 
Criminal mischief in the first degree
(1) A person commits the crime of criminal mischief in the first degree who, with intent to damage property, and having no right to do so nor reasonable ground to believe that the person has such right:
(a) Damages or destroys property of another:
(A) In an amount exceeding $1,000;
(B) By means of an explosive;
(C) By starting a fire in an institution while the person is committed to and confined in the institution;
(D) Which is a livestock animal as defined in ORS 164.055 (Theft in the first degree);
(E) Which is the property of a public utility, telecommunications carrier, railroad, public transportation facility or medical facility used in direct service to the public; or
(F) By intentionally interfering with, obstructing or adulterating in any manner the service of a public utility, telecommunications carrier, railroad, public transportation facility or medical facility; or
(b) Intentionally uses, manipulates, arranges or rearranges the property of a public utility, telecommunications carrier, railroad, public transportation facility or medical facility used in direct service to the public so as to interfere with its efficiency.
(2) As used in subsection (1) of this section:
(a) Institution includes state and local correctional facilities, mental health facilities, juvenile detention facilities and state training schools.
(b) Medical facility means a health care facility as defined in ORS 442.015 (Definitions), a licensed physicians office or anywhere a licensed medical practitioner provides health care services.
(c) Public utility has the meaning provided for that term in ORS 757.005 (Definitions) and includes any cooperative, peoples utility district or other municipal corporation providing an electric, gas, water or other utility service.
(d) Railroad has the meaning provided for that term in ORS 824.020 (Definitions for ORS 824.020 to 824.042).
(e) Public transportation facility means any property, structure or equipment used for or in connection with the transportation of persons for hire by rail, air or bus, including any railroad cars, buses or airplanes used to carry out such transportation.

(f) Telecommunications carrier has the meaning given that term in ORS 133.721 (Definitions for ORS 41.910 and 133.721 to 133.739).
(3) Criminal mischief in the first degree is a Class C felony. [1971 c.743 §147; 1973 c.133 §6; 1975 c.344 §1; 1979 c.805 §1; 1983 c.740 §33a; 1987 c.447 §104; 1987 c.907 §10; 1989 c.584 §2; 1991 c.837 §13; 1991 c.946 §2; 1993 c.94 §1; 1993 c.332 §3; 1999 c.1040 §11; 1999 c.1093 §2; 2003 c.543 §4; 2009 c.16 §6]

What is the definition of criminal mischief?

A person commits the offense of criminal mischief if he or she willfully and maliciously injures or damages by any means any real or personal property belonging to another, including, but not limited to, the placement of graffiti thereon or other acts of vandalism thereto.

What is the definition of "A Class A Misdemeanor?"

It is the most serious classification of misdemeanor charge in most states. States typically divide misdemeanors into categories such as Class A, B, C, D (or some numerical equivalent), with A being the most serious and C or D being the least serious. Mar 1, 2016


All of this Legal activity seems Draconian when compared to a simple roadside memorial to someone who died;  however, when the State or Federal Government is involved and their involvement was the cause of the fatality, extreme measures seem to be necessary. Why?  Possibly to deflect or misdirect any blame or guilt in any direction other than where it squarely belongs, at the Government's front door. 

What, if any, action must be taken to gard Property against this type of damage?

The the BLM’s Air Tactical Program could be enlarged in purpose and scope and used to track and record these types of truely serious crimes against humanity, just like Military Drones tracking and recording the loss (think collateral damage or innocent bystander) of women, children, and babies in the War torn areas of the Mideast and elsewhere. 

http://reagangirl.com/blm-launching-drone-program-to-monitor-public-lands/

BLM LAUNCHING DRONE PROGRAM TO MONITOR PUBLIC LANDS
Posted by ReaganGirl in Bureau of Land Management, Federal militarism, Range Wars
massacres, June 22, 2016

The Bureau of Land Management has already promoted a notorious thug agent, Dan Love, to head up its new Protective, Security and Intelligence (think Spy) division, and now the federal agency is launching a drone program to monitor various activities and conditions on public lands under BLM control. Do you trust this agency, headed by Harry Reid lackey, Neil Kornze, to use surveillance drones for the limited and specific purposes they profess?


The following story is written by Gary Harmon, as published by the G.J. Daily Sentinel

MEEKER COLORADO — A drone could do in minutes the work of several federal employees to monitor pipeline reclamation efforts, identify and provide a count of endangered plants, watch over raptors, even in their nests, and go where literally no man has gone for hundreds, if not thousands, of years.

Drones were doing just those things, and more, recently, in northwest Colorado, as a team of drone operators and supervisors tested the craft under the deep blue Colorado sky and buffeting spring winds.

“We’re just testing the technology to see how well it works,” Kent Walter, manager of the Bureau of Land Management’s Meeker Field Office, said before heading to the Hay Gulch area to see a drone, or unmanned aerial system, do its stuff over a stretch of the Overland Pipeline.

On a dusty road through a meadow, a crew of BLM employees ran through a checklist, much as a pilot on manned aircraft might do, in preparation for a UAS flight to survey about 400 yards of pipeline.

Once clear, the drone was released to shoot up to 100 feet — the pre-set altitude for the survey — and then down to another pre-set point, where it began a series of transects back toward its starting point.

Think of a transect as one might mow a yard, said Gil Dustin, the BLM’s air tactical program manager. The drone flies a pattern just as a lawnmower would cut a strip, turn and cut a return strip parallel to the first, gradually working its way back to the crew.

In the drone’s case, the swaths are some 40 feet wide across the pipeline and the camera aboard takes high-resolution photos according to a program built into the flight plan. Those photos then are studied by experts to determine whether the earth above the pipeline is indeed being reclaimed according to BLM requirements.

It would require several hours with a crew of employees on foot to conduct the same survey, Walter said.

The same territory could be surveyed again, using GPS, to determine what kinds of change have occurred over the intervening time.

The UAS crew didn’t limit itself to a reclamation survey. It also flew a nearby canyon in search of cultural sites, capturing views of rugged country no human — in centuries — has seen, Walter said.

“We’ll see country that has never been seen before, using the drone’s camera, Walter said.

It also was used to study raptor nests in the piñon-juniper forest — “It doesn’t seem to bother raptors,” said Walter — as well as other tasks.

The drone crews file flight plans with the Federal Aviation Administration, just as they would if flying manned craft.

Reposted by Reagangirl.com  6/22/16

Enough is Enough:  Can anyone say OVERKILL!

Reference:

Thoughts From The North Forty: or That which Pushes the Mind Is Not Always Felt

Stand By Me: Dedicated to the Memory of Robert LaVoy Finicum (UPDATED)

Updated June 19, 2016

The American people must unite, as our forefathers did, under the principle of Liberty. The Forefathers fought for liberty from the English Monarchy and the Crown and they gained independence and the law of the land, Common Law. It is unimportant as to which faction any American identifies, ie. conservative, Liberal, etc. What is important is to recognize and understand that all that America is, flows from those two concepts; independence and the law of the land. Everything else was and is, left to the people, the highest authority, as to what or which is necessary and proper. 

The unalienable right to command our own actions comes with a price. That price eternal is vigilance of those who will take  our freedom through inaction, or whatever they are allowed, and then we fail to take the action necessary to stop them from taking what doe not belong to them. When those who would take anything that does not belong to them, suppress our unalienable right to voice our opinion, freedom of speech, and to seek redress from any group who has interfered or deprived anyone of any unalienable right is the right of one and all to stand up against such actions and restore our rights. It is the responsibility to stand for our Individual Rights and to band together as brothers and sisters and stand united against all usurpations (see footnote 1) of those rights.

To interfere with the right of free speech, the right to assemble, or seek redress of grievance is to be un-American at best and tyrannical at the worst.

It is interesting to note that local, state and federal authorities interfered with and deprived Robert LaVoy Finicum of his unalienable RIGHTS  by taking his life.  We stand to make certain that it was not in vain.

http://www.nationalstandbymeforliberty.com/

Footnotes:

Usurpations and security

The government is guarded from usurpations because it is divided into distinct and separate departments.

In 1788, power over people was divided both through federalism (between the federal government and the state governments) and through branches (legislative, executive, and judicial) within the national (or federal) government. Because of the division of power, a "double security arises to the rights of the people. The governments will control each other, at the same time that each will be controlled by itself"

Video From Inside The Truck Finicum Was Driving

It should be apparent to the Esteemed Readers of Fix America, that based on the evidence known at this time, Robert LaVoy Finicum was murdered in retaliation for defying the unlawful regulative orders of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), a Puerto Rican Corporation. It is relatively unimportant at this time just which agency or NGO (non-government organization) fired. The truly important point is no one discharged any firearm of any type except one or more Government, or State Agency, or NGO. All of the bullshit legaleze about officers fearing for their lives when faced by an unarmed already wounded American with his hands raised is outrageous!  The 9mm drop gun ostensibly found by the FBI is a laughable outcome of agencies or NGOs covering their protruding asses.     





The others that were arrested on charges of "federal felony charge of conspiracy to impede officers of the United States from discharging their official duties through the use of force, intimidation or threats" is at the very least questionable.

Those alleged charges have nothing to do with the peaceful occupation of the Malhuer National Wildlife Refuge, nor the rally for the injustices done to the Hammonds, or the Hammond's 'terrorist arson charges and conviction' as alleged by the BLM and the corporate Administrative Public Policy Tribunals that handed down the conviction against the Hammonds.

The refusal of the federal government to allow inspection or photography of the bullet riddled pickup truck Mr. Finicum was driving or provide government or NGO dash cam and body cam evidence is understandable; considering that it is evidence that will surely and undoubtedly be presented at the various trials to prove the government's allegations. 

The entire incident has been just one of many demonstrations to come of raw naked killing force meant to frighten and intimidate the Americans-on-the-Land into giving up their unalienable rights, their constitutionally protected rights, and eventually their property and finally their liberty.

This type of unlawful government or NGO action will strip you and me of our unalienable rights, rights which can only be taken by force, and only if Americans are incapable of self-defense. It is for all Americans who cherish the freedoms and liberty they have so dearly fought for to resist giving in to the fear of an out-of-control tyrannical government. 

Hammond Ranch Update

EXCLUSIVE: Massive Cover-up – BLM leases Hammond ranch land to Russia through Clinton Foundation donors for uranium

By: Greg White  Date: February 11, 2016

"The Hammond Ranch controversy continues to sink into a rabbit hole without end. Evidence has surfaced that the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has been taking land with plans to lease it to Clinton Foundation donors.

Russia gradually gained control of Uranium One, a major mining company, in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, while Hillary Clinton served as Secretary of State. Canadian records reveal that the company’s chairman used his own family foundation to make four donations to the Clinton Foundation during that time, resulting in a sum contribution of $2.35 million. Secretary Clinton approved the deal for Russia soon after her family’s slush fund received the donations. Now, Vladimir Putin controls 20 percent of all uranium production capacity in the U.S.


Undisclosed contributions made to the Clinton Foundation

These contribution were not made known to the public by the Clintons, even though Hillary Clinton made a deal with President Obama to disclose all the donors. Other individuals associated with the company made donations too.

Furthermore, after Russia declared that it was taking over Uranium One, Bill Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank, which promoted Uranium One stock.

A gold mine for uranium

It is not known whether the donations were responsible for the uranium deal, but the timing is suspicious. Since Hammond Ranch is a gold mine for uranium, it’s unsurprising that the Clinton Foundation would want to lease the land to Russia through donors.

This would also explain why U.S. authorities have been coming down so hard on protesters. Officials aren’t prosecuting individuals because of the Hammond controversy. Officials are coming down on protesters because they are occupying a valuable piece of land; a piece of land that was promised to the Russians.

According to The New York Times: “Whether the donations [to the Clinton Foundation] played any role in the approval of the uranium deal is unknown. But the episode underscores the special ethical challenges presented by the Clinton Foundation, headed by a former president who relied heavily on foreign cash to accumulate $250 million in assets even as his wife helped steer American foreign policy as secretary of state, presiding over decisions with the potential to benefit the foundation’s donors.”


Sources include:

CanadaFreePress.com

Evil.news

LibertyBlitzkrieg.com

NewsTarget.com "

Land of the Ignorant , Or Home of the Destitute

As covered in past articles the various agencies, departments, bureaus, and programs (like Strong Cities and Smart Cities) of the Federal Government are actively seeking to remove Americans from rural areas and force them, by whatever means are necessary, from the land into the more densely populated and highly controlled areas. This type of control is best exemplified by the Strong Cities Strong Communities (sc2) initiative ( with a Police force of its own), and Smart Cities initiative. These types of Initiatives are just a few examples of the Regional Government System and its Change Agents. A quick read of Jo Hindman's article "Thirteen Thirteen" from the January 1959 American Mercury Magazine is a good start at understanding the problems Americans face. Follow up that read with the books "Terrible 1313", 1963, "Blame Metro", 1966, and "The Metrocrats", 1974 and you will have a solid background of the movement to quietly and slowly "change" the American Constitutional System to a system of administrative public policy.

With this background in mind, the Esteemed Readers of Fix America and especially Oregonians can proceed to "Rockefeller--Reagionalism:  The Shadow Behind Oregon's LCDC.", by Joe Spenner and a clear picture will emerge regarding the serious and immediate danger the UNITED NATION's Regional Government System poses to America. The impact of Regional Planning, Programming, Budget System (PPBS) and Management by Objective (MBO) of the Regional Government System is discussed in "The Impossible Dream", By K. M. Heaton

      

Remember Harney County?  The City of Burns (the County Seat) is occupied by Military Forces and for-all-practical-purposes-and-intents is under Martial Law. The Malheur Reserve is now permanently closed to the public and an open pit uranium mine is planned with threat reported by the BLM of expected ground water pollution. The lease is going to Uranium One, a Canadian Corporation owned by the Russian atomic energy agency (Rosatom) that were arranged by (then) Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, benefiting the Clinton Foundation and expected to benefit the Federal Government with billions (B-billions) of dollars. A well written article in the APRIL 23, 2015, The New York Times titled "Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal" by Jo Becker and Mike McIntire. None of the revenue will be going to Harney County and the uranium will be going to Iranian Nuclear Programs.

The land (private property) is shrinking very quickly as large areas are being brought under the management and control of the EPA. The method being used is the endangerment of species concept;  however, the endangerment is not coming from proper private enterprise. It is coming from The US Bureau of Land Management (BLM), US Fish and wildlife Service (USFWS), US Forest Service (USFS), and the Environmental Protection Agency. An excellent example is the endangered desert tortoise. Ranchers were blamed for an alleged reduction of desert tortoise due to cattle trampling them (cattle, sheep, and horses will avoid stepping on living creatures - just as people do). The BLM collected every desert tortoise they could find and after various discussions decided that the best solution to the BLM caused problem of what to do with all these troublesome endangered tortoises was to euthanize 840  tortoises saying, “because that’s the sensible thing to do.” Dr. Michael S. Coffman has lectured many, many times (many of which are available on Youtube and has written books explaining how the Federal Government is ridding the land of People under the guise of protecting one resource or another or saving one species or another. Some of the largest of the various Animal Rights groups are funded by the same select group of people funding the worst politicians in American History.  

 

Another method of acquisition and control is the Soetoro/Obama  Blue Way Initiative (Blue Water Trails) which is a failing program at best and the various franchise Corporate Governments (Governments of Whichever State) progress to re-classify water ways in accord with 100 year, 500 year flood plain projections (lands that have never seen flowing water or standing water in the histories of local record have been classified as water ways and that changes the Jurisdiction from the Law of the Land (common Law) to the Law of the Sea (Admirality Law, and Roman Civil Law-an example of this type of activity was carried out by Dianne Feinstein and Friends)

The US Bureau of Land Management (BLM), US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS),  US Forest Service (USFS), US Department of the Interior-Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), U.S. Department of the Interior-Bureau of National Park Service, Department of Defense (DOD) acquisitions under the National Security Act (NSA 1947), Presidential declarations of National Monuments, and many, many, many other named and un-named ABC groups are moving rapidly forward with change. As Americans are forced from their homes, property, and in many cases their livelihoods the Federal Government, Banks, and the United Nations dba the IMF dba The UNITED STATES Inc. are filing for Land Patents and Allodial Title to the Geographical Continental united States of America as-fast-as-is-possible.

The Fraud occupying the White House has generated another Executive order declaring a Million Acre Monument in the Grants Pass Area. This is not Public Land. A Monument is more restrictive than Wildlands. No cars, bikes, hunting. You can walk. Check and and see if your property is within the boundary. If so, you stand the real possibility you are going to have your property confiscated. Do you know of someone that has their property within the boundary? Notify them. Get them involved. Every property owner needs to speak up and contact their Sheriff. Other recent declared National Monument areas include: Rio Grande del Norte National Monument, New Mexico, San Juan Islands National Monument, Washington State, Harriet Tubman National Monument, Maryland, Charles Young Buffalo Soldiers National Monument, Ohio, Delaware Historic Sites, Delaware, and the area occupied is growing quickly.

Before everything is further divided up by these private corporations, stripped of whatever worth can possibly be obtained, and sold to the highest bidder on the International Market, it would be really swell if Americans woke up in time to see it go, just before they are rounded up and hauled off to F.E.M.A. Camps.

  

Sources: 

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-
russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=0

http://tyrantwatch.co/2016/01/15/harney-county-oregon-what-they-dont-want-you-to-know/

http://www.infowars.com/before-nevada-cattle-rancher-dispute-blm-was-euthanizing-
endangered-desert-tortoise/

http://wilderness.org/article/win-wildlands-president-obama-designates-five-
new-national-monuments#sthash.a1c9HXJl.dpuf
The great escape.

Rescuing a Broken America: Why America is Deeply Divided and How to Heal it Constitutionally 
Paperback – October 2, 2010 by Michael Coffman 

Radical Islam In The House: The Plan to Take America for the Global Islamic State 
Feb 27, 2013 by Michael S. Coffman Ph.D. and Kate Mathieson




Plundered: How Progressive Ideology is Destroying America May 8, 2012 
by Michael S. Coffman

The Birth of World Government: Through Global Deception, Intrigue and War 
2001 by Michael S. Coffman Paperback




Environmentalism! The Dawn of Aquarius or the Twilight of a New Dark Age?  
Jul 1992 by Michael S. Coffman

Saviors of the Earth? : The Politics & Religion of the Environmental Movement Jan 1994
by Michael S. Coffman




Problems with the Endangered Species Act 2003
by Michael S. Coffman