Up Is Down Left Is Right, or Government Is Good, Fight! Fight! Fight!

Anna Brown's kangaroo Tribunal (an unlawful court held by a group of people in order to try someone regarded, especially without good evidence, as guilty of violating the Law) in Portland Oregon is using every underhanded tactic to convict the defendants before the trial. As the Esteemed Readers that have been following the proceedings of the Bundy/Hammond Malheur Wildlife Refuge Protest already know, Ridiculous charges, false allegations, and a parody of due process are only the beginning efforts of this unlawful Legal charade. The Latest effort of Public Policy Administrator Brown and the U.S. Prosecuting Attorney has placed every potential witness of the protest under the cloud of possible arrest on the same false charges and more. The Administrative Legal Tribunal has announced that anyone who actually went to the Malheur Wildlife Refuge is an unindicted co-conspirator
   

An unindicted co-conspirator, or unindicted conspirator, is a person or entity that is alleged in an indictment to have engaged in conspiracy, but who is not charged in the same indictment; but, once identified, may have alleged actions be declared as somehow supposedly illegal and charges brought in a different indictment. This type of pre-indictment labeling of course colors or taints every potential witness as somehow participating in the supposedly illegal activities that led to the  allegations and indictment of charges. To the mind of the potential witness, this type of Labeling can only place every witness in jeopardy of being indicted. In the eyes of the prosecuting Attorney, all witnesses for the defense are potential targets for new indictments based on skewed allegations and false charges. 

"The legal term "unindicted co-conspirator," or unindicted conspirator, is a person or entity that is alleged in an indictment to have engaged in conspiracy, but who is not charged in the same indictment. Prosecutors choose to name persons as unindicted 
co-conspirators for a variety of reasons including grants of immunity, pragmatic 
considerations, and evidentiary concerns.

The United States Attorneys' Manual generally recommends against naming unindicted 
co-conspirators, although their use is not generally prohibited by law or policy.[1] 
Some commentators have raised due process concerns over the use of unindicted 
co-conspirators.[2] Although there have been few cases on the subject, the Fifth 
Circuit Court of Appeals addressed these concerns in United States v. Briggs.[3]

The term unindicted co-conspirator was familiarized in 1974 when then president Richard 
Nixon was named as an unindicted co-conspirator in indictments stemming from the 
Watergate Investigation. Nixon was not indicted due to concerns about whether the 
United States Constitution allowed the indictment of a sitting President (see Executive 
privilege).

References:

1. United States Attorneys' Manual, 9-11.130, available at 
http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/11mcrm.htm#9-11.130 (2008)

2. See Ira P. Robbins, Guilty without Charge: Assessing the Due Process Rights of 
Unindicted Co-Conspirators, 2004 Fed. Cts. L. Rev. 1 (2004)

3. 514 F.2d 794 (5th Cir. 1975).


From Wikipedia"

There is no Justice in any of this activity, it is meant to sway public opinion against anyone charged, or intimidate anyone willing to bare witness to the actions of the protesters and in the process of witness leave themselves open to possible charges. The ultimate goal of all of this activity is to force landowners off their land and to lay claim to public property so those in power can reap financial reward by selling something that does not belong to them. Gold, Uranium, Clinton, Uranium One, "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men (women) are almost always bad men (women)." 

Littering?, or Operation OVERKILL!

How many times in any state have drivers passed temporary memorials to fatalities along the roadside?

The Esteemed Readers might guess hundreds of thousands of temporary memorials across America, and that might be an underestimate. These small memorials usually consist of a small wooden cross, a picture, flowers and cards. Do these remembrances constitute terrorist activity?  Do they constitute littering? 

Do these activities constitute true Felony Criminal Mischief (a $5,000.00 dollar fine), or a Class A Misdemeanor (a $400.00 to $1,200.00 dollar fine)?  What will the Administrative Assistant to the State Tribunal (read as Judge in a state court) decide the fine should really be?  If the alleged crime took place on Federal Public Property (a National Forest), Why would the proceedings be held in a State Tribunal?

Are simple temporary memorials within the boundary of State or Federal Highway Easements really serious crimes worthy of $5,000.00 dollar fine?   Is the damage to State or Federal Property in excess of $1,000.00 dollars?

Oregon Public Policy Statutes follow:

§ 164.365¹ 
Criminal mischief in the first degree
(1) A person commits the crime of criminal mischief in the first degree who, with intent to damage property, and having no right to do so nor reasonable ground to believe that the person has such right:
(a) Damages or destroys property of another:
(A) In an amount exceeding $1,000;
(B) By means of an explosive;
(C) By starting a fire in an institution while the person is committed to and confined in the institution;
(D) Which is a livestock animal as defined in ORS 164.055 (Theft in the first degree);
(E) Which is the property of a public utility, telecommunications carrier, railroad, public transportation facility or medical facility used in direct service to the public; or
(F) By intentionally interfering with, obstructing or adulterating in any manner the service of a public utility, telecommunications carrier, railroad, public transportation facility or medical facility; or
(b) Intentionally uses, manipulates, arranges or rearranges the property of a public utility, telecommunications carrier, railroad, public transportation facility or medical facility used in direct service to the public so as to interfere with its efficiency.
(2) As used in subsection (1) of this section:
(a) Institution includes state and local correctional facilities, mental health facilities, juvenile detention facilities and state training schools.
(b) Medical facility means a health care facility as defined in ORS 442.015 (Definitions), a licensed physicians office or anywhere a licensed medical practitioner provides health care services.
(c) Public utility has the meaning provided for that term in ORS 757.005 (Definitions) and includes any cooperative, peoples utility district or other municipal corporation providing an electric, gas, water or other utility service.
(d) Railroad has the meaning provided for that term in ORS 824.020 (Definitions for ORS 824.020 to 824.042).
(e) Public transportation facility means any property, structure or equipment used for or in connection with the transportation of persons for hire by rail, air or bus, including any railroad cars, buses or airplanes used to carry out such transportation.

(f) Telecommunications carrier has the meaning given that term in ORS 133.721 (Definitions for ORS 41.910 and 133.721 to 133.739).
(3) Criminal mischief in the first degree is a Class C felony. [1971 c.743 §147; 1973 c.133 §6; 1975 c.344 §1; 1979 c.805 §1; 1983 c.740 §33a; 1987 c.447 §104; 1987 c.907 §10; 1989 c.584 §2; 1991 c.837 §13; 1991 c.946 §2; 1993 c.94 §1; 1993 c.332 §3; 1999 c.1040 §11; 1999 c.1093 §2; 2003 c.543 §4; 2009 c.16 §6]

What is the definition of criminal mischief?

A person commits the offense of criminal mischief if he or she willfully and maliciously injures or damages by any means any real or personal property belonging to another, including, but not limited to, the placement of graffiti thereon or other acts of vandalism thereto.

What is the definition of "A Class A Misdemeanor?"

It is the most serious classification of misdemeanor charge in most states. States typically divide misdemeanors into categories such as Class A, B, C, D (or some numerical equivalent), with A being the most serious and C or D being the least serious. Mar 1, 2016


All of this Legal activity seems Draconian when compared to a simple roadside memorial to someone who died;  however, when the State or Federal Government is involved and their involvement was the cause of the fatality, extreme measures seem to be necessary. Why?  Possibly to deflect or misdirect any blame or guilt in any direction other than where it squarely belongs, at the Government's front door. 

What, if any, action must be taken to gard Property against this type of damage?

The the BLM’s Air Tactical Program could be enlarged in purpose and scope and used to track and record these types of truely serious crimes against humanity, just like Military Drones tracking and recording the loss (think collateral damage or innocent bystander) of women, children, and babies in the War torn areas of the Mideast and elsewhere. 

http://reagangirl.com/blm-launching-drone-program-to-monitor-public-lands/

BLM LAUNCHING DRONE PROGRAM TO MONITOR PUBLIC LANDS
Posted by ReaganGirl in Bureau of Land Management, Federal militarism, Range Wars
massacres, June 22, 2016

The Bureau of Land Management has already promoted a notorious thug agent, Dan Love, to head up its new Protective, Security and Intelligence (think Spy) division, and now the federal agency is launching a drone program to monitor various activities and conditions on public lands under BLM control. Do you trust this agency, headed by Harry Reid lackey, Neil Kornze, to use surveillance drones for the limited and specific purposes they profess?


The following story is written by Gary Harmon, as published by the G.J. Daily Sentinel

MEEKER COLORADO — A drone could do in minutes the work of several federal employees to monitor pipeline reclamation efforts, identify and provide a count of endangered plants, watch over raptors, even in their nests, and go where literally no man has gone for hundreds, if not thousands, of years.

Drones were doing just those things, and more, recently, in northwest Colorado, as a team of drone operators and supervisors tested the craft under the deep blue Colorado sky and buffeting spring winds.

“We’re just testing the technology to see how well it works,” Kent Walter, manager of the Bureau of Land Management’s Meeker Field Office, said before heading to the Hay Gulch area to see a drone, or unmanned aerial system, do its stuff over a stretch of the Overland Pipeline.

On a dusty road through a meadow, a crew of BLM employees ran through a checklist, much as a pilot on manned aircraft might do, in preparation for a UAS flight to survey about 400 yards of pipeline.

Once clear, the drone was released to shoot up to 100 feet — the pre-set altitude for the survey — and then down to another pre-set point, where it began a series of transects back toward its starting point.

Think of a transect as one might mow a yard, said Gil Dustin, the BLM’s air tactical program manager. The drone flies a pattern just as a lawnmower would cut a strip, turn and cut a return strip parallel to the first, gradually working its way back to the crew.

In the drone’s case, the swaths are some 40 feet wide across the pipeline and the camera aboard takes high-resolution photos according to a program built into the flight plan. Those photos then are studied by experts to determine whether the earth above the pipeline is indeed being reclaimed according to BLM requirements.

It would require several hours with a crew of employees on foot to conduct the same survey, Walter said.

The same territory could be surveyed again, using GPS, to determine what kinds of change have occurred over the intervening time.

The UAS crew didn’t limit itself to a reclamation survey. It also flew a nearby canyon in search of cultural sites, capturing views of rugged country no human — in centuries — has seen, Walter said.

“We’ll see country that has never been seen before, using the drone’s camera, Walter said.

It also was used to study raptor nests in the piñon-juniper forest — “It doesn’t seem to bother raptors,” said Walter — as well as other tasks.

The drone crews file flight plans with the Federal Aviation Administration, just as they would if flying manned craft.

Reposted by Reagangirl.com  6/22/16

Enough is Enough:  Can anyone say OVERKILL!

Reference:

Thoughts From The North Forty: or That which Pushes the Mind Is Not Always Felt

Video From Inside The Truck Finicum Was Driving

It should be apparent to the Esteemed Readers of Fix America, that based on the evidence known at this time, Robert LaVoy Finicum was murdered in retaliation for defying the unlawful regulative orders of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), a Puerto Rican Corporation. It is relatively unimportant at this time just which agency or NGO (non-government organization) fired. The truly important point is no one discharged any firearm of any type except one or more Government, or State Agency, or NGO. All of the bullshit legaleze about officers fearing for their lives when faced by an unarmed already wounded American with his hands raised is outrageous!  The 9mm drop gun ostensibly found by the FBI is a laughable outcome of agencies or NGOs covering their protruding asses.     





The others that were arrested on charges of "federal felony charge of conspiracy to impede officers of the United States from discharging their official duties through the use of force, intimidation or threats" is at the very least questionable.

Those alleged charges have nothing to do with the peaceful occupation of the Malhuer National Wildlife Refuge, nor the rally for the injustices done to the Hammonds, or the Hammond's 'terrorist arson charges and conviction' as alleged by the BLM and the corporate Administrative Public Policy Tribunals that handed down the conviction against the Hammonds.

The refusal of the federal government to allow inspection or photography of the bullet riddled pickup truck Mr. Finicum was driving or provide government or NGO dash cam and body cam evidence is understandable; considering that it is evidence that will surely and undoubtedly be presented at the various trials to prove the government's allegations. 

The entire incident has been just one of many demonstrations to come of raw naked killing force meant to frighten and intimidate the Americans-on-the-Land into giving up their unalienable rights, their constitutionally protected rights, and eventually their property and finally their liberty.

This type of unlawful government or NGO action will strip you and me of our unalienable rights, rights which can only be taken by force, and only if Americans are incapable of self-defense. It is for all Americans who cherish the freedoms and liberty they have so dearly fought for to resist giving in to the fear of an out-of-control tyrannical government. 

Hammond Ranch Update

EXCLUSIVE: Massive Cover-up – BLM leases Hammond ranch land to Russia through Clinton Foundation donors for uranium

By: Greg White  Date: February 11, 2016

"The Hammond Ranch controversy continues to sink into a rabbit hole without end. Evidence has surfaced that the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has been taking land with plans to lease it to Clinton Foundation donors.

Russia gradually gained control of Uranium One, a major mining company, in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, while Hillary Clinton served as Secretary of State. Canadian records reveal that the company’s chairman used his own family foundation to make four donations to the Clinton Foundation during that time, resulting in a sum contribution of $2.35 million. Secretary Clinton approved the deal for Russia soon after her family’s slush fund received the donations. Now, Vladimir Putin controls 20 percent of all uranium production capacity in the U.S.


Undisclosed contributions made to the Clinton Foundation

These contribution were not made known to the public by the Clintons, even though Hillary Clinton made a deal with President Obama to disclose all the donors. Other individuals associated with the company made donations too.

Furthermore, after Russia declared that it was taking over Uranium One, Bill Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank, which promoted Uranium One stock.

A gold mine for uranium

It is not known whether the donations were responsible for the uranium deal, but the timing is suspicious. Since Hammond Ranch is a gold mine for uranium, it’s unsurprising that the Clinton Foundation would want to lease the land to Russia through donors.

This would also explain why U.S. authorities have been coming down so hard on protesters. Officials aren’t prosecuting individuals because of the Hammond controversy. Officials are coming down on protesters because they are occupying a valuable piece of land; a piece of land that was promised to the Russians.

According to The New York Times: “Whether the donations [to the Clinton Foundation] played any role in the approval of the uranium deal is unknown. But the episode underscores the special ethical challenges presented by the Clinton Foundation, headed by a former president who relied heavily on foreign cash to accumulate $250 million in assets even as his wife helped steer American foreign policy as secretary of state, presiding over decisions with the potential to benefit the foundation’s donors.”


Sources include:

CanadaFreePress.com

Evil.news

LibertyBlitzkrieg.com

NewsTarget.com "

Land of the Ignorant , Or Home of the Destitute

As covered in past articles the various agencies, departments, bureaus, and programs (like Strong Cities and Smart Cities) of the Federal Government are actively seeking to remove Americans from rural areas and force them, by whatever means are necessary, from the land into the more densely populated and highly controlled areas. This type of control is best exemplified by the Strong Cities Strong Communities (sc2) initiative ( with a Police force of its own), and Smart Cities initiative. These types of Initiatives are just a few examples of the Regional Government System and its Change Agents. A quick read of Jo Hindman's article "Thirteen Thirteen" from the January 1959 American Mercury Magazine is a good start at understanding the problems Americans face. Follow up that read with the books "Terrible 1313", 1963, "Blame Metro", 1966, and "The Metrocrats", 1974 and you will have a solid background of the movement to quietly and slowly "change" the American Constitutional System to a system of administrative public policy.

With this background in mind, the Esteemed Readers of Fix America and especially Oregonians can proceed to "Rockefeller--Reagionalism:  The Shadow Behind Oregon's LCDC.", by Joe Spenner and a clear picture will emerge regarding the serious and immediate danger the UNITED NATION's Regional Government System poses to America. The impact of Regional Planning, Programming, Budget System (PPBS) and Management by Objective (MBO) of the Regional Government System is discussed in "The Impossible Dream", By K. M. Heaton

      

Remember Harney County?  The City of Burns (the County Seat) is occupied by Military Forces and for-all-practical-purposes-and-intents is under Martial Law. The Malheur Reserve is now permanently closed to the public and an open pit uranium mine is planned with threat reported by the BLM of expected ground water pollution. The lease is going to Uranium One, a Canadian Corporation owned by the Russian atomic energy agency (Rosatom) that were arranged by (then) Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, benefiting the Clinton Foundation and expected to benefit the Federal Government with billions (B-billions) of dollars. A well written article in the APRIL 23, 2015, The New York Times titled "Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal" by Jo Becker and Mike McIntire. None of the revenue will be going to Harney County and the uranium will be going to Iranian Nuclear Programs.

The land (private property) is shrinking very quickly as large areas are being brought under the management and control of the EPA. The method being used is the endangerment of species concept;  however, the endangerment is not coming from proper private enterprise. It is coming from The US Bureau of Land Management (BLM), US Fish and wildlife Service (USFWS), US Forest Service (USFS), and the Environmental Protection Agency. An excellent example is the endangered desert tortoise. Ranchers were blamed for an alleged reduction of desert tortoise due to cattle trampling them (cattle, sheep, and horses will avoid stepping on living creatures - just as people do). The BLM collected every desert tortoise they could find and after various discussions decided that the best solution to the BLM caused problem of what to do with all these troublesome endangered tortoises was to euthanize 840  tortoises saying, “because that’s the sensible thing to do.” Dr. Michael S. Coffman has lectured many, many times (many of which are available on Youtube and has written books explaining how the Federal Government is ridding the land of People under the guise of protecting one resource or another or saving one species or another. Some of the largest of the various Animal Rights groups are funded by the same select group of people funding the worst politicians in American History.  

 

Another method of acquisition and control is the Soetoro/Obama  Blue Way Initiative (Blue Water Trails) which is a failing program at best and the various franchise Corporate Governments (Governments of Whichever State) progress to re-classify water ways in accord with 100 year, 500 year flood plain projections (lands that have never seen flowing water or standing water in the histories of local record have been classified as water ways and that changes the Jurisdiction from the Law of the Land (common Law) to the Law of the Sea (Admirality Law, and Roman Civil Law-an example of this type of activity was carried out by Dianne Feinstein and Friends)

The US Bureau of Land Management (BLM), US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS),  US Forest Service (USFS), US Department of the Interior-Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), U.S. Department of the Interior-Bureau of National Park Service, Department of Defense (DOD) acquisitions under the National Security Act (NSA 1947), Presidential declarations of National Monuments, and many, many, many other named and un-named ABC groups are moving rapidly forward with change. As Americans are forced from their homes, property, and in many cases their livelihoods the Federal Government, Banks, and the United Nations dba the IMF dba The UNITED STATES Inc. are filing for Land Patents and Allodial Title to the Geographical Continental united States of America as-fast-as-is-possible.

The Fraud occupying the White House has generated another Executive order declaring a Million Acre Monument in the Grants Pass Area. This is not Public Land. A Monument is more restrictive than Wildlands. No cars, bikes, hunting. You can walk. Check and and see if your property is within the boundary. If so, you stand the real possibility you are going to have your property confiscated. Do you know of someone that has their property within the boundary? Notify them. Get them involved. Every property owner needs to speak up and contact their Sheriff. Other recent declared National Monument areas include: Rio Grande del Norte National Monument, New Mexico, San Juan Islands National Monument, Washington State, Harriet Tubman National Monument, Maryland, Charles Young Buffalo Soldiers National Monument, Ohio, Delaware Historic Sites, Delaware, and the area occupied is growing quickly.

Before everything is further divided up by these private corporations, stripped of whatever worth can possibly be obtained, and sold to the highest bidder on the International Market, it would be really swell if Americans woke up in time to see it go, just before they are rounded up and hauled off to F.E.M.A. Camps.

  

Sources: 

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-
russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=0

http://tyrantwatch.co/2016/01/15/harney-county-oregon-what-they-dont-want-you-to-know/

http://www.infowars.com/before-nevada-cattle-rancher-dispute-blm-was-euthanizing-
endangered-desert-tortoise/

http://wilderness.org/article/win-wildlands-president-obama-designates-five-
new-national-monuments#sthash.a1c9HXJl.dpuf
The great escape.

Rescuing a Broken America: Why America is Deeply Divided and How to Heal it Constitutionally 
Paperback – October 2, 2010 by Michael Coffman 

Radical Islam In The House: The Plan to Take America for the Global Islamic State 
Feb 27, 2013 by Michael S. Coffman Ph.D. and Kate Mathieson




Plundered: How Progressive Ideology is Destroying America May 8, 2012 
by Michael S. Coffman

The Birth of World Government: Through Global Deception, Intrigue and War 
2001 by Michael S. Coffman Paperback




Environmentalism! The Dawn of Aquarius or the Twilight of a New Dark Age?  
Jul 1992 by Michael S. Coffman

Saviors of the Earth? : The Politics & Religion of the Environmental Movement Jan 1994
by Michael S. Coffman




Problems with the Endangered Species Act 2003
by Michael S. Coffman

All Mimsy Were The Borogoves, And The Mome Raths Outgrabe!

Judge Grasty of Harney County is Incompetent to hold the office he occupies. The best that can be said about about his recent statements are that they put on the record his fallacious reasons, misconceptions, faulty logic, and obvious disregard for the history and laws of the state of Oregon, all of which lead to negligence in office and failure to uphold his constitutional oath of office. Making false statements (Title 18 U.S.C. Section 1001) is the common name for the UNITED STATES federal crime which generally prohibits knowingly and willfully making false or fraudulent statements, or concealing information, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the federal government of the UNITED STATES, even by mere denial. This is more than sufficient reason to remove Mr. Grasty from the office he occupies. 

Other reasons only become apparent when his decisions  and actions are examined retro-actively. He has made legal, not lawful, decisions based on his faulty logic and misinterpretation of the Constitution for the united States of America and with regard to the Oregon Constitution. 


To the Esteemed Readers of Fix America I can only suggest you look up the 
definition of Personage and Barratry. Just for Fun.

All Bar Association licenses are extinguished

APOSTOLIC LETTER OF THE SUPREME PONTIFF FRANCIS
Anna addresses Cardinal George
http://scannedretina.com/2013/07/25/apostolic-letter-of-the-supreme-pontiff-francis/

APOSTOLIC LETTER OF THE SUPREME PONTIFF FRANCIS:

By order of Pope Francis:  All Bar Association licenses are extinguished.

“There will be no seizure of the American retirement accounts, no false flags, no murder, no mayhem, no scalar weapons deployed.There will be no deceptive “offers” in commerce seeking to exchange gold for land or human capital under conditions of non-disclosure and deceit.

There will be an end to this criminality and to the complacency of the Church and of the American Cardinals and Archbishops responsible for the mis-administration of the courts. Or there will be Hell on earth, Cardinal George — literally, and it will not come against the innocent Americans. The Left Hand of God will come for those who are responsible and unrepentant.

The Treaty of Verona is extinguished.

All Bar Association licenses are extinguished.

By order of Pope Francis, all attorneys, all clerks, every member of the judicial system operating these frauds and oppression became 100% individually and commercially liable as of September 1, 2013.

The banking cartels and governmental services corporations have been given three years to clean up their acts from top to bottom, to come into compliance with the Original Equity 
contract owed to the Americans, and to stop operating in criminal default.

I suggest that you get over your idea that it is the voter’s responsibility.

May God bless you to the same extent that you bless others.

Anna Maria Wilhelmina Hanna Sophia: Riezinger-von Reitzenstein von Lettow”

https://shieenalivingwater.wordpress.com/2014/07/26/letter-from-
archbishop-of-chicago-and-response/

ANYONE CAN TAKE THIS INFORMATION ANY WAY THEY WISH. THAT SAID, ONE THING IS ABUNDANTLY CLEAR, WHETHER OR NOT ONE IS AWAKENED ENOUGH TO BELIEVE THE FACTS UNDER THEIR NOSE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 4 IS A CROWN/VATICAN/SWISS BANK PROPERTY"


I am aware that Judge Grasty has been formally informed of his unlawful actions in light of public documents that he has read and rejected, based on his faulty logic and misinterpretation of the Constitution for the united States of America and with regard to the Oregon Constitution. He is aware, as the Unelected Sheriff is aware of his unlawful actions in light of public documents that he has read and rejected, that the FBI, BLM, FWS, and US Armed Forces have no Jurisdiction to take any action or claim to ownership of  anything within the geographical boundary of Oregon State.

First Open Letter To Sheriff Dave Ward

"Letter to Sheriff Ward in Oregon from judge Anna von Reitz 
01-07-2016 • judge Anna von Reitz

An Open Letter to Sheriff Ward of Harney County Oregon-and to All County Sheriffs in America from Judge Anna



Dear Sheriff Ward,

I am writing to you today to ascertain your office and position with respect to the Hammonds and the developing situation at the Bundy Ranch with respect to "Federal Officers".

My name is Anna Maria Riezinger, also known as Anna von Reitz because my actual name is German and a mile long. I am an American Common Law Superior Court Judge in Alaska where operation of the Seventh Amendment Courts started up again in conjunction with the Common Law Grand Juries more than a year ago and I also serve as a Federal Postal District Court Judge for the Western Region.

As you can clearly see by reading the Seventh Amendment all matters pertaining to living people and their property must be addressed to Common Law Courts. How then, are the Hammonds being addressed by federal admiralty courts?

The answer lies in the past.

During the Civil War the normal court system owed the people in the South shut down and did not immediately reopen. Commanders in the military districts in ten states appointed civilian tribunals to function under "Special Admiralty"----- a euphemism. For the purposes of these military tribunals, people and property could be addressed in an arbitrary fashion without regard for the Law of the Land. This was very convenient for the administrators and very unfortunate for the people.

In 1866 the Supreme Court addressed the situation in Milligan Ex Parte and decided that so long as the American Common Law Courts were running there was no excuse for the use of any form of martial law. Be advised that the American Common Law Courts are up and running.

But both the military administrators and the judges and most particularly, the Bar Associations, had a taste of arbitrary power and the bit in their teeth back then--- and a concerted effort to shut the Common Law Courts down began, so as to usurp their jurisdiction and "move the venue" of the local courts off the land and into the international jurisdiction of martial law and the sea, where power could be exerted against the people and their assets on the land in a comparatively arbitrary fashion.

By 1965 the rats had achieved their ends and almost all Common Law Courts in America were either shut down or functioning with only two offices--- justice of the peace and notary publics.

This allowed the members of the Bar Associations to impose admiralty law on the people and to avoid the guarantees of The Constitution. The use of "Special Admiralty" in a courtroom is signified by the heavy gold fringe on the flag.

A word here about the Bar Associations and some facts about the ABA that deserve to be far more widely known, also some information about the current Court System that you probably don't know:

The American Bar Association is an offshoot of the London Lawyer's Guild, an avowed Communist organization. The American Bar Association and the IRS are both owned and operated by Northern Trust, Inc. They are private, foreign debt collection agencies, not units of government, not "professional associations", and certainly not "non-profit organizations". As an organization representing a foreign (British) government, the Bar Associations are only allowed to function here via a Treaty (the last one in 1947) that they have abundantly violated. Their members are required to present Foreign Agent Statements as part of their credentials in open court, which they hardly ever do.

As a result of their misdeeds and usurpation against the Law of the Land and the people and their violations of both their corporate charter and their Treaty, a commercial obligation lien of $279 trillion dollars has been assessed against the American Bar Association, the International Bar Association, and the "US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE"----which, it turns out, is just another private subcontractor performing "governmental services" and doing a criminally bad job of it.

The "US District Courts" are also private for-hire subcontractors that run all the related courts in their districts. Please see Title 28, Sections 80 to 131. All these "State" Courts and "County" Courts are being run as franchises of the "US District Court"---and they are all private corporate institutions having no public office or function at all, and being related to the actual state and county only insomuch as they are operating within the geographical boundaries of a state and a county. This can be readily proven by looking up the Dun and Bradstreet Numbers, CAGE numbers, and corporate filings of these organizations. And, as was recently demonstrated by the Lufkin Case in Texas, neither the "US District Court" nor its "State" and "County" affiliates have any authority to collect debts outside the ten square miles of the District of Columbia.

We should also clear up another misunderstanding. Back in 1864, the "United States Congress" acting as a Board of Directors for The United States of America, Inc., changed the meaning of several words by executive fiat, without telling the rest of us. For their purposes and from June 30, 1864 onward, the words "state" and "State" and "United States" are code for "District of Columbia Municipal Corporation". Thus, instead of "US District Court" you should be reading "District of Columbia Municipal Corporation District Court" and the "Idaho State Supreme Court" for example, should be read as "Idaho District of Columbia Municipal Corporation Supreme Court".

Are you beginning to feel as if you have landed in the Land of Oz?

Yes, all this means that until you make some important decisions, you aren't working for the people of your county as an elected public peace officer. You are working as an employee of a federal corporation franchise in a private capacity. Your election is being "interpreted" as an election to an office in a private corporation. You are presently acting as a mall cop. You have no public office, no public bond, and no public oath. If you are like most members of the "law enforcement community" you are not even licensed or bonded or insured in a private capacity by your cheapskate employers. You are working for The Man, not the people.

And all this got off track 150 years ago.

So all those "federal agents" who are harassing the Hammonds and who are offering to arrest them and transport them to a private prison facility? They are private corporate employees of a franchise or subcontractor of the District of Columbia Municipal Corporation having no more authority than a floorwalker at JC PENNY, despite their pretensions otherwise. They are misinformed as to their authority and also misinformed regarding the identity of the Hammonds. These "federal agents" are literally foreign with respect to the Hammonds and have no jurisdiction related to them at all.

As part of the overall outrageous circumstance and fraud scheme the members of the American Bar Association have also contrived to change the citizenship of American State Citizens---- people born on the land of the Continental United States like the Hammonds have been "kidnapped on paper" and their civil records have been falsified--- which is in violation of international law, the Law of War, and the United Nation's Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which both the Federal United States and the British Government have signed.

An examination of the paperwork will reveal that virtually every single American State Citizen has been deemed a "foundling" and ward of the state, the unwanted child of an unwed mother---- almost 400 million of us, and not a Daddy to be found? This is the result of a systematic and repugnant scheme by international commercial banks and the ABA, and again, all serving to change the natural venue on the land to a court venue in the international jurisdiction of the sea.

The fact is that although human slavery has been outlawed worldwide since 1926, it is not against the law to enslave a corporation.

So what have the criminals among us contrived to do? To "redefine" living people as corporations---- specifically as foreign situs trusts doing business under names styled like this: John Quincy Adams, and ESTATE trusts operating under names styled like this: JOHN QUINCY ADAMS, and now, most recently, Puerto Rican public transmitting utilities styled like this: JOHN Q. ADAMS.

Look at the paperwork in your hands seemingly addressed to the Hammonds. Depending on the style used to write their names, you can tell whether the documents are addressed to foreign situs trusts owned and operated by the "State of Oregon, Inc." , a Cestui Que Vie Estate Trust owned and operated by the "STATE OF OREGON, INC." or a public transmitting utility owned and operated by "OREGON"---- a franchise of the UN Corporation.

Please bear in mind that these "legal fiction entities" were created without the Hammond's knowledge or permission and they are completely, 100%, the responsibility of those who created them. If the HAMMONDS referenced are ESTATE trusts belonging to the "STATE OF OREGON" it is high time for someone who is responsible for the "STATE OF OREGON" to pay any debts related to the franchise without delay----and without bothering the living people these franchises are named after.

It also behooves them to leave the living people and their property strictly alone and forego any pretense that the living Americans known as the Hammonds have knowingly or willingly agreed to act as Federal United States Citizens or have any agreed upon responsibility to act as "co-trustees" of the Public Charitable Trust, which they most likely don't make use of and don't even know that it exists.

Bottom line--- these "courts" and their presentments and "orders" have nothing whatsoever to do with the Hammonds as living people, nor their actual physical property assets at all. They have to do with the mis-administration of public trusts and "legal persons" operated by private, mostly foreign-owned corporations which are attempting to entrap and enslave Americans and lay false claims against their property via probate fraud, identity theft, and coercion.

This is the kind of criminality and fraud we are dealing with, Sheriff Ward, and at the end of the day, the pedal hits the metal in your office.

The British Government contrived the means to "press gang" the "land assets"--- living people and their property assets--- of America into the jurisdiction of the sea during the Second World War. They enslaved us and our property assets under false pretenses and via the use of legal chicanery "for the war effort" --- and after the war, they simply continued on with these abuses.

You have a choice.

You can continue to operate as a good little debt slave of the Queen acting on "automatic" and taking orders regardless of where those orders come from----- that is, you can act as a corporate mall cop in a private capacity and take your licks when the people catch up with you, or you can honor the truth---- that the people of your county elected you in Good Faith, with the understanding that you would enforce the guarantees of The Constitution owed to them and faithfully impose the land jurisdiction of the united States of America on any British agents who put a tentacle outside their actual jurisdiction.

As a Sheriff duly elected by the people of your county and operating the land jurisdiction owed to the Continental United States you have the authority to take your lawful Oath of Office, obtain a bond for your own security, and deputize as many men as you require to restrict the "federal agents" to their actual capacity. It is your duty to inform these foreign agents that the living people known as the Hammonds do not "reside" in any "federal territory" nor act in any capacity subject to the District of Columbia Municipal Corporation. You also have the right to collect Bounty from the Secretary of State and the US District Court under the terms of the 14th Amendment to cover any costs you incurr as a result of having to deal with these improper demands and false claims made by their agents.

If these "federal agents" persist, you have the authority to address the "US District Court" responsible and request their removal from your county. If they still won't behave and honor The Constitution and the actual limits of their own jurisdiction, you have the right and responsibility to arrest the whole kit and caboodle, just as you would arrest the keepers of a tavern operating outside the Public Law.

You also have the right and responsibility to inform the "US District Court" and their franchise affiliates operating the "State" and "County" Courts that the American Common Law Courts and Grand Juries are in operation again and any use of martial law including "Special Admiralty" is no longer excusable.

Acting as an elected Officer of the American Common Law Court indigenous to your county, along with the justices of the peace and the notary public, it is your duty to convene the Common Law Grand Jury chosen at random from among the landowners of your county to investigate crimes, including this one against the Hammonds, and to convene a Common Law Trial Jury if necessary before the Justice of the Peace, to decide any and all matters affecting the living people and actual property assets of the county on the land. If there is no one able and willing to serve as Justice of the Peace in your County, a Justice of the Peace may be appointed by any Federal Postal District Judge in your region. Contact me if you need help.

Please also know that as the Sheriff duly elected by the people of your county you have the authority and responsibility to demand the return of any American State Citizen being held in "federal custody" for a non-capital crime (murder or assault with a deadly weapon) within 72 hours of their arrest. So if the "federal agents" make the mistake of arresting the Hammonds under false pretenses and holding them in a private capacity, it is your right and role to present a Public Custody Order to the "US District" or other court responsible demanding that the Hammonds be released to your custody. You may then use your own discretion whether to keep them in custody or release them on parole pending final resolution of the jurisdictional complaint.

These are matters that affect millions of people and they must be addressed openly and with determination. The British Monarch has acted in Breach of Trust against the Americans, Canadians, Australians, and others. This criminality and the resulting surreptitious use of the Americium Bar Association members as licensed privateers operating on our shores is a serious international crime which is being addressed.

The misrepresentations of Americans as "foundlings" and "bastards" resulting in them being declared wards of the corporate "state" and further misrepresentations leading to them being declared "legally dead" are criminal acts of self-interested fraud carried out against us by avowed "allies" and "friends in perpetuity"-- parties who are bound by the most solemn obligations of international trust and treaty, who have abused America and Americans for their own profit.

This same pattern of lying about us and making false claims against us and seeking to "re-venue" us to foreign jurisdictions has also been attempted against our federation of nation-states as a whole. Two weeks ago, international banks and governmental services corporations in their employ appeared before the UN Trust Committee---North America, and claimed that the States of America no longer exist. They claimed among other things that we no longer have a national currency in circulation. They claimed that all 400 million Americans had voluntarily accepted Federal United States Citizenship. They claimed that our country is "civilly dead" and "depopulated" and that there are no American State Citizens.

This was, of course, done behind our backs by people representing secondary creditors of defunct federal "governmental services corporations" claiming to be the beneficiaries and/or creditors of our estates. It's time to set the records straight and for us to act in our naked sovereign capacity.

A Declaration of Joint Sovereignty was issued by lawful heirs of the National Trust(s), together with Sovereign Letters Patent in behalf of the United Colonies of America, the united States of America, and the Native American Nations and delivered to the UN Trust Committee--North America and to the UN Security Council, the Pope, the Queen, Ban Ki Moon, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Bank of International Settlements.

The criminals responsible for this circumstance are being recognized for who and what they are and the die is cast. We are going to get down to the bottom of this fraud and misrepresentation once and for all.

If you wish to be called "Sheriff" of a county in America, you must now step up and earn the title and begin operating the land jurisdiction owed to the Continental United States. You are under moral and lawful obligation to protect the Hammonds against any "federal agent" and to fully inform those agents of the limitations of their jurisdiction while standing on our soil. If there is no American Common Law Court presently operating in your county, it is your duty to organize one without further delay. In most counties there are active Justices of the Peace who still perform private marriage ceremonies and public notaries are still active. You may draft your Grand Jury and if needed, Trial Juries, from among the landowners listed in the county land records. All actions of the actual County Court should be stamped in red and signed in black. All actions by admiralty courts ---by whatever name they operate under---are stamped in blue.

Sincerely,

Judge Anna Maria Riezinger"




Second Public Letter to Sheriff Dave Ward

"Dear Sheriff Ward,

I have already sent you and the other "federal law enforcement agents" one letter. I did not expect to have to send you two.

There are two kinds of people in this country according to the Definitive Treaty of Peace known as the Treaty of Paris, 1783, Article III and they are-- "the free sovereign and independent people of the United States" and the "inhabitants"-- British Loyalists and subjects of the British Crown who were allowed to stay here after the Revolutionary War.

These are political statuses and as the Expatriation Act explains, the government is forbidden from interfering with our choice in the matter.

This was more recently reiterated by the Geneva Protocols of 1949, Laws of War, Volume II, Article 3 forbids tampering with anyone's political status-- and it is a capital offense war crime if you do.

The Hammonds and the Bundys have all made their political status choice very clear. They are members of the "free sovereign and independent people of the United States." They have self-declared their status and have given you Notice of the same and it is not within the powers of your office to alter this decision or offer to interpret anything about it.

You and all your misinformed buddies owe the Hammonds and the Bundys "essential governmental services" under Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2. And a HUGE apology.

Those "services" do not include armed extortion, trespass on their private property, or any false claims or presumption of any ownership interest in them, their land, or their other assets.

Cattle rustling, as you and your friends need to be reminded, is a capital CRIME in the western states and if you boys get out of line, these ranchers are well within their rights to invoke the Public Law and hang you all from the nearest trees.

Somewhere in the back of your mind, you know that. Are you clear on this point, Sheriff Ward? Do you know the difference between Public Law and corporate codes, statutes, or regulations that apply ONLY to corporations and government agents?

Judge Anna Maria Riezinger"

Source Material:

https://jhaines6a.wordpress.com/2016/01/21/blmoregon-judge-grastys-brother-a-blm-agent-and-scandals-of-the-blm/