Trump Leading 67% to Hillary’s 19% in National Poll of 50,000 Voters

For the enlightenment of the Esteemed Fix America readers:  This poll was conducted back in August and most of the 'media' polls still show Hillary Clinton with a slight lead. If the graduate students polls reflect a more accurate portrayal of the voters, then Trump's true lead can only have widened due to all of the reports regarding all of the investigations surrounding Hillary Clinton's wrongdoings and what was revealed in the emails recovered from pedophile Anthony Weiner's laptop. 

"The Constitution
   AUGUST 19, 2016



Columns
Trump Leading 67% to Hillary’s 19% in National Poll of 50,000 Voters
 By Dave Jolly  August 12, 2016



Ever since the Democratic Convention, the only poll results being reported by the liberal mainstream media show that Hillary Clinton is slowly pulling ahead of Donald Trump. Of course the same liberal mainstream media had been conducting a biased editing and reporting campaign to show Trump in a bad way and glorify Hillary.

They edited his comments about the Muslim parents of whose son was killed in action while serving in the US military. Trump stated about the mom not speaking, the liberal media intentionally edited out when Trump stated that that’s what others have written. They made it to look like those were Trump’s own words.

Now all of the controversy surrounding the way liberals have twisted Trump’s comment about people who value the Second Amendment. Hillary and even the Kennedy family have twisted it in such a way as declare Trump is inciting violence in some form. However, none of the same liberal media, nor Clinton nor the Kennedy family mention the fact that Hillary once stated that Obama could be assassinated.

The sad part is that so many people today believe everything they hear and see from the liberal mainstream media. They take the reports as gospel.

Did you know that in most of the polls, where they are reporting a Clinton lead, are conducted in such a way as to bias the outcome? Often, they only poll 100 up to 1,000 people. Not only are their sample sizes statistically small, but they often poll areas that are known to be predominately Democratic, hence, it only makes sense that Hillary is ahead.

But you probably have not heard about one poll that was recently taken where they polled 1,000 people from every state. Yep, 50,000 people were polled. They intentionally called 33% Republicans, 33% Democrats and 34% Independents and the results were so astonishing that none of the national liberal media have dared to report it.

The poll  was conducted by a group of graduate students and we first noticed it at the Arizona Freedom Alliance. According to their post:

” We’ve been telling you the difference between a media poll and an internal poll.  
Media polls are driven by the desire to achieve a certain outcome.  That is why you 
think Hillary is leading Trump by 10 points.  If you were paying attention, one of these polls had Hillary up by 15 points before the GOP convention.  After the convention, Trump was up 15 points, a 30% jump!  Statistically impossible.  After the democrat convention, Hillary was up 10 points, a 25% swing.  Again, can’t happen.  The media is jerking our chain.  DO NOT believe them.  The only polls that can be believed are internal polls that are rarely made public.  While the poll below is not an internal poll, it was done in a most interesting manner – with no perceived bias.  And it is HUGE!”

“And by the way, it nearly mirrors what internal polls are showing.  By any accurate 
measure, Hillary is NOT leading Trump in the minds of the voters.”

‘We have just completed our own poll since we cannot get factual information from the 
mainstream media!! We called 1000 homes in each of the 50 states and asked basic 
questions on the economy, terrorism, immigration and presidential pick.”

“Economy was the number one factor that Americans are concerned about  terrorism was number two.
Presidential pick was Trump by a large percentage.
Trump 33478 votes 67%
Clinton 9788 Votes 19%
Undecided or other 6739 votes 13%”

“My friends and I are all Graduate students from all walks of life.  We meet to discuss 
stuff… 13 people who like and have served in the Military. It took us most of two weeks 
to be sure our calls were to all people and not just one party or another.  We called Americans.. our poll is by taking registered voter lists and we accumulated 33% repub, 33% dems and 34% ind.. our poll consisted of 1000 calls per state. all 50 states. 50,000 
people are in this poll not the 100 like other polls.”

“Please everyone copy and paste to your status so everyone knows that the other polls 
are rigged!”

Can you imagine if word got out about the results of this poll, which was conducted with 
a 50 to 500 times larger sample size than most of the national polls and was conducted 
equally among Republicans, Democrats and Independents.

They have asked that everyone share their results so please do. Let America and mainstream 
liberal media, and especially Hillary Clinton know that Trump has a HUGE lead over her in 
one of the largest independent polls conducted. Let’s blow the liberals out of the water."

Original Source:   http://constitution.com/trump-leading-67-hillarys-19-national-poll-50000-voters/

Former Hillary Associate Claims to Have Been Her Personal Hit Man

In light of all the talk about Hillary Clinton for President, her "At this point what difference does it make?" reaction to a Congressional inquiry into Benghazi, it seemed appropriate to bring this story to the Esteemed Readers of Fix America.

"Like many Americans I have been glued to the Pete Santilli show today in an attempt to keep up to date with any updates on the truckers. That show is streaming live at www.ridefortheconstitution.org as I write this.
There are bombshells being dropped on that show that go far beyond a trucker’s strike.

The story the listeners are getting is that Larry Klayman was prepared to go on Neil Cavuto’s show tonight and show pictures of National Guard troops that have been assembled to squash the uprising, should it get out of hand. But it is also being reported that Fox News pulled the interview. Why?
>Was the Fox interview pulled because Klayman wanted to talk about some other issues as well, including a gentleman named Larry Nichols, who was a longtime associate of Bill and Hillary Clinton? The accusation is that Fox News does not want to share this story and only wants reports of the alleged National Guard troops in D.C .

Guerilla Media Network reported on September 24, 2013:

Clinton Insider Admits To Murder For Hire Claiming He Did It For The Money

Larry Nichols, former 10 year accomplice to the Clintons, can now add hit-man to his list of dirty deeds.  Nichols dropped a bombshell on The Pete Santilli Show when he very calmly admitted that he had murdered people, on command, for Bill and Hillary Clinton.  Mr. Nichols has been a voice crying out in the wilderness since he brought to light the sexual brutality of Bill Clinton during his reign as Governor in Arkansas. That information would eventually play a key role to Clinton’s impeachment in the 90′s.  Larry says he makes no apologies.

They sent me overseas to kill people for them and told me it was for the good of the Country. So when they asked me to do it for them in the States it felt no different. The real truth is, I did it for the money and I didn’t give a shit about the women I beat and the men I murdered.  The Clintons are bad people and I did bad things for them.  I had to live with that all of these years and now I just don’t care anymore who knows it.

Larry maintains the Clintons were into so many illegal activities at the time, they had to have a team of mercenaries made up of friends and state-troopers to cover it all up and keep them protected from the public finding out.  According to Larry Nichols, both Bill and Hillary were wild and out of control and both were relentless in their pursuit for money and power.  From running drugs, to the rape and beating of women and young girls, both of the Clintons are guilty of the unspeakable crimes.

When Pete asked Larry about Gennifer Flowers making headlines last week claiming Bill had told her Hillary had eaten more pussy than he had Larry said that’s old news, and indeed it is … Larry had made that same statement on the Pete Santilli show early last spring.  Larry is adamant that Hillary Clinton is a “Dyke” and always has been.

One thing I know for sure She did have enough sex with men to have a kid, but it wasn’t Bill Clinton’s Kid she had … Chelsea is actually the daughter of Web Hubble.

Nichols and many other insiders claim Clinton began having sex with Hubble to gain employment at The Rose Law Firm which she believed would eventually advance Bill Clinton’s chances of becoming Governor of Arkansas.

The above quotes came from a radio interview. I have obtained a video that is posted on the same page. It is 4 hours long and I have not had time to isolate the comments so I have no idea what segment of the show contains them. I am posting the video for those who might have time to listen to it.

WARNING: Some content in the video may be offensive to some in this audience. Pick up the video around the 1Hr 09Min mark."

Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/10/former-hillary-associate-claims-personal-hit-man-admits-killing-money/#EufWgqUApwMSZS9q.99

http://www.dcclothesline.com/2013/10/14/bombshell-long-time-clinton-associate-says-killed-people-bill-hillary/

A Fork in the Road

Yes, we have reached a fork in the road as a nation. We have a choice to make that will determine whether or not we really cherish liberty or want to become like every other nation that fell under the yoke of socialist slavery.

We already are questioning the validity of our Constitution in view of world governance, and have not been vigilant of the runaway usurpation by those we chose by election to represent and protect us. Slowly over the decades, our servants have become our leaders and they are leading us off of the path of liberty and onto the road to serfdom.

Even what we eat and drink has become a subject of sociopolitical concern of those who we asked to protect us from a government that steps beyond its constitutional boundaries, and into the private lives of the American People.

What are we to think of a government that uses the same propaganda to scare and disarm its citizens as every dictator and tyrannical government has since recorded history? Are we to believe that it will be different this time? Why? If humans were better today than they were during the Inquisition and more civilized, we wouldn’t be discussing gun control at all. But the issue is what to do to protect ourselves without giving up our liberty in the process. And the truth is there is proof that no matter how well intentioned such laws were when enacted, the result has always been the murder or innocent civilians.

Our military is the most advanced on the planet, more than capable of protecting all of the United States from border to border and sea to shining sea from any enemies. But why are we paying them to protect other nations and corporate interests? If they were all brought home to defend  America, we would not have the need for the excessive military spending we have now.  And with a smaller military force that is backed up at home by the very capable and well armed citizens, less taxes need to be levied on the businesses and work force in America.

Some will say that we live in a more dangerous world today than even that of fifty years ago. That is all the more reason for the people to be well armed and trained in protecting themselves. How many planes would have been taken by terrorists if all those brave Americans were armed? Even a Sky Marshall or a few on a plane will be targets to take out before taking over the cockpit or crew.

I am saddened by these school killings, and I am appalled that those in positions to do the most good have instead continued to play a dangerous game of politicking which only serves to embolden criminals and place more good people in harm’s way. I will not however be willing to give up any rights for the illusion of security. Not once in human history has the banning of weapons benefited the people at large. Not once.

So here we are, looking at spiraling debt and out of control government spending, as the government looks for more ways to restrict the rights of its citizens as it taxes them into poverty. We have reached a fork in the road and if we take the path to the right, we may have the means to restore the Republic and our natural liberties and rights. Or we can continue to allow 534 people in Washington to continue to ruin our nation while they continue to enact laws designed to take more of our rights and our property.

Still think it’s about Democrats and Republicans?

The Blame Game: GOP Takes Their Turn

Before the final totals were in, the sore losing Republican Party was already blaming Ron Paul supporters for their loss. Having cheated Dr. Paul out of the nomination by every devious method possible, having denied him the opportunity to be a keynote speaker at the Republican National Convention in Tampa, they had the audacity and gall to ask Ron Paul supporters to throw themselves under the Romney bus.

Just as they accused Barack Obama for blaming all of his problems on George W. Bush, the GOP is taking the same path of blaming others for their own blunders. When Tea Party endorsed running mate Paul Ryan promised fiscal responsibility and no debt ceiling increase, he reneged and voted for it anyway. At least he was as consistent a flip-flopping liar as Romney.

Early on during the debates, Rush Limbaugh mentioned that to win the Presidency, the candidates had to sway the 30% of independent and non-partisan voters. In other words, the majority of  the Tea Party folks. I can't see how they would back Romney/Ryan after the double-crossing Ryan gave them. These are Americans who are not lock stepping with any party agenda. These are the young and educated voters, who know better than to by the propaganda slime of the privately-owned major media.

So who will the Republican Party choose as it's next victim? More relevant is the question, "When will American voters realize that the two party system is an illusion and that it never represents the interests of  the People? Will it happen before the collapse of the USA or will this nation struggle and endure another four years of constitutional deterioration and fiscal irresponsibility?

Will more States nullify the Affordable Patient Protection Act and stand by their own legalization of cannabis in the face of federal threats? Or will they capitulate in fear of losing federal funding for their local law enforcement budgets?

And who will they blame when foreign troops under the United Nations flag begin to deploy on American soil to quash "civil unrest" and maintain order when the people begin to rebel against the tyranny that has become the federal government?

Resistance is Futile: Assimilate or Annihilate

History shows that no matter how bitter the battle and how costly the victory, the public will soon forget and feel they can once again trust others to protect them.

That happened with the victors of the Revolutionary War as the general public relaxed and allowed others to deal with the protection of the new Republic. They soon forgot how important it was to their own liberty to be wary and remain vigilant. There are always those who attempt to subvert the will of the people through deceit and force.

The entire chronology of the events that leads up to the present will be too lengthy to display in a blog article. However it does demonstrate the steps that were taken to slowly take control of the nation and the methods employed were devious.

Controlling the People’s money was the primary goal employed. The failed Aldrich Bill was later reintroduced as the Federal Reserve Act, and the public was duped into believing in was the cure for economic collapse. Reality has demonstrated the contrary in that it is the cause and not the cure.

Getting the individual States to lose the Senatorial selection played a major part in defeating the Republic. The 17^th Amendment needs to be repeals so that there is a more equitable balance of power in the Congress.

Of course that alone will not restore liberty to the States and the People respectively, but it will serve to repair the foundation of federal government that become shaky when the amendment was ratified. Some question the validity of that ratification, and I mention it here so my readers may further research and determine the veracity of it for themselves.

The education of the young was another part of society that became a “responsibility” of the federal government through the effective lobby of the corporate leaders in America, why felt by controlling what was taught and how student were “supposed” to think, it would benefit the corporate need for disciplined workers. By further standardizing education into primary and secondary, and then post-secondary further segregated from the former two, they made that college and University education expensive so that the average worker could not afford it for themselves or their children. It was an effective process to separate People into “classes.”

The premise of “life, liberty and property” became “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” where happiness became synonymous with having two weeks vacation after all the living expenses were paid, and the assumption of property ownership was unlawfully replaced with deeds issued by the corporate state. Think you “own” your house? Try refusing to pay property taxes and see how long you remain in possession of it. It is the State’s property so long as you pay your lease fees which are called property taxes.

Motor vehicles are not owned by the People, they are registered to the lessee, and the lessee pays fees to register said vehicle in their name as the responsible party.

Instead of protecting the religious rights of the People, the modern interpretation of the Constitution fools the People into thinking that banning any religious displays in public is protection. Under the guise of not wanting to offend others with contrary beliefs the rights to religious expression are thereby suppressed. That is unless of course, the religion happens to be Muslim and the political environment wants to appear tolerant by becoming intolerant to expression of all other faiths. It is this very thing that the Constitution was to prevent.

People step up and dare to challenge the system of delusion only to be beat back with anger, arrest, harassment, and ridicule. No suppression or retribution is unwarranted when the government and its puppet masters need to quell the uprising against them.

So we are left with this:

Obey the government no matter what they tell you or become a dissenter, an insurgent, a rebel, a terrorist. Regardless of how you feel, the government will choose what category you fall into based on the level of your resistance to slavery. They will determine whether you can be interred and “re-educated” or if you are threat to society because you cannot be reprogrammed, and therefore must be eliminated from being a disruptive influence on others.

American Revolution in the 21st Century

Republicans are busy defending their position and their candidate Mitt Romney. Democrats are telling us that Barack Obama needs four more years to complete his change in America. Even Libertarians are thumping their candidate Gary Johnson as the alternative to the other two.

While the division of the American people continue, Ron Paul supporters are being “warned” that a vote for Dr. Paul will assure four more years of Obama. In my blog post entitled, “Obama Issues Kill Order on Ron Paul” I explained how the administration and their minions were pushing for a Romney challenge, because they know that America will not support him. The privately-owned major media supported the administration by limiting coverage of Ron Paul, and even the debates limited his air time.

We are no longer free to choose our own candidate for office, as the party apparatus controls the rules of elections and the selection of candidates. You and I have no real choice unless we stand up to these thieves and force open and honest elections. This is not a popularity contest; this is a matter of restoration of constitutional government and returning to sound money and fiscal responsibility.

To accomplish this task we must assure that our elections are without fraud. In Protecting the Vote I explained how this can be done. We must have paper ballots, authentication of valid voters, an honest count of ballots, and a clear audit trail in case of any challenges.

It is a proven fact that the current occupier of the White House has no regard at all for the Constitution or the rule of law. With the appointing of “czars” he has eliminated the powers of the legislative branch of government and through his admonishments and threats, forced the judicial branch to rule that the Affordable Patient Protection Act, a.k.a. Obamacare is a tax and therefore constitutional.

Romney has supported the Patriot Act, NDAA, the Federal Reserve, and war against Iran. He even wants to start an economic war with China. His choices for a cabinet are as frightening to liberty as the Obama Czars. See: the blog post Bigger Sharper Teeth or Romney's Dirty Dozen.

There are very little freedoms left to the American people. If we do not elect a President who will follow the Constitution and a Congress that will have the courage to repeal all of the laws that have made that Constitution powerless, we will no longer have a sovereign nation and we will surely be slaves to the global elite that has been successfully destroying the United States over many decades.

This is the time where America must put aside its ideological and political differences and unite for liberty. This is the only chance we have to revolt against this usurpation of the rule of law. There is no other way out now.

Where Were They During the Primaries?

It really galls me to listen to all of these GOP Senators and Representatives praise Ron Paul after the fact. Where were they when he was campaigning against Romney? They were calling him a crazy isolationist, with dangerous foreign policy. They and the mainstream media locked him out of every debate when they could. FOX News's Carl Cameron had the audacity to ask Dr. Paul if he was electable during that network's debate.

The Republican Party lied and cheated in each of the primaries to prevent Ron Paul delegates from being recognized at the convention. Changing the rules illegally to extort the delegate support required to insure their favorite son gets the nomination. The sad truth is Obama will beat Romney as he did with McCain in 2008, because Romney isn't even a third-rate candidate.

Now look at how many of the GOP praise Ron Paul. After he was demonized by the privately-owned major media and his own party.



If Ron Paul will endorse the Libertarian Party candidate, Gary Johnson, I will support and vote for him. But if not, I will vote my conscience and write in Ron Paul as my President. This is not merely about removing Obama and the Democrats, it is ending the domination of elections by the two corrupted parties.

Instead of playing by party rules it's time they played by OUR rules. We the People are the government and We are coming to take back our nation!

Sawyer Adrift On A River of Lies

ABC's Diane Sawyer has relayed the triumphant victory of the Texas Primary for Republican darling Willard Mittington Romney as having more than the required number of delegates to catapult that dead weight to be the nominated republican candidate for president.

But, WAIT A MINUTE... less than ten percent of the precincts had been reported when she reported. and less than 30 percent have been reported as I write.  An interesting video:

The Texas primary like many other primaries does not pick delegates until the delegate's convention is held and that occurs after the Primary. The delegates are assigned in regard to the proportion of the popular votes cast during the primary, which has not yet been counted. The delegates  then hold a state convention to vote for the delegates to attend the Republican National  Convention in Tampa, FL  The delegates will then cast their votes at the convention for the candidate who will represent the party in the Presidential election in November. However, the delegates are not bound by the first vote rule or any other rule. Reference US Code and Republican Party Rule 38:

42 USC § 1971 - Voting Rights

Summary: It is Unlawful to use intimidation, threats, or coercion for the purpose of interfering with the right of a person to vote as he may choose as a delegate for the selection of a candidate for the office of President. -

Rule 38: The Republican Party

No delegate shall be bound by any attempt of any state or congressional district to impose the unit rule. 

Any Delegate can vote for Ron Paul or any other candidate running for the Republican nominee for president. Any Delegate can vote for whomever, on the First Ballot at the delegates' convention to be held in Florida which has yet to happen! NO PERSON HAS EVER BEEN DISQUALIFIED FOR NOT VOTING with the "UNIT" EVER!

Once again, the ditsy blond seems to have gotten just about every single fact wrong and incorrect and then declared something-or-other based on poor reasoning skills. Way to Go, ABC!

GOP Chairman Should be Allowed Time to Think

After carefully reading the reports regarding Charlie Webster's (GOP Chairman for Maine), account of the Maine recount effort, It has become painfully obvious the totals don't add up. As a matter of fact, once again various towns vote totals have been left out of the total count. This, according to the chairman, was due to the impossibility of any kind of communications being possible with various towns to find out what totals they might have to report.

It should also be noted that several caucus polling locations in which small numbers of voters (7 to 20 people) cast their ballots... astonishingly picked up more voters (5 to 10 people) that had not been counted and reported in the first official totals, which left out totals from various counties and towns. It can only be understood that any improprieties the RNC may have directed Charlie Webster to accomplish are nothing more than suspected vote fraud on a massive state wide scale. Especially considering all of the votes cast by those extra voters that totaled more than the original total number of voters that were casting ballots the first time were cast for Mitt Romney.

The RNC should be very happy, even though various towns were not included in the recount at all, that Charlie Webster, GOP Chairman, did his very best. The RNC should not be worried about any suspected vote fraud having been accomplished. The aftermath is clear, according to Charlie Webster, GOP Chairman, all the ballots were not counted except those amazing extra ones and a county or two.

The people that oversaw this poorly orchestrated affair and made sure that everything turned out just right should be allowed time to think about the entire debacle, where they belong, in prison.

Who Would Have More Votes?

Headlines tell the stories of the recent rash of vote fraud being perpetrated on the nation.  2010 was a busy year for prosecutors dealing with vote fraud issues, and 2012 is shaping-up nicely to be a record year for indictments and convictions.

It has now been reported and in a very clear fashion that the caucuses in Iowa, New Hampshire, Maine, Nevada, were all severely compromised not only in regard to fraudulent voter registration, fraudulent street lists, and individual voters registered and reported as voting in two or more States, but violations of caucus rules, fraudulent counting tallies, fraudulent tallied numbers reporting, and in addition to to those problems, unreported and uncounted county or district tallies, missing district ballots, etc. The list of violations and types of fraud continues growing as information is collected. Virginia authorities have identified the Gingrich campaign of fraudulent registration practices. Other states' authorities have identified many irregularities or frauds of various kinds. The numbers are in the hundreds of thousands of votes with numbers growing.

Vote fraud is a serious problem. Every American citizen is denied of civil rights every time vote fraud occurs. The injury is felt when legally cast votes are negated by the fraudulently cast votes. This leads to the core American belief of “one person, one vote” being frivolous and places elections in doubt as vote fraud pervades our election process. Vote fraud is not a victimless crime, everyone becomes the victim.

Some of these frauds are so extensive that federal authorities have begun investigations. It is now without doubt that many state GOP committee leaders have reported Romney as having won whichever, when it fact he had not. In fact, a large majority of the frauds has called to mind the saying "the-ends-justify-the-means." The ends in this situation are Romney, or Santorum, or Gingrich coming out ahead in numbers depending on where the numbers were tallied. These criminal activities of the RNC and the collusion of the privately-owned major media to sway the citizens, by reporting false numbers and in a few instances reporting final vote tallies before the tallies were finished being counted, into thinking Romney, Santorum, or Gingrich are being voted for more often than another candidate.

It is interesting to note that a new study finds that millions of the names on U.S. voter rolls appear in more than one state... or on tombstones. The Pew Center on the States found and has reported millions of invalid registrations remain on the books, including an "army of (potential) zombie voters" who remain registered long after they died. Voter registration in the following data are just one gateway to election fraud, and place in question the integrity of our elections. Here is a part of the problem:  1.8 million Deceased Americans whose voter registration remains active, 2.75 million People registered in more than one state, 68,725 Voters registered in three states, 1,807 Voters registered in more than three states, 51 million Americans who are eligible to vote, but remain not registered, 12 million People registered under addresses that are old or have errors severe enough that mailings are unlikely to reach them, 24 million Voter registrations that are inaccurate or no longer valid — nearly 13 percent of the names currently on voter rolls nationwide, a total of 76 Percent of eligible adults who are registered to vote in the U.S. Most, if not more than these kinds of, problems have been an ongoing problem for tens of decades.

Americans must take it upon themselves to insure integrity in the election process since clearly the election officials are alowing it to happen and restore the importance of voting. In regard to voters, this will require the implementation of safeguards such as photo identification requirements, an adequate period for elections officials to verify voter registrations before the elections, and a close eye on the abuse of absentee voting. In regard to the process, this will require printed rules that are understandable. In regard to the procedure, an adherence to Robert's Rules of Order. It is up to us as citizens to ensure that every legally cast vote counts.

Who would rig an election so that their opponents would have more votes?

Your Choice Should Be America

Whenever some well-meaning person questions my convictions, I usually make time to explain why I believe as I do.

When the English Monarchy and the Church were both exercising control over empires, nations, and individuals' thoughts, there came to be an increasing number of people that felt they had lost what little control over their own lives they had managed to gain. These people decided, in one way or another, it was time to take control of their own lives and they came from many parts of the old world to settle in the new world. However, because the old world continued to exercise, what the new world settlers felt unfair and confining, control in various forms, they decided to begin a Great Experiment to be free.

The aftermath of the conflict between the old and new world was the establishment of The Perpetual Union (which is no longer in effect) and the later United States Of America. The important ideas, ideals, and concepts were composed and written down as two founding documents the Declaration of Independence and The Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union (A.C.P.U. which is no longer in effect) and the later Constitution of the United States of America. These two sole sources of intents and purposes define America and American Citizens. If, by letter or spirit, either one or both are under attack, by inaction in defense of, or by action to corrupt letter or spirit of, the very way of life in America becomes threatened.

Why do Americans pick between Democrats and Republicans? Why do we patronize the privately-owned major media who regards Americans as having so little intellect that they have to tell us what the candidates stand for and which ones are important? Are we so engrossed in that kind of authoritarian nonsense that we have to rely on others to make choices for us? The "fair and balanced" claim by one network is betrayed by their bias for party favorites to the detriment of any others that may challenge typical Washington politics. All of the major media ignores candidates from any other party, and have even ridiculed one of the most outstanding statesman of our time.

Why do we tolerate public employees who were elected to serve the nation by presenting the best American ideals and addressing the most important issues facing our country and providing solutions to attain those goals, but instead did otherwise? The interests of American Citizens; home and hearth, financial soundness, and personal rights and freedoms are the concerns of all. These important ideas and issues are held as important concepts, as well as many others, within the Constitution. That document and our country largely have been ignored, by the party favorites and only recently have they even mentioned the very real problems we face. It is only obvious that Romney, Santorum, and Gingrich have changed the tune they hum. Instead of their usual stance, pompously prancing about proclaiming themselves our leaders while taking advantage of anything they can, they are now on uncertain ground and are now parroting the only candidate that has said the same things for thirty years. Romney, Santorum, and Gingrich have never been our "leaders" at best they were our representative employees!

It doesn't require a genius intellect to know that neither party has provided a difference in identifying problems nor finding approaches to solutions that have beneficial results, except to grow government in ways that were never intended. What they have provided over the past three or four decades, regardless of their supposed liberal or conservative policies, is an expansion of government in every direction; controlling through legislation, mandates, regulations, taxation, and executive orders has been the result. So far the solutions offered by big government thinking is more jobs in government (most of which are temporary) and borrowing money to fund what they cannot do by increasing taxation. The economic stimulus has been to guarantee enormous loans to companies with poor management and business models that have failed at the taxpayer's expense. Solyndra, Evergreen Solar, M F Global - J P Morgan are all examples.

The generalized root beliefs of today's current American Democratic philosophy are those dangerously close to, if not, socialism. Any of the various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods, or a system of society or group living in which there is no private property and in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state, which is a stage of society in Marxist theory that is transitional between capitalism and communism and is distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done are not American in concept or ideals.

The generalized root beliefs of today's current American Republican philosophy are those dangerously close to, if not, Fascism. The political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and which stands for a centralized autocratic government or dictatorial control which is effected by policies or practices of, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition are not American in concept or ideals.

And still the voters select from these same two diseased pools of philosophically political sociopaths.

The generalized root method of enacting today's current American Business philosophy are those of Corporatism. The organization of a society into industrial and professional corporations serving as organs of political representation and exercising control over persons and activities within their jurisdiction. This concept was borrowed from the business practices of the English Crown and is not American in either concept or ideal.

The generalized root beliefs of today's current American Business philosophy are those of Capitalism. The economic system characterized by private or partner ownership of capital goods, by investments that are determined by private decision, and by prices, production, and the distribution of goods that are determined mainly by competition in a free market is the mainstay in America.

It seems clear that "conservative" Republicans want to save us from the "liberal" Democrats and the "liberal" Democrats want to save us from the "conservative" Republicans. In the end, both parties seek to dismantle freedom and constitutional government in order to accomplish their own agendas. They only differ in style; in substance they are twins. While fiercely opposing each other, both parties seek but one thing: unbridled power and control.

As things stand now, we do not need to fear al Qaeda, Iran, or North Korea as urgently as we need to fear the abuse of power from within our own government. There is no question that we have the military power and strength to fight off any foreign enemy. The bigger question is, do we have the moral strength and ethical power to fight off those within our own country who would strip us of our freedoms? How we answer that question will determine our destiny.

It's our choice: we can continue to vote for candidates that are members of the two major party philosophies, or we can vote for candidates, regardless of party affiliation, who will represent the best interests of America and its Citizens. That does not automatically disqualify a candidate from a major party, it does mean that it is the responsibility of the voter to vet the candidates to determine the ones who have demonstrated their honesty, integrity, and eligibility that have honored their oaths of office to uphold and defend the Constitution (if they have been in office), and who have a record of performance that demonstrates they have made those hard decisions.

It should be obvious I will never vote for Romney, Santorum, or Gingrich to be my employee to hold any public office. I carefully looked at their morals, ethics, qualifications, and their voting records. Instead, and because of a thirty year length record of voting for American ideals and concepts, I am voting for Dr. Ron Paul.

What America Means to Me: or Some Essential Parts of It

I was born in the late 1940's and grew up in the '50's. My formal education began with Jacks & Jill's during 1950 and continued unabated with few summer or winter breaks until I graduated from school and enlisted with The U.S. Navy in '68. I attend school during my entire enlistment and received an honorable discharge during '72 and remained on temporary duty (TDRL) until placed on the retired list in 1974. I decided to continue the pursuit of formal education until graduation 1998. Since that time, I have informally continued my education where my interests dictate.

As I became a young man, my day would typically consist of the common household activities, rising, bathing, dressing and taking breakfast at that point school began. My time at school followed a rigid pattern concerning certain traditions. At the commencement of each day, all students gathered, hands were placed over hearts and the national anthem began and the raising of the U.S. Flag commenced. Before the beginning of the first class, the class would stand beside their desks and, with hand over heart, sing the Pledge of Allegiance. Class followed class until dinner and then classes resumed until time for supper. All students then gathered and the lowering of the U.S. Flag and taps was sound. This ceremonial tradition continued daily, until I transferred into public school during the eighth grade,  where there was little tradition and even less respect.

Years later I took the Oath of Military Service when I Joined the U.S. Navy.

I hold great respect for the Flag, the Pledge of Allegiance, and the oath I took;   however, I have even greater respect for the instrument which our Nation was formed under, The Constitution for the united States of America. In detail, it describes the parts of government and their composition. This document also contains the manner in which the parts are allowed to interact. The Constitution for the united States of America also contains a Bill of Rights which applies to all U.S. Citizens. Amendments have been adopted and repealed since its enactment, which may or may not have had worth. It was written in common English of the time in a manner which was expected to be understood by every U.S. Citizen. This does not mean that all citizens could read but could understand what was being said when another read it out loud.

It holds the foundation of ideas and concepts our nation of people represent.

Many other documents of the time contain a much more detailed account and commentary of arguments, both for and against, the various ideas and concepts involved in the composition. The Constitution for the united States of America remains the only single source document that defines America. All other documents of any nature are subordinate. To be sure, there are many other source documents which support its reasoned construction. The United States Declaration of Independence another U.S. sole source document, which itself has many other documents of the time and previous times with which it is supported. These support documents contain many ideals or ideas which were conceptually incorporated in the composition of its construction.

The People of the United States are the primary governing body. They delegate the day to day responsibility of governance to the Federal Republic through representatives and the combination is bound together under the Constitution for the united States of America. The process of selecting representatives is determined by casting individual votes.

Every U.S. Citizen has the right and responsibility to uphold and defend the U.S Constitution against all enemies. If this single source document and the integral components are allowed to be violated in any way, its' worth is in question. If the Constitution for the united States of America falls due to inattention to its maintenance the Nation falls and the American concept and actuality of a United States of America ceases to exist. It becomes something else that is defined by something else. I vote for the most qualified representatives and candidates that will uphold and defend the Constitution for the united States of America above all else.

I do not believe in political parties and have changed my affiliation many times in order to vote for the candidate best qualified with a proven record of decisions ,that will uphold and defend the Constitution for the united States of America, and that will be beneficial to the Nation.

I Trust Statesmen;  I Do Not Trust Politicians.

I cast my vote to maintain the Constitution for the united States of America first, everything else becomes secondary. If a candidate has a record of any unethical, immoral or improper action of any kind while in or out of office that has damaged the letter or spirit of Constitution for the united States of America, I will not and have never voted for that candidate. I will die first before that consideration is undertaken.

Beliefs and Actions

So... Palin says, "they are getting more grounded in their beliefs and are articulating them better."

Palin thinks Romney, Gingrich, and Santorum are becoming more grounded in their beliefs. These politicians and businessman are fully grown men with past actions and public statements which should have cemented their convictions and character development by the age of 21.

By the time U.S. males turn 30, patterns of belief and behavior are developed and become set and the actions and words derived from them define and reinforce those convictions. These male characteristics remain in and with their holders until overtaken by death.

The prime ability and skill politicians must posses is to speak well and convey their ideas to listeners convincingly, nothing else is more important. Even if mistakes are made in their actions or words the skill to talk around, under, over or through opposition, disaster or debacle is paramount:   nothing is more important to a successful career politician. If nothing else, Romney, Gingrich, and Santorum should have developed the skill to speak well and convincingly, by now.

You might think Romney, Gingrich, and Santorum truly would have made up their minds ten years later by their 40th year of thought over what they believe in and their actions should have revealed exactly what they believed, or 20 years later by their 50th year of thinking over the same things they believe in and whatever they have done.

Most, if not the majority, of the male population of the U.S. Are considered old codgers that are completely set in their ways by the time they reach their 55th year. Romney, Gingrich, and Santorum have the experience of their actions and the publics' reaction and response to whatever they have done or said in the past with which to work. Regardless of reaction and response, when considering the true worth and measure of any man, his record of actions can be the only quality of merit or accomplishment.

Romney, a corporate raider with a record of business cannibalism and destruction, believes money and the power to get more is the most important thing in his life, since he has spent his entire professional life doing just that. Great hair, pretty teeth and a real live shark.

Gingrich, a politician with a long ugly record of ethics violations and more, continues to do and say whatever he thinks people will believe. His personal life, a failure at any point except to take advantage of self-made disasters, and use them for financial or political gain reflects his professional life and vise-versa. Great hair, rotund presence and words that are only backed by current listeners.

Santorum, another career politician with severe blemishes, pandering to lobbyists, developing rapidly into a sleazy politician (no moral or ethical compass of any bearing) and representing foreign institutions by adding an amendment which drove the suicide rate at one home for Veterans from 59 in 2000 to 131 in 2003. Earmarking, big government spending, and bringing religious matters and concerns to whip-up the voting public. It should be remembered that the U.S. Constitution prohibits laws regarding religion. Santorum does not think it important and does what he can to circumvent the letter and spirit of the U.S. Constitution, even at the high price of U.S. Veterans lives. Suave, self righteousness at any price oozing from every pore.

However, there is a completely unexplainable exception to this cavalcade of professional Politicians and wanna-bes.

An apparent statesman, who relies on and applies judiciously and unerringly what was written and trusted more than two centuries ago. His entire carrier has in purpose and action been applied to the benefit and well being of his countrymen. These actions of record were gained by a thorough understanding of what was written and what it represented. Few politicians and even fewer citizens take the time to truly become familiar with the document that defines our nation and by extension its people. While others argue, accuse and insult one another, this statesman explains truthfully and simply what has gone wrong and what must be done to correct these problems. His beliefs are secondary when compared to his record. He lives an ordinary life with his family in Texas with one huge glaring difference:  he well knows his beliefs and convictions and has had the character and courage to stand alone in upholding the U.S. Constitution against all enemies.