But, WAIT A MINUTE... less than ten percent of the precincts had been reported when she reported. and less than 30 percent have been reported as I write. An interesting video:
The Texas primary like many other primaries does not pick delegates until the delegate's convention is held and that occurs after the Primary. The delegates are assigned in regard to the proportion of the popular votes cast during the primary, which has not yet been counted. The delegates then hold a state convention to vote for the delegates to attend the Republican National Convention in Tampa, FL The delegates will then cast their votes at the convention for the candidate who will represent the party in the Presidential election in November. However, the delegates are not bound by the first vote rule or any other rule. Reference US Code and Republican Party Rule 38:
Summary: It is Unlawful to use intimidation, threats, or coercion for the purpose of interfering with the right of a person to vote as he may choose as a delegate for the selection of a candidate for the office of President. -
No delegate shall be bound by any attempt of any state or congressional district to impose the unit rule.
Any Delegate can vote for Ron Paul or any other candidate running for the Republican nominee for president. Any Delegate can vote for whomever, on the First Ballot at the delegates' convention to be held in Florida which has yet to happen! NO PERSON HAS EVER BEEN DISQUALIFIED FOR NOT VOTING with the "UNIT" EVER!
Once again, the ditsy blond seems to have gotten just about every single fact wrong and incorrect and then declared something-or-other based on poor reasoning skills. Way to Go, ABC!
Due to voter fraud all across the Great Lone StarReplyDelete
State by the RNC and Romney Campaign Operatives, Dr. Ron Paul has now won the state primary
and holds the delegates with a 5 to 1 lead.
Fraud confirmed in Texas. Election judge says votes were switched.ReplyDelete
by Dr.K. Research on Mon, 06/11/2012, 13:29, in Daily Paul Liberty Forum
Note: this was first revealed by an alert DP'er, who posted this blog post: http://annebeck58.wordpress.com/2012/05/
Could Ron Paul have gotten 72% of the vote
instead of 12%? Anne Beckett, election judge
for Austin (Travis County), says it is so.
In fact, she did an entrance poll of
Republican voters for their party preference
and says that a minimum of 66% offered on
their own that they came to vote for Dr. Ron
Paul. As she polled them she wrote a line on
her hand, then, counted the total voters.
A minimum of 66% and as high as 72% of all
the votes went for Paul, NOT Romney (she
wishes to be conservative, but says that
at the bare minimum 66%, not 12%, of the
votes went to Paul).
For credibility it is important to note
that she took a complete poll and was there
from 6:00 a.m. until closing (12 hours).
The precinct she judged was 247-R.
Here are the 'acclaimed' numbers from
the election board:
Scroll down to pg. 456. The results she is
disputing are as follows:
Live voters, May 29
Mitt Romney: 72
Ron Paul: 15
Early voting (absentee ballots)
Mitt Romney: 41
Ron Paul: 4
Don’t feel depressed about all that has happened.
We have been severely cheated. Apparently, in
this case the real numbers in the live voting
are 72 or more for Paul and 15 or less for Romney.
Ms. Beckett states categorically that these
numbers are false. In her words, it’s “completely
UPDATE: She has noted another anomaly. There
were over 155 Republican votes in her precinct,
not 87, as listed above. One wonders how many
other times were the number of Paul votes in
Texas precincts simply purged by these vile
computerized voting machines.
The judge has filed an affidavit with ElectionFraudRemedy.com.
Tune in to this epic show. Dr. K. will interview
Ms. Beckett about her findings and will discuss
the full strategy going forward for proving the
fraud in other counties and states.
See also: http://www.dailypaul.com/238805/we-
Note: here are all the charts by our mathematicians
on vote flipping: https://www.sugarsync.com/share/bzvpf3dyq5hre
BIG UPDATE: this Travis County chart is a must see,
which confirms Ms. Beckett's findings -
Note how Dr. Paul starts out at a higher vote count
level than Romney, only to be suppressed with
increasing vote counting.
Previous update: See also this powerful analysis by
one of our top experts in Riverside, County, CA, also breaking news:
Since "Sapper Gloves" Romney lost the popular vote in The
Great State of Texas, because of voting machine tampering
and other illegal acts of vote fraud, and since The Great
State of Texas is an all or nothing (regarding delegates)
Doesn't that mean the candidate who won now has all the
delegates for The Great State of Texas? Because the major
media continues to report that "Sapper Gloves" Romney has
won many states-when he didn't, Romney's delegate count is really down around 250 somewhere. The only thing that
"Sapper Gloves" Romney has won is a solid reputation for
vote fraud and RomneyCare (on which ObamaCare is based).
What a looser this liar Romney is!
Dr. Ron Paul has those delegates!