Video From Inside The Truck Finicum Was Driving

It should be apparent to the Esteemed Readers of Fix America, that based on the evidence known at this time, Robert LaVoy Finicum was murdered in retaliation for defying the unlawful regulative orders of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), a Puerto Rican Corporation. It is relatively unimportant at this time just which agency or NGO (non-government organization) fired. The truly important point is no one discharged any firearm of any type except one or more Government, or State Agency, or NGO. All of the bullshit legaleze about officers fearing for their lives when faced by an unarmed already wounded American with his hands raised is outrageous!  The 9mm drop gun ostensibly found by the FBI is a laughable outcome of agencies or NGOs covering their protruding asses.     





The others that were arrested on charges of "federal felony charge of conspiracy to impede officers of the United States from discharging their official duties through the use of force, intimidation or threats" is at the very least questionable.

Those alleged charges have nothing to do with the peaceful occupation of the Malhuer National Wildlife Refuge, nor the rally for the injustices done to the Hammonds, or the Hammond's 'terrorist arson charges and conviction' as alleged by the BLM and the corporate Administrative Public Policy Tribunals that handed down the conviction against the Hammonds.

The refusal of the federal government to allow inspection or photography of the bullet riddled pickup truck Mr. Finicum was driving or provide government or NGO dash cam and body cam evidence is understandable; considering that it is evidence that will surely and undoubtedly be presented at the various trials to prove the government's allegations. 

The entire incident has been just one of many demonstrations to come of raw naked killing force meant to frighten and intimidate the Americans-on-the-Land into giving up their unalienable rights, their constitutionally protected rights, and eventually their property and finally their liberty.

This type of unlawful government or NGO action will strip you and me of our unalienable rights, rights which can only be taken by force, and only if Americans are incapable of self-defense. It is for all Americans who cherish the freedoms and liberty they have so dearly fought for to resist giving in to the fear of an out-of-control tyrannical government. 

The Second Amendment: It's Not Just About Keeping Arms!

Most of the focus in general regarding the Second Article of Amendment to the Constitution of the united States of America, is on the second clause of that amendment, that is, "the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."

While doing research on the first part of that amendment, I discovered some very interesting posts, one of which I feel is relevant to share with the Esteemed Readers of this blog.

I therefore present the post in its entirety with no embellishments of edits of my own.




"Some Factions Allege That True Constitutional Militia Exist, Despite the Absence of Actual Proof. —Here’s the Straight Dope

Posted on May 8, 2014 by Daniel Vincent McGonigle III

By Daniel Vincent McGonigle III
May 7, 2014

Here’s some of the straight dope from true American history, and analysis.

Alleged “Laws” that were not “made in Pursuance thereof” do not qualify as legitimate proof; e.g. such as the repugnant federal and state Militia statutes passed into “Law” since 1903, currently codified at 10 USC 311 and the 50 State Militia Acts.
The April 29, 2014 commentary “The States and The Sovereign’s . .” posted here re-asserted some previously asserted legitimate proofs that stand un-rebutted, and the same commentary asserted some new proofs, through analysis of historical and constitutional language in American documents and publications, and specific statutory analysis such as of the repugnant 1916 oxymoron “Unorganized Militia”, a phrase that had no historical or constitutional basis whatsoever.

By constitutional enumeration and definition, Militia are State institutions only, to be composed of county and local command structures per State statute; structures which are in turn composed of the whole body of the People. After reading and studying the following key words, phrases, and clauses in American documents, ask yourselves—DO the ALLEGATIONS of State Militia institutions existence, that must meet the requirements and mandates confirmed by the language in these American documents, CONTAIN ANY TRUTH WHATSOEVER? What will your legitimate answers to the posed questions reveal about alleged Militia existence? (Upper case emphasis added by DVM3)

“A WELL REGULATED MILITIA, COMPOSED of THE BODY of THE PEOPLE, TRAINED TO ARMS ..” – Virginia Constitution, Decl of Rights, Sec 13

“.. EVERY STATE SHALL ALWAYS KEEP UP A WELL-REGULATED and DISCIPLINED MILITIA ..” – Articles of Confederation and perpetual Union, Art VI Clause 4

“.. THE MILITIA TO EXECUTE THE LAWS ..” – Constitution for the United States of America, Art I Sec 8 Clause 15

“This CONSTITUTION, and THE LAWS of the United States WHICH SHALL BE MADE IN PURSUANCE THEREOF .. SHALL BE the SUPREME LAW ..” – Art VI Clause 2

“A WELL REGULATED MILITIA, being NECESSARY to the SECURITY of a FREE State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, SHALL NOT BE infringed.” –Second Amendment

“MILI’TIA, n. .. The body of soldiers in a state enrolled for discipline, but not engaged in actual service except in emergencies; as distinguished from regular troops, whose sole occupation is war or military service. The militia of a country are the able bodied men organized into companies, regiments and brigades, with officers of all grades, and required by law to attend military exercises on certain days only, but at other times left to pursue their usual occupations.” – Noah Webster’s 1828 American Dictionary of the English Language

Story on the 2nd: “§ 1890. The importance of this article will scarcely be doubted by any persons, who have duly reflected upon the subject. The militia is the natural defence of a free country against sudden foreign invasions, domestic insurrections, and domestic usurpations of power by rulers. It is against sound policy for a free people to keep up large military establishments and standing armies in time of peace, both from the enormous expenses, with which they are attended, and the facile means, which they afford to ambitious and unprincipled rulers, to subvert the government, or trample upon the rights of the people. The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a republic; since it offers a strong moral check against the usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers; and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph over them. ..” – Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States(1833) Joseph Story. First part of Sec 1890 on the Second Amendment

Short list of questions:
1. Do the alleged Militia—the National Guard, the State Defense Forces, or the private groups, meet all the requirements of Militia existence, Militia duty and execution of enumerated Militia powers in any emergency? Are they composed of the whole body of the People, as required? (Determine your own legitimate answers to the questions after analyzing all document quotes.)
2. Did any true constitutional Militia composed of the People provide all the security necessary before, during and after Hurricane Katrina or Hurricane Sandy? How about before, during and after western wildfires? How about before, during and after central tornadoes?
3. Are there any Militia, governed by State and federal statutes, in the four southern border States that have been called forth to guard and protect the southern border, on a rotation basis?
4. Are there any Militia in the country that have been called forth to actively execute the Laws?—i.e. taken lawful actions to enforce the Constitution, Bill of Rights and State Constitutions, or taken lawful actions to stop unlawful actions?
5. Have all able-bodied 17/18 year olds in any local, county or state jurisdiction, been automatically enrolled and reported to their first Militia muster on the town green?
6. What federal or state statutes are the alleged Militia citing as authority, that enumerate the body of the People, each able-bodied person with rank in organized governmental command structures, or that enumerate the body of the People to execute the Laws and enforce the Constitution and Laws made in Pursuance thereof?
7. Are alleged Militia activities limited to domestic activity on American soil?
8. Do alleged Militia members keep their Arms and accoutrements required for Militia duty?
9. Have any alleged Militia units or members made lawful arrests of tyrants, usurpers or criminals?
10. Have any alleged Militia provided lawful security at elections, both outside and inside polling places?
11. Have any alleged Militia secured the health and safety of the food supply, the water supply?
12. Have any alleged local, county, or state Militia units representing the People, the Sovereign, decided the unconstitutionality of alleged “Laws” not “made in Pursuance thereof”, and taken lawful action against said unconstitutional “Laws”?
13. What is the Second Amendment about in its totality? (Few seem to know.) Have any of the recent Second Amendment rallies been true Second Amendment rallies, or just RTKBA rallies?
14. Are alleged Militia (NG, SDF) under local-county-state control, pre-1903 state & federal statutes, and Clauses 15/16/2nd Am per constitutional requirements, or are they under Clause 12 “Armies” federal control through the State Adjutant-General?
(Clauses 11 “ declare War”/12 “raise and support Armies”, and Clauses 15/16 “Militia”, were never intended to all meet and work together, except against a foreign military invasion on American soil.)

Authority sources and quotes from American documents:

“The said United Colonies for themselves and their posterities do jointly and severally hereby enter into a firm and perpetual league of friendship and amity for offence and defence . . . all the parts of this Confederation .. bring a true account and number of all their males .. from sixteen years old to threescore ..” – The Articles of Confederation of the United Colonies of New England, May 19, 1643

“That the lieutenant, or in his absence the chief officer of the militia, in every county, .. shall list all male persons above the age of eighteen years, and under the age of sixty years, within this colony .. under the command of such captain as he shall think fit . . . That every person so as aforesaid inlisted .. shall be armed in the manner following, . .” – Virginia Militia Acts, April, 1757

“Government was instituted for the purposes of common defence .. the grand end of civil government, from the very nature of its institution, is for the support, protection, and defence of those very rights; the principal of which, as is before observed, are Life, Liberty, and Property.” — Samuel Adams, Boston Committee of Correspondence Report, November 20, 1772

“.. a well-regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the proper, natural, and safe defense of a free state; .. that in all cases the military should be under strict subordination to, and governed by, the civil power.” – Virginia Constitution, Decl of Rights, Sec 13

“.. every State shall always keep up a well-regulated and disciplined militia, sufficiently armed and accoutered, ..” – Articles of Confederation and perpetual Union, Art VI Clause 4

“The people have a right to keep and to bear arms for the common defence. .. the military power shall always be held in an exact subordination to the civil authority, and be governed by it.” – Massachusetts Constitution, Decl of Rights, Art XVII

“That all free male persons between the ages of eighteen and fifty years, . . shall be inrolled or formed into companies, of three serjeants, three corporals, a drummer and fifer, and not less than forty, nor more than sixty-five, rank and file; and these companies shall again be formed into regiments of not more than one thousand, nor less than five hundred men, if there be so many in the county. Each company shall be commanded by a captain, lieutenant, and an ensign; each regiment by a colonel, lieutenant-colonel, and major; and the whole by a county-lieutenant. . .” – Virginia Militia Act, October 17, 1785

“To .. provide for the common Defence ..” – Constitution for the United States of America, Art I Sec 8 Clause 1

“To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;” – Art I Sec 8 Clause 15

“To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;” – Art I Sec 8 Clause 16

“This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; .. shall be the supreme Law of the Land; ..” – Art VI Clause 2

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” – Second Amendment

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” – Tenth Amendment

Around the same time that President Andrew Jackson was routing out the international banksters, a warning was issued by Justice Joseph Story in his 1833 Commentaries:

“§ 1890. … And yet, though this truth would seem so clear, and the importance of a well regulated militia would seem so undeniable, it cannot be disguised, that among the American people there is a growing indifference to any system of militia discipline, and a strong disposition, from a sense of its burthens, to be rid of all regulations. How it is practicable to keep the people duly armed without some organization, it is difficult to see. There is certainly no small danger, that indifference may lead to disgust, and disgust to contempt; and thus gradually undermine all the protection intended by this clause of our national bill of rights.”
– Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States, Joseph Story. Last part of Sec 1890 on the Second Amendment

Some private factions allege the right or power to form Militia themselves without superseding civil authority, statutes and regulations, because in their words the government at all levels has failed to adhere to the Constitution. Usurpation is allowed to occur due to lack of political vigilance by the People. Is it just a coincidence that the same private factions never wanted any part of pursuit of political action or remedy? The defeat of the 2009 Mass. “Pandemic Bill” after passing the Senate 36-0, proves the potential of political success when pursued. According to State Constitutions (2 cited above), military power must always be subordinate to the civil power or authority. Civil authority must be politically adjusted or changed first in order then to adjust or change the military power. State legislators now have the duty and power to revitalize the Militia power with one statute. If legislators continue abdication upon a major emergency, the Sovereign would have the duty and authority, in order to protect life, liberty and property, to make necessary emergency adjustments to restore lawful civil authority in order to restore the Sovereign People’s enumerated Militia powers and duties in “the common Defence” of natural rights.

What do the enumerations, requirements, and your own legitimate answers reveal? What is revealed—of the restorative action necessary to be executed by State legislators? Is the necessity revealed of what must be done by statute?—To bring the mandated State Militia institutions back into proven constitutional compliance, including satisfying the mandate “A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State”, and including satisfying the mandated duty and power of the States and the People to Enforce Our Constitution through execution of the Laws.

__________________

Dan McGonigle spent almost thirty years in the building and construction industry, from carpenter to project superintendent, and held numerous licenses, certifications and registrations related to expertise, supervision, safety and instruction in the industry. He has a B.S. in Construction Management from Wentworth Institute of Technology. He was active in politics and ran for State Representative in 1994. From May through October, 2009, Mr. McGonigle wrote a constitutional analysis of, and instructed and led citizens inside the Massachusetts State House in instructing their legislators in the House of Representatives on—the dangers of public health emergency bill S.2028 which had passed the Senate unanimously 36-0 in April, just after the false world-wide swine flu scare. After several months of lobbying and instructions, the House passed a different version in October, and the draconian S.2028 died in conference committee. After Mr. McGonigle witnessed a speech by Dr. Edwin Vieira, Jr. at the Boston Tea Party event at Faneuil Hall in December, 2008, and after finishing his State House work on “The Pandemic Bill” in 2009, he immersed his studies in the works of Dr. Vieira and the constitutional history and principles of the power of the sword. Mr. McGonigle wrote his first book “Execute the Laws” To Restore the Republic, Vol. 1 in 2013. He publishes short commentaries regularly at EnforceOurConstitution.com and in the blog section of CampConstitution.net, he posts regularly on Facebook, and he’s a regular instructor at Camp Constitution—the week-long family camp held annually in mid-July.

Sources of Pertinent Information:

http://EnforceOurConstitution.com

http://CampConstitution.net — Camp blog

True Vs. False Militia & Why the Difference Matters, Parts 1 to 3, Dr. Edwin Vieira, Jr., July 30, 2007 — http://www.newswithviews.com/Vieira/edwin61.htm

http://ConstitutionalMilitia.org

“On A Militia Mission”, The New American, January 6, 2014, by Joe Wolverton II, JD — http://www.scribd.com/doc/200991264/On-a-Militia-Mission

“No Militia Means More Intrusive Law Enforcement: Our Framers didn’t envision a free State with the current level of government control”, USAToday, March 9, 2014, Columnist Opinion by Glenn Harlan Reynolds, JD — http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2014/03/09/second-amendment-militia-guns-military-swat-constitution-column/6230769

Edwin Vieira, Jr., PhD, JD—Archive of Commentaries, 2005 to Present — www.NewsWithViews.com/Vieira/edwinA.htm

Constitutional “Homeland Security” Vol. 1: The Nation In Arms (2007) Edwin Vieira, Jr. — http://www.amazon.com/Constitutional-Homeland-Security-Nation-Arms/dp/0967175925

The Sword and Sovereignty: The Constitutional Principles of “the Militia of the Several States” (2012) Edwin Vieira, Jr. CD: 2,300 pgs, 6,500 footnotes & endnotes. — http://www.amazon.com/The-Sword-Sovereignty-Constitutional-Principles/dp/0967175941

Molon Labe: How the Second Amendment Guarantees America’s Freedom (2013) Produced by Edwin Vieira, Jr. and Henrietta Jaeger. Written & Directed by James Jaeger — http://molon.us/dvd

Thirteen Words (2013) Edwin Vieira, Jr. — http://www.amazon.com/Thirteen-Words-Jr-Edwin-Vieira/dp/096717595X — On the First Clause of the Second Amendment

“Execute the Laws” To Restore the Republic, Vol. 1 (2013) Daniel Vincent McGonigle III — http://www.amazon.com/Execute-Restore-Republic-Nicholas-McGonigle/dp/0989670201

The Rights of the Colonists, aka The Boston Pamphlet, by Samuel Adams; The Report of the Committee of Correspondence to the Boston Town Meeting, Nov. 20, 1772 – http://history.hanover.edu/texts/adamss.html — Excerpts re-printed in “Execute the Laws” To Restore the Republic, from the Report published in Boston Town Records and by The Old South Meeting House.

Virginia Militia Acts, 1757 – 1785. — http://www.virginia1774.org/MilitiaActs.html

Virginia Declaration of Rights — http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/virginia_declaration_of_rights.html

Articles of Confederation and perpetual Union — http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/artconf.asp

Declaration; Constitution; Bill of Rights — http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/charters.html

Noah Webster’s 1828 American Dictionary of the English Language — http://1828.mshaffer.com — http://webstersdictionary1828.com

Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States (1833) Joseph Story. Sec 1890 on the Second Amendment — http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/amendIIs10.html

© 2014 Daniel Vincent McGonigle III"

Crisis Actors: Creating Reality For You!

The following was sent to me in email. Americans need to be aware of what is happening to their country and so I present to the Esteemed Readers, this following post. Please visit the Forbidden Knowledge TV site and let them know that you were referred by Fix America!

"The existence of "crisis actors" entered the spotlight, in the wake of the Boston Bombings, when footage of live, "man on the street" interviews from local Boston TV news stations, were reviewed for further inspection, revealing that some of the same people interviewed at the scene of the crime were also interviewed at the the scene of the reprehensible siege of the citizens of Watertown, MA.

You may recall the body-armored agents of the DHS and Federally-deputized Massachusetts State Police and Boston Police,wearing full body armor and driving BearCat armored urban assault vehicles (i.e., tanks)systematically breaking down the doors of innocent citizens' homes and dragging the occupants out onto the streets, while wielding assault rifles.

When I broadcast anything related to the many falsehoods propagated by the Criminal Mainstream Media in relation to the Boston Bombing story shortly after the events, I was bombarded by the rage of family members and friends of the 200+ injured and3 killed during this incident - or so I thought. I'm beginning to suspect that perhaps some of this tsunami-sized out-pouring was by government-paid,sock-puppets, alleging to be these justly-outraged people: such online services are, indeed publicly-acknowledged to be provided by the actors trained by companies like Visionbox.

I wasn't aware of Visionbox at that time, so the desired effects were achieved - because I stopped talking about the Boston Bombings.

Visionbox Crisis Actors is a "talent agency" for actors, based in Denver Colorado, which is self-described as"...a project of the Colorado Nonprofit Development Center. Crisis Actors is a project of the Colorado Safety Task Force established by Colorado State Senator Steve King."

Their stated function, in late 2012 was to train actors to help law enforcement professionals In training exercises, by playing everyday Citizens during crisis scenarios, such as mass Shootings in shopping malls, etc.

Footage reviewed in the wake of the Boston Bombings and the subsequent domestic military siege of Watertown (illegal, by definition), reveal that these crisis actors will continue to "stay in character" and oblige TV news camera crews with their scripted version of events. They will even continue to stay in character online, on social media sites and in emails to online publishers,like me.

That's their job, which various government agencies, masquerading as NGOs are paying them to do. As the Visionbox website, itself said in December 2012,"Crisis Actors can also play the role of citizens calling 911 or mall management,or posting comments on social media websites."

It has long been speculated that at least a few such dis-informational "crisis actors" made their way into the televised coverage, at the scene of the demolished WTC complex during the 9/11crisis.

Now, we have the actual name of one such government-sponsored service, which trains and pays actors to actually do this: Visionbox CrisisActors. Moreover, the Visionbox site says:"Security camera footage is edited for after-action reports and future training."

I'd bet this NGO is more than happy to pass along edited footage of"real" events to TV news outlets, who are also happy to save a buck with free footage, starring the Thespian employees of Visionbox CrisisActors, who make a living by playing victims or witnesses during false-flag operations to TV news outlets - the latter of whom may or may not be unsuspecting in their own involvement in perpetrating fraud - or to be more charitable,Psychological Operations - all in the interests of our own National Security, of course!

To quote Marine Colonel Peter Martino (Ret.),

from a video I sent a few days ago of a Concord,New Hampshire city council public hearing held in November 2013:

"What's happening here is we're building a domestic military, because its unlawful or unconstitutional to use American troops on American soil...

"I saw a picture in the Boston Globe after the Marathon bombing where there was a state police officer - actually there were two officers - both had identical helmets, flak jackets, weapons,everything I wore in Iraq - only it was all blue.

"The officer on one side had a big patch on his back that said Massachusetts State Police. Another officer next to him, his patch said Boston Police.

"So what we're doing here, and let's not kid ourselves about it, we're building a domestic army and we’re shrinking the military because the government is afraid of its own citizens."

-- Marine Colonel Pete Martino (Ret.)

Please do not take mainstream TV news at face value, anymore, people!

Beneath my article that appears below the video screen, at the page linked below is the full text that was recorded by the uploader of this YouTube video, as what was published on the website, www.Visionbox.org in December of 2012.

The current pages at that address do not refer to these activities but the splash page for http://crisisactors.org, which requires that you sign-in makes no bones about what their job is. I encourage all readers of this to visit that page,for yourselves to see what's going on - and if you're unemployed and looking for acting work, you might even land yourself a job!

(Video: around one and half mins):

Crisis Actors: CrisisActors.org

http://www.ForbiddenKnowledgeTV.com/page/26302.html

- Alexandra

P.S.Please share Forbidden Knowledge TV emails and videos with your friends and colleagues. That's how we grow. Thanks!"

Hook, Line, and Sinker - Part 1

As an afterthought to False Flag Operations being carried out by the Federal Government, it is on-going and shows no signs of stopping or letting up. Following the staged;  Waco Event on February 28, 1993, Oklahoma City Bombing Event on April 19, 1995, and the World Trade Center Event on September 11, 2001, and the Sandy Hook School Massacre Event On December 14, 2012, and the Boston Marathon Bombing Event on April 15, 2013, we can only expect more of the same in order to instill fear, instability, and insecurity in the minds of the people of this country.

Like other False Flag Operations, the Sandy Hook School Massacre Event has yet to be resolved to any degree of certainty regarding exactly what happened. All the available information indicates some type of State and Federal Active Shooter Training Exercise. Hundreds of unanswered important questions have been followed by denied FOIA requests which all point to another False Flag Operation carried out by Federal and State Authorities. This FFO was used as an example of why guns should be made illegal and confiscated. 

What can be stated as fact is straight forward.

A Federal 'Active Shooter Training Event' occurred on the same day at the same time in the local area.

Over 1,200 Law Enforcement Officers responded to the Sandy Hook School Massacre event.

First Responders and Police officers violated State regulations, crime scene protocols and procedures, and dozens of state laws. 

It was reported that an Assault Rifle was the only weapon responsible for the deaths. Then two hand guns were supposedly retrieved from the crime scene, then it was reported that there were four hand guns.

No assault rife was found in the trunk of Mrs. Lanza's vehicle. What was found was an un-fired shotgun.

No blood was seen by anyone, anywhere.

No children were processed through any triage area.

No bodies or body bags were transported anywhere at any time. No bodies were seen.

Miss Emily Parker (one of the supposedly deceased Sandy Hook School students) does not appear in any Sandy Hook School class photograph.

Parents of the supposed victims of gun violence were denied positive identification of alleged dead children.

All burials were closed casket to all persons.

The day after the alleged killing of his daughter, Emily Parker, Mr. Robbie Parker gave a press interview which reveals very bad acting at best.

All Information regarding autopsies, death certificates is not available to anyone because it has been sealed under court order by state law.

Name changes and relocation of families were provided by federal funds (your tax dollars at work). They were also provided with shares of $17 million raised through internet donation sites.

Mr. Robbie Parker was setting up an internet donation site before and during the time of his daughter's alleged murder. He opened the account on the day before the Sandy Hook School Massacre Event.

Miss Emily Parker was photographed sitting on the lap of the person occupying the White House, after her supposed death and closed casket burial.

The Sandy Hook School has been razed and the rubble removed by an unnamed company to an unknown location.

Thousands of unanswered questions are all that remain.

Video Links:

http://www.federaljack.com/school-safety-expert-threatened-for-questioning-sandy-hook/

http://www.federaljack.com/ct-cop-on-sandy-hook-inconsistencies-things-dont-add-up/

http://www.federaljack.com/the-sandy-hook-shooting-fully-exposed/

What Has Happened to Our System of Governance?

. (Credit: EPA)

The government of the United States of America has declared war on its own People and it is winning! Your life no longer belongs to you, it belongs to the government.

The government will decide the curriculum best suited for your child and what school they will attend. When they graduate, the government will place them in a government job that best suits the talents developed, which of course are always to serve the best interests of the government.

If it is determined that you do not raise your children in a manner that government approves, Child Protective Services will take them from you and assure they get a proper government approved upbringing. You can get all of the expensive attorneys you can afford or deal with a court appointed one. In the end it really won't matter because the courts that no longer serve justice will rule in favor of CPS and the government, because after all, who knows better on what is right for children than the government?

You will not be permitted to have any arms because you may do harm to others or yourself with them. Those found with arms or commit any crime with arms will be put to death; or at the government's discretion, given a sentence in a prison camp as a guard. 

The government will determine if you medical needs warrant the expense versus your potential worth to the government. In a nation of share the wealth, nobody can be permitted to burden society unless they are privileged by their service to the government and loyalty to their leader.

A Congress is no longer necessary since all they do is argue and never get anything done.  Some even bring up issues such as constitutionality, when it is clear, that anything government deems, “necessary and proper” or “promotes the general welfare” (from the government's point of view) is constitutional period. The President will determine what the best laws are and will just write an executive order to make it law. Those laws already written will be ignored or changed to best suit the needs of the government.

Even the Supreme Court, the highest court in the land cannot be questioned once they decide a law is constitutional. Why if that were permitted, every law the People don't like can be called into question. Government cannot permit such blatant disregard for the tyranny it forces upon us.

Liberty is rarely lost all at once. The branches are pruned off the Tree of Liberty, until it is either restored or destroyed. Government has been allowed to cut branches off the Tree of liberty by using fear as a tool to enact laws that deprive liberty for the promise of security. And every time another 'crisis' arises, another few liberties are taken away. 

Government can take all of your rights if you allow them to. The only thing they cannot take is free will.  That is the root from which the Tree of Liberty grows.  Free will in inherent in all of humanity and is our birthright. 

Have we reached the point of total enslavement by the government, now an entity unto itself?  Knowing what the government has become, it makes me wonder if Americans have forgotten who they are! (Or is it simply a matter of education?)

Almost Like Hitler's Youth Corps

I really have a problem with teaching Boy Scouts  how to "take out" a disgruntled Iraq war veteran" as if he/she were just another threat to Homeland Security. This is an individual who put their own life on the line, so that Americans can enjoy the liberty of scouting. But training them to "secure" or "take down" a war veteran is more like what extremists teach their youth.

Along with the PSA videos that tell citizens, "If you see something, say something" we are becoming what the National Socialists engineered for the citizens of Germany, where anyone that disagrees with government will be labeled as an extremist or terrorist and hence a threat to national security.

How much more obvious does it need to be before the majority of Americans see what is quickly becoming a police state? We already have elected public servants that are turning on the people who put them in office, labeling Tea Party supporters as terrorists and subversives, claiming that the goal of the group is to bring down the government.

No, that is not true, and any awake and reasonable individual can never come to such an absurd conclusion about their fellow Americans, who are simply fed up with the rhetoric from both major parties, and are going to use the voice of the people to change it.

We must stop Congress and the White House from spending money they don't have, and then come crying to the people that they need to raise taxes or reduce services to Americans. And we Americans who don't buy that line anymore, are going to keep making noise about reducing spending, and you can call us whatever names suits your agenda.

But we will not allow any group, including those who have abused the privileges of office to attempt to stop us from our just and proper causes of liberty and Constitutional limits of power. We are not going to be intimidated by "Hitler Youth Corps" tactics either.