LET US UNDERSTAND JUST A FEW THINGS

Let us understand just a few things that are of paramount importance.

1. The united States of America belongs solely to Americans living on the land. 

It does NOT belong to the IMF, the World Bank, or the UNITED STATES, Inc.

2. Americans are Sovereign Individuals and are guaranteed the conventions and rights as stated in the Constitution for the united States of America.

They are NOT property to be owned by anyone. 

3. The Constitution for the united States of America 1788 with a Ratified Amendment added March 12, 1819 is the controlling document of governance for the Republic of the united States of America.

It was during the administration of Abraham Lincoln that Congress lost quorum and adjourned Sine Die. Lincoln unlawfully re-convened Congress with appointed congressmen which negated and made null and void all actions of Congress since that time. (see Note Below)

It is NOT the Constitution of the UNITED STATES of 1871 which is a corporate Document.

4. The Supreme Law of the Land is American Common Law.

It is NOT the Federal Government Statutory structure;  USC, UCC, Admiralty Law, Roman Civil Law, International Law, Sharia Law, or Administrative Public Policy dicta.

5. The form of the Nation is a Constitutionally bound representative Federal Republic. 

It is NOT a Democracy and it is not a Privately owned foreign Corporation.

Note: The sole objective of the war of 1812, which was to destroy records and prevent the American People form discovering Treasonous activity on the part of the Federal government, was satisfied by English Troops who burned part of the library of Congress which was housed in the White House and contained the documents of agreement between foreign Governments and organizations which allowed a change of ownership of the united States of America and the changes to the system of Jurisprudence practiced in the united States of America, namely the slow migration from American Common Law to Admiralty Law and Roman Civil Law .


"http://www.abodia.com/2/United-States-is-a-corporation.htm

The United States is a corporation
You are here:  www.abodia.com/2/United-States-is-a-corporation.htm
US is a Corp.    Supreme Court confirms    Federal Zone (zip codes)
District of Columbia, corporation possession of the Queen of England
1788 Original               Constitution for the united states,      original organic, of the people government.
1871 Amended version    CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES,    US is a private corporation.

The UNITED STATES was formed in 1871, which controls only the District of Columbia and the territories it purchases or acquires; Puerto Rico, Guam, Virgin Islands.  Many think that income taxes, and some laws do not effect people in the sovereign states of the union as they are outside of the control / jurisdiction of the United States corporation.  The United States of America is different from the "United States" [corporation].

The terms UNITED STATES and/or United States of America and/ or United States Government are all a private corporation, even with registered trademark.

The US corporation (originally called the District of Columbia) does not effect or control the 50 sovereign states that are protected from the federal government by the US Constitution for the United States adopted in 1788.

There are 2 United States, one formed in 1787, the collection of the several sovereign states of the union, and another separate and different one formed in 1871, which only controls the District of Columbia and it’s territories.  Others may can give you specific references and explain this further.  Here is an outline of the concepts.

The date is February 21, 1871 and the Forty-First Congress is in session. I refer you to the "Acts of the Forty-First Congress," Section 34, Session III, chapters 61 and 62. On this date in the history of our nation, Congress passed an Act titled: "An Act To Provide A Government for the District of Columbia." This is also known as the "Act of 1871." What does this mean? Well, it means that Congress, under no constitutional authority to do so, created a separate form of government for the District of Columbia, which is a ten mile square parcel of land.

The Constitution for the United States of America was adopted on September 17, 1787, by the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and ratified by conventions in each U.S. state in the name of "The People".

- - -
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=129&invol=141
U.S. Supreme Court

STOUTENBURGH v. HENNICK, 129 U.S. 141 (1889)
129 U.S. 141

STOUTENBURGH, Intendant of Washington Asylum, v. HENNICK.

January 14, 1889


Sections 1 and 18 of the act of congress of February 21, 1871, entitled 'An act to provide a government for the District of Columbia,' (16 St. 419,) are as follows: 'Section 1. That all that part of the territory of the United States included within the limits of the District of Columbia be, and the same is hereby, created into a government by the name of the District of Columbia, by which name it is hereby constituted a body corporate for municipal purposes, and may contract and be contracted with, sue and be sued, plead and be impleaded, have a seal, and exercise all other powers of a municipal corporation not inconsistent with the constitution and laws of the United States and the provisions of this act.' 'Sec. 18. That the legislative power of the District shall [129 U.S. 141, 144]   extend to all rightful subjects of legislation within said District, consistent with the constitution of the United States and the provisions of this act, subject, nevertheless, to all the restrictions and limitations imposed upon states by the tenth section of the first article of the constitution of the United States; but all acts of the legislative assembly shall at all times be subject to repeal or modification by the congress of the United States, and nothing herein shall be construed to deprive congress of the power of legislation over said District in as ample manner as if this law had not been enacted.' These sections are carried forward into the act of congress of June 22, 1874, entitled 'An act to revise and consolidate the statutes of the United States, general and permanent in their nature, relating to the District of Columbia, in force on the first day of December, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and seventy-three,' as sections 2, 49, 50.

- - - also note:
And Whereas: The Constitution does provide that Congress has the power to exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever over such district not exceeding ten miles square, as may, by session of particular states and the acceptance of Congress, become the seat of government of the United States. 

And Whereas: On February 21, 1871, the Forty First Congress passed an act entitled "An Act to Provide a Government for the District of Columbia," legislating the organization of a municipal corporation to run the day to day affairs of the District of Columbia, the seat of government, which transferred the United States of America, the Republic, into "a corporate entity" entitled UNITED STATES, in capital letters, having "no" jurisdiction outside the District of Columbia. 

And Whereas: Congress adopted the text of the federal constitution as the constitution or charter of this municipal corporation. This municipal corporation was granted the power to contract to provide municipal services to the inhabitants of the District of Columbia and necessarily as an operation of the privileges and immunity clause of Article Four of the Constitution, any other person who chooses to contract for its services.

- - Is there fraud in our ranks ?

The Webster’s Dictionary states that Fraud means Deceit, Trickery, intentional perversion of truth in order to induce another to part with something of value or to surrender a legal right.

The Blacks Law Dictionary states pretty much what the Webster’s Dictionary does but adds about two pages full of information.  My favorite part is: A false representation of a matter of fact, whether by words or by conduct, by false or misleading allegations, or by concealment of that which should have been disclosed, which deceives and is intended to deceive another so that he shall act upon it to his legal injury.
- - - -
February 21, 1871 Congress Passes an Act to Provide a Government for the District of Columbia, also known as the Act of 1871*
With no constitutional authority to do so, Congress creates a separate form of government for the District of Columbia, a ten mile square parcel of land (see, Acts of the Forty-first Congress," Section 34, Session III, chapters 61 and 62).

The act -- passed when the country was weakened and financially depleted in the aftermath of the Civil War -- was a strategic move by foreign interests (international bankers) who were intent upon gaining a stranglehold on the coffers and neck of America.
Congress cut a deal with the international bankers (specifically Rothschilds of London) to incur a DEBT to said bankers. Because the bankers were not about to lend money to a floundering nation without serious stipulations, they devised a way to get their foot in the door of the United States.

The Act of 1871 formed a corporation called THE UNITED STATES. The corporation, OWNED by foreign interests, moved in and shoved the original Constitution into a dustbin. With the Act of 1871, the original Constitution for the united States (1788) was defaced in effect vandalized and sabotage when the title was capitalized and the word "for" was changed to "of" in the title THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (1871) is the constitution of the INCORPORATED UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. 

It operates in an economic capacity and has been used to fool the People into thinking it governs the Republic. It does is not!

Capitalization is significant when one is referring to a legal document. This seemingly "minor" alteration has had a major impact on every subsequent generation of Americans.

What Congress did by passing the Act of 1871 was create an entirely new document, a constitution for the government of the District of Columbia, an INCORPORATED government. This newly altered Constitution was not intended to benefit the Republic. It benefits only the corporation of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and operates entirely outside the original Constitution.

Instead of having absolute and unalienable rights guaranteed under the original Constitution, we the people now have "relative" rights or privileges. One example is the Sovereign's right to travel, which has now been transformed (under corporate government policy) into a "privilege" that requires citizens to be licensed.

By passing the Act of 1871, Congress committed TREASON against the People who were Sovereign under the grants and decrees of the Declaration of Independence and the original Constitution.
- - - -
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/dccases/metrorrc.htm   gives this discussion

  JUDICIAL INTERPRETATIONS

District of Columbia
  
     On May 3rd, 1802 an Act was passed to incorporate the City of Washington. (2  Stat. at  L. 195.)
In 1871  an important  modification was  made in the form of the district  government --  a Legislature  was established, with all the  apparatus of  a distinct  government.   By  the  Act  of February 21st,  of that  year, entitled  "An  Act  to  Provide  a Government for  the District of Columbia (16 Stat. at L. 419), it was enacted (sec. 1) that all that territory of the United States included within the limits of the District of Columbia be created into a  government by  the name  of the  District of  Columbia by which name  it was  constituted a "a body corporate for municipal purposes," with power to make contracts, sue and be sued, and "to exercise  all   other  powers  of  a  municipal  corporation  not inconsistent with the Constitution and laws of the United States.
…
This Constitution  lasted until June 20th, 1874, when an Act was passed entitled "An Act for the Government of the District of Columbia, and  for other purposes." (18 Stat. at L. 116)  By this Act the  government established by the Act of 1871 was abolished.
p 234

     By a  subsequent Act,  approved June 11th, 1878 (20 Stat. at L. 102),  it was  enacted that  the District  of Columbia  should "remain and  continue a  municipal corporation,"  as provided  in section two  of the  Revised Statutes  relating to said District, and the  appointment of  commissioners was  provided for, to have and  to  exercise  similar  powers  given  to  the  commissioners appointed under  the Act  of 1874. All rights of action and suits for and against the  District were  expressly preserved in status quo.  p. 234

     All municipal  governments are  but agencies of the superior power of  the State  or government by which they are constituted, and are  invested with  only such  subordinate  powers  of  local legislation and  control as  the superior Legislature sees fit to confer upon them.  p. 234

     The people are the recognized source of all authority, state or municipal, and to this authority it must come at last, whether immediately  or  by  circuitous  route.  Barnes  v.  District  of Columbia, 91 U.S. 540, 545 [23: 440, 441]. p 234

     Chief Justice Marshall, speaking for this court, in the case of Hepburn  v. Ellzey,  6 U.S. 2 Cranch, 445 [ 2:332 ], where the question was  whether a  citizen of the District could sue in the circuit courts of the United States as a citizen of a State.  The court did  not deny  that the  District of Columbia is a State in the sense of being a distinct political community;  but held that the word  "State" in  the  Constitution,  where  it  extends  the judicial power to cases between citizens of the several "States," refers to  the States  of the Union.  It is undoubtedly true that the District  of Columbia  is a separate political community in a certain sense,  and in that sense may be called a State;  but the sovereign power  of this  qualified State  is not  lodged in  the corporation of the District of Columbia, but in the government of the United  States.   Its supreme  legislative body  is Congress. The subordinate legislative powers of a municipal character which have been  or may  lodged in  the city  corporations, or  in  the District of  Columbia, do not make those bodies sovereign.
- - -
Text of the District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871
Aa copy of the pages here: 

http://www.nikolasschiller.com/blog/index.php/archives/2009/01/30/2215/
- - - -
The United States Isn't a Country
—It's a Corporation ! by Lisa Guliani

http://www.serendipity.li/jsmill/us_corporation.htm
more here:
http://www.wariscrime.com/2009/01/15/news/the-usa-isnt-a-country-its-a-corporation/

- - - - -
Constitution for the United States of America
http://www.barefootsworld.net/constit1.html
- - - - - -
United States - US- U.S.-USA-America ( a possession of the Queen of England)

Means: (A) a federal corporation . . . Title 28 USC Section 3002(5) Chapter 176. It is clear that the United States . . . is a corporation . . . 534 FEDERAL SUPPLEMENT 724.

`It is well settled that "United States" et al is a corporation, originally incorporated February 21, 1871 under the name "District of Columbia," 16 Stat. 419 Chapter 62. It was reorganized June 11, 1878; a bankrupt organization per House Joint Resolution 192 on June 5, 1933, Senate Report 93-549, and Executive Orders 6072, 6102, and 6246; a de facto (define de facto) government, originally the ten square mile tract ceded by Maryland and Virginia and comprising Washington D. C., plus the possessions, territories, forts, and arsenals.

The significance of this is that, as a corporation, the United States has no more authority to implement its laws against "We The People" than does Mac Donald Corporations, except for one thing -- the contracts we've signed as surety for our strawman with the United States and the Creditor Bankers. These contracts binding us together with the United States and the bankers are actually not with us, but with our artificial entity, or as they term it "person", which appears to be us but spelled with ALL CAPITAL LETTERS.

All this was done under,

VICE-ADMIRALTY COURTS.

In English Law. Courts established in the queen's possessions beyond the seas, with jurisdiction over maritime causes, including those relating to prize.

The United States of America is lawfully the possession of the English Crown per original commercial joint venture agreement between the colonies and the Crown, and the Constitution, which brought all the states (only) back under British ownership and rule. The American people, however, had sovereign standing in law, independent to any connection to the states or the Crown. This fact necessitated that the people be brought back, one at a time, under British Rule, and the commercial process was the method of choice in order to accomplish this task. First, through the 14th Amendment and then through the registration of our birth certificate and property. All courts in America are Vice-admiralty courts in the Crown’s private commerce.

Supreme Law Library : The Federal Zone : index
"Supreme Law Library. The Federal Zone: Cracking the Code of Internal Revenue Electronic Eleventh Edition [Note: Small numbers indicate number of bytes in ..."
www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/index.htm
2. Supreme Law Firm
"The Supreme Law Firm holds informative seminars nationwide, and maintains the ... His massive book entitled "The Federal Zone: Cracking the Code of Internal ..."
www.supremelaw.org/
- - - - - -
The Illegal Quasi-Government in Washington D.C.
The "Federal" Government is a Separate Nation and should be called the United States, Incorporated.
http://home.iae.nl/users/lightnet/creator/federalgovernment.htm
- - - - - -
Fraud in government ? Wake up, learn, act, become a sovereign, free again
http://www.nmcservices.net/governmentfraud.html


If you doubt anything, learn to check it !

Go to Truth Seekers (below) At top left, click on Search
Learn how to find anything quickly on internet w/ Thought Print ©
Back to Truth Seekers"

Where Do We Go From Here?

Since 2008 I have been writing articles and sharing articles from other authors with the Esteemed Readers of Fix America. Over those years I  have also shared these posts on forums and within comments of news articles, published by the privately-owned major media and other media outlets of lesser fame.

Most of what I see, hear, and read today is a far cry from news correspondence of a free and impartial press. Instead we are bombarded with the analysis and commentary of others, who, have no more right to voice their opinions than anyone else. The problem is, that what we expect to be unadulterated reporting of current events is instead spin and propaganda, not news, based on the particular ideology of the publisher or their political handlers and their sponsors.

Over the span of the past six or so years, Fix American has informed and educated the Esteemed Readers with facts, and while my opinions and those of other authors are offered, the facts are presented in whole without embellishment.

In an attempt to stifle the views of opposition, Senator Diane Feinstein (D-CA) has so much as said that anyone with a cellphone and blog does not constitute a reporter, and she wants to stop anyone without 'proper credentials' from reporting news. In other words, if you don't plan on reporting what the government approves, you will be silenced. So now approval by the government is prerequisite for someone to obtain a press pass or even to work for the media as a reporter.

It is by the consent of the governed that governments exists in the first place. It is We the People who created a constitutional representative republican form of self-governance, by which the People and the States remain sovereign and the federal system of governance is the servant and not the master. When did that change, 1871?  You will find most of the answers in the posts that Fix America has published. What you will not find is how and why it happened. For that answer you will have to look for future articles.

If the People are to be free to live their lives as they so choose, they must be willing to do whatever it takes to defend that freedom. To enjoy the fruits of one's labor, to own property, to be safe in their lands and homes, these are what we must all defend for ourselves as individuals, and collectively as communities. We must also be willing to defend our State if need arises to do so.

It is apparent that we can no longer trust those who we elect, members of the corporate UNITED STATES, to protect our rights and secure our borders. It is therefore incumbent upon We the People to defend ourselves and our neighbors from this attack on our unalienable rights.

Without digressing into the intricate details that led to the revolt against Great Britain, it is obvious that the collective reasons were enough to risk everything to gain sovereignty and be free of servitude. 

Our rights have been taken and replaced with privileges, granted by the corporate UNITED STATES. Our freedoms are no longer a foregone conclusion as more and more infringements by militarized law enforcement agencies disregard even basic individual rights all over the nation. While focus is held to one or two incidents that are used as propaganda by the privately-owned major media to reinforce the justification for more laws that take away more individual rights, police forces are treating the People as enemies of the STATE and use deadly force against the most benign of our fellow citizens.

What can we do? How much abuse will We the People tolerate before taking action?

Where do we go from here?

Without Consent of the Governed

The People created a Constitution which in turn created a system of governance, which through the duties and responsibilities mandated by the Constitution is to serve the needs of the union of Free and Sovereign States not the incorporated states.  It is We the People who govern, and the corporate government that has replaced the system of governance has no constitutional authority.

The purpose of a system of governance under the Constitution is to defend the Sovereign States against foreign aggressors and guarantee the freedoms under the Bill of Rights, including life, liberty, and the ability to own property. It was never the purpose of the system of governance to control the People and the way they live.

We live in a state of confusion today, with regard to the function and purpose of those in Washington D.C., not because we have an uncontrollable government, but because we have a nation of People who are ignorant of the true purpose of a system of governance but are aware of a controlling corporate government, and would rather give up their freedoms to a corporate government willing to extend privileges to them for a price, than to take responsibility for themselves.

The education of children is the responsibility of their parents. If it was the mandate of constitutional governance to provide education it would have been included in the Constitution. Educational requirements are different from community to community. A one size fits all system of educational standards cannot benefit the student or the community within which he resides.

If there is to be made any investment in education, it must be from family participation and the private sector. The corporations with needs for skilled engineers must invest in the schools who provide them with the best candidates, and provide funding for those that merit a higher education . This benefits all parties concerned. Corporate Government subsidies on the other hand drive up the cost of education and it's mandates and standards deprive students of the truth and the very diversity the corporate government claims is a goal.

Health is a personal responsibility and health care is also your responsibility. The cost of health care is high because of how the system is designed. The deliberate interference of the AMA, FDA, CDC, DHHS, etc. and the exclusion or regulation of alternative medicine (suppression of natural medicine and other forms of treatment) benefits only the insurance and pharmaceutical corporations to the detriment of patients and providers alike.

We are a nation of immigrants and we adopted and created a system of common law, laws that were not created to make criminals, but to protect the States and their People. With nearly one million immigrants coming to the United States of America annually, immigration seems to work rather well for those who follow the law. Reforming immigration laws is analogous with reforming rape laws to accommodate the criminals instead of providing justice and restitution for the victims.

The current state of the union is in crisis. We have a corporate government that has taken control of nearly every aspect of an individual's life. We have a monetary system that is debt-based and enslaves everyone to the banks through the corporate state, both locally and nationally.

We have a Congress that is nothing more than a corporate board of directors who have very little say when it comes to the Chairman of the Board's tyrannical and treasonous actions. Instead of arrest or impeachment, they cower under the umbrella of a law suit, a frivolous waste of time and taxpayer resources.

If We the People want action, then it must be We the People who take that action, just as our patriotic founders did in defiance of George II and the banker controlled British Parliament.

Congress Will Hear Us!

Some things are self-evident and we don't have to refer to founding principles for guidance. We have the foundation that was set before us with the creation of a national government under the Constitution. It is up to us, We the People, to restrict that government to the constitutional limitations placed on it.

Social changes notwithstanding, the principles of a federal republic and the limitations of that federal government to protect the rights and property of the people, led to prosperity for as long as the representatives of the people operated within those constitutional limitations, and did truly represent the best interests of their constituents.

The purpose of government is not to produce laws, but to protect the people under the laws set forth that are constitutionally valid. Those laws that are prohibited by the Constitution are by their very nature, null and void under the limitations of the Constitution.

The love of liberty was the cause that birthed this nation and giving up that love will be its downfall.

The Cost of Freedom

We all know the often repeated phrase, "Freedom is not free" yet we ignore the reality of the price we must pay to sustain it. If you are not willing to defend your freedom with your life, you really do not deserve to have it.

I have been writing the Fix America blog since 2008. In that time I have covered many subjects that I felt were relevant to a majority of Americans. I have leaned heavily on the principles of liberty as a birthright as opposed to something that is granted by government. In fact, the very nature of our liberty is dependent on those willing to sacrifice all on order to have it.

The foundations for American liberty can be found in the words of Thomas Jefferson, specifically in the Declaration of Independence. In that superbly written document we read,

 "We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with' certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.- That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the governed, that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its Foundation on such Principles, and organizing its Powers in such Form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness." 

It then stands to reason that the government itself is created through the consent of We the People, and its purpose is to protect the rights of all sovereign individuals. At some point in the history of this once great nation, people began to take freedom for granted and the government began taking freedom from them.

The document itself is rebellious. It is the very essence of what Americans are in a sense, a revolutionary force in the world, that does not subscribe to the subjection to laws and regulations that inhibit the freedoms we hold so precious. And to protect those freedoms we must be rebellious at all times to anyone and anything that will attempt to deny us those rights.

In her book, Give Me Liberty, Naomi Wolf challenges the reader with these very same principles, to revolt, to rebel, and to be ever vigilant of those who seek to control you. It is portrayed as "A handbook for American Revolutionaries" and rightly so. 

In the present times, the very government that our founders created now view those same founders as extremists and insurgents, and that is exactly how we all must be to keep our freedoms and stop the tyranny of a government out of control. It is why the government wants gun bans, and laws that prohibit free speech. It is why we have unconstitutional laws such as the (un)Patriot(otic) Act and NDAA. If our founders were alive today, I am certain they would be gathering militias to storm the halls of the nation's capital and remove those guilty of high crimes and treason. But they are no longer with us and we must take up the challenge ourselves.

A Proclamation of Liberty

We the Sovereign Individuals of the Sovereign States of America, gave the Constitution for the United States of America in order to form a more perfect union of the many States, granting certain permissions to protect the sovereignty of the People and the States, and to form a representative government.

The Constitution created three separate branches of government in order to govern by our consent, and duly produce that government to protect the rights and the sovereignty of States and Individuals, those rights articulated but not limited to those documented in the first ten Articles of Amendment of that Constitution.

Over the last two hundred years those rights have been usurped by a government that has taken liberty away from the Individuals and the States in the name of equality and fairness and the general welfare of the People. It was never intended by our founders, nor was it unanimously accepted by the People to give up those liberties and rights to the federal government for whatever cause or reason that government may have seen as proper.

In the most recent several years, the majority of people, most of whom have become wards of the federal government, have seen fit to dictate to the rest of the people, a burden of regulations and taxation that has caused the republic to fail. This is no more acceptable to the current nation of States than it was to the colonists when the Crown also began to inflict injustices and tyranny over the People.

It is not only the right, but the duty of the People, to end the reign of tyranny which the federal government has inflicted upon us. It stands to reason that with cause, we must throw off the bonds that have been placed upon us, and to declare to the nations of the world once again our right to self determination based upon the laws of the land and the laws of nations.

If unable to convince the elected representatives whom we have sent to represent  and protect us from these infringements upon our liberties and well being, it is our duty to renounce that government, to secede from such tyrannical union, and to form a new nation based on the very principles and the law as we ratified at the signing of the Constitution in Philadelphia.

It is also our right and responsibility to hold all those who have disobeyed their oaths of office and conspired as enemies of the People accountable and punish them for their deeds of high crimes and treason against the sovereign States and the sovereign People who reside in them. Without further authority necessary or required by any elected or appointed officers of the Congress or State assemblies, or of the law enforcement departments of any jurisdiction, we shall hereby make civilian arrests of those criminals who by citizen Grand Jury, are presented with such evidence, to issue warrants of arrest.

I swear by the God Creator, that I will perform these acts in a manner which is out of love and respect for all sovereign individuals, to bring those who have been indicted for those acts of high crimes and treason against us, to justice as defined in our Constitution in accordance with the laws of nations. Whosoever stands for liberty and justice for all, will certainly make a declaration to uphold the law, the law of nations as is defined in our Constitution, and repeal those Articles of Amendment which have taken that original Constitution out of its explicit meaning, in order to undermine the very foundations which created this great nation.

I ask that everyone who is a true patriot and liberty loving sovereign individual to add their name as signatory to this declaration and support the cause of liberty by having others of like mind and spirit to add their names and support as well.

Tampering in Tampa

With the Republican National Convention about to begin in Tampa, the Romney team along with the RNC has stepped up their efforts to remove delegates who support Ron Paul while they also have been throwing out sound bites to attract Ron Paul supporters with such promises as support for Dr. Paul’s platform policies.

Last week Romney said he would support an audit of the Federal Reserve but insisted that Congress (our elected representatives) could not be trusted with the responsibility of controlling the monetary system of the People, choosing instead for it to remain in control of the private banks. Now they are hinting at a return to the Gold Standard, admitting that sound money may be the answer to the inflation of the dollar and its lack of worth. Again, it is merely to appease the supporters of Ron Paul.

As was the case in 2008 when Senator John McCain won the nomination defeating both Mike Huckabee (2^nd in the nomination process) and Mitt Romney who finished a distant third at the convention, the GOP pundits are claiming again that a vote for Ron Paul would be equal to a vote for Obama. While most diehard Republicans will vote the party line, most independents and libertarian voters will not. Romney cannot win an election against Barack Obama because his flip-flopping does not bode well with most educated voters. Some pundits think that his choice of Paul Ryan as a Vice Presidential running mate will solidify his nomination and eventual victory in November yet most informed voters without short-term memory loss will remember that Ryan reneged on his own campaign promises to not increase the debt ceiling and instead cut spending. He did neither as the records show. And also the McCain Book on Romney clearly demonstrates why he must not win the nomination.

There is no doubt that another term with Obama would end the United States as a free and sovereign nation. Of that you can be certain. But the election of Mitt Romney will not fare much better as he will further erode our liberties as he is in favor of both the Patriot Act and the National Defense Authorization Act, claiming that it is necessary in the world we live in today.

While we still debate the issue of Obama’s eligibility with several States moving to take him off their November ballots, fewer are doing the same with Romney anticipating his winning the GOP nomination.  It does seem obvious to the informed that Ron Paul’s plan to reduce the debt and the size of government stands out from the rest of the pack.

I feel that the issues in the privately-own major media are divisive and fail to address the crisis we all face as sovereign People in the United States today. Militarism for the sake of corporate greed is hidden behind the curtain while the threat of terrorism if made the mainstream topic. Calling Ron Paul an isolationist and a danger to our Israeli ally is spread throughout the press and television news while calls for a preemptive strike against the threat of a nuclear Iran are blasted across the headlines.

We the People must unite and stand together to restore our republic to the Constitution and not the laws of the Corporate State. Or we will continue to lose all liberty and become full slaves to the global elite government they are  pushing on us.And we must accomplish that through an honest election.

Time is Running Out for America

Romney and Ryan are already campaigning as if they have secured the nomination and the privately-owned media is spinning the choice of Paul Ryan as the completion of the GOP dream team. It amazes me how utterly ignorant and forgetful that most Americans seem to be.

The latest comparison portrays the Ross Perot supporters as the reason that Bill Clinton won the Presidency, ignoring the facts that demonstrate that his election was as rigged as the George W. Bush vs. Al Gore election in which the deciding votes in the state of Florida were ignored which would have made Gore the victor. Not that I would have wanted Gore as President, but I did want the election to be honest.

In a post entitled Protecting the Vote I referenced the ease of which computerized voting machines can be rigged without the knowledge of the officials at the polling places. I demonstrate that the only method that can be employed to insure that the election can be held to the highest degree of integrity is through the use of paper ballots.

In my more recent post Romney/Ryan Dream Team or Nightmare researching the facts indicates the dishonesty that both of these candidates have demonstrated through their professional and political careers. Yet most voters will go to the polls in November believing that electing Romney is better than another Obama term, and that playing not to lose is somehow equal to playing to win. Rush Limbaugh in his radio show spoke of this difference at length some time ago. It is one of  the few points that I agree with Mr. Limbaugh, although I disagree with who wold be the best choice for America.

How can we as a nation remain divided in our basic ideology of liberty and expect that we can restore it? Is it not apparent to everyone that listened to the debates that the only candidate who has remained steadfast in his convictions of limited powers and Constitution is Ron Paul? Is it not equally apparent that his honesty and integrity as a doctor and a member of Congress speaks volumes to his ability to restore America to the exceptional greatness that once made it the envy of the world? Does history not show us that neither party is interested in your liberty and mine, but remains the prostitutes of the corporate elite?

The Constitution charges Congress with the duty and responsibility for the peoples currency and yet Mitt Romney insists that it is better to have private banks through the Federal Reserve take that responsibility from the American people through the elected representation of the People's Congress. And by choosing Mr. Ryan as his running mate it further enhances my conviction that Romney has no intention of restoring integrity to the monetary system or to remove the debt that rapidly destroying our nation and enslaving generations of Americans yet to be born.

Without a doubt this November will determine the fate of the United States of America. This election will be the most important in the nation's history as it will be a choice between remaining a sovereign nation or a province of a global government, run not by freely elected representatives of the people, but the executive officers of the banks and the corporations they created under laws that by-pass the Constitution and create instead, Corporate law in which the Corporation has status as a person and where a person is reduced to representation of themselves as a number, a piece of property that is owned by the corporate state.

Under the current laws such as the Patriot Act and NDAA if our founders were alive today they would be labeled as terrorists, anti-government dissidents and insurgents whose aims are to topple the government. And that is exactly what is required when a government begins to ignore the Constitution of the People and creates a tyranny against the very people they are charged to protect.

Perhaps in attempting brevity and to allow readers the opportunity to discover these truths for themselves, I omit many of the books and textual references that prove beyond reasonable doubt that all of these things are truly a great conspiracy to topple the United States as a free nation. How can a nation be free when laws are enacted that prevent the free expression of grievances by the people? How can a free nation allow remote controlled drones to spy on the very people the government is charged to protect? Ben Franklin's quote comes to mind in which he states, "A people willing to give up freedom for the illusion of security deserve neither freedom nor security."

After the Affordable Patient Protection Act was signed into law, Americans voted for new representatives who promised they would repeal it. They also promised that the debt-ceiling would not be raised but spending cuts would be put into effect that would make increasing borrowing unnecessary. Paul Ryan was one of the most vocal on this issue and yet he voted for the increase. And now his deficit reduction plan will not reduce anything for at least thirty years. Where will our nation be in thirty years if spending is not reduced now?

Dr. Ron Paul's budget plan calls for a reduction of $1.5 trillion dollars in his first year of office. His opponents say it is lunacy and yet when you look at how he will accomplish this reduction, it is clear that domestic programs will not suffer in the least. Much of these cuts are in foreign aid and military spending, although the cuts in military spending will increase national defense by securing the borders and the seas. It makes perfect sense to anyone that actually reads his plan and does not rely on the soundbites of the corporate media.

It is going to be a challenge to get a majority of Americans to know the truth because they have become so trusting of what the media tells them. The two major political parties pretend to have diametrically opposed ideologies yet both have fostered bigger government and more spending. As approach the conventions, the media has stepped up its blitzkrieg propaganda to make us believe that the election will be Obama vs. Romney.

If you allow that to be, it will simply be a matter of how fast the ship will sink, but sink it inevitably will. But if you exercise courage and integrity yourselves, you can be part of the revolution that will restore our country to exceptional greatness once again. It is a true patriot's duty to defend and protect the nation, even when that requires the government must be defeated to do so.

Time is running out.

Romney/Ryan: Dream Team or Nightmare?

It is apparent to anyone with a pulse that Obama must be removed from office. The privately-owned major media will have you think that Romney is the way to accomplish that task. But perhaps America voters suffer from memory lapses, as they think that Romney can defeat Obama in November.

I count myself among those with memory and reason, as Romney was a distant third behind Mike Huckabee and eventual GOP nominee Johm McCain. We know the dismal results of 2008, and in an attempt to make a course correction in Congress in 2010 by electing "Tea Party" endorsed candidates to break the stronhold of the liberal left.

With promises of reducing spending and debt, America sent many new faces to Washington with a hope that changes will take place.

Results prove the intentions of those elected then and there is no reason to think that Romney along with Paul Ryan will make changes if elected in November. What is really required is radical change, and that is the only way we can restore our representative republic to the limited government conceived and nurtured by our founders.

Buying the propaganda of the party elite will only result in a further slide into a global takeover and the complete loss of national sovereignty. This is not like any other elected in the history of the United States. This is the election that our enemies have been waiting for since the beginning of the Revolution, and their dreams are about to become our nightmares.

In my previous posts I have demonstrated why Romney is not a good choice for America. In Bigger Sharper Teeth  I listed what a Romney cabinet would look like. Romney supports the Patriot Act, the NDAA, the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, and will support war against Iran. The rhetoric about a 'radical' Islamic nation with a nuclear capability seems to justify a policy of preemptive war. That is a dangerous policy at best and one that has been used by those who promote aggression against sovereign nations not because of their threat towards America, but the competition they produce against the petroleum corporations of Great Britain and the United States.



Support for all the military bases the United States built and populated with America troops comes from borrowing money that the nation does not have. True to the warnings of President Eisenhower in his farewell address the 'military industrial complex' poses the most serious threat to our national security. But he failed to warn us about the threat that the central banks pose on our liberty and sovereignty. That is to me the most eminent threat we face as we approach the November elections.

Having your vote count is not merely voting for the candidate(s) who best  represent your ideology and opinions. It is a matter of the integrity of the election and the counting of the ballots. In recent times we have been using machines to make it easier to vote. The cost of this simplicity is the very integrity of the process. Machines can be programmed to cheat and these fixed elections have been reported in many states of the past several years.

What is more important to you? An expeditious result or an accurate and honest count? I choose the latter and I feel that paper ballots are a priority to that integrity. In my post, Protecting The Vote it is explained in detail how this can be done. The important thing to remember is that wherever there is opportunity to cheat, someone will attempt to do so and some will succeed.



Do your patriotic duty and vote for the best candidate and not the lesser of two evils. Evil is still evil whether it is greater or less.

What It Is and Is Not

This nation was founded on the basic principles of inalienable rights to life or individual sovereignty, free choice or liberty, the pursuit of individual interest or that which makes one happy, and the right to own property, both personal and real.

The Declaration of Independence is the first of two source documents upon which our nation was founded. This document puts forward the concepts of individual sovereignty and freedom from ruler-ship of all kinds. The Declaration of Independence was a statement adopted by the Continental Congress on July 4, 1776, which announced that the thirteen American colonies, then at war with Great Britain, regarded themselves as independent states, and no longer a part of the British Empire. John Adams put forth a resolution earlier in the year which made a formal declaration inevitable. A committee was assembled to draft the formal declaration, to be ready when congress voted on independence. Adams persuaded the committee to select Thomas Jefferson to compose the original draft of the document, which congress would edit to produce the final version. The Declaration was ultimately a formal explanation of why Congress had voted on July 2 to declare independence from Great Britain, more than a year after the outbreak of the American Revolutionary War. The Independence Day of the United States of America is celebrated on July 4, the day Congress approved the wording of the Declaration.

The U.S. Constitution is the current second source document (based on the Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union) upon which our Nation was founded. The Union is much older than the Constitution. It was formed, in fact, by the Articles of Association in 1774. It was matured and continued by the Declaration of Independence in 1776. It was further matured ... by the Articles of Confederation in 1778. And finally, in 1787, one of the declared objects for ordaining and establishing the Constitution was "to form a more perfect Union." It describes the means by which self governance functions. It can be modified based on rules within its own framework. For this reason, it is described, in an overall sense, as a living document. It is the relationship between each citizen and the source document which determines and defines each American. This singular relationship is paramount. The Constitution for the United States is the supreme law of the United States of America. The first three Articles of the Constitution establish the rules and separate powers of the three branches which when taken together form the method of governance of the the federal Republic:  a legislature, the bicameral Congress; an executive branch led by the President; and a federal judiciary headed by the Supreme Court. The last four Articles frame the principle of federalism. The Tenth Amendment confirms its federal characteristics.

The Constitution was adopted on September 17, 1787, by the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and ratified by conventions in eleven states. It went into effect on March 4, 1789.

The first ten amendments are known as the Bill of Rights. The Constitution has been amended eighteen times (for a total of 28 amendments).  The current 28 Amendments are meant to modify the Constitution with concepts which allow the Constitution to be relevant to the current society within America.

Each State has its own Constutution to further define self governance in regard to any powers or rights not mandated to the federal government by the Constitution and returned to the states should they care to take either or both before the Legislature for consideration. The many states constitutions and the U.S. Constitution are the documents which comprise the states relationship within the Republic and the Republic as a whole.

The United States of America is a representative form of Democracy that is a Constitutionally bound Federal Rpeublic. Each Comonwealth, Dominion, District, and State are Constitutionally bound representative democracies. Each Natural born Citizen is a Sovereign individual by right of birth from parents who are U.S. Citizens. U.S. Citizenship is comprised of three catagories which are determined by the method under which thier citzenship was established.

Problems always arise when any citizen dose not adhere to the concepts within the framework of the U.S. Constitution.

The U.S. Constitution is not a document of social interaction or structure.

Social interactions are the folkways, mores, morals (which have or are based on higher principles), which describe behavior between two (i.e. a dyad), three (i.e. a triad) or more individuals (e.g. a social group). Social relations, derived from individual agency, form the basis of the social structure. These are best put forward or described in a community of people which is called the social structure of the society and is governed by social codes and ethics.

Social interaction is further developed with the practice of custom, manners, etiquette, courtesy, protocol, decorum etc. Among the most prominent writers on North American etiquette are Letitia Baldrige, Judith Martin, Emily Post, Elizabeth Post, Peggy Post, Gertrude Pringle, and Amy Vanderbilt.

Judith Martin states that if one wishes to become an accepted member of any society or group, one "had better learn to practice its etiquette." Early North American etiquette books claimed that the manners and customs of the "Best Society" could be imitated by all, although some authors lamented that the lower classes, meaning those "whose experience in life has been a hardening process," in fact treated the rules of etiquette with "contempt and ... a sneer." Current etiquette books do not employ the concept of "best society," but rather define etiquette as a set of guidelines that "help steer our behavior as we move through our daily routines" and that can help deal with "the pressures of modern life [which] make it all the more difficult to stay civil." This change is reflected in the content of etiquette books; etiquette books published in the early 20th century contained detailed advice on the treatment of servants, the conducting of formal dinner parties, and the behavior of a debutante;  more modern books are likely to emphasize the importance of respecting people of all classes, races, and ethnic backgrounds. Some books make a further distinction between etiquette and manners:  Etiquette is protocol, rules of behavior that you memorize and that rarely bend to encompass individual concerns and needs. Manners embrace socially acceptable behavior, of course, but also much more than that. They are an expression of how you treat others when you care about them, their self-esteem, and their feelings. Etiquette writers assert that etiquette rules, rather than being stuffy or classist, serve to make life more pleasant. Though etiquette rules may seem arbitrary at times and in various situations, these are the very situations in which a common set of accepted customs can help to eliminate awkwardness. While etiquette is often a means to make others feel comfortable, it is also the case that etiquette can serve to eliminate inappropriate behaviors in others by increasing discomfort.

The beliefs and faiths within a society are religiously or philosophically based. These religiously based concepts are between oneself and the Great Creator of all. The philosophically based concepts, like Confucianism (which is a Chinese ethical and philosophical system) are more practically based on various traditional principles and customs.