The Results Are In: America Lost!

And so it came to pass, that the American people believed that the government was better equipped to care for their needs than they could themselves, and so when they were given the opportunity to stand on principles, they instead chose to shirk responsibility and hide behind the illusion of security.

Even after four years of broken promises and shattered dreams, they ignored common sense and logic. The emotional fervor that swept a little known young Senator into the Presidency in 2008 was replaced with an acceptance of fate.

When I first started writing about the elections to come back in 2010, it seemed that the most relevant issue was how the Republican Party was going to respond to the overwhelming support they received from the Tea Party, mostly independent voters who for the most part, were not pleased at all with how the Democratic President and his Congressional majority handled the debt crisis, the health care issue, and the joblessness in America.

A young Congressman, Paul Ryan won his seat on promises of no compromises regarding spending or debt ceiling increases, and yet even after his broken promises to the American taxpayers, he was selected as the running mate for a third-rate GOP nominee.

Even with widespread reports of vote fraud and delegate fraud by the Republican National Committee and many of the state committees, conservative Americans somehow held the belief that they could somehow topple the incumbent President simply by campaigning on negativity.

The American people can be fooled by the people they came to trust. The privately-owned major media was all in President Obama’s corner, never wavering their loyalty to a man who has underhandedly done more to obliterate the Constitution of the United States of America and the rule of law, than any President since Woodrow Wilson. Wilson of course signed the Federal Reserve Act which place the wealth of the American People in the hands of private banks. President Obama has shown himself to be one up on that by selling the wages of children and grandchildren to the banks even before they are born.

I have written many posts in these past two years outlining the danger and I have been ridiculed by some and simply dismissed by others. I have constantly read comments that Romney will beat Obama since he is the lesser of two evils. But when the majority of the People spoke, they were satisfied with the present evil and did not want to change to a man who consistently changed his own platform to suit the current trend.

After the Republican National Convention was over, an early GOP nominee dropout emerged as a third party choice. Gary Johnson became the Libertarian party candidate and began his campaign with Ron Paul’s ideology. His results did not hurt either of the party favorites although there are a few people who think that his support hurt Romney.

The thing that hurt Romney the most is Mitt Romney. He fell further from grace by selecting a running mate who had lied to the American People to get into office and whose budget and spending plans would take 30 years to show any improvement in the government.

Ron Paul supporters were even asked to back Romney after Dr. Paul was shunned by the GOP and pretty much locked out of a speaking role in Tampa. I for one did not feel I could back the man nor the party that exhibited such blatant disregard to ethics and the rule of law.

So now we face another four years of an Administration of secrecy instead of transparency, of legislation from appointed czars and directors instead of Representatives and Senators. It seems evident that America in heading towards its end. Liberty and rights are mocked by this President. He has blatantly shunned the rule of law, placed Americans abroad in grave danger, ruined any chance of an economic recovery in the foreseeable future, has made executive orders his method to take dictatorial control of this nation, while his supporters are praising him.

There are many dictators in history who ruined their countries by taking the same route to destruction as President Obama. And it seems the majority of Americans are either ignorant of history or just choose to ignore it.

Where will we be in four years? Will American be a sovereign nation or part of a global government? 

We will soon know!

The Chance of a Lifetime!

History will remember the 2012 United States Election regardless of the outcome. It will either record the greatest defeat of liberty or it will be the greatest restoration of sovereignty known to modern humanity. As the world waits and watches the results, their fate will also be determined by the choice the American voters make.

Some will see this as a challenge between Barack Hussein Obama and Willard Mittington Romney. Others will cast it as a left versus right challenge between Democrats and Republicans. I see it as freedom versus slavery. And then I also see another choice other than the two favorites of the two corrupted political parties.

Gary Johnson dropped out of the GOP race early and became a Libertarian, embracing the same ideology that has been the hallmark of Ron Paul. Dr. Paul was defeated by that corruption and not be the People's refusal to support him. His views of constitutional government, fiscal responsibility, less spending and less taxing all will be proven to be the way to prosperity. History does prove that.

Gary Johnson chose to run as a third party candidate mainly because the two major corrupted parties have locked out everyone else who dared challenge the status quo. In digging through foreign news sources I came up with circumstantial evidence that showed that Ron Paul was the most feared candidate by the left in my post "Obama Issues Kill Order Regarding Ron Paul..." And how Dr. Paul was cheated by the GOP (See: "Tampering in Tampa") by refusing to sit his delegates in state caucuses and in the national convention. Cheating and lying has become the norm for both major parties.

Obama has not produced proof of his citizenship. He has spend millions to cover up his past. His associates and friends are labeled as socialists and radicals. His own words indicate that he wants to change America into a socialist dictatorship, and his actions to bypass Congress through appointed "czars" is more proof than a jury can deny. And yet the privately-owned major media still covers for him as they pretend to give others equal and fair air time.

This nation was founded on basic principles of liberty. It was never a perfect nation, although when we return to those basic principles and hold our elected representatives accountable, it does prosper and provide for the greatest majority of the populace.

Government created the problems that they always promise to fix. Let's start with the most obvious one. Since the installation of the Federal Reserve System, the nation has suffered through more wars and debt than at any time prior. We were the world's richest nation, the most industrially active, and best educated. And that was before there were federal income taxes or Social Security.

As a senior who is rapidly approaching the age where Social Security will be depended upon, I do not feel confident that it will be capable of taking care of my basic needs, even after having paid into it for over forty four years. I would rather have a President and Congress who respect the law and obeys the Constitution. That will mean that all of America will have greater opportunity to prosper and take care of themselves and their communities. Less government is more freedom, and more freedom is less regulation.

The World Will Change

It is predictions and prophecy  that guides many. It seems that when you believe so strongly in something, that it will occur. Many people believe in the End Times, and they have pretty most the same idea of what that is supposed to look like.

I see a possibility of an alternative outcome. But it will take a great amount of people who are willing to look beyond the doom and gloom prophets many people now follow.  I see the possibility that people all over the world will begin to awaken.

For so long, the world has been fighting a spiritual tug-of-war as different religions claim exclusive dominion over the souls of humanity. Followers of Jesus, Mohammed, and Moses all believe their way is the only way  to salvation. But what if they are all wrong?

It is quite arrogant for people to cling to beliefs that put the Earth at the center of the Universe. At some point in the past there lacked a basic knowledge of the cosmos and the Earth was even considered to be flat, and punishment of death do those that dared to think otherwise.

As a nation, we face the most important election in our history. The United States was founded on fundamental principles that stated our rights our derived from our Creator, in whatever form that may be to you as an individual. It doesn't matter what God or religion you believe in. As far as individual rights are concerned in the context of a government, our Constitution makes it your right to choose. But keep in mind, others have that same right also. And most important is the fact that because both you and they share the same rights, you don't have to share the same beliefs and opinions, nor can you force your beliefs and opinions on others. That is a clear violation of their God-given rights.

But throughout history, there are always those who feel that "they" know what is best for others. Whether it be a church or an entire religion, whether it be the local, state or federal government, there are always those who think their way is best for the community or for society. I feel there are some basic rights that get infringed upon when one special interest group tries to force their beliefs on everyone.

Which brings us back to why the world must and will change. It is a matter of choice. Some choose to back a group thought process and tell us that they are "free thinkers" and that they just happen to agree with most of the group. If the group is of a special interest, then that it to the exclusion of all others who are not in that particular group or who just don't agree with their opinions.

This nation as an example to the rest of the world, was to allow everyone group to live as they feel best for themselves but without interfering with everyone else. But that was also against the wishes of those groups who wished to control all the groups, and who wanted to homogenize society into a group of obedient workers and managers. They assumed the roles of executive officers and with privileges that denied the majority their basic God-given rights.

Bans on anything the government wants to control is against basic human rights. Allowing one group special privileges over all others is an infringement on the rights of others. Often I hear or read about people who feel that they have been wronged by others who have not allowed basic rights. The simple solution is to allow them rights but not to grant special privileges to them.

The world is in crisis. Economies are toppling the world over. Political and religious conflicts occur daily, with humans murdering humans simply because they differ in thinking. It is all a manipulation and it is made easy because most people deny that it exists. People refuse to believe that their government would harm them. Especially when their government is formed under their beliefs in God.  Somehow  they equate the religious leaders as being all knowing and always right about what God wants from you.

Did you ever bother just asking God? Do you really think that any other human has a more direct communication with God than you or I? Doesn't it seem rather arrogant to think that if God wanted to tell the world something, that it would be through one religion as opposed to all others?

There is religious war being waged today. It is being waged on many fronts as Islam and Christianity clash and Judaism it caught in the middle. But more important to the idea of God-given rights, it the ideological and philosophical war being fought. That the two are intertwined is obvious. Each religion has its own set rules, or prohibitions. And the forcing of those prohibitions as laws of government directly infringe on the God-given rights of all others, who are of a different faith than the current majority or the loudest protester.

As we are less than a week away from the 2012 Presidential Election, it appears that there are lines being drawn to differentiate between the two most prominent candidates in the media.  Yet there are so parallels between these two, I find it less than amusing that the major likenesses are most ignored.

Both Barack Obama and Mitt Romney are for big government and tight control over the citizens. Individual rights mean nothing to either of them although they each pay lip service to it, and defend the denial and suspension of rights when the illusion of security is at risk.

Make no mistake; there is no difference when it comes to enforcing laws like the Patriot Act or National Defense Authorization Act. Both agree that if they feel it necessary, an Executive Order can be written that will by-pass the normal channels of legislation to do whatever it is they want to do.

While on the surface they seem so far apart on many issues that are relevant, they both support the same methods that got us in this mess, whether it is taxes and regulation, or defining a class of people to single out as being good or bad for the nation.

Is it too late to convince registered voters of both major parties to abandon the party and vote for a different candidate?  How about a Libertarian?  How about Gary Johnson?

Reaction Without Reason

It is easy to assume that most Americans are looking for an alternative to four more years of President Obama and his administration; however it is not clear in what direction the mainstream alternative will take us.

It is quite obvious that Mitt Romney is the choice of the Republican Party, yet it is also obvious the lengths they have taken to subvert challenges to his candidacy at all costs. Even the formidable Tea Party lobby has been usurped by the ‘neo-cons’ who have chosen to back a candidate who clearly was not even a second choice just four years ago. Now they expect a short-term memory public will jump on the bandwagon just to replace the incumbent President. With taglines like, “Anyone but Obama!” it is believed that high fuel prices and high unemployment will cause many Democrats and independent voters to back the GOP candidate.

This a reaction without a reasonable basis. It was evident on 2008 that the GOP did not want Ron Paul as their candidate. Instead they backed the most liberal choice in John McCain and the current candidate finished third in the convention behind former Governor Mike Huckabee.  In the caucuses and debates that led to the primaries, and finally to the Republican National Convention, evidence of corruption and fraud went unnoticed and under reported by the privately-owned major media, who fell in line with party propaganda to boost a ‘flip-flopping’ Mitt Romney into the presidential candidacy.

In the post, Obama Issues "Kill Order" Regarding Ron Paul and Russia Prepares for Nuclear World War III , evidence surfaced in foreign media that the Obama camp was adamant about keeping Ron Paul off the ballot, as they knew he was the most formidable foe the President would face in the November elections.  It was Ron Paul who they feared would topple the regime and begin the real revolution to restore the Republic.

Apparently that sentiment is still stoking the fires as we are less than a month away from the polls, we still find the power structure continues to divide the American vote.  Several States have unlawfully refused to allow Ron Paul on the ballot, and now some are saying that Ron Paul write-in votes will not be counted. Furthering the division is the Libertarian Party who backed Gary Johnson, an early dropout for the Republican nomination, who all of a sudden is thumping a platform that is the hallmark of the Ron Paul campaign and the Revolution Movement.

Reasonable people seldom make rash decisions, so it must be well planned and implemented by a propaganda campaign that attacks on many fronts, confusing the voter with so many rhetorical points. With all of the points of attack, I see one that is ignored; liberty is omitted in all the rhetoric. The economy and education, healthcare and women’s rights, national security and terrorism, are all good points to address although how these issues are solved by government leaves many wondering what happened to our basic rights. But before it can be brought up in public forum, another crisis must be handled, once again obscuring the real issues in the face of another immediate danger or threat to national security.

The fate of the entire world rests on the choices America makes in this coming Presidential Election. The very essence of freedom teeters on the edge of a precipice with no safety net. The future of mankind will be determined by an election not unlike elections that brought Adolph Hitler and other dictators to power. But this time it is not one nation alone, it is a global maneuver that has been decades in the making.

Will America react or will they exercise reason? We will all know in a few weeks!

Give Me Liberty!

I have written many posts about many topics over several years now. I now feel that it is time that I write about the ignorance of the general population in America. As I listen to and read the pettiness of party politics, it is more evident that this nation is failing.

I can blame many things on the nation’s decline. Education has been and will continue to be one of the major reasons it is failing. Not that funding is inadequate, but rather curriculum and teachers are failing to provide the education that is necessary to a free and prosperous nation.

We as People have failed to protect ourselves. We have allowed bureaucrats and corporatists to take our nation away from us. We have been enslaved by the very institutions that swore to protect us. Every discipline of our society has been infiltrated and corrupted by the elite. We have become enslaved and many don’t even realize it.

In my recent post Lawyers, Guns, And Money I did valiantly attempt to instill the outrage of what our so-called leaders are doing to take away our freedom. Since 2008 I have written and warned readers of the dangers we face, not from foreign terrorists, but from the very people we elect to represent our best interests.

In the post titles Real Money I explained what real money is and how the Federal Reserve Act created fiat currency that is debt and not real. I offered you the opportunity to educate yourselves and pointed you to the Money Masters website and the teachings of Nobel Prize winning economist Milton Friedman  I have also written extensively about presidential candidate and Congressman, Dr. Ron Paul and why he would make the best President of  the United States. The posts, What Would Really Happen If Ron Paul Were Elected President? and Ron Paul’s Plan to Reduce The Cost of Government explains why we need a President who understands that government does not create jobs but does prevent economic growth by its interference in the markets.

We need a President who holds the Constitution as the law of the land and does not compromise his oath of office to appease the international community. We need a Congress that takes responsibility for the constitutionally mandated duties it is charged with by We the People, and does not delegate those responsibilities to private banks and institutions who were not authorized by the people to do so.

But most of all we require an American People with courage to stand up for their God-given rights and not allow any government to take them away.  The most important of which are those included in the Constitution as the first ten amendments, also known as the Bill of Rights.

Most will point to the Patriot Act as the beginning of the loss of liberty, but it goes back in history much further. We can go back to the passage of the Federal Reserve Act, but I go even further back to the hiding of the Title of Nobility Amendment and the War of 1812. It really begins with the founding of this nation as a sovereign country, which was never fully accepted by the British Crown.

There is no doubt that our founders were rebels and in the eyes of the Crown, insurrectionists. By today's standards they may even be labeled as "terrorists" and were hunted down as those terrorists of today. Were they wrong in what that did? Shall we today, follow what our government dictates or stand up for our national sovereignty and our rights as free and sovereign individuals?